Some targets may add required passes via
TargetMachine::registerPassBuilderCallbacks(). We need to run those even
under -O0. As an example, BPFTargetMachine adds
BPFAbstractMemberAccessPass, a required pass.
This also allows us to clean up BackendUtil.cpp (and out-of-tree Rust
usage of the NPM) by allowing us to share added passes like coroutines
and sanitizers between -O0 and other optimization levels.
Since callbacks may end up not adding passes, we need to check if the
pass managers are empty before adding them, so PassManager now has an
isEmpty() function. For example, polly adds callbacks but doesn't always
add passes in those callbacks, so this is necessary to keep
-debug-pass-manager tests' output from changing depending on if polly is
enabled or not.
Tests are a continuation of those added in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D89083.
Reviewed By: asbirlea, Meinersbur
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89158
This allows those instrumentation to log when they decide to skip a
pass. This provides extra helpful info for optnone functions and also
will help with opt-bisect.
Have OptNoneInstrumentation print when it skips due to seeing optnone.
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90545
D70365 allows us to make attributes default. This is a follow up to
actually make nosync, nofree and willreturn default. The approach we
chose, for now, is to opt-in to default attributes to avoid introducing
problems to target specific intrinsics. Intrinsics with default
attributes can be created using `DefaultAttrsIntrinsic` class.
This pass is like DeadCodeEliminationPass, but only does one pass
through a function instead of iterating on users of eliminated
instructions.
DeadCodeEliminationPass should be used in all cases.
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87933
As discussed in D86843, -earlycse-debug-hash should be used in more regression
tests to catch inconsistency between the hashing and the equivalence check.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86863
This was done by turning on -enable-npm-optnone and fixing failures.
That will be enabled in a follow-up change for ease of reverting.
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85457
If OptNoneInstrumentation prints it instead, 'Skipping pass' will print for even required passes.
Reviewed By: ychen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85493
No verification for pass mangers since it is not needed.
No verification for skipped loop pass since the asserted condition is not used.
Add a BeforeNonSkippedPass callback for this. The callback needs more
inputs than its parameters to work so the callback is added on-the-fly.
Reviewed By: aeubanks, asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84977
To match NewPM pass name, and also for readability.
Also rename rpo-functionattrs -> rpo-function-attrs while we're here.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84694
OptNoneInstrumentation is part of StandardInstrumentations. It skips
functions (or loops) that are marked optnone.
The feature of skipping optional passes for optnone functions under NPM
is gated on a -enable-npm-optnone flag. Currently it is by default
false. That is because we still need to mark all required passes to be
required. Otherwise optnone functions will start having incorrect
semantics. After that is done in following changes, we can remove the
flag and always enable this.
Reviewed By: ychen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83519
This is D77454, except for stores. All the infrastructure work was done
for loads, so the remaining changes necessary are relatively small.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79968
For IR generated by a compiler, this is really simple: you just take the
datalayout from the beginning of the file, and apply it to all the IR
later in the file. For optimization testcases that don't care about the
datalayout, this is also really simple: we just use the default
datalayout.
The complexity here comes from the fact that some LLVM tools allow
overriding the datalayout: some tools have an explicit flag for this,
some tools will infer a datalayout based on the code generation target.
Supporting this properly required plumbing through a bunch of new
machinery: we want to allow overriding the datalayout after the
datalayout is parsed from the file, but before we use any information
from it. Therefore, IR/bitcode parsing now has a callback to allow tools
to compute the datalayout at the appropriate time.
Not sure if I covered all the LLVM tools that want to use the callback.
(clang? lli? Misc IR manipulation tools like llvm-link?). But this is at
least enough for all the LLVM regression tests, and IR without a
datalayout is not something frontends should generate.
This change had some sort of weird effects for certain CodeGen
regression tests: if the datalayout is overridden with a datalayout with
a different program or stack address space, we now parse IR based on the
overridden datalayout, instead of the one written in the file (or the
default one, if none is specified). This broke a few AVR tests, and one
AMDGPU test.
Outside the CodeGen tests I mentioned, the test changes are all just
fixing CHECK lines and moving around datalayout lines in weird places.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78403
Windows doesn't properly support pass plugins (as a shared library
can't have undefined references, which pass plugins assume, being
loaded into a host process that contains provides them), thus
disable building it and the corresponding test.
This matches what was done for the passes unit test in
bc8e44218810c0db6328b9809c959ceb7d43e3f5.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79771
This should make both static and dynamic NewPM plugins work with LTO.
And as a bonus, it makes static linking of OldPM plugins more reliable
for plugins with both an OldPM and NewPM interface.
I only implemented the command-line flag to specify NewPM plugins in
llvm-lto2, to show it works. Support can be added for other tools later.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76866
The LoopExtractor created new functions (by definition), which violates
the restrictions of a LoopPass.
The correct implementation of this pass should be as a ModulePass.
Includes reverting rL82990 implications on the LoopExtractor.
Fixes PR3082 and PR8929.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69069
This behavior appears to have changed unintentionally in
b0e979724f2679e4e6f5b824144ea89289bd6d56.
Instead of printing the leading newline in printFunction, print it when
printing a module. This ensures that `OS << *Func` starts printing
immediately on the current line, but whole modules are printed nicely.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73505
There's quite a lot of references to Polly in the LLVM CMake codebase. However
the registration pattern used by Polly could be useful to other external
projects: thanks to that mechanism it would be possible to develop LLVM
extension without touching the LLVM code base.
This patch has two effects:
1. Remove all code specific to Polly in the llvm/clang codebase, replaicing it
with a generic mechanism
2. Provide a generic mechanism to register compiler extensions.
A compiler extension is similar to a pass plugin, with the notable difference
that the compiler extension can be configured to be built dynamically (like
plugins) or statically (like regular passes).
As a result, people willing to add extra passes to clang/opt can do it using a
separate code repo, but still have their pass be linked in clang/opt as built-in
passes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61446
of integers to floating point.
This includes some of Craig Topper's changes for promotion support from
D71130.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69275
This reapplies: 8ff85ed905a7306977d07a5cd67ab4d5a56fafb4
Original commit message:
As a follow-up to my initial mail to llvm-dev here's a first pass at the O1 described there.
This change doesn't include any change to move from selection dag to fast isel
and that will come with other numbers that should help inform that decision.
There also haven't been any real debuggability studies with this pipeline yet,
this is just the initial start done so that people could see it and we could start
tweaking after.
Test updates: Outside of the newpm tests most of the updates are coming from either
optimization passes not run anymore (and without a compelling argument at the moment)
that were largely used for canonicalization in clang.
Original post:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-April/131494.html
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65410
This reverts commit c9ddb02659e3ece7a0d9d6b4dac7ceea4ae46e6d.
This change doesn't include any change to move from selection dag to fast isel
and that will come with other numbers that should help inform that decision.
There also haven't been any real debuggability studies with this pipeline yet,
this is just the initial start done so that people could see it and we could start
tweaking after.
Test updates: Outside of the newpm tests most of the updates are coming from either
optimization passes not run anymore (and without a compelling argument at the moment)
that were largely used for canonicalization in clang.
Original post:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-April/131494.html
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65410
After speaking with Sanjay - seeing a number of miscompiles and working
on tracking down a testcase. None of the follow on patches seem to
have helped so far.
This reverts commit 8a0aa5310bccbb42d16d11db090419fcefdd1376.
After speaking with Sanjay - seeing a number of miscompiles and working
on tracking down a testcase. None of the follow on patches seem to
have helped so far.
This reverts commit 7ff57705ba196ce649d6034614b3b9df57e1f84f.
Provides support for using r6-r11 as globally scoped
register variables. This requires a -ffixed-rN flag
in order to reserve rN against general allocation.
If for a given GRV declaration the corresponding flag
is not found, or the the register in question is the
target's FP, we fail with a diagnostic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68862
We have a vector compare reduction problem seen in PR39665 comment 2:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39665#c2
Or slightly reduced here:
define i1 @cmp2(<2 x double> %a0) {
%a = fcmp ogt <2 x double> %a0, <double 1.0, double 1.0>
%b = extractelement <2 x i1> %a, i32 0
%c = extractelement <2 x i1> %a, i32 1
%d = and i1 %b, %c
ret i1 %d
}
SLP would not attempt to turn this into a vector reduction because there is an
artificial lower limit on that transform. We can not completely remove that limit
without inducing regressions though, so this patch just hacks an extra attempt at
creating a 2-way reduction to the end of the analysis.
As shown in the test file, we are still not getting some of the motivating cases,
so follow-on patches will be needed to solve those cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59710
Earlier in the year intrinsics for lrint, llrint, lround and llround were
added to llvm. The constrained versions are now implemented here.
Reviewed by: andrew.w.kaylor, craig.topper, cameron.mcinally
Approved by: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64746
llvm-svn: 373900
A set of function attributes is required in any function that uses constrained
floating point intrinsics. None of our tests use these attributes.
This patch fixes this.
These tests have been tested against the IR verifier changes in D68233.
Reviewed by: andrew.w.kaylor, cameron.mcinally, uweigand
Approved by: andrew.w.kaylor
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67925
llvm-svn: 373761
This implements constrained floating point intrinsics for FP to signed and
unsigned integers.
Quoting from D32319:
The purpose of the constrained intrinsics is to force the optimizer to
respect the restrictions that will be necessary to support things like the
STDC FENV_ACCESS ON pragma without interfering with optimizations when
these restrictions are not needed.
Reviewed by: Andrew Kaylor, Craig Topper, Hal Finkel, Cameron McInally, Roman Lebedev, Kit Barton
Approved by: Craig Topper
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D63782
llvm-svn: 370228
For consistency with normal instructions and clarity when reading IR,
it's best to print the %0, %1, ... names of function arguments in
definitions.
Also modifies the parser to accept IR in that form for obvious reasons.
llvm-svn: 367755
Summary:
In D62801, new function attribute `willreturn` was introduced. In short, a function with `willreturn` is guaranteed to come back to the call site(more precise definition is in LangRef).
In this patch, willreturn is annotated for LLVM intrinsics.
Reviewers: jdoerfert
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: jvesely, nhaehnle, sstefan1, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64904
llvm-svn: 367184
This patch adds a function attribute, nofree, to indicate that a function does
not, directly or indirectly, call a memory-deallocation function (e.g., free,
C++'s operator delete).
Reviewers: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49165
llvm-svn: 365336
This patch implements a limited form of autolinking primarily designed to allow
either the --dependent-library compiler option, or "comment lib" pragmas (
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/preprocessor/comment-c-cpp?view=vs-2017) in
C/C++ e.g. #pragma comment(lib, "foo"), to cause an ELF linker to automatically
add the specified library to the link when processing the input file generated
by the compiler.
Currently this extension is unique to LLVM and LLD. However, care has been taken
to design this feature so that it could be supported by other ELF linkers.
The design goals were to provide:
- A simple linking model for developers to reason about.
- The ability to to override autolinking from the linker command line.
- Source code compatibility, where possible, with "comment lib" pragmas in other
environments (MSVC in particular).
Dependent library support is implemented differently for ELF platforms than on
the other platforms. Primarily this difference is that on ELF we pass the
dependent library specifiers directly to the linker without manipulating them.
This is in contrast to other platforms where they are mapped to a specific
linker option by the compiler. This difference is a result of the greater
variety of ELF linkers and the fact that ELF linkers tend to handle libraries in
a more complicated fashion than on other platforms. This forces us to defer
handling the specifiers to the linker.
In order to achieve a level of source code compatibility with other platforms
we have restricted this feature to work with libraries that meet the following
"reasonable" requirements:
1. There are no competing defined symbols in a given set of libraries, or
if they exist, the program owner doesn't care which is linked to their
program.
2. There may be circular dependencies between libraries.
The binary representation is a mergeable string section (SHF_MERGE,
SHF_STRINGS), called .deplibs, with custom type SHT_LLVM_DEPENDENT_LIBRARIES
(0x6fff4c04). The compiler forms this section by concatenating the arguments of
the "comment lib" pragmas and --dependent-library options in the order they are
encountered. Partial (-r, -Ur) links are handled by concatenating .deplibs
sections with the normal mergeable string section rules. As an example, #pragma
comment(lib, "foo") would result in:
.section ".deplibs","MS",@llvm_dependent_libraries,1
.asciz "foo"
For LTO, equivalent information to the contents of a the .deplibs section can be
retrieved by the LLD for bitcode input files.
LLD processes the dependent library specifiers in the following way:
1. Dependent libraries which are found from the specifiers in .deplibs sections
of relocatable object files are added when the linker decides to include that
file (which could itself be in a library) in the link. Dependent libraries
behave as if they were appended to the command line after all other options. As
a consequence the set of dependent libraries are searched last to resolve
symbols.
2. It is an error if a file cannot be found for a given specifier.
3. Any command line options in effect at the end of the command line parsing apply
to the dependent libraries, e.g. --whole-archive.
4. The linker tries to add a library or relocatable object file from each of the
strings in a .deplibs section by; first, handling the string as if it was
specified on the command line; second, by looking for the string in each of the
library search paths in turn; third, by looking for a lib<string>.a or
lib<string>.so (depending on the current mode of the linker) in each of the
library search paths.
5. A new command line option --no-dependent-libraries tells LLD to ignore the
dependent libraries.
Rationale for the above points:
1. Adding the dependent libraries last makes the process simple to understand
from a developers perspective. All linkers are able to implement this scheme.
2. Error-ing for libraries that are not found seems like better behavior than
failing the link during symbol resolution.
3. It seems useful for the user to be able to apply command line options which
will affect all of the dependent libraries. There is a potential problem of
surprise for developers, who might not realize that these options would apply
to these "invisible" input files; however, despite the potential for surprise,
this is easy for developers to reason about and gives developers the control
that they may require.
4. This algorithm takes into account all of the different ways that ELF linkers
find input files. The different search methods are tried by the linker in most
obvious to least obvious order.
5. I considered adding finer grained control over which dependent libraries were
ignored (e.g. MSVC has /nodefaultlib:<library>); however, I concluded that this
is not necessary: if finer control is required developers can fall back to using
the command line directly.
RFC thread: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-March/131004.html.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60274
llvm-svn: 360984
The 3-field form was introduced by D3499 in 2014 and the legacy 2-field
form was planned to be removed in LLVM 4.0
For the textual format, this patch migrates the existing 2-field form to
use the 3-field form and deletes the compatibility code.
test/Verifier/global-ctors-2.ll checks we have a friendly error message.
For bitcode, lib/IR/AutoUpgrade UpgradeGlobalVariables will upgrade the
2-field form (add i8* null as the third field).
Reviewed By: rnk, dexonsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61547
llvm-svn: 360742
