As we perform a zext on any arguments used in the promoted tree, it
doesn't matter if they're marked as signext. The only permitted
user(s) in the tree which would interpret the sign bits are signed
icmps. For these instructions, their promoted operands are truncated
before the icmp uses them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68019
llvm-svn: 373186
This reverts r366419 because the analysis performed is within the context of
the loop and it's only valid to add wrapping flags to "global" expressions if
they're always correct.
llvm-svn: 373184
The tool reports verbose output for the DWARF debug location coverage.
The llvm-locstats for each variable or formal parameter DIE computes what
percentage from the code section bytes, where it is in scope, it has
location description. The line 0 shows the number (and the percentage) of
DIEs with no location information, but the line 100 shows the number (and
the percentage) of DIEs where there is location information in all code
section bytes (where the variable or parameter is in the scope). The line
50..59 shows the number (and the percentage) of DIEs where the location
information is in between 50 and 59 percentage of its scope covered.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66526
llvm-svn: 373183
SystemZPostRewrite needs to be run before (it may emit COPYs) the Post-RA
pseudo pass also at -O0, so it should be added in addPostRegAlloc().
Review: Ulrich Weigand
llvm-svn: 373182
This was added back to allow some performance regressions to be
investigated. The main perf issue was fixed shortly after adding
this back and no other major issues have been reported. So I
think its safe to remove this again.
llvm-svn: 373174
There's room from improvement here, but this is a decent
starting point.
There are a few minor regressions in the vector-rotate tests,
where we are now forming a vpternlog from an and before we get
a chance to form it for a bitselect that we were matching
previously. This results in an AND and an ANDN feeding the
vpternlog where previously we just had an AND after the
vpternlog. I think we can probably DAG combine the AND with
the bitselect to get back to similar codegen.
llvm-svn: 373172
Moves existing article links on the Programming, Subsystem, and Reference documentation pages to new locations. Also moves Github Repository and Publications links to the sidebar.
llvm-svn: 373169
For the following two cases, we currently suppress the symbols. This
patch emits them (compatible with GNU as).
* `test2_a = undef`: if `undef` is otherwise unused.
* `.hidden hidden`: if `hidden` is unused. This is the main point of the
patch, because omitting the symbol would cause a linker semantic
difference.
It causes a behavior change that is not compatible with GNU as:
.weakref foo1, bar1
When neither foo1 nor bar1 is used, we now emit bar1, which is arguably
more consistent.
Another change is that we will emit .TOC. for .TOC.@tocbase . For this
directive, suppressing .TOC. can be seen as a size optimization, but we
choose to drop it for simplicity and consistency.
llvm-svn: 373168
If we happen to have the same div in two basic blocks,
and in one of those we also happen to have the rem part,
we'd match the div-rem pair, but the wrong ones.
So let's drop overly-ambiguous assert.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43500
llvm-svn: 373167
Initially SLP vectorizer replaced all going-to-be-vectorized
instructions with Undef values. It may break ScalarEvaluation and may
cause a crash.
Reworked SLP vectorizer so that it does not replace vectorized
instructions by UndefValue anymore. Instead vectorized instructions are
marked for deletion inside if BoUpSLP class and deleted upon class
destruction.
Reviewers: mzolotukhin, mkuper, hfinkel, RKSimon, davide, spatel
Subscribers: RKSimon, Gerolf, anemet, hans, majnemer, llvm-commits, sanjoy
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29641
llvm-svn: 373166
Summary:
g++ build emits warning:
llvm/lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCAsmPrinter.cpp:667:77: error: suggest parentheses around ?&&? within ?||? [-Werror=parentheses]
assert(MO.isGlobal() || MO.isCPI() || MO.isJTI() || MO.isBlockAddress() &&
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~
"Unexpected operand type for LWZtoc pseudo.");
I believe the intension is to assert all different types,
so we should add a parentheses to include all '||'.
Reviewers: #powerpc, sfertile, hubert.reinterpretcast, Xiangling_L
Reviewed By: Xiangling_L
Subscribers: wuzish, nemanjai, hiraditya, kbarton, MaskRay, shchenz, steven.zhang, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68180
llvm-svn: 373164
This is an attempt to fill in some of the missing instructions from the
Cortex-M4 schedule, and make it easier to do the same for other ARM cpus.
- Some instructions are marked as hasNoSchedulingInfo as they are pseudos or
otherwise do not require scheduling info
- A lot of features have been marked not supported
- Some WriteRes's have been added for cvt instructions.
- Some extra instruction latencies have been added, notably by relaxing the
regex for dsp instruction to catch more cases, and some fp instructions.
This goes a long way to get the CompleteModel working for this CPU. It does not
go far enough as to get all scheduling info for all output operands correct.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67957
llvm-svn: 373163
This allows us to reduce the use count on the condition node before
the match. This enables load folding for that operand without
relying on the peephole pass. This will be improved on for
broadcast load folding in a subsequent commit.
This still requires a bunch of isel patterns for vXi16/vXi8 types
though.
llvm-svn: 373156
The fma mutate test will not exercise what it was intended to test
once we simplify those ops immediately, but the test will still
pass with the existing CHECKs, so I'm leaving it in case that
still has minimal value.
llvm-svn: 373149
We need to propagate this information from the IR in order to be able to safely
do tail call optimizations on the intrinsics during legalization. Assuming
it's safe to do tail call opt without checking for the marker isn't safe because
the mem libcall may use allocas from the caller.
This adds an extra immediate operand to the end of the intrinsics and fixes the
legalizer to handle it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68151
llvm-svn: 373140
Creating new nodes is what we usually do. Have to explicitly
check that we don't update to an existing node and having
to manually manage the worklist is unusual.
We can probably add a helper function to reduce the duplication
of having to check if we should create a gather or scatter, but
I wanted to just get the simple thing done.
llvm-svn: 373137
The majority of the code doesn't run on the X86 nodes today since
its gated by isBeforeLegalizeOps and we don't formm X86 nodes
until after that. Except for a couple special case in type
legalization. But I think we would probably break those if
some of the transforms fire on them.
I want to remove the hardcoded operand numbers and the unusual
use of UpdateNodeOperands. Being able to know which ISD opcodes
are present should help with that.
llvm-svn: 373136
profile symbol list.
Currently many existing users using profile-sample-accurate want to reduce
code size as much as possible. Their use cases are different from the scenario
profile symbol list tries to handle -- the major motivation of adding profile
symbol list is to get the major memory/code size saving without introduce
performance regression. So to keep the behavior of profile-sample-accurate
unchanged, we think decoupling these two things and using a new flag to
control the handling of profile symbol list may be better.
When profile-sample-accurate and the new flag profile-accurate-for-symsinlist
are both present, since profile-sample-accurate is a user assertion we let it
have a higher precedence.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68047
llvm-svn: 373133
With avx512, the vXi1 type is legal. And we can more easily sign
extend them to vector registers. zext requires a sign extend and
a shift.
If we can easily turn the zext into a sext we should.
llvm-svn: 373131
m_SExtOrSelf() is for consistency.
m_ZExtOrSExtOrSelf() is motivated by the D68103/r373106 :
sometimes it is useful to look past any extensions of the shift amount,
and m_ZExtOrSExtOrSelf() may be exactly the tool to do that.
llvm-svn: 373128
This is for compatibility with GNU readobj. --arm-attributes option is
left as a hidden alias due to large number of tests using it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68110
llvm-svn: 373125
We start with two separate sext's, but EarlyCSE runs before InstCombine,
so when we get them, they are a single sext, and we just ignore that.
Likewise, if we had a single sext, we don't do anything there.
llvm-svn: 373115
Adds a section to the User Guides page for articles related to building, packaging, and distributing LLVM. Includes sub-sections for CMake, Clang, and Docker.
llvm-svn: 373113
Summary:
This is valid for any `sext` bitwidth pair:
```
Processing /tmp/opt.ll..
----------------------------------------
%signed = sext %y
%r = shl %x, %signed
ret %r
=>
%unsigned = zext %y
%r = shl %x, %unsigned
ret %r
%signed = sext %y
Done: 2016
Optimization is correct!
```
(This isn't so for funnel shifts, there it's illegal for e.g. i6->i7.)
Main motivation is the C++ semantics:
```
int shl(int a, char b) {
return a << b;
}
```
ends as
```
%3 = sext i8 %1 to i32
%4 = shl i32 %0, %3
```
https://godbolt.org/z/0jgqUq
which is, as this shows, too pessimistic.
There is another problem here - we can only do the fold
if sext is one-use. But we can trivially have cases
where several shifts have the same sext shift amount.
This should be resolved, later.
Reviewers: spatel, nikic, RKSimon
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: efriedma, hiraditya, nlopes, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68103
llvm-svn: 373106
Summary: This is a cleanup patch for MachineDominatorTree. It would be an NFC, except for replacing custom DomTree verification with the generic one.
Reviewers: tstellar, tpr, nhaehnle, arsenm, NutshellySima, grosser, hliao
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: wdng, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67976
llvm-svn: 373101
