Summary:
This patch adds DoubleAPFloat mode to APFloat.
Now, an APFloat with semantics PPCDoubleDouble will have DoubleAPFloat layout
(APFloat.U.Double), which contains two underlying APFloats as
PPCDoubleDoubleImpl and IEEEdouble semantics. Currently the IEEEdouble APFloat
is not used, and the first APFloat behaves exactly the same before this change.
This patch consists of three kinds of logics:
1) Construction and destruction of APFloat. Now the ctors, dtor, assign
opertors and factory functions construct different underlying layout
based on the semantics passed in.
2) s/IEEE/getIEEE()/ for normal, lifetime-unrelated computation functions.
These functions only access Floats[0] in DoubleAPFloat, which is the
same as today's semantic.
3) A "Double dispatch" function, APFloat::convert. Converting between two
different layouts requires appropriate logic.
Neither of these change the external behavior.
Reviewers: hfinkel, kbarton, echristo, iteratee
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25977
llvm-svn: 285351
There is a use after free bug in the existing code. Loop layout selects
a preferred exit block, and then lays out the loop. If this block is
removed during layout, it needs to be invalidated to prevent a use after
free.
llvm-svn: 285348
obsolete load commands.
Again the philosophy of the error checking in libObject for
Mach-O files, the idea behind the checking is that we never
will return a Mach-O file out of libObject that contains unknown
things the library code can’t operate on. So known obsolete
load commands will cause a hard error.
Also to make things clear I have added comments to the
values and structures in Support/Mach-O.h and
Support/MachO.def as to what is obsolete.
As noted in a TODO in the code, there may need to be a
non-default mode to allow some unknown values for well
structured Mach-O files with things like unknown load
load commands. So things like using an old lldb on a newer
Mach-O file could still provide some limited functionality.
llvm-svn: 285342
This testcase was originally part of r284995, but I put it in a wrong directory.
So I removed it. Before adding it back I did some small enhancements. Also I
changed the assertions a little bit, to take into account the impact of some
changes performed since code review is done.
This is similar to changes done for another testcase in the original commit.
See: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23614#577749
Basically for instead of vxor we now generate xxlxor in some cases, which is
better.
llvm-svn: 285333
The Windows ARM target expects the compiler to emit a division-by-zero check.
The check would use the form of:
cmp r?, #0
cbz .Ltrap
b .Lbody
.Lbody:
...
.Ltrap:
udf #249 @ __brkdiv0
This works great most of the time. However, if the body of the function is
greater than 127 bytes, the branch target limitation of cbz becomes an issue.
This occurs in the unoptimized code generation cases sometimes (like in
compiler-rt).
Since this is a matter of correctness, possibly pay a small penalty instead. We
now form this slightly differently:
cbnz .Lbody
udf #249 @ __brkdiv0
.Lbody:
...
The positive case is through the branch instead of being the next instruction.
However, because of the basic block layout, the negated branch is going to be
a short distance always (2 bytes away, after the inserted __brkdiv0).
The new t__brkdiv0 instruction is required to explicitly mark the instruction as
a terminator as the generic UDF instruction is not a terminator.
Addresses PR30532!
llvm-svn: 285312
Summary: LICM may hoist instructions to preheader speculatively. Before code generation, we need to sink down the hoisted instructions inside to loop if it's beneficial. This pass is a reverse of LICM: looking at instructions in preheader and sinks the instruction to basic blocks inside the loop body if basic block frequency is smaller than the preheader frequency.
Reviewers: hfinkel, davidxl, chandlerc
Subscribers: anna, modocache, mgorny, beanz, reames, dberlin, chandlerc, mcrosier, junbuml, sanjoy, mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22778
llvm-svn: 285308
r282428 added the MipsOptimizePICCall as an opt-in pass that can be
skipped when using the -opt-bisect-limit option. However, this pass is
needed because it generates code that conforms to the o32 ABI
specification by using the $t9 register for PIC calls with JALR
instructions.
This bug was exposed by the fact that skipFunction() also checks for
the "optnone" attribute. This caused functions with that attribute to
break the requirements of the o32 ABI.
llvm-svn: 285305
With DQI but without VLX, lower v2i64 and v4i64 MUL operations with v8i64 MUL (vpmullq).
Updated cost table accordingly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26011
llvm-svn: 285304
Summary:
Found when running Valgrind.
This removes two unnecessary assignments when using
AttrBuilder::removeAttribute.
AttrBuilder::removeAttribute returns a reference to the object.
As the LHSes were the same as the callees, the assignments
resulted in memcpy calls where dst = src.
Commited on behalf-of: dstenb (David Stenberg)
Reviewers: mkuper, rnk
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25460
llvm-svn: 285298
Currently computeKnownBits returns the common known zero/one bits for all elements of vector data, when we may only be interested in one/some of the elements.
This patch adds a DemandedElts argument that allows us to specify the elements we actually care about. The original computeKnownBits implementation calls with a DemandedElts demanding all elements to match current behaviour. Scalar types set this to 1.
The approach was found to be easier than trying to add a per-element known bits solution, for a similar usefulness given the combines where computeKnownBits is typically used.
I've only added support for a few opcodes so far (the ones that have proven straightforward to test), all others will default to demanding all elements but can be updated in due course.
DemandedElts support could similarly be added to computeKnownBitsForTargetNode in a future commit.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25691
llvm-svn: 285296
After successfull horizontal reduction vectorization attempt for PHI node
vectorizer tries to update root binary op by combining vectorized tree
and the ReductionPHI node. But during vectorization this ReductionPHI
can be vectorized itself and replaced by the `undef` value, while the
instruction itself is marked for deletion. This 'marked for deletion'
PHI node then can be used in new binary operation, causing "Use still
stuck around after Def is destroyed" crash upon PHI node deletion.
Also the test is fixed to make it perform actual testing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25671
llvm-svn: 285286
Elf.h already has code checking that section table does not go past end of file.
Problem is that this check may not work on values greater than UINT64_MAX / Header->e_shentsize
because of calculation overflow.
Parch fixes the issue.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25432
llvm-svn: 285285
Revealed using "id_000038,sig_11,src_000015,op_havoc,rep_16" from PR30540,
when sh_size was 0, crash happened.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25091
llvm-svn: 285282
UMAAL is a DSP instruction and it is not available on thumbv7m
(Cortex-M3) and thumbv6m (Cortex-M0+1) targets. Also fix wrong
CHECK prefix in longMAC.ll test.
Patch by Vadzim Dambrouski.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25890
llvm-svn: 285278
Summary:
When finding a match for a merge and collecting the instructions that must
be moved, keep in mind that the instruction we merge might actually use one
of the defs that are being moved.
Fixes piglit spec/arb_enhanced_layouts/execution/component-layout/vs-tcs-load-output[-indirect].
The fact that the ds_read in the test case is not eliminated suggests that
there might be another problem related to alias analysis, but that's a
separate problem: this pass should still work correctly even when earlier
optimization passes missed something or were disabled.
Reviewers: tstellarAMD, arsenm
Subscribers: kzhuravl, wdng, yaxunl, llvm-commits, tony-tye
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25829
llvm-svn: 285273
This patch corresponds to review:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D25896
It just eliminates the redundant ZExt after a count trailing zeros instruction.
llvm-svn: 285267
Most of the version of report_error were quoting the filename and
printing a colon between the file name and the error message, but this
one wasn't doing either of those. Fix the output to be more
consistent.
llvm-svn: 285252
