1
0
mirror of https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git synced 2024-11-26 04:32:44 +01:00
Commit Graph

1493 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Chris Lattner
13546cb380 Add a bunch more instructions
llvm-svn: 12737
2004-04-07 04:06:46 +00:00
Chris Lattner
a58da750eb Merge my changes with brians
llvm-svn: 12736
2004-04-07 04:05:49 +00:00
Brian Gaeke
ece16e53c4 Add in some things I forgot, which Chris helpfully reminded me of...
llvm-svn: 12735
2004-04-07 04:05:12 +00:00
Brian Gaeke
4b90f62e6d Add support for the "Y" register, used by MUL & DIV.
llvm-svn: 12734
2004-04-07 04:01:11 +00:00
Brian Gaeke
8651efab54 Add UDIV, SDIV, and a few variants of WR.
llvm-svn: 12733
2004-04-07 04:01:00 +00:00
Brian Gaeke
0d35bd3ca9 Preliminary support for getting 64-bit integer constants into registers.
Preliminary support for division. It's gross because you have to initialize
the "Y" register, which is the top 32 bits of the thing you're dividing.

llvm-svn: 12732
2004-04-07 04:00:49 +00:00
Brian Gaeke
2aa3485241 Prune unnecessary #includes
llvm-svn: 12731
2004-04-06 23:25:07 +00:00
Brian Gaeke
c59ef116a2 Simple delay slot filler pass.
llvm-svn: 12730
2004-04-06 23:21:45 +00:00
Brian Gaeke
38ad8d1aea Add references to delay slot filler pass.
Fill in addPassesToJITCompile method.

llvm-svn: 12729
2004-04-06 23:21:24 +00:00
Brian Gaeke
0ee6eb1c1a First attempt at handling frame index elimination.
llvm-svn: 12728
2004-04-06 22:10:22 +00:00
Brian Gaeke
b7f86edbf3 First attempt at special-casing printing of [%reg + offset] for
ld/st instructions - doesn't seem to work yet, but I think it's
just a typo or something somewhere.

llvm-svn: 12727
2004-04-06 22:10:11 +00:00
Brian Gaeke
74d26802a4 Delete reference to "the Mach-O Runtime ABI".
llvm-svn: 12726
2004-04-06 22:09:59 +00:00
Brian Gaeke
da22005285 Deal with call return values.
Don't put NOPs in delay slots at all. We'll have a fix-up pass later.

llvm-svn: 12725
2004-04-06 22:09:23 +00:00
Jakub Staszak
fc0d9bb7e9 file based off InstSelectSimple.cpp, slowly being replaced by generated code from the really simple X86 instruction selector tablegen backend
llvm-svn: 12715
2004-04-06 19:35:17 +00:00
Jakub Staszak
06dc0add14 Tablgen files for really simple instruction selector
llvm-svn: 12714
2004-04-06 19:34:00 +00:00
Chris Lattner
3808778190 Fix PR313: [x86] JIT miscompiles unsigned short to floating point
llvm-svn: 12711
2004-04-06 19:29:36 +00:00
Chris Lattner
993d6106c7 Fix incorrect encoding of some ADC and SBB instuctions
llvm-svn: 12710
2004-04-06 19:20:32 +00:00
Chris Lattner
54e93df11a Fix a minor bug in previous checking
Enable folding of long seteq/setne comparisons into branches and select instructions
Implement unfolded long relational comparisons against a constants a bit more efficiently

Folding comparisons changes code that looks like this:
        mov %EAX, DWORD PTR [%ESP + 4]
        mov %EDX, DWORD PTR [%ESP + 8]
        mov %ECX, %EAX
        or %ECX, %EDX
        sete %CL
        test %CL, %CL
        je .LBB2 # PC rel: F

into code that looks like this:
        mov %EAX, DWORD PTR [%ESP + 4]
        mov %EDX, DWORD PTR [%ESP + 8]
        mov %ECX, %EAX
        or %ECX, %EDX
        jne .LBB2 # PC rel: F

This speeds up 186.crafty by 6% with llc-ls.

llvm-svn: 12702
2004-04-06 17:34:50 +00:00
Chris Lattner
2d9b28ac0b Improve codegen of long == and != comparisons against constants. Before,
comparing a long against zero got us this:

        sub %ESP, 8
        mov DWORD PTR [%ESP + 4], %ESI
        mov DWORD PTR [%ESP], %EDI
        mov %EAX, DWORD PTR [%ESP + 12]
        mov %EDX, DWORD PTR [%ESP + 16]
        mov %ECX, 0
        mov %ESI, 0
        mov %EDI, %EAX
        xor %EDI, %ECX
        mov %ECX, %EDX
        xor %ECX, %ESI
        or %EDI, %ECX
        sete %CL
        test %CL, %CL
        je .LBB2 # PC rel: F

Now it gets us this:

        mov %EAX, DWORD PTR [%ESP + 4]
        mov %EDX, DWORD PTR [%ESP + 8]
        mov %ECX, %EAX
        or %ECX, %EDX
        sete %CL
        test %CL, %CL
        je .LBB2 # PC rel: F

llvm-svn: 12696
2004-04-06 16:02:27 +00:00
Chris Lattner
fd7b570dff Handle various other important cases of multiplying a long constant immediate. For
example, multiplying X*(1 + (1LL << 32)) now produces:

test:
        mov %ECX, DWORD PTR [%ESP + 4]
        mov %EDX, DWORD PTR [%ESP + 8]
        mov %EAX, %ECX
        add %EDX, %ECX
        ret

[[[Note to Alkis: why isn't linear scan generating this code??  This might be a
 problem with your intervals being too conservative:

test:
        mov %EAX, DWORD PTR [%ESP + 4]
        mov %EDX, DWORD PTR [%ESP + 8]
        add %EDX, %EAX
        ret

end note]]]

Whereas GCC produces this:

T:
        sub     %esp, 12
        mov     %edx, DWORD PTR [%esp+16]
        mov     DWORD PTR [%esp+8], %edi
        mov     %ecx, DWORD PTR [%esp+20]
        xor     %edi, %edi
        mov     DWORD PTR [%esp], %ebx
        mov     %ebx, %edi
        mov     %eax, %edx
        mov     DWORD PTR [%esp+4], %esi
        add     %ebx, %edx
        mov     %edi, DWORD PTR [%esp+8]
        lea     %edx, [%ecx+%ebx]
        mov     %esi, DWORD PTR [%esp+4]
        mov     %ebx, DWORD PTR [%esp]
        add     %esp, 12
        ret

I'm not sure example what GCC is smoking here, but it looks like it has just
confused itself with a bunch of stack slots or something.  The intel compiler
is better, but still not good:

T:
        movl      4(%esp), %edx                                 #2.11
        movl      8(%esp), %eax                                 #2.11
        lea       (%eax,%edx), %ecx                             #3.12
        movl      $1, %eax                                      #3.12
        mull      %edx                                          #3.12
        addl      %ecx, %edx                                    #3.12
        ret                                                     #3.12

llvm-svn: 12693
2004-04-06 04:55:43 +00:00
Chris Lattner
6038e5a4a1 Efficiently handle a long multiplication by a constant. For this testcase:
long %test(long %X) {
        %Y = mul long %X, 123
        ret long %Y
}

we used to generate:

test:
        sub %ESP, 12
        mov DWORD PTR [%ESP + 8], %ESI
        mov DWORD PTR [%ESP + 4], %EDI
        mov DWORD PTR [%ESP], %EBX
        mov %ECX, DWORD PTR [%ESP + 16]
        mov %ESI, DWORD PTR [%ESP + 20]
        mov %EDI, 123
        mov %EBX, 0
        mov %EAX, %ECX
        mul %EDI
        imul %ESI, %EDI
        add %ESI, %EDX
        imul %ECX, %EBX
        add %ESI, %ECX
        mov %EDX, %ESI
        mov %EBX, DWORD PTR [%ESP]
        mov %EDI, DWORD PTR [%ESP + 4]
        mov %ESI, DWORD PTR [%ESP + 8]
        add %ESP, 12
        ret

Now we emit:
test:
        mov %EAX, DWORD PTR [%ESP + 4]
        mov %ECX, DWORD PTR [%ESP + 8]
        mov %EDX, 123
        mul %EDX
        imul %ECX, %ECX, 123
        add %ECX, %EDX
        mov %EDX, %ECX
        ret

Which, incidently, is substantially nicer than what GCC manages:
T:
        sub     %esp, 8
        mov     %eax, 123
        mov     DWORD PTR [%esp], %ebx
        mov     %ebx, DWORD PTR [%esp+16]
        mov     DWORD PTR [%esp+4], %esi
        mov     %esi, DWORD PTR [%esp+12]
        imul    %ecx, %ebx, 123
        mov     %ebx, DWORD PTR [%esp]
        mul     %esi
        mov     %esi, DWORD PTR [%esp+4]
        add     %esp, 8
        lea     %edx, [%ecx+%edx]
        ret

llvm-svn: 12692
2004-04-06 04:29:36 +00:00
Chris Lattner
dd0d31ca2a Improve code generation of long shifts by 32.
On this testcase:

long %test(long %X) {
        %Y = shr long %X, ubyte 32
        ret long %Y
}

instead of:
t:
        mov %EAX, DWORD PTR [%ESP + 4]
        mov %EAX, DWORD PTR [%ESP + 8]
        sar %EAX, 0
        mov %EDX, 0
        ret


we now emit:
test:
        mov %EAX, DWORD PTR [%ESP + 4]
        mov %EAX, DWORD PTR [%ESP + 8]
        mov %EDX, 0
        ret

llvm-svn: 12688
2004-04-06 03:42:38 +00:00
Chris Lattner
7eb61104dc Bugfixes: inc/dec don't set the carry flag!
llvm-svn: 12687
2004-04-06 03:36:57 +00:00
Chris Lattner
8cdbb1fe84 Improve code for passing constant longs as arguments to function calls.
For example, on this instruction:

        call void %test(long 1234)

Instead of this:
        mov %EAX, 1234
        mov %ECX, 0
        mov DWORD PTR [%ESP], %EAX
        mov DWORD PTR [%ESP + 4], %ECX
        call test

We now emit this:
        mov DWORD PTR [%ESP], 1234
        mov DWORD PTR [%ESP + 4], 0
        call test

llvm-svn: 12686
2004-04-06 03:23:00 +00:00
Chris Lattner
2738d6d4a4 Emit more efficient 64-bit operations when the RHS is a constant, and one
of the words of the constant is zeros.  For example:
  Y = and long X, 1234

now generates:
  Yl = and Xl, 1234
  Yh = 0

instead of:
  Yl = and Xl, 1234
  Yh = and Xh, 0

llvm-svn: 12685
2004-04-06 03:15:53 +00:00
Chris Lattner
bdbedf9523 Fix typeo
llvm-svn: 12684
2004-04-06 02:13:25 +00:00
Chris Lattner
606639ed1a Add support for simple immediate handling to long instruction selection.
This allows us to handle code like 'add long %X, 123456789012' more efficiently.

llvm-svn: 12683
2004-04-06 02:11:49 +00:00
Chris Lattner
e84f12a165 The sbb instructions really ARE sbb's, not adc's
llvm-svn: 12682
2004-04-06 02:02:11 +00:00
Chris Lattner
0808f5daa5 Implement negation of longs efficiently. For this testcase:
long %test(long %X) {
        %Y = sub long 0, %X
        ret long %Y
}

We used to generate:

test:
        sub %ESP, 4
        mov DWORD PTR [%ESP], %ESI
        mov %ECX, DWORD PTR [%ESP + 8]
        mov %ESI, DWORD PTR [%ESP + 12]
        mov %EAX, 0
        mov %EDX, 0
        sub %EAX, %ECX
        sbb %EDX, %ESI
        mov %ESI, DWORD PTR [%ESP]
        add %ESP, 4
        ret

Now we generate:

test:
        mov %EAX, DWORD PTR [%ESP + 4]
        mov %EDX, DWORD PTR [%ESP + 8]
        neg %EAX
        adc %EDX, 0
        neg %EDX
        ret

llvm-svn: 12681
2004-04-06 01:48:06 +00:00
Chris Lattner
56dcdcf638 Minor tweak to avoid an extra reg-reg copy that the register allocator has to eliminate
llvm-svn: 12680
2004-04-06 01:25:33 +00:00
Chris Lattner
42cf317fca Two changes:
* In promote32, if we can just promote a constant value, do so instead of
    promoting a constant dynamically.
  * In visitReturn inst, actually USE the promote32 argument that takes a
    Value*

The end result of this is that we now generate this:

test:
        mov %EAX, 0
        ret

instead of...

test:
        mov %AX, 0
        movzx %EAX, %AX
        ret

for:

ushort %test() {
        ret ushort 0
}

llvm-svn: 12679
2004-04-06 01:21:00 +00:00
Chris Lattner
9236135e8f Support getelementptr instructions which use uint's to index into structure
types and can have arbitrary 32- and 64-bit integer types indexing into
sequential types.

llvm-svn: 12653
2004-04-05 01:30:19 +00:00
Chris Lattner
c69fd63e82 In the perhaps not-to-distant future, we might support gep instructions that
have non-long indices for sequential types.  In order to avoid trying to figure
out how the v9 backend works, we'll just hack it in the preselection pass.

llvm-svn: 12647
2004-04-04 20:44:05 +00:00
Brian Gaeke
dec12ea71d Add support for many of the MRegisterInfo callbacks.
Eliminating call-frame pseudo instrs and frame indices are still stubs.
Flesh out the emitPrologue method based on better ABI knowledge.

llvm-svn: 12632
2004-04-02 20:53:37 +00:00
Brian Gaeke
b2d36cced3 Add load, store, and NOP instructions.
Fix up comments.

llvm-svn: 12631
2004-04-02 20:53:37 +00:00
Brian Gaeke
741518f9f6 Add support for printing pc-relative displacements of functions (as used in
the CALL instruction).

llvm-svn: 12630
2004-04-02 20:53:35 +00:00
Brian Gaeke
10ab592570 Add support for call instructions (0-ary only for now).
llvm-svn: 12629
2004-04-02 20:53:33 +00:00
Alkis Evlogimenos
27ed33c309 Clean up code a bit.
llvm-svn: 12615
2004-04-02 18:11:32 +00:00
Brian Gaeke
73afcebba1 Only strip symbols if emitting bytecode to the assembly file.
Move lowerselect pass to come after preselection.  Move machine
code construction and stack slots pass to come right before instruction
selection. This is to help fix perlbmk.

Update comments.

Make the sequence of passes in addPassesToJITCompile look more like
the sequence of passes in addPassesToEmitAssembly, including support
for -print-machineinstrs.

llvm-svn: 12614
2004-04-02 17:52:40 +00:00
Brian Gaeke
3fb4f87195 Add support for constant select expressions. Clarify the assertion failure msg.
llvm-svn: 12613
2004-04-02 17:52:29 +00:00
Alkis Evlogimenos
85e007a6dc Fix type in comments
llvm-svn: 12611
2004-04-02 16:02:50 +00:00
Alkis Evlogimenos
84ee10f9e1 Fix type in instruction builder instantiation
llvm-svn: 12610
2004-04-02 15:51:03 +00:00
Alkis Evlogimenos
20b074682c Add more ADC and SBB variants
llvm-svn: 12607
2004-04-02 07:11:10 +00:00
Chris Lattner
ef90bac3e3 Add support for select constant expressions to the CBE, fixing SIOD
llvm-svn: 12589
2004-04-01 05:28:26 +00:00
Chris Lattner
b6e4e5a95e Simplify code by using the more powerful BuildMI forms.
Implement a small optimization.  In test/Regression/CodeGen/X86/select.ll,
we now generate this for foldSel3:

foldSel3:
        mov %AL, BYTE PTR [%ESP + 4]
        fld DWORD PTR [%ESP + 8]
        fld DWORD PTR [%ESP + 12]
        mov %EAX, DWORD PTR [%ESP + 16]
        mov %ECX, DWORD PTR [%ESP + 20]
        cmp %EAX, %ECX
        fxch %ST(1)
        fcmovae %ST(0), %ST(1)
***     fstp %ST(1)
        ret

Instead of:

foldSel3:
        mov %AL, BYTE PTR [%ESP + 4]
        fld DWORD PTR [%ESP + 8]
        fld DWORD PTR [%ESP + 12]
        mov %EAX, DWORD PTR [%ESP + 16]
        mov %ECX, DWORD PTR [%ESP + 20]
        cmp %EAX, %ECX
        fxch %ST(1)
        fcmovae %ST(0), %ST(1)
***     fxch %ST(1)
***     fstp %ST(0)
        ret

In practice, this only effects code size: performance should be basically
unaffected.

llvm-svn: 12588
2004-04-01 04:06:09 +00:00
Chris Lattner
78027ca4ff Wrap at 80 cols
llvm-svn: 12587
2004-04-01 04:03:27 +00:00
Chris Lattner
2e0755a058 Generate slightly smaller code, "test R, R" instead of "cmp R, 0"
llvm-svn: 12579
2004-03-31 22:22:36 +00:00
Chris Lattner
97e8b80649 The X86 backend no longer needs the select lowering pass.
llvm-svn: 12578
2004-03-31 22:03:46 +00:00
Chris Lattner
e5d60adc20 Codegen FP select instructions into X86 conditional moves. Annoyingly enough
the X86 does not support a full set of fp cmove instructions, so we can't always
fold the condition into the select.  :(  Yuck.

llvm-svn: 12577
2004-03-31 22:03:35 +00:00
Chris Lattner
d50df93168 Add support for floating point conditional move instructions
llvm-svn: 12576
2004-03-31 22:02:36 +00:00