[llvm] Use llvm::all_of (NFC)

lib/Analysis/IRSimilarityIdentifier.cpp

@@ -124,15 +124,13 @@ bool IRSimilarity::isClose(const IRInstructionData &A,
 
     auto ZippedOperands = zip(GEP->indices(), OtherGEP->indices());
 
-    auto ZIt = ZippedOperands.begin();
-
     // We increment here since we do not care about the first instruction,
     // we only care about the following operands since they must be the
     // exact same to be considered similar.
-    return std::all_of(++ZIt, ZippedOperands.end(),
-                       [](std::tuple<llvm::Use &, llvm::Use &> R) {
-                         return std::get<0>(R) == std::get<1>(R);
-                       });
+    return all_of(drop_begin(ZippedOperands),
+                  [](std::tuple<llvm::Use &, llvm::Use &> R) {
+                    return std::get<0>(R) == std::get<1>(R);
+                  });
   }
 
   // If the instructions are functions, we make sure that the function name is

lib/CodeGen/MachineVerifier.cpp

@@ -1005,16 +1005,15 @@ void MachineVerifier::verifyPreISelGenericInstruction(const MachineInstr *MI) {
   }
   case TargetOpcode::G_PHI: {
     LLT DstTy = MRI->getType(MI->getOperand(0).getReg());
-    if (!DstTy.isValid() ||
-        !std::all_of(MI->operands_begin() + 1, MI->operands_end(),
-                     [this, &DstTy](const MachineOperand &MO) {
-                       if (!MO.isReg())
-                         return true;
-                       LLT Ty = MRI->getType(MO.getReg());
-                       if (!Ty.isValid() || (Ty != DstTy))
-                         return false;
-                       return true;
-                     }))
+    if (!DstTy.isValid() || !all_of(drop_begin(MI->operands()),
+                                    [this, &DstTy](const MachineOperand &MO) {
+                                      if (!MO.isReg())
+                                        return true;
+                                      LLT Ty = MRI->getType(MO.getReg());
+                                      if (!Ty.isValid() || (Ty != DstTy))
+                                        return false;
+                                      return true;
+                                    }))
       report("Generic Instruction G_PHI has operands with incompatible/missing "
              "types",
              MI);

lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp

@@ -19452,9 +19452,8 @@ SDValue DAGCombiner::visitCONCAT_VECTORS(SDNode *N) {
     return DAG.getUNDEF(VT);
 
   // Optimize concat_vectors where all but the first of the vectors are undef.
-  if (std::all_of(std::next(N->op_begin()), N->op_end(), [](const SDValue &Op) {
-        return Op.isUndef();
-      })) {
+  if (all_of(drop_begin(N->ops()),
+             [](const SDValue &Op) { return Op.isUndef(); })) {
     SDValue In = N->getOperand(0);
     assert(In.getValueType().isVector() && "Must concat vectors");
 
@@ -21441,11 +21440,10 @@ SDValue DAGCombiner::SimplifyVBinOp(SDNode *N) {
   // Make sure all but the first op are undef or constant.
   auto ConcatWithConstantOrUndef = [](SDValue Concat) {
     return Concat.getOpcode() == ISD::CONCAT_VECTORS &&
-           std::all_of(std::next(Concat->op_begin()), Concat->op_end(),
-                     [](const SDValue &Op) {
-                       return Op.isUndef() ||
-                              ISD::isBuildVectorOfConstantSDNodes(Op.getNode());
-                     });
+           all_of(drop_begin(Concat->ops()), [](const SDValue &Op) {
+             return Op.isUndef() ||
+                    ISD::isBuildVectorOfConstantSDNodes(Op.getNode());
+           });
   };
 
   // The following pattern is likely to emerge with vector reduction ops. Moving

lib/DebugInfo/Symbolize/Symbolize.cpp

@@ -589,8 +589,8 @@ StringRef demanglePE32ExternCFunc(StringRef SymbolName) {
   if (Front != '?') {
     size_t AtPos = SymbolName.rfind('@');
     if (AtPos != StringRef::npos &&
-        std::all_of(SymbolName.begin() + AtPos + 1, SymbolName.end(),
-                    [](char C) { return C >= '0' && C <= '9'; })) {
+        all_of(drop_begin(SymbolName, AtPos + 1),
+               [](char C) { return C >= '0' && C <= '9'; })) {
       SymbolName = SymbolName.substr(0, AtPos);
     }
   }

lib/Transforms/Scalar/GuardWidening.cpp

@@ -698,9 +698,7 @@ bool GuardWideningImpl::combineRangeChecks(
       return (HighOffset - RC.getOffsetValue()).ult(MaxDiff);
     };
 
-    if (MaxDiff.isMinValue() ||
-        !std::all_of(std::next(CurrentChecks.begin()), CurrentChecks.end(),
-                     OffsetOK))
+    if (MaxDiff.isMinValue() || !all_of(drop_begin(CurrentChecks), OffsetOK))
       return false;
 
     // We have a series of f+1 checks as:

lib/Transforms/Scalar/SimpleLoopUnswitch.cpp

@@ -692,11 +692,9 @@ static bool unswitchTrivialSwitch(Loop &L, SwitchInst &SI, DominatorTree &DT,
   // successor.
   BasicBlock *CommonSuccBB = nullptr;
   if (SI.getNumCases() > 0 &&
-      std::all_of(std::next(SI.case_begin()), SI.case_end(),
-                  [&SI](const SwitchInst::CaseHandle &Case) {
-                    return Case.getCaseSuccessor() ==
-                           SI.case_begin()->getCaseSuccessor();
-                  }))
+      all_of(drop_begin(SI.cases()), [&SI](const SwitchInst::CaseHandle &Case) {
+        return Case.getCaseSuccessor() == SI.case_begin()->getCaseSuccessor();
+      }))
     CommonSuccBB = SI.case_begin()->getCaseSuccessor();
   if (!DefaultExitBB) {
     // If we're not unswitching the default, we need it to match any cases to