1
0
mirror of https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git synced 2024-10-20 19:42:54 +02:00
Commit Graph

31 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
John Brawn
9f05fb5e02 [BPI] Don't assume that strcmp returning >0 is more likely than <0
The zero heuristic assumes that integers are more likely positive than negative,
but this also has the effect of assuming that strcmp return values are more
likely positive than negative. Given that for nonzero strcmp return values it's
the ordering of arguments that determines the sign of the result there's no
reason to assume that's true.

Fix this by inspecting the LHS of the compare and using TargetLibraryInfo to
decide if it's strcmp-like, and if so only assume that nonzero is more likely
than zero i.e. strings are more often different than the same. This causes a
slight code generation change in the spec2006 benchmark 403.gcc, but with no
noticeable performance impact. The intent of this patch is to allow better
optimisation of dhrystone on Cortex-M cpus, but currently it won't as there are
also some changes that need to be made to if-conversion.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33934

llvm-svn: 304970
2017-06-08 09:44:40 +00:00
Serguei Katkov
23f153bff9 [BPI] Reduce the probability of unreachable edge to minimal value greater than 0
The probability of edge coming to unreachable block should be as low as possible.
The change reduces the probability to minimal value greater than zero.

The bug https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32214 show the example when
the probability of edge coming to unreachable block is greater than for edge
coming to out of the loop and it causes incorrect loop rotation.

Please note that with this change the behavior of unreachable heuristic is a bit different
than others. Specifically, before this change the sum of probabilities
coming to unreachable blocks have the same weight for all branches
(it was just split over all edges of this block coming to unreachable blocks).
With this change it might be slightly different but not to much due to probability of
taken branch to unreachable block is really small.

Reviewers: chandlerc, sanjoy, vsk, congh, junbuml, davidxl, dexonsmith
Reviewed By: chandlerc, dexonsmith
Subscribers: reames, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30633

llvm-svn: 303327
2017-05-18 06:11:56 +00:00
Serguei Katkov
4f8d50be22 [BPI] Ignore remainder while distributing the remaining probability from unreachanble
This is a follow up patch for https://reviews.llvm.org/rL300440
to address a comment.

To make implementation to be consistent with other cases we just
ignore the remainder after distribution of remaining probability between
reachable edges.

If we reduced the probability of some edges coming to unreachable
blocks we should distribute the remaining part across other edges
coming to reachable blocks to satisfy the condition that sum of all
probabilities should be equal to one. If this remaining part is not
divided by number of "reachable" edges then we get this remainder.
This remainder probability should be pretty small. Other cases just ignore
if the sum of probabilities is not equal to one so we do the same.

Reviewers: chandlerc, sanjoy, vsk, junbuml, reames
Reviewed By: reames
Subscribers: reames, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32124

llvm-svn: 302883
2017-05-12 07:50:06 +00:00
Serguei Katkov
4c27f4ad1e [BPI] Use metadata info before any other heuristics
Metadata potentially is more precise than any heuristics we use, so
it makes sense to use first metadata info if it is available. However it makes
sense to examine it against other strong heuristics like unreachable one.
If edge coming to unreachable block has higher probability then it is expected 
by unreachable heuristic then we use heuristic and remaining probability is
distributed among other reachable blocks equally.

An example where metadata might be more strong then unreachable heuristic is
as follows: it is possible that there are two branches and for the branch A
metadata says that its probability is (0, 2^25). For the branch B
the probability is (1, 2^25).
So the expectation is that first edge of B is hotter than first edge of A
because first edge of A did not executed at least once.
If first edge of A points to the unreachable block then using the unreachable
heuristics we'll set the probability for A to (1, 2^20) and now edge of A
becomes hotter than edge of B.
This is unexpected behavior.

This fixed the biggest part of https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32214

Reviewers: sanjoy, junbuml, vsk, chandlerc

Reviewed By: chandlerc

Subscribers: llvm-commits, reames, davidxl

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30631

llvm-svn: 300440
2017-04-17 04:33:04 +00:00
Serguei Katkov
dbe48d9fbb [BPI] Refactor post domination calculation and simple fix for ColdCall
Collection of PostDominatedByUnreachable and PostDominatedByColdCall have been
split out of heuristics itself. Update of the data happens now for each basic
block (before update for PostDominatedByColdCall might be skipped if
unreachable or matadata heuristic handled this basic block).

This separation allows re-ordering of heuristics without loosing
the post-domination information.

Reviewers: sanjoy, junbuml, vsk, chandlerc, reames

Reviewed By: chandlerc

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31701

llvm-svn: 300029
2017-04-12 05:42:14 +00:00
Jun Bum Lim
bd9da0f624 Enhance calcColdCallHeuristics for InvokeInst
Summary: When identifying cold blocks, consider only the edge to the normal destination if the terminator is InvokeInst and let calcInvokeHeuristics() decide edge weights for the InvokeInst.

Reviewers: mcrosier, hfinkel, davidxl

Subscribers: mcrosier, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24868

llvm-svn: 282262
2016-09-23 17:26:14 +00:00
Adam Nemet
9449a00cc1 [BPI] Add new LazyBPI analysis
Summary:
The motivation is the same as in D22141: In order to add the hotness
attribute to optimization remarks we need BFI to be available in all
passes that emit optimization remarks.  BFI depends on BPI so unless we
make this lazy as well we would still compute BPI unconditionally.

The solution is to use the new LazyBPI pass in LazyBFI and only compute
BPI when computation of BFI is requested by the client.

I extended the laziness test using a LoopDistribute test to also cover
BPI.

Reviewers: hfinkel, davidxl

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22835

llvm-svn: 277083
2016-07-28 23:31:12 +00:00
Xinliang David Li
497e1a3160 [PM] Port Branch Probability Analysis pass to the new pass manager.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19839

llvm-svn: 268601
2016-05-05 02:59:57 +00:00
Sanjoy Das
f97ce19844 [BPI] Consider deoptimize calls as "unreachable"
Summary:
Calls to @llvm.experimental.deoptimize are expected to "never execute",
so optimize them as such.

Reviewers: chandlerc

Subscribers: junbuml, mcrosier, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19095

llvm-svn: 266654
2016-04-18 19:01:28 +00:00
Cong Hou
50c405416c [BPI] Replace weights by probabilities in BPI.
This patch removes all weight-related interfaces from BPI and replace
them by probability versions. With this patch, we won't use edge weight
anymore in either IR or MC passes. Edge probabilitiy is a better
representation in terms of CFG update and validation.


Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15519 

llvm-svn: 256263
2015-12-22 18:56:14 +00:00
Jun Bum Lim
8b973fac5e Enhance BranchProbabilityInfo::calcUnreachableHeuristics for InvokeInst
This is recommit of r256028 with minor fixes in unittests:
  CodeGen/Mips/eh.ll
  CodeGen/Mips/insn-zero-size-bb.ll

Original commit message:

When identifying blocks post-dominated by an unreachable-terminated block
in BranchProbabilityInfo, consider only the edge to the normal destination
block if the terminator is InvokeInst and let calcInvokeHeuristics() decide
edge weights for the InvokeInst.

llvm-svn: 256202
2015-12-21 22:00:51 +00:00
Rafael Espindola
0cdfda8077 Revert "Enhance BranchProbabilityInfo::calcUnreachableHeuristics for InvokeInst"
This reverts commit r256028.

It broke:

    LLVM :: CodeGen/Mips/eh.ll
    LLVM :: CodeGen/Mips/insn-zero-size-bb.ll

llvm-svn: 256032
2015-12-18 21:23:32 +00:00
Jun Bum Lim
a88667c58b Enhance BranchProbabilityInfo::calcUnreachableHeuristics for InvokeInst
When identifying blocks post-dominated by an unreachable-terminated block
in BranchProbabilityInfo, consider only the edge to the normal destination
block if the terminator is InvokeInst and let calcInvokeHeuristics() decide
edge weights for the InvokeInst.

llvm-svn: 256028
2015-12-18 20:53:47 +00:00
Cong Hou
3919ffc012 Use fixed-point representation for BranchProbability.
BranchProbability now is represented by its numerator and denominator in uint32_t type. This patch changes this representation into a fixed point that is represented by the numerator in uint32_t type and a constant denominator 1<<31. This is quite similar to the representation of BlockMass in BlockFrequencyInfoImpl.h. There are several pros and cons of this change:

Pros:

1. It uses only a half space of the current one.
2. Some operations are much faster like plus, subtraction, comparison, and scaling by an integer.

Cons:

1. Constructing a probability using arbitrary numerator and denominator needs additional calculations.
2. It is a little less precise than before as we use a fixed denominator. For example, 1 - 1/3 may not be exactly identical to 1 / 3 (this will lead to many BranchProbability unit test failures). This should not matter when we only use it for branch probability. If we use it like a rational value for some precise calculations we may need another construct like ValueRatio.

One important reason for this change is that we propose to store branch probabilities instead of edge weights in MachineBasicBlock. We also want clients to use probability instead of weight when adding successors to a MBB. The current BranchProbability has more space which may be a concern.

Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12603

llvm-svn: 248633
2015-09-25 23:09:59 +00:00
Diego Novillo
62bfc25308 Fix information loss in branch probability computation.
Summary:
This addresses PR 22718. When branch weights are too large, they were
being clamped to the range [1, MaxWeightForBB]. But this clamping is
only applied to edges that go outside the range, so it distorts the
relative branch probabilities.

This patch changes the weight calculation to scale every branch so the
relative probabilities are preserved. The scaling is done differently
now. First, all the branch weights are added up, and if the sum exceeds
32 bits, it computes an integer scale to bring all the weights within
the range.

The patch fixes an existing test that had slightly wrong branch
probabilities due to the previous clamping. It now gets branch weights
scaled accordingly.

Reviewers: dexonsmith

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9442

llvm-svn: 236750
2015-05-07 17:22:06 +00:00
Daniel Jasper
266ce3788c Re-apply r234898 and fix tests.
This commit makes LLVM not estimate branch probabilities when doing a
single bit bitmask tests.

The code that originally made me discover this is:

  if ((a & 0x1) == 0x1) {
    ..
  }

In this case we don't actually have any branch probability information
and should not assume to have any. LLVM transforms this into:

  %and = and i32 %a, 1
  %tobool = icmp eq i32 %and, 0

So, in this case, the result of a bitwise and is compared against 0,
but nevertheless, we should not assume to have probability
information.

CodeGen/ARM/2013-10-11-select-stalls.ll started failing because the
changed probabilities changed the results of
ARMBaseInstrInfo::isProfitableToIfCvt() and led to an Ifcvt of the
diamond in the test. AFAICT, the test was never meant to test this and
thus changing the test input slightly to not change the probabilities
seems like the best way to preserve the meaning of the test.

llvm-svn: 234979
2015-04-15 06:24:07 +00:00
Rafael Espindola
19e464908f Revert "The code that originally made me discover this is:"
This reverts commit r234898.
CodeGen/ARM/2013-10-11-select-stalls.ll was faling.

llvm-svn: 234903
2015-04-14 15:56:33 +00:00
Daniel Jasper
a598c99e31 The code that originally made me discover this is:
if ((a & 0x1) == 0x1) {
    ..
  }

In this case we don't actually have any branch probability information and
should not assume to have any. LLVM transforms this into:

  %and = and i32 %a, 1
  %tobool = icmp eq i32 %and, 0

So, in this case, the result of a bitwise and is compared against 0,
but nevertheless, we should not assume to have probability
information.

llvm-svn: 234898
2015-04-14 15:20:37 +00:00
David Blaikie
ab043ff680 [opaque pointer type] Add textual IR support for explicit type parameter to load instruction
Essentially the same as the GEP change in r230786.

A similar migration script can be used to update test cases, though a few more
test case improvements/changes were required this time around: (r229269-r229278)

import fileinput
import sys
import re

pat = re.compile(r"((?:=|:|^)\s*load (?:atomic )?(?:volatile )?(.*?))(| addrspace\(\d+\) *)\*($| *(?:%|@|null|undef|blockaddress|getelementptr|addrspacecast|bitcast|inttoptr|\[\[[a-zA-Z]|\{\{).*$)")

for line in sys.stdin:
  sys.stdout.write(re.sub(pat, r"\1, \2\3*\4", line))

Reviewers: rafael, dexonsmith, grosser

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7649

llvm-svn: 230794
2015-02-27 21:17:42 +00:00
David Blaikie
0d99339102 [opaque pointer type] Add textual IR support for explicit type parameter to getelementptr instruction
One of several parallel first steps to remove the target type of pointers,
replacing them with a single opaque pointer type.

This adds an explicit type parameter to the gep instruction so that when the
first parameter becomes an opaque pointer type, the type to gep through is
still available to the instructions.

* This doesn't modify gep operators, only instructions (operators will be
  handled separately)

* Textual IR changes only. Bitcode (including upgrade) and changing the
  in-memory representation will be in separate changes.

* geps of vectors are transformed as:
    getelementptr <4 x float*> %x, ...
  ->getelementptr float, <4 x float*> %x, ...
  Then, once the opaque pointer type is introduced, this will ultimately look
  like:
    getelementptr float, <4 x ptr> %x
  with the unambiguous interpretation that it is a vector of pointers to float.

* address spaces remain on the pointer, not the type:
    getelementptr float addrspace(1)* %x
  ->getelementptr float, float addrspace(1)* %x
  Then, eventually:
    getelementptr float, ptr addrspace(1) %x

Importantly, the massive amount of test case churn has been automated by
same crappy python code. I had to manually update a few test cases that
wouldn't fit the script's model (r228970,r229196,r229197,r229198). The
python script just massages stdin and writes the result to stdout, I
then wrapped that in a shell script to handle replacing files, then
using the usual find+xargs to migrate all the files.

update.py:
import fileinput
import sys
import re

ibrep = re.compile(r"(^.*?[^%\w]getelementptr inbounds )(((?:<\d* x )?)(.*?)(| addrspace\(\d\)) *\*(|>)(?:$| *(?:%|@|null|undef|blockaddress|getelementptr|addrspacecast|bitcast|inttoptr|\[\[[a-zA-Z]|\{\{).*$))")
normrep = re.compile(       r"(^.*?[^%\w]getelementptr )(((?:<\d* x )?)(.*?)(| addrspace\(\d\)) *\*(|>)(?:$| *(?:%|@|null|undef|blockaddress|getelementptr|addrspacecast|bitcast|inttoptr|\[\[[a-zA-Z]|\{\{).*$))")

def conv(match, line):
  if not match:
    return line
  line = match.groups()[0]
  if len(match.groups()[5]) == 0:
    line += match.groups()[2]
  line += match.groups()[3]
  line += ", "
  line += match.groups()[1]
  line += "\n"
  return line

for line in sys.stdin:
  if line.find("getelementptr ") == line.find("getelementptr inbounds"):
    if line.find("getelementptr inbounds") != line.find("getelementptr inbounds ("):
      line = conv(re.match(ibrep, line), line)
  elif line.find("getelementptr ") != line.find("getelementptr ("):
    line = conv(re.match(normrep, line), line)
  sys.stdout.write(line)

apply.sh:
for name in "$@"
do
  python3 `dirname "$0"`/update.py < "$name" > "$name.tmp" && mv "$name.tmp" "$name"
  rm -f "$name.tmp"
done

The actual commands:
From llvm/src:
find test/ -name *.ll | xargs ./apply.sh
From llvm/src/tools/clang:
find test/ -name *.mm -o -name *.m -o -name *.cpp -o -name *.c | xargs -I '{}' ../../apply.sh "{}"
From llvm/src/tools/polly:
find test/ -name *.ll | xargs ./apply.sh

After that, check-all (with llvm, clang, clang-tools-extra, lld,
compiler-rt, and polly all checked out).

The extra 'rm' in the apply.sh script is due to a few files in clang's test
suite using interesting unicode stuff that my python script was throwing
exceptions on. None of those files needed to be migrated, so it seemed
sufficient to ignore those cases.

Reviewers: rafael, dexonsmith, grosser

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7636

llvm-svn: 230786
2015-02-27 19:29:02 +00:00
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith
9c5542c040 IR: Make metadata typeless in assembly
Now that `Metadata` is typeless, reflect that in the assembly.  These
are the matching assembly changes for the metadata/value split in
r223802.

  - Only use the `metadata` type when referencing metadata from a call
    intrinsic -- i.e., only when it's used as a `Value`.

  - Stop pretending that `ValueAsMetadata` is wrapped in an `MDNode`
    when referencing it from call intrinsics.

So, assembly like this:

    define @foo(i32 %v) {
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata !{i32 %v}, metadata !0)
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata !{i32 7}, metadata !0)
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata !1, metadata !0)
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata !3, metadata !0)
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata !{metadata !3}, metadata !0)
      ret void, !bar !2
    }
    !0 = metadata !{metadata !2}
    !1 = metadata !{i32* @global}
    !2 = metadata !{metadata !3}
    !3 = metadata !{}

turns into this:

    define @foo(i32 %v) {
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata i32 %v, metadata !0)
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata i32 7, metadata !0)
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata i32* @global, metadata !0)
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata !3, metadata !0)
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata !{!3}, metadata !0)
      ret void, !bar !2
    }
    !0 = !{!2}
    !1 = !{i32* @global}
    !2 = !{!3}
    !3 = !{}

I wrote an upgrade script that handled almost all of the tests in llvm
and many of the tests in cfe (even handling many `CHECK` lines).  I've
attached it (or will attach it in a moment if you're speedy) to PR21532
to help everyone update their out-of-tree testcases.

This is part of PR21532.

llvm-svn: 224257
2014-12-15 19:07:53 +00:00
Akira Hatanaka
bf62cde86e Fix a bug in which BranchProbabilityInfo wasn't setting branch weights of basic blocks inside loops correctly.
Previously, BranchProbabilityInfo::calcLoopBranchHeuristics would determine the weights of basic blocks inside loops even when it didn't have enough information to estimate the branch probabilities correctly. This patch fixes the function to exit early if it doesn't see any exit edges or back edges and let the later heuristics determine the weights.

This fixes PR18705 and <rdar://problem/15991090>.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3363

llvm-svn: 206194
2014-04-14 16:56:19 +00:00
Hal Finkel
38113823b9 Consider (x == -1) unlikely in BranchProbabilityInfo
This adds another heuristic to BPI, similar to the existing heuristic that
considers (x == 0) unlikely to be true. As suggested in the PACT'98 paper by
Deitrich, Cheng, and Hwu, -1 is often used to indicate an invalid index, and
equality comparisons with -1 are also unlikely to succeed. Local
experimentation supports this hypothesis: This yields a 1-2% speedup in the
test-suite sqlite benchmark on the PPC A2 core, with no significant
regressions.

llvm-svn: 193855
2013-11-01 10:58:22 +00:00
Daniel Dunbar
a496d61c01 [tests] Cleanup initialization of test suffixes.
- Instead of setting the suffixes in a bunch of places, just set one master
   list in the top-level config. We now only modify the suffix list in a few
   suites that have one particular unique suffix (.ml, .mc, .yaml, .td, .py).

 - Aside from removing the need for a bunch of lit.local.cfg files, this enables
   4 tests that were inadvertently being skipped (one in
   Transforms/BranchFolding, a .s file each in DebugInfo/AArch64 and
   CodeGen/PowerPC, and one in CodeGen/SI which is now failing and has been
   XFAILED).

 - This commit also fixes a bunch of config files to use config.root instead of
   older copy-pasted code.

llvm-svn: 188513
2013-08-16 00:37:11 +00:00
Diego Novillo
d1f091f169 Add a new function attribute 'cold' to functions.
Other than recognizing the attribute, the patch does little else.
It changes the branch probability analyzer so that edges into
blocks postdominated by a cold function are given low weight.

Added analysis and code generation tests.  Added documentation for the
new attribute.

llvm-svn: 182638
2013-05-24 12:26:52 +00:00
Manman Ren
6342812033 BranchProb: modify the definition of an edge in BranchProbabilityInfo to handle
the case of multiple edges from one block to another.

A simple example is a switch statement with multiple values to the same
destination. The definition of an edge is modified from a pair of blocks to
a pair of PredBlock and an index into the successors.

Also set the weight correctly when building SelectionDAG from LLVM IR,
especially when converting a Switch.
IntegersSubsetMapping is updated to calculate the weight for each cluster.

llvm-svn: 162572
2012-08-24 18:14:27 +00:00
Eli Bendersky
4afdeeb682 Replace all instances of dg.exp file with lit.local.cfg, since all tests are run with LIT now and now Dejagnu. dg.exp is no longer needed.
Patch reviewed by Daniel Dunbar. It will be followed by additional cleanup patches.

llvm-svn: 150664
2012-02-16 06:28:33 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
acdf352b77 Make the unreachable probability much much heavier. The previous
probability wouldn't be considered "hot" in some weird loop structures
or other compounding probability patterns. This makes it much harder to
confuse, but isn't really a principled fix. I'd actually like it if we
could model a zero probability, as it would make this much easier to
reason about. Suggestions for how to do this better are welcome.

llvm-svn: 147142
2011-12-22 09:26:37 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
3cbbc35715 Fix the API usage in loop probability heuristics. It was incorrectly
classifying many edges as exiting which were in fact not. These mainly
formed edges into sub-loops. It was also not correctly classifying all
returning edges out of loops as leaving the loop. With this match most
of the loop heuristics are more rational.

Several serious regressions on loop-intesive benchmarks like perlbench's
loop tests when built with -enable-block-placement are fixed by these
updated heuristics. Unfortunately they in turn uncover some other
regressions. There are still several improvemenst that should be made to
loop heuristics including trip-count, and early back-edge management.

llvm-svn: 142917
2011-10-25 09:47:41 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
d04f838629 Remove return heuristics from the static branch probabilities, and
introduce no-return or unreachable heuristics.

The return heuristics from the Ball and Larus paper don't work well in
practice as they pessimize early return paths. The only good hitrate
return heuristics are those for:
 - NULL return
 - Constant return
 - negative integer return

Only the last of these three can possibly require significant code for
the returning block, and even the last is fairly rare and usually also
a constant. As a consequence, even for the cold return paths, there is
little code on that return path, and so little code density to be gained
by sinking it. The places where sinking these blocks is valuable (inner
loops) will already be weighted appropriately as the edge is a loop-exit
branch.

All of this aside, early returns are nearly as common as all three of
these return categories, and should actually be predicted as taken!
Rather than muddy the waters of the static predictions, just remain
silent on returns and let the CFG itself dictate any layout or other
issues.

However, the return heuristic was flagging one very important case:
unreachable. Unfortunately it still gave a 1/4 chance of the
branch-to-unreachable occuring. It also didn't do a rigorous job of
finding those blocks which post-dominate an unreachable block.

This patch builds a more powerful analysis that should flag all branches
to blocks known to then reach unreachable. It also has better worst-case
runtime complexity by not looping through successors for each block. The
previous code would perform an N^2 walk in the event of a single entry
block branching to N successors with a switch where each successor falls
through to the next and they finally fall through to a return.

Test case added for noreturn heuristics. Also doxygen comments improved
along the way.

llvm-svn: 142793
2011-10-24 12:01:08 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
151d4fc273 Teach the BranchProbabilityInfo pass to print its results, and use that
to bring it under direct test instead of merely indirectly testing it in
the BlockFrequencyInfo pass.

The next step is to start adding tests for the various heuristics
employed, and to start fixing those heuristics once they're under test.

llvm-svn: 142778
2011-10-23 21:21:50 +00:00