We were default constructing the Lower/Upper APInts. Then creating min or max value, then doing a move assignment to Lower and copy assignment to upper. The copy assignment operator in particular has an out of line function call that has to examine whether or not a previous allocation exists that can be reused which of course it can't in this case.
The new code creates the min/max value first, move constructs Lower from it then copy constructs Upper from Lower.
This also seems to have convinced a self host build that this constructor can be inlined more readily into other methods in ConstantRange.
llvm-svn: 301736
We were creating an APInt at the top of these methods that isn't always returned. For ranges wider than 64-bits this results in an allocation and deallocation when its not used.
In getSignedMax we were creating Upper-1 to use in a compare and then creating it again for a return value. The compiler is unable to determine that these can be shared. So help it out and create the Upper-1 in a temporary that can be reused.
This provides a little compile time improvement.
llvm-svn: 300621
This typedef used to be conditional based on whether rvalue references were supported. Looks like it got left behind when we switched to always having rvalue references with c++11. I don't think it provides any value now.
llvm-svn: 300146
Summary:
ConstantRange class currently has a method getSetSize, which is mostly used to
compare set sizes of two constant ranges (there is only one spot where it's used
in a slightly different scenario). This patch introduces setSizeSmallerThanOf
method, which does such comparison in a more efficient way. In the original
method we have to extend our types to (BitWidth+1), which can result it using
slow case of APInt, extra memory allocations, etc.
The change is supposed to not change any functionality, but it slightly improves
compile time. Here is compile time improvements that I observed on CTMark:
* tramp3d-v4 -2.02%
* pairlocalalign -1.82%
* lencod -1.67%
Reviewers: sanjoy, atrick, pete
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31104
llvm-svn: 298236
We had various variants of defining dump() functions in LLVM. Normalize
them (this should just consistently implement the things discussed in
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2014-January/034323.html
For reference:
- Public headers should just declare the dump() method but not use
LLVM_DUMP_METHOD or #if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP)
- The definition of a dump method should look like this:
#if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP)
LLVM_DUMP_METHOD void MyClass::dump() {
// print stuff to dbgs()...
}
#endif
llvm-svn: 293359
This just extracts out the transfer rules for constant ranges into a single shared point. As it happens, neither bit of code actually overlaps in terms of the handled operators, but with this change that could easily be tweaked in the future.
I also want to have this separated out to make experimenting with a eager value info implementation and possibly a ValueTracking-like fixed depth recursion peephole version. There's no reason all four of these can't share a common implementation which reduces the chances of bugs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27294
llvm-svn: 288413
This change teaches getEquivalentICmp to be smarter about generating
ICMP_NE and ICMP_EQ predicates.
An earlier version of this change was landed as rL283057 which had a
use-after-free bug. This new version has a fix for that bug, and a (C++
unittests/) test case that would have triggered it rL283057.
llvm-svn: 283078
They've broken the sanitizer-bootstrap bots. Reverting while I investigate.
Original commit messages:
r283057: "[ConstantRange] Make getEquivalentICmp smarter"
r283058: "[SCEV] Rely on ConstantRange instead of custom logic; NFCI"
llvm-svn: 283062
r231483 taught ConstantRange::multiply to be clever about signed vs unsigned ranges. For example, an unsigned range could be full-set while the signed range is more specific than that.
In looking at the allocations trace for LTO'ing verify-uselistorder (see r236629 for details), millions of allocations are from APInt, many of which come from ConstantRange's.
This change tries to avoid some (3.2 million) allocations by returning the unsigned range if its suitable. The checks here are that it should not be a wrapping range, and should be positive. That should be enough to check for ranges such as [1, 10) which the signed range will be equal to, if we were to calculate it.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20723
Reviewed by James Molloy
llvm-svn: 271020
This reapplies commit r268521, that was reverted in r268530 due to a test failure in select-implied.ll
Modified the test case to reflect the new change.
llvm-svn: 268557
Rename makeNoWrapRegion to a more obvious makeGuaranteedNoWrapRegion,
and add a comment about the counter-intuitive aspects of the function.
This is to help prevent cases like PR26628.
llvm-svn: 261532
Summary: This will be used in a future change to ScalarEvolution.
Reviewers: hfinkel, reames, nlewycky
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13612
llvm-svn: 250975
Summary:
This change splits `makeICmpRegion` into `makeAllowedICmpRegion` and
`makeSatisfyingICmpRegion` with slightly different contracts. The first
one is useful for determining what values some expression //may// take,
given that a certain `icmp` evaluates to true. The second one is useful
for determining what values are guaranteed to //satisfy// a given
`icmp`.
Reviewers: nlewycky
Reviewed By: nlewycky
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8345
llvm-svn: 232575
Multiplication is not dependent on signedness, so just treating
all input ranges as unsigned is not incorrect. However it will cause
overly pessimistic ranges (such as full-set) when used with signed
negative values.
Teach multiply to try to interpret its inputs as both signed and
unsigned, and then to take the most specific (smallest population)
as its result.
llvm-svn: 231483
a bit surprising, as the class is almost entirely abstracted away from
any particular IR, however it encodes the comparsion predicates which
mutate ranges as ICmp predicate codes. This is reasonable as they're
used for both instructions and constants. Thus, it belongs in the IR
library with instructions and constants.
llvm-svn: 202838
