Due to the semantics of ARC, we must be extremely conservative with autorelease
calls inserted by the frontend since ARC gaurantees that said object will be in
the autorelease pool after that point, an optimization invariant that the
optimizer must respect.
On the other hand, we are allowed significantly more flexibility with
autoreleaseRV instructions.
Often times though this flexibility is disrupted by early transformations which
transform objc_autoreleaseRV => objc_autorelease if said instruction is no
longer being used as part of an RV pair (generally due to inlining). Since we
can not tell the difference in between an autorelease put into place by the
frontend and one created through said ``strength reduction'' we can not perform
these optimizations.
The addition of this set gets around said issues by allowing us to differentiate
in between said two cases.
rdar://problem/13697741.
llvm-svn: 180222
This patch disables memory-instruction vectorization for types that need padding
bytes, e.g., x86_fp80 has 10 bytes store size with 6 bytes padding in darwin on
x86_64. Because the load/store vectorization is performed by the bit casting to
a packed vector, which has incompatible memory layout due to the lack of padding
bytes, the present vectorizer produces inconsistent result for memory
instructions of those types.
This patch checks an equality of the AllocSize of a scalar type and allocated
size for each vector element, to ensure that there is no padding bytes and the
array can be read/written using vector operations.
Patch by Daisuke Takahashi!
Fixes PR15758.
llvm-svn: 180196
debug location. This solves a problem where range of an inlined
subroutine is emitted wrongly.
Patch by Manman Ren.
Fixes rdar://problem/12415623
llvm-svn: 180140
even if erroneously annotated with the parallel loop metadata.
Fixes Bug 15794:
"Loop Vectorizer: Crashes with the use of llvm.loop.parallel metadata"
llvm-svn: 180081
This is an edge case that can happen if we modify a chain of multiple selects.
Update all operands in that case and remove the assert. PR15805.
llvm-svn: 179982
There is the temptation to make this tranform dependent on target information as
it is not going to be beneficial on all (sub)targets. Therefore, we should
probably do this in MI Early-Ifconversion.
This reverts commit r179957. Original commit message:
"SimplifyCFG: If convert single conditional stores
This transformation will transform a conditional store with a preceeding
uncondtional store to the same location:
a[i] =
may-alias with a[i] load
if (cond)
a[i] = Y
into an unconditional store.
a[i] = X
may-alias with a[i] load
tmp = cond ? Y : X;
a[i] = tmp
We assume that on average the cost of a mispredicted branch is going to be
higher than the cost of a second store to the same location, and that the
secondary benefits of creating a bigger basic block for other optimizations to
work on outway the potential case were the branch would be correctly predicted
and the cost of the executing the second store would be noticably reflected in
performance.
hmmer's execution time improves by 30% on an imac12,2 on ref data sets. With
this change we are on par with gcc's performance (gcc also performs this
transformation). There was a 1.2 % performance improvement on a ARM swift chip.
Other tests in the test-suite+external seem to be mostly uninfluenced in my
experiments:
This optimization was triggered on 41 tests such that the executable was
different before/after the patch. Only 1 out of the 40 tests (dealII) was
reproducable below 100% (by about .4%). Given that hmmer benefits so much I
believe this to be a fair trade off.
I am going to watch performance numbers across the builtbots and will revert
this if anything unexpected comes up."
llvm-svn: 179980
This will make it clearer when we are actually resetting a sequence's progress
vs just changing state. This is an important distinction because the former case
clears any pointers that we are tracking while the later does not.
llvm-svn: 179963
This transformation will transform a conditional store with a preceeding
uncondtional store to the same location:
a[i] =
may-alias with a[i] load
if (cond)
a[i] = Y
into an unconditional store.
a[i] = X
may-alias with a[i] load
tmp = cond ? Y : X;
a[i] = tmp
We assume that on average the cost of a mispredicted branch is going to be
higher than the cost of a second store to the same location, and that the
secondary benefits of creating a bigger basic block for other optimizations to
work on outway the potential case were the branch would be correctly predicted
and the cost of the executing the second store would be noticably reflected in
performance.
hmmer's execution time improves by 30% on an imac12,2 on ref data sets. With
this change we are on par with gcc's performance (gcc also performs this
transformation). There was a 1.2 % performance improvement on a ARM swift chip.
Other tests in the test-suite+external seem to be mostly uninfluenced in my
experiments:
This optimization was triggered on 41 tests such that the executable was
different before/after the patch. Only 1 out of the 40 tests (dealII) was
reproducable below 100% (by about .4%). Given that hmmer benefits so much I
believe this to be a fair trade off.
I am going to watch performance numbers across the builtbots and will revert
this if anything unexpected comes up.
llvm-svn: 179957
The logic that actually compares the types considers pointers and integers the
same if they are of the same size. This created a strange mismatch between hash
and reality and made the test case for this fail on some platforms (yay,
test cases).
llvm-svn: 179905
Also make some static function class functions to avoid having to mention the
class namespace for enums all the time.
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 179886
A min/max operation is represented by a select(cmp(lt/le/gt/ge, X, Y), X, Y)
sequence in LLVM. If we see such a sequence we can treat it just as any other
commutative binary instruction and reduce it.
This appears to help bzip2 by about 1.5% on an imac12,2.
radar://12960601
llvm-svn: 179773
This occurs due to an alloca representing a separate ownership from the
original pointer. Thus consider the following pseudo-IR:
objc_retain(%a)
for (...) {
objc_retain(%a)
%block <- %a
F(%block)
objc_release(%block)
}
objc_release(%a)
From the perspective of the optimizer, the %block is a separate
provenance from the original %a. Thus the optimizer pairs up the inner
retain for %a and the outer release from %a, resulting in segfaults.
This is fixed by noting that the signature of a mismatch of
retain/releases inside the for loop is a Use/CanRelease top down with an
None bottom up (since bottom up the Retain-CanRelease-Use-Release
sequence is completed by the inner objc_retain, but top down due to the
differing provenance from the objc_release said sequence is not
completed). In said case in CheckForCFGHazards, we now clear the state
of %a implying that no pairing will occur.
Additionally a test case is included.
rdar://12969722
llvm-svn: 179747
