For some reason VS_32 ends up factoring into the pressure heuristics
even though we should never see a virtual register with this class.
When SGPRs are reserved for register spilling, this for some reason
triggers reg-crit scheduling.
Setting isAllocatable = 0 may help with this since that seems to remove
it from the default implementation's generated table.
llvm-svn: 252321
This wasn't doing anything useful. They weren't explicitly used
anywhere, and the RegScavenger ignores reserved registers.
This for some reason caused a random scheduling change in the test.
Getting the check lines to pass is too frustrating, and there's probably
not too much value in checking the vector case's operands N times.
llvm-svn: 250794
This was the slowest target custom pass and was spending 80%
of the time in getMinimalPhysRegClass which was called
for every register operand.
Try to use the statically known register class when possible from
the instruction's MCOperandInfo. There are a few pseudo instructions
which are not well behaved with unknown register classes which still
require the expensive physical register class search.
There are a few other possibilities for making this even faster,
such as not inspecting implicit operands. For now those are checked
because it is technically possible to have a scalar load into
exec or vcc which can be implicitly used.
llvm-svn: 249079
Allow a target to do something other than search for copies
that will avoid cross register bank copies.
Implement for SI by only rewriting the most basic copies,
so it should look through anything like a subregister extract.
I'm not entirely satisified with this because it seems like
eliminating a reg_sequence that isn't fully used should work
generically for all targets without them having to override
something. However, it seems to be tricky to have a simple
implementation of this without rewriting to invalid kinds
of subregister copies on some targets.
I'm not sure if there is currently a generic way to easily check
if a subregister index would be valid for the current use.
The current set of TargetRegisterInfo::get*Class functions don't
quite behave like I would expect (e.g. getSubClassWithSubReg
returns the maximal register class rather than the minimal), so
I'm not sure how to make the generic test keep searching if
SrcRC:SrcSubReg is a valid replacement for DefRC:DefSubReg. Making
the default implementation to check for simple copies breaks
a variety of ARM and x86 tests by producing illegal subregister uses.
The ARM tests are not actually changed since it should still be using
the same sharesSameRegisterFile implementation, this just relaxes
them to not check for specific registers.
llvm-svn: 248478
We have a detailed def/use lists for every physical register in
MachineRegisterInfo anyway, so there is little use in maintaining an
additional bitset of which ones are used.
Removing it frees us from extra book keeping. This simplifies
VirtRegMap.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10911
llvm-svn: 242173
