The clang frontend helps out GDB by emitting the members of local anonymous
unions as artificial local variables with shared storage. When SROA splits
the storage for artificial local variables that are smaller than the entire
union, the overhang piece will be outside of the allotted space for the
variable and this check fails.
rdar://problem/20730771
llvm-svn: 236124
x86 Windows uses the '_' prefix for all global symbols, and this was
mistakenly being applied to frameescape labels, which are not externally
visible global symbols. They use the private global prefix 'L'.
The *right* way to fix this is probably to stop masquerading this label
as an ExternalSymbol and create a new SDNode type. These labels are not
"external", and we know they will be resolved by assembly time. Having a
custom SDNode type would allow us to do better X86 address mode
matching, so it's probably worth doing eventually.
llvm-svn: 236123
Finish off PR23080 by renaming the debug info IR constructs from `MD*`
to `DI*`. The last of the `DIDescriptor` classes were deleted in
r235356, and the last of the related typedefs removed in r235413, so
this has all baked for about a week.
Note: If you have out-of-tree code (like a frontend), I recommend that
you get everything compiling and tests passing with the *previous*
commit before updating to this one. It'll be easier to keep track of
what code is using the `DIDescriptor` hierarchy and what you've already
updated, and I think you're extremely unlikely to insert bugs. YMMV of
course.
Back to *this* commit: I did this using the rename-md-di-nodes.sh
upgrade script I've attached to PR23080 (both code and testcases) and
filtered through clang-format-diff.py. I edited the tests for
test/Assembler/invalid-generic-debug-node-*.ll by hand since the columns
were off-by-three. It should work on your out-of-tree testcases (and
code, if you've followed the advice in the previous paragraph).
Some of the tests are in badly named files now (e.g.,
test/Assembler/invalid-mdcompositetype-missing-tag.ll should be
'dicompositetype'); I'll come back and move the files in a follow-up
commit.
llvm-svn: 236120
Reg+%g0 is preferred to Reg+imm0 by the manual, and is what GCC produces.
Futhermore, reg+imm is invalid for the (not yet supported) "alternate
address space" instructions.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8753
llvm-svn: 236107
Summary:
The existing code was correct for 32-bit GPR's but not 64-bit GPR's. It now
accounts for both cases.
Reviewers: vkalintiris
Reviewed By: vkalintiris
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mohit.bhakkad, sagar
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9337
llvm-svn: 236099
Summary:
Do the assemble-time shifts from createLShiftOri at the source, which groups all the shifting together, closer to the main logic path, and
store the results in concisely-named variables to improve code clarity.
Reviewers: dsanders
Reviewed By: dsanders
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8973
llvm-svn: 236096
It doesn't have a maintainer and none of the release testers test it,
so I don't think it should be part of the release.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D9331
llvm-svn: 236077
We were trying to look through COPY instructions, but only to the next
instruction in a BB and incorrectly anyway. The cases where that would actually
be a good idea are rare enough (and not even tested!) that it's not worth
trying to get right.
rdar://20721342
llvm-svn: 236050
This is a compromise: with this simple patch, we should always handle a chain of exactly 3
operations optimally, but we're not generating the optimal balanced binary tree for a longer
sequence.
In general, this transform will reduce the dependency chain for a sequence of instructions
using N operands from a worst case N-1 dependent operations to N/2 dependent operations.
The optimal balanced binary tree would reduce the chain to log2(N).
The trade-off for not dealing with longer sequences is: (1) we have less complexity in the
compiler, (2) we avoid unknown compile-time blowup calculating a balanced tree, and (3) we
don't need to worry about the increased register pressure required to parallelize longer
sequences. It also seems unlikely that we would ever encounter really long strings of
dependent ops like that in the wild, but I'm not sure how to verify that speculation.
FWIW, I see no perf difference for test-suite running on btver2 (x86-64) with -ffast-math
and this patch.
We can extend this patch to cover other associative operations such as fmul, fmax, fmin,
integer add, integer mul.
This is a partial fix for:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=17305
and if extended:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=21768https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=23116
The issue also came up in:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D8941
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9232
llvm-svn: 236031
Summary:
We don't seem to need to assert here, since this function's callers expect
to get a nullptr on error. This way we don't assert on user input.
Bug found with AFL fuzz.
Reviewers: rafael
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9308
llvm-svn: 236027
