LineCoverageIterator makes it easy for clients of coverage data to
determine line execution counts for a file or function. The coverage
iteration logic is tricky enough that it really pays not to have
multiple copies of it. Hopefully having just one implementation in LLVM
will make the iteration logic easier to test, reuse, and update.
This commit is NFC but I've added a unit test to go along with it just
because it's easy to do now.
llvm-svn: 316141
In r315960, I accidentally assumed that the first line segment is
guaranteed to be the non-gap region entry segment (given that one is
present). It can actually be any segment on the line, and the test I
checked in demonstrates that.
llvm-svn: 315963
Gap areas make it possible to correctly determine when to use counts
from deferred regions. Before gap areas were introduced, llvm-cov needed
to use a heuristic to do this: it ignored counts from segments that
start, but do not end, on a line. This heuristic breaks down on a simple
example (see PR34962).
This patch removes the heuristic and picks counts from any region entry
segment which isn't a gap area.
llvm-svn: 315960
There were two copies of the logic needed to construct a line stats
object for each line in a range: this patch brings it down to one. In
the future, this will make it easier for IDE clients to display coverage
in-line in source editors. To do that, we just need to move the new
LineCoverageIterator class to libCoverage.
llvm-svn: 315789
* Fix an unsigned integer overflow in the logic that computes the
number of uncovered lines in a function.
* When aggregating region and line coverage summaries, take into account
that different instantiations may have a different number of regions.
The new test case provides test coverage for both bugs. I also verified
this change by preparing a coverage report for a stage2 build of llc --
the new assertions should detect any outstanding over-counting bugs.
Fixes PR34613.
llvm-svn: 313417
There's a bug in the way the line and region summary objects are merged.
It would have been less likely to occur if those objects kept some data
private.
llvm-svn: 313416
The "NotCovered" fields in the region and line summary structs are
redundant. We should remove them to make the code clearer.
As a follow-up, the "NotCovered" entries should be removed from the
reports as well.
llvm-svn: 313415
The CoverageMapping::getInstantiations() API retrieved all function
records corresponding to functions with more than one instantiation (e.g
template functions with multiple specializations). However, there was no
simple way to determine *which* function a given record was an
instantiation of. This was an oversight, since it's useful to aggregate
coverage information over all instantiations of a function.
llvm-cov works around this by building a mapping of source locations to
instantiation sets, but this duplicates logic that libCoverage already
has (see FunctionInstantiationSetCollector).
This change adds a new API, CoverageMapping::getInstantiationGroups(),
which returns a list of InstantiationGroups. A group contains records
for each instantiation of some particular function, and also provides
utilities to get the total execution count within the group, the source
location of the common definition, etc.
This lets removes some hacky logic in llvm-cov by reusing
FunctionInstantiationSetCollector and makes the CoverageMapping API
friendlier for other clients.
llvm-svn: 309904
These are distinct statistics which are useful to look at separately.
Example: say you have a template function "foo" with 5 instantiations
and only 3 of them are covered. Then this contributes (1/1) to the total
function coverage and (3/5) to the total instantiation coverage. I.e,
the old "Function Coverage" column has been renamed to "Instantiation
Coverage", and the new "Function Coverage" aggregates information from
the various instantiations of a function.
One benefit of making this switch is that the Line and Region coverage
columns will start making sense. Let's continue the example and assume
that the 5 instantiations of "foo" cover {2, 4, 6, 8, 10} out of 10
lines respectively. The new line coverage for "foo" is (10/10), not
(30/50). The old scenario got confusing because we'd report that there
were more lines in a file than what was actually possible.
llvm-svn: 281875
PR22575 occurred because we were unsafely storing references into a
std::vector. If the vector moved because it grew, we'd be left
iterating through garbage memory. This avoids the issue by simplifying
the logic to gather coverage information as we go, rather than storing
it and iterating over it.
I'm relying on the existing tests showing that this is semantically
NFC, since it's difficult to hit the issue this fixes without
relatively large covered programs.
llvm-svn: 229215
This commit fixes llvm-cov's function coverage metric by using the number of executed functions instead of the number of fully covered functions.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5196
llvm-svn: 218672
This splits the logic for actually looking up coverage information
from the logic that displays it. These were tangled rather thoroughly
so this change is a bit large, but it mostly consists of moving things
around. The coverage lookup logic itself now lives in the library,
rather than being spread between the library and the tool.
llvm-svn: 218184
This commit expands llvm-cov's functionality by adding support for a new code coverage
tool that uses LLVM's coverage mapping format and clang's instrumentation based profiling.
The gcov compatible tool can be invoked by supplying the 'gcov' command as the first argument,
or by modifying the tool's name to end with 'gcov'.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4445
llvm-svn: 216300
