4 Commits

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Adrian Prantl	fb3abba237	[PR27284] Reverse the ownership between DICompileUnit and DISubprogram. ... Currently each Function points to a DISubprogram and DISubprogram has a scope field. For member functions the scope is a DICompositeType. DIScopes point to the DICompileUnit to facilitate type uniquing. Distinct DISubprograms (with isDefinition: true) are not part of the type hierarchy and cannot be uniqued. This change removes the subprograms list from DICompileUnit and instead adds a pointer to the owning compile unit to distinct DISubprograms. This would make it easy for ThinLTO to strip unneeded DISubprograms and their transitively referenced debug info. Motivation ---------- Materializing DISubprograms is currently the most expensive operation when doing a ThinLTO build of clang. We want the DISubprogram to be stored in a separate Bitcode block (or the same block as the function body) so we can avoid having to expensively deserialize all DISubprograms together with the global metadata. If a function has been inlined into another subprogram we need to store a reference the block containing the inlined subprogram. Attached to https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27284 is a python script that updates LLVM IR testcases to the new format. http://reviews.llvm.org/D19034 <rdar://problem/25256815> llvm-svn: 266446	2016-04-15 15:57:41 +00:00
Adrian Prantl	1653aa9f14	testcase gardening: update the emissionKind enum to the new syntax. (NFC) ... llvm-svn: 265081	2016-04-01 00:16:49 +00:00
Adrian Prantl	3e537cddb9	Move the DebugEmissionKind enum from DIBuilder into DICompileUnit. ... This mostly cosmetic patch moves the DebugEmissionKind enum from DIBuilder into DICompileUnit. DIBuilder is not the right place for this enum to live in — a metadata consumer should not have to include DIBuilder.h. I also added a Verifier check that checks that the emission kind of a DICompileUnit is actually legal. http://reviews.llvm.org/D18612 <rdar://problem/25427165> llvm-svn: 265077	2016-03-31 23:56:58 +00:00
Keno Fischer	0efdadb478	[Verifier] Fix !dbg validation if Scope is the Subprogram ... Summary: We are inserting both Scope and SP into the Seen map and check whether it was already there in which case we skip the validation (the idea being that we already checked this Subprogram before). However, if (Scope == SP) as MDNodes, then inserting the Scope, will trigger the Seen check causing us to incorrectly not validate this !dbg attachment. Fix this by not performing the SP Seen check if Scope == SP Reviewers: pcc, dexonsmith, dblaikie Subscribers: dblaikie, llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14697 llvm-svn: 254887	2015-12-06 23:05:38 +00:00