Phabricator to trunk.
The previous documentation had a few issues:
* It did not make it explicit that code could be
committed without using the Arcanist tool and how this should be done.
* There was also an implicit assumption on using Subversion
rather than git-svn in the example using Arcanist. The documentation now
explicitly mentions both cases and details how to commit to trunk in
each case.
Reviewers: klimek, probinson
Subscribers: probinson, nwilson, reames, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15801
llvm-svn: 257764
Summary:
I need a test commit for using arc.
This seems like an appropriate commit to use as a test
We may want to port this commit back to 3.7 also
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11527
llvm-svn: 243408
I noticed this convention from the commit logs. It seems like it
would be useful to document it, to encourage other committers to link
back to code reviews in their commits.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2678
llvm-svn: 201160
offer up my email to the spam lords for it. Hopefully this will
eventually be more automatic, but we don't want people to think there is
only one option.
llvm-svn: 166870
