From d8ac6d4a2579d4711a39d557b98aaa61d3a28adf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Lattner <sabre@nondot.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 18:26:14 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Plug a memory leak in the asmparser.  It turns out that we
 were leaking the strings for basic block labels in some cases.  This amounted
 to about 120K of memory for namd, a medium sized program.

llvm-svn: 17262
---
 lib/AsmParser/llvmAsmParser.y | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/lib/AsmParser/llvmAsmParser.y b/lib/AsmParser/llvmAsmParser.y
index f450c8f0c55..1f6b53909f0 100644
--- a/lib/AsmParser/llvmAsmParser.y
+++ b/lib/AsmParser/llvmAsmParser.y
@@ -405,7 +405,7 @@ static BasicBlock *getBBVal(const ValID &ID, bool isDefinition = false) {
     CurFun.CurrentFunction->getBasicBlockList().remove(BB);
     CurFun.CurrentFunction->getBasicBlockList().push_back(BB);
   }
-
+  ID.destroy();
   return BB;
 }