This is third patch to clean up the code.
Included in this patch:
1. Further unclutter trace/chain formation main routine;
2. Isolate the logic to compute global cost/conflict detection
into its own method;
3. Heavily document the selection algorithm;
4. Added helper hook to allow PGO specific logic to be
added in the future.
llvm-svn: 272582
This is second patch to clean up the code.
In this patch, the logic to determine block outlinining
is refactored and more comments are added.
llvm-svn: 272514
This used to be free, copying and moving DebugLocs became expensive
after the metadata rewrite. Passing by reference eliminates a ton of
track/untrack operations. No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 272512
This is one of the patches to clean up the code so that
it is in a better form to make future enhancements easier.
In htis patch, the logic to collect viable successors are
extrated as a helper to unclutter the caller which gets very
large recenty. Also cleaned up BP adjustment code.
llvm-svn: 272482
undef uses are no real uses of a register and must be ignored by
findLastUseBefore() so that handleMove() does not produce invalid live
intervals in some cases.
This fixed http://llvm.org/PR28083
llvm-svn: 272446
Summary:
When stack-protection is activated and WinEH exceptions is used,
the EHRegNode (exception handling registration) is allocated twice on the stack.
This was not breaking anything except loosing space on the stack.
```
D:\src\llvm\examples>llc exc2.ll -debug-only=pei
alloc FI(0) at SP[-24]
alloc FI(1) at SP[-48] <<-- Allocated
alloc FI(1) at SP[-72] <<-- Allocated twice!?
alloc FI(2) at SP[-76]
alloc FI(4) at SP[-80]
alloc FI(3) at SP[-84]
```
Reviewers: rnk, majnemer
Subscribers: chrisha, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21188
llvm-svn: 272426
Adds a MachineFunctionPass that scans the body to find calls, and
update the register mask with the one saved by the
RegUsageInfoCollector analysis in PhysicalRegisterUsageInfo.
Patch by Vivek Pandya <vivekvpandya@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21180
llvm-svn: 272414
Add an option to enable the analysis of MachineFunction register
usage to extract the list of clobbered registers.
When enabled, the CodeGen order is changed to be bottom up on the Call
Graph.
The analysis is split in two parts, RegUsageInfoCollector is the
MachineFunction Pass that runs post-RA and collect the list of
clobbered registers to produce a register mask.
An immutable pass, RegisterUsageInfo, stores the RegMask produced by
RegUsageInfoCollector, and keep them available. A future tranformation
pass will use this information to update every call-sites after
instruction selection.
Patch by Vivek Pandya <vivekvpandya@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20769
llvm-svn: 272403
When we delete a live-range, we check if that live-range is the origin of others
to keep it around for rematerialization. For that we check that the instruction
we are about to remove is the same as the definition of the VNI of the original
live-range.
If this is the case, we just shrink the live-range to an empty one.
Now, when we try to delete one of the children of such live-range (product of
splitting), we do the same check.
However, now the original live-range is empty and there is no way we can
access the VNI to check its definition, and we crash.
When we cannot get the VNI for the original live-range, that means we are not in
the presence of the original definition. Thus, this check does not need to happen
in that case and the crash is sloved!
This bug was introduced in r266162 | wmi | 2016-04-12 20:08:27. It affects every
target that uses the greedy register allocator.
To happen, we need to delete both a the original instruction and its split
products, in that order. This is likely to happen when rematerialization comes
into play.
Trying to produce a more robust test case. Will follow in a coming commit.
This fixes llvm.org/PR27983.
rdar://problem/26651519
llvm-svn: 272314
This reapplies commit r271930, r271915, r271923. They hit a bug in
Thumb which is fixed in r272258 now.
The original message:
The code layout that TailMerging (inside BranchFolding) works on is not the
final layout optimized based on the branch probability. Generally, after
BlockPlacement, many new merging opportunities emerge.
This patch calls Tail Merging after MBP and calls MBP again if Tail Merging
merges anything.
llvm-svn: 272267
Without that check it was possible to write test cases where the size
was not specified and we ended up with weird asserts down the road,
because the default value (1) would not make sense.
llvm-svn: 272226
For complex rewrittings, which do not occur currently, the related
machine instruction may have been deleted in the process. Therefore, do
not try to print it after the mapping is applied.
llvm-svn: 272209
Refactor the code so that we do not compute in two different places the
end iterator for the range of new virtual registers for a given operand.
Although this refactoring was intended as NFC, this is not the case
because it actually fixes a bug where we were returning a range off by 1
(too long). Right now, this could not result in an actual bug because we
were accessing this range via the BreakDown size of the related operand.
llvm-svn: 272208
Summary:
Consider the following diamond CFG:
A
/ \
B C
\/
D
Suppose A->B and A->C have probabilities 81% and 19%. In block-placement, A->B is called a hot edge and the final placement should be ABDC. However, the current implementation outputs ABCD. This is because when choosing the next block of B, it checks if Freq(C->D) > Freq(B->D) * 20%, which is true (if Freq(A) = 100, then Freq(B->D) = 81, Freq(C->D) = 19, and 19 > 81*20%=16.2). Actually, we should use 25% instead of 20% as the probability here, so that we have 19 < 81*25%=20.25, and the desired ABDC layout will be generated.
Reviewers: djasper, davidxl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20989
llvm-svn: 272203
Summary:
Now DISubroutineType has a 'cc' field which should be a DW_CC_ enum. If
it is present and non-zero, the backend will emit it as a
DW_AT_calling_convention attribute. On the CodeView side, we translate
it to the appropriate enum for the LF_PROCEDURE record.
I added a new LLVM vendor specific enum to the list of DWARF calling
conventions. DWARF does not appear to attempt to standardize these, so I
assume it's OK to do this until we coordinate with GCC on how to emit
vectorcall convention functions.
Reviewers: dexonsmith, majnemer, aaboud, amccarth
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21114
llvm-svn: 272197
When repairing with a copy, instead of accounting for the cost of that
copy and actually inserting it, we may be able to use an alternative
source for the register to repair and just use it.
Make sure this is documented, so that we consider that opportunity at
some point.
llvm-svn: 272176
Now, the target will be able to provide its how implementation to remap
an instruction. This open the way to crazier optimizations, but to
beginning with, we will be able to handle something else than the
default mapping.
llvm-svn: 272165
When the command line option is set, it overrides any thing that the
target may have set. The rationale is that we get what we asked for.
Options are respectively regbankselect-fast and regbankselect-greedy for
fast and greedy mode.
llvm-svn: 272158
repairing.
Copies are easy because we repair only when there is a mismatch. For
non-copy repairing, i.e., cases that involves breaking down or gathering
up the value, one of the operand may not have a register bank yet. Thus,
derivate a cost from that, requires more work.
llvm-svn: 272157
As suggested by clang-tidy's performance-unnecessary-copy-initialization.
This can easily hit lifetime issues, so I audited every change and ran the
tests under asan, which came back clean.
llvm-svn: 272126
The cost of a copy may be different based on how many bits we have to
copy around. E.g., a 8-bit copy may be different than a 32-bit copy.
llvm-svn: 272084
Summary:
This patch is adding support for the MSVC buffer security check implementation
The buffer security check is turned on with the '/GS' compiler switch.
* https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/8dbf701c.aspx
* To be added to clang here: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20347
Some overview of buffer security check feature and implementation:
* https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa290051(VS.71).aspx
* http://www.ksyash.com/2011/01/buffer-overflow-protection-3/
* http://blog.osom.info/2012/02/understanding-vs-c-compilers-buffer.html
For the following example:
```
int example(int offset, int index) {
char buffer[10];
memset(buffer, 0xCC, index);
return buffer[index];
}
```
The MSVC compiler is adding these instructions to perform stack integrity check:
```
push ebp
mov ebp,esp
sub esp,50h
[1] mov eax,dword ptr [__security_cookie (01068024h)]
[2] xor eax,ebp
[3] mov dword ptr [ebp-4],eax
push ebx
push esi
push edi
mov eax,dword ptr [index]
push eax
push 0CCh
lea ecx,[buffer]
push ecx
call _memset (010610B9h)
add esp,0Ch
mov eax,dword ptr [index]
movsx eax,byte ptr buffer[eax]
pop edi
pop esi
pop ebx
[4] mov ecx,dword ptr [ebp-4]
[5] xor ecx,ebp
[6] call @__security_check_cookie@4 (01061276h)
mov esp,ebp
pop ebp
ret
```
The instrumentation above is:
* [1] is loading the global security canary,
* [3] is storing the local computed ([2]) canary to the guard slot,
* [4] is loading the guard slot and ([5]) re-compute the global canary,
* [6] is validating the resulting canary with the '__security_check_cookie' and performs error handling.
Overview of the current stack-protection implementation:
* lib/CodeGen/StackProtector.cpp
* There is a default stack-protection implementation applied on intermediate representation.
* The target can overload 'getIRStackGuard' method if it has a standard location for the stack protector cookie.
* An intrinsic 'Intrinsic::stackprotector' is added to the prologue. It will be expanded by the instruction selection pass (DAG or Fast).
* Basic Blocks are added to every instrumented function to receive the code for handling stack guard validation and errors handling.
* Guard manipulation and comparison are added directly to the intermediate representation.
* lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp
* lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp
* There is an implementation that adds instrumentation during instruction selection (for better handling of sibbling calls).
* see long comment above 'class StackProtectorDescriptor' declaration.
* The target needs to override 'getSDagStackGuard' to activate SDAG stack protection generation. (note: getIRStackGuard MUST be nullptr).
* 'getSDagStackGuard' returns the appropriate stack guard (security cookie)
* The code is generated by 'SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp' and 'SelectionDAGISel.cpp'.
* include/llvm/Target/TargetLowering.h
* Contains function to retrieve the default Guard 'Value'; should be overriden by each target to select which implementation is used and provide Guard 'Value'.
* lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
* Contains the x86 specialisation; Guard 'Value' used by the SelectionDAG algorithm.
Function-based Instrumentation:
* The MSVC doesn't inline the stack guard comparison in every function. Instead, a call to '__security_check_cookie' is added to the epilogue before every return instructions.
* To support function-based instrumentation, this patch is
* adding a function to get the function-based check (llvm 'Value', see include/llvm/Target/TargetLowering.h),
* If provided, the stack protection instrumentation won't be inlined and a call to that function will be added to the prologue.
* modifying (SelectionDAGISel.cpp) do avoid producing basic blocks used for inline instrumentation,
* generating the function-based instrumentation during the ISEL pass (SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp),
* if FastISEL (not SelectionDAG), using the fallback which rely on the same function-based implemented over intermediate representation (StackProtector.cpp).
Modifications
* adding support for MSVC (lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp)
* adding support function-based instrumentation (lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp, .h)
Results
* IR generated instrumentation:
```
clang-cl /GS test.cc /Od /c -mllvm -print-isel-input
```
```
*** Final LLVM Code input to ISel ***
; Function Attrs: nounwind sspstrong
define i32 @"\01?example@@YAHHH@Z"(i32 %offset, i32 %index) #0 {
entry:
%StackGuardSlot = alloca i8* <<<-- Allocated guard slot
%0 = call i8* @llvm.stackguard() <<<-- Loading Stack Guard value
call void @llvm.stackprotector(i8* %0, i8** %StackGuardSlot) <<<-- Prologue intrinsic call (store to Guard slot)
%index.addr = alloca i32, align 4
%offset.addr = alloca i32, align 4
%buffer = alloca [10 x i8], align 1
store i32 %index, i32* %index.addr, align 4
store i32 %offset, i32* %offset.addr, align 4
%arraydecay = getelementptr inbounds [10 x i8], [10 x i8]* %buffer, i32 0, i32 0
%1 = load i32, i32* %index.addr, align 4
call void @llvm.memset.p0i8.i32(i8* %arraydecay, i8 -52, i32 %1, i32 1, i1 false)
%2 = load i32, i32* %index.addr, align 4
%arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds [10 x i8], [10 x i8]* %buffer, i32 0, i32 %2
%3 = load i8, i8* %arrayidx, align 1
%conv = sext i8 %3 to i32
%4 = load volatile i8*, i8** %StackGuardSlot <<<-- Loading Guard slot
call void @__security_check_cookie(i8* %4) <<<-- Epilogue function-based check
ret i32 %conv
}
```
* SelectionDAG generated instrumentation:
```
clang-cl /GS test.cc /O1 /c /FA
```
```
"?example@@YAHHH@Z": # @"\01?example@@YAHHH@Z"
# BB#0: # %entry
pushl %esi
subl $16, %esp
movl ___security_cookie, %eax <<<-- Loading Stack Guard value
movl 28(%esp), %esi
movl %eax, 12(%esp) <<<-- Store to Guard slot
leal 2(%esp), %eax
pushl %esi
pushl $204
pushl %eax
calll _memset
addl $12, %esp
movsbl 2(%esp,%esi), %esi
movl 12(%esp), %ecx <<<-- Loading Guard slot
calll @__security_check_cookie@4 <<<-- Epilogue function-based check
movl %esi, %eax
addl $16, %esp
popl %esi
retl
```
Reviewers: kcc, pcc, eugenis, rnk
Subscribers: majnemer, llvm-commits, hans, thakis, rnk
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20346
llvm-svn: 272053
This reverts commit r271962 and reinstantes r271957.
MSVC's linker doesn't appear to like it if you have an empty symbol
substream, so only open a symbol substream if we're going to emit
something about globals into it.
Makes check-asan pass.
llvm-svn: 271965
The code layout that TailMerging (inside BranchFolding) works on is not the
final layout optimized based on the branch probability. Generally, after
BlockPlacement, many new merging opportunities emerge.
This patch calls Tail Merging after MBP and calls MBP again if Tail Merging
merges anything.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20276
llvm-svn: 271925
