This is another part of solving PR39475:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39475
This might be enough to fix that particular issue, but as noted
with the FIXME, we're still dropping FMF on other folds around here.
llvm-svn: 346234
This patch makes LICM use `ICFLoopSafetyInfo` that is a smarter version
of LoopSafetyInfo that leverages power of Implicit Control Flow Tracking
to keep track of throwing instructions and give less pessimistic answers
to queries related to throws.
The ICFLoopSafetyInfo itself has been introduced in rL344601. This patch
enables it in LICM only.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50377
Reviewed By: apilipenko
llvm-svn: 346201
This reverts commit 2f425e9c7946b9d74e64ebbfa33c1caa36914402.
It seems that the check that we still should do the transform if we
know the result is constant is missing in this code. So the logic that
has been deleted by this change is still sometimes accidentally useful.
I revert the change to see what can be done about it. The motivating
case is the following:
@Y = global [400 x i16] zeroinitializer, align 1
define i16 @foo() {
entry:
br label %for.body
for.body: ; preds = %entry, %for.body
%i = phi i16 [ 0, %entry ], [ %inc, %for.body ]
%arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds [400 x i16], [400 x i16]* @Y, i16 0, i16 %i
store i16 0, i16* %arrayidx, align 1
%inc = add nuw nsw i16 %i, 1
%cmp = icmp ult i16 %inc, 400
br i1 %cmp, label %for.body, label %for.end
for.end: ; preds = %for.body
%inc.lcssa = phi i16 [ %inc, %for.body ]
ret i16 %inc.lcssa
}
We should be able to figure out that the result is constant, but the patch
breaks it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51584
llvm-svn: 346198
This is NFCI for InstCombine because it calls InstSimplify,
so I left the tests for this transform there. As noted in
the code comment, we can allow this fold more often by using
FMF and/or value tracking.
llvm-svn: 346169
Summary:
This patch prevents MergeICmps to performn the transformation if the address operand GEP of the load instruction has a use outside of the load's parent block. Without this patch, compiler crashes with the given test case because the use of `%first.i` is still around when the basic block is erased from https://github.com/llvm-mirror/llvm/blob/master/lib/Transforms/Scalar/MergeICmps.cpp#L620. I think checking `isUsedOutsideOfBlock` with `GEP` is the original intention of the code, as the checking for `LoadI` is already performed in the same function.
This patch is incomplete though, as this makes the pass overly conservative and fails the test `tuple-four-int8.ll`. I believe what needs to be done is checking if GEP has a use outside of block that is not the part of "Comparisons" chain. Submit the patch as of now to prevent compiler crash.
Reviewers: courbet, trentxintong
Reviewed By: courbet
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54089
llvm-svn: 346151
There was no coverage for at least 2 out of the 4 patterns because
of fcmp canonicalization. The tests and code should be moved to
InstSimplify in a follow-up because this doesn't create any new values.
llvm-svn: 346150
As stated in IEEE-754 and discussed in:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38086
...the sign of zero does not affect any FP compare predicate.
Known regressions were fixed with:
rL346097 (D54001)
rL346143
The transform will help reduce pattern-matching complexity to solve:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39475
...as well as improve CSE and codegen (a zero constant is almost always
easier to produce than 0x80..00).
llvm-svn: 346147
It looks like we correctly removed edge cases with 0.0 from D50714,
but we were a bit conservative because getBinOpIdentity() doesn't
distinguish between +0.0 and -0.0 and 'nsz' is effectively always
true for fcmp (see discussion in:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38086
Without this change, we would get regressions by canonicalizing
to +0.0 in all fcmp, and that's a step towards solving:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39475
llvm-svn: 346143
We currently seem to underestimate the size of functions with loops in them,
both in terms of absolute code size and in the difficulties of dealing with
such code. (Calls, for example, can be tail merged to further reduce
codesize). At -Oz, we can then increase code size by inlining small loops
multiple times.
This attempts to penalise functions with loops at -Oz by adding a CallPenalty
for each top level loop in the function. It uses LI (and hence DT) to calculate
the number of loops. As we are dealing with minsize, the inline threshold is
small and functions at this point should be relatively small, making the
construction of these cheap.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52716
llvm-svn: 346134
Using TargetTransformInfo allows the splitting pass to factor in the
code size cost of instructions as it decides whether or not outlining is
profitable.
This did not regress the overall amount of outlining seen on the handful
of internal frameworks I tested.
Thanks to Jun Bum Lim for suggesting this!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53835
llvm-svn: 346108
In PR39475:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39475
..we may fail to recognize/simplify fabs() in some cases because we do not
canonicalize fcmp with a -0.0 operand.
Adding that canonicalization can cause regressions on min/max FP tests, so
that's this patch: for the purpose of determining whether something is min/max,
let the value returned by the select determine how we treat a 0.0 operand in the fcmp.
This patch doesn't actually change the -0.0 to +0.0. It just changes the analysis, so
we don't fail to recognize equivalent min/max patterns that only differ in the
signbit of 0.0.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54001
llvm-svn: 346097
This patch gives the IR ComputeNumSignBits the same functionality as the
DAG version (the code is derived from the existing code).
This an extension of the single input shuffle analysis added with D53659.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53987
llvm-svn: 346071
Summary:
-mldst-motion creates a new phi node without any debug info. Use the merged debug location from the incoming stores to fix this.
Fixes PR38177. The test case here is (somewhat) simplified from:
```
struct S {
int foo;
void fn(int bar);
};
void S::fn(int bar) {
if (bar)
foo = 1;
else
foo = 0;
}
```
Reviewers: dblaikie, gbedwell, aprantl, vsk
Reviewed By: vsk
Subscribers: vsk, JDevlieghere, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54019
llvm-svn: 346027
Model this function more closely after the BasicTTIImpl version, with
separate handling of loads and stores. For loads, the set of actually loaded
vectors is checked.
This makes it more readable and just slightly more accurate generally.
Review: Ulrich Weigand
https://reviews.llvm.org/D53071
llvm-svn: 345998
Fix PR39417, PR39497
The loop vectorizer may generate runtime SCEV checks for overflow and stride==1
cases, leading to execution of original scalar loop. The latter is forbidden
when optimizing for size. An assert introduced in r344743 triggered the above
PR's showing it does happen. This patch fixes this behavior by preventing
vectorization in such cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53612
llvm-svn: 345959
Inner-loop only reductions require additional checks to make sure they
form a load-phi-store cycle across inner and outer loop. Otherwise the
reduction value is not properly preserved. This patch disables
interchanging such loops for now, as it causes miscompiles in some
cases and it seems to apply only for a tiny amount of loops. Across the
test-suite, SPEC2000 and SPEC2006, 61 instead of 62 loops are
interchange with inner loop reduction support disabled. With
-loop-interchange-threshold=-1000, 3256 instead of 3267.
See the discussion and history of D53027 for an outline of how such legality
checks could look like.
Reviewers: efriedma, mcrosier, davide
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53027
llvm-svn: 345877
When rewriting loop exit values, IndVars considers this transform not profitable if
the loop instruction has a loop user which it believes cannot be optimized away.
In current implementation only calls that immediately use the instruction are considered
as such.
This patch extends the definition of "hard" users to any side-effecting instructions
(which usually cannot be optimized away from the loop) and also allows handling
of not just immediate users, but use chains.
Differentlai Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51584
Reviewed By: etherzhhb
llvm-svn: 345814
Unlike its legacy counterpart new pass manager's LoopUnrollPass does
not provide any means to select which flavors of unroll to run
(runtime, peeling, partial), relying on global defaults.
In some cases having ability to run a restricted LoopUnroll that
does more than LoopFullUnroll is needed.
Introduced LoopUnrollOptions to select optional unroll behaviors.
Added 'unroll<peeling>' to PassRegistry mainly for the sake of testing.
Reviewers: chandlerc, tejohnson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53440
llvm-svn: 345723
For some unclear reason rewriteLoopExitValues considers recalculation
after the loop profitable if it has some "soft uses" outside the loop (i.e. any
use other than call and return), even if we have proved that it has a user inside
the loop which we think will not be optimized away.
There is no existing unit test that would explain this. This patch provides an
example when rematerialisation of exit value is not profitable but it passes
this check due to presence of a "soft use" outside the loop.
It makes no sense to recalculate value on exit if we are going to compute it
due to some irremovable within the loop. This patch disallows applying this
transform in the described situation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51581
Reviewed By: etherzhhb
llvm-svn: 345708
optsize using masked wide loads
Under Opt for Size, the vectorizer does not vectorize interleave-groups that
have gaps at the end of the group (such as a loop that reads only the even
elements: a[2*i]) because that implies that we'll require a scalar epilogue
(which is not allowed under Opt for Size). This patch extends the support for
masked-interleave-groups (introduced by D53011 for conditional accesses) to
also cover the case of gaps in a group of loads; Targets that enable the
masked-interleave-group feature don't have to invalidate interleave-groups of
loads with gaps; they could now use masked wide-loads and shuffles (if that's
what the cost model selects).
Reviewers: Ayal, hsaito, dcaballe, fhahn
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53668
llvm-svn: 345705
InstCombine features an optimization that essentially replaces:
if (a)
free(a)
into:
free(a)
Right now, this optimization is gated by the minsize attribute and therefore
we only perform it if we can prove that we are going to be able to eliminate
the branch and the destination block.
However when casts are involved the optimization would fail to apply, because
the optimization was not smart enough to realize that it is possible to also
move the casts away from the destination block and that is harmless to the
performance since they are just noops.
E.g.,
foo(int *a)
if (a)
free((char*)a)
Wouldn't be optimized by instcombine, because
- We would refuse to hoist the `bitcast i32* %a to i8` in the source block
- We would fail to see that `bitcast i32* %a to i8` and %a are the same value.
This patch fixes both these problems:
- It teaches the pattern matching of the comparison how to look
through casts.
- It checks that whether the additional instruction in the destination block
can be hoisted and are harmless performance-wise.
- It hoists all the code of the destination block in the source block.
Differential Revision: D53356
llvm-svn: 345644
shuffle (insert ?, Scalar, IndexC), V1, Mask --> insert V1, Scalar, IndexC'
The motivating case is at least a couple of steps away: I noticed that
SLPVectorizer does not analyze shuffles as well as sequences of
insert/extract in PR34724:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34724
...so SLP may fail to vectorize when source code has shuffles to start
with or instcombine has converted insert/extract to shuffles.
Independent of that, an insertelement is always a simpler op for IR
analysis vs. a shuffle, so we should transform to insert when possible.
I don't think there's any codegen concern here - if a target can't insert
a scalar directly to some fixed element in a vector (x86?), then this
should get expanded to the insert+shuffle that we started with.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53507
llvm-svn: 345607
This commit is a combination of two patches:
* "Fix in getScalarizationOverhead()"
If target returns false in TTI.prefersVectorizedAddressing(), it means the
address registers will not need to be extracted. Therefore, there should
be no operands scalarization overhead for a load instruction.
* "Don't pass the instruction pointer from getMemInstScalarizationCost."
Since VF is always > 1, this is a cost query for an instruction in the
vectorized loop and it should not be evaluated within the scalar
context of the instruction.
Review: Ulrich Weigand, Hal Finkel
https://reviews.llvm.org/D52351https://reviews.llvm.org/D52417
llvm-svn: 345603
This fixes an assertion when constant folding a GEP when the part of the offset
was in i32 (IndexSize, as per DataLayout) and part in the i64 (PointerSize) in
the newly created test case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52609
llvm-svn: 345585
It can be profitable to outline single-block cold regions because they
may be large.
Allow outlining single-block regions if they have over some threshold of
non-debug, non-terminator instructions. I chose 3 as the threshold after
experimenting with several internal frameworks.
In practice, reducing the threshold further did not give much
improvement, whereas increasing it resulted in substantial regressions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53824
llvm-svn: 345524
