Currently we can't keep any state in the selector object that we get from
subtarget. As a result we have to plumb through all our variables through
multiple functions. This change makes it non-const and adds a virtual init()
method to allow further state to be captured for each target.
AArch64 makes use of this in this patch to cache a call to hasFnAttribute()
which is expensive to call, and is used on each selection of G_BRCOND.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65984
llvm-svn: 368652
r367088 made it so that funclets store XMM registers into their local
frame instead of storing them to the parent frame. However, that change
forgot to update the parent frame pointer offset for catch blocks. This
change does that.
Fixes crashes when an exception is rethrown in a catch block that saves
XMMs, as described in https://crbug.com/992860.
llvm-svn: 368631
This is infrastructural, will be needed for future work.
For some reason it was only used in MIMG_NoSampler, while
needed everywere we use MIMGBaseOpcode if we want to use
predicates.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66115
llvm-svn: 368626
We need AVX512BW to be able to truncate an i16 vector. If we don't
have that we have to extend i16->i32, then trunc, i32->i8. But we
won't be able to remove the min/max if we do that. At least not
without more special handling.
llvm-svn: 368623
If we're after type legalize, we should make sure we won't create
a store with an illegal type when we separate the AVG pattern
from the truncating store.
I don't know of a way to fail for this today. Just noticed while
I was in the vicinity.
llvm-svn: 368608
This teaches the cost model that the sext or zext of a load is going to be
free.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66006
llvm-svn: 368593
This pass is a port of the according pass from the HSAIL compiler.
It parses printf calls and setup runtime printf buffer.
After that it copies printf arguments to the buffer and fills in
module metadata for runtime.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24035
llvm-svn: 368592
A VDUP will perform a vector broadcast in a single instruction. Update the cost
model for MVE accordingly.
Code originally by David Sherwood.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63448
llvm-svn: 368589
This puts some of the calls in ARMTargetTransformInfo.cpp behind hasNeon()
checks, now that we have MVE, and updates all the tests accordingly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63447
llvm-svn: 368587
Summary:
Ana Pazos reported a bug where we were not checking that an APInt would
fit into 64-bits before calling `getSExtValue()`. This caused asserts when
compiling large constants, such as i128s, as happens when compiling compiler-rt.
This patch adds a testcase and makes the callback less error-prone.
Reviewers: apazos, asb, luismarques
Reviewed By: luismarques
Subscribers: hiraditya, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, Jim, s.egerton, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66081
llvm-svn: 368572
Support -march=tigerlake for x86.
Compare with Icelake Client, It include 4 more new features ,they are
avx512vp2intersect, movdiri, movdir64b, shstk.
Patch by Xiang Zhang (xiangzhangllvm)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65840
llvm-svn: 368543
Due to the nature of the beat system in the MVE architecture, along with tail
predication and low-overhead loops, unrolling has less benefit compared to
normal loops. You can not, for example, hide the latency of a load with other
instructions as you can for scalar code. Preventing unrolling also makes the
code easier to read and reason about.
So if a loop contains vector code, don't enable the runtime unrolling. At least
for the time being.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65803
llvm-svn: 368530
With enough codegen complete, we can now correctly report the number and size
of vector registers for MVE, allowing auto vectorisation. This also allows FP
auto-vectorization for MVE without -Ofast/-ffast-math, due to support for IEEE
FP arithmetic and parity between scalar and vector FP behaviour.
Patch by David Sherwood.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63728
llvm-svn: 368529
Summary:
When exceptions are repeatedly thrown in the middle of handling another
exception, we call `__clang_call_terminate` with the exception pointer
(i32) as an argument. But in case of foreign exceptions, we don't have
the pointer, so we call the function with 0. (This requires
`__clang_call_terminate` can deal with 0 argument, which will be done
later)
But previously the 0 argument was not added as a `i32.const 0` but an
immediate by mistake, causing the `call` instruction to take not an i32
but rather an exnref, because an `exnref` is left on top of the value
stack if `br_on_exn` is not taken.
```
block i32
br_on_exn 0, __cpp_exception
;; exnref is on top of stack now
i32.const 0 ;; This was missing!
call __clang_call_terminate
unreachable
end
call __clang_call_terminate ;; This takes i32 extracted by br_on_exn
```
Reviewers: dschuff
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65475
llvm-svn: 368527
The test case that changed is probably better served through
allowing combineTruncatedArithmetic to create narrow vectors. It
also appears InstCombine would have simplified this test case
to remove the zext and trunc anyway.
llvm-svn: 368522
On SSE41+ targets we always lower vector shuffles to ZERO_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG, even if we don't need the extended bits.
This patch relaxes this so that we lower to ANY_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG if we can, meaning that shuffle combines have a better idea of what elements need to be kept zero. This helps the multiple reduction code as we can now combine away a lot more of the pack+extend codes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65741
llvm-svn: 368515
Summary:
This patch adds a special DAG combine for SSE1 to recognize the IR pattern InstCombine gives us for movmsk. This only does the recognition for a few cases where its obvious the input won't be scalarized resulting in building a vector just do to the movmsk. I've made it separate from our existing matching for movmsk since that's called in multiple places and I didn't spend time to see if the other callers would make sense here. Plus the restrictions and additional checks would complicate that.
This fixes the case from PR42870. Buts its probably still broken the presence of logic ops feeding the movmsk pattern which would further hide the v4f32 type.
Reviewers: spatel, RKSimon, xbolva00
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65689
llvm-svn: 368506
Summary:
On windows if the frame size exceed 4096 bytes, compiler need to
generate a call to _alloca_probe. X86CallFrameOptimization pass
changes the reserved stack size and cause of stack probe function
not be inserted. This patch fix the issue by detecting the call
frame size, if the size exceed 4096 bytes, drop X86CallFrameOptimization.
Reviewers: craig.topper, wxiao3, annita.zhang, rnk, RKSimon
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65923
llvm-svn: 368503
Summary:
Targets often have instructions that can sign-extend certain cases faster
than the equivalent shift-left/arithmetic-shift-right. Such cases can be
identified by matching a shift-left/shift-right pair but there are some
issues with this in the context of combines. For example, suppose you can
sign-extend 8-bit up to 32-bit with a target extend instruction.
%1:_(s32) = G_SHL %0:_(s32), i32 24 # (I've inlined the G_CONSTANT for brevity)
%2:_(s32) = G_ASHR %1:_(s32), i32 24
%3:_(s32) = G_ASHR %2:_(s32), i32 1
would reasonably combine to:
%1:_(s32) = G_SHL %0:_(s32), i32 24
%2:_(s32) = G_ASHR %1:_(s32), i32 25
which no longer matches the special case. If your shifts and extend are
equal cost, this would break even as a pair of shifts but if your shift is
more expensive than the extend then it's cheaper as:
%2:_(s32) = G_SEXT_INREG %0:_(s32), i32 8
%3:_(s32) = G_ASHR %2:_(s32), i32 1
It's possible to match the shift-pair in ISel and emit an extend and ashr.
However, this is far from the only way to break this shift pair and make
it hard to match the extends. Another example is that with the right
known-zeros, this:
%1:_(s32) = G_SHL %0:_(s32), i32 24
%2:_(s32) = G_ASHR %1:_(s32), i32 24
%3:_(s32) = G_MUL %2:_(s32), i32 2
can become:
%1:_(s32) = G_SHL %0:_(s32), i32 24
%2:_(s32) = G_ASHR %1:_(s32), i32 23
All upstream targets have been configured to lower it to the current
G_SHL,G_ASHR pair but will likely want to make it legal in some cases to
handle their faster cases.
To follow-up: Provide a way to legalize based on the constant. At the
moment, I'm thinking that the best way to achieve this is to provide the
MI in LegalityQuery but that opens the door to breaking core principles
of the legalizer (legality is not context sensitive). That said, it's
worth noting that looking at other instructions and acting on that
information doesn't violate this principle in itself. It's only a
violation if, at the end of legalization, a pass that checks legality
without being able to see the context would say an instruction might not be
legal. That's a fairly subtle distinction so to give a concrete example,
saying %2 in:
%1 = G_CONSTANT 16
%2 = G_SEXT_INREG %0, %1
is legal is in violation of that principle if the legality of %2 depends
on %1 being constant and/or being 16. However, legalizing to either:
%2 = G_SEXT_INREG %0, 16
or:
%1 = G_CONSTANT 16
%2:_(s32) = G_SHL %0, %1
%3:_(s32) = G_ASHR %2, %1
depending on whether %1 is constant and 16 does not violate that principle
since both outputs are genuinely legal.
Reviewers: bogner, aditya_nandakumar, volkan, aemerson, paquette, arsenm
Subscribers: sdardis, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, rovka, kristof.beyls, javed.absar, hiraditya, jrtc27, atanasyan, Petar.Avramovic, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61289
llvm-svn: 368487
As discussed on PR42825, if we are inverting the selection mask we can just swap the inputs and avoid the inversion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65522
llvm-svn: 368438
Fast-isel was picking AFGR64 register class for processing call
arguments when +fp64 options was used. We simply check is option +fp64
is used and pick appropriate register.
Patch by Mirko Brkusanin.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65886
llvm-svn: 368433
All TLS access on Darwin is in the "general dynamic" form where we call
a function to resolve the address, so implementation is pretty simple.
llvm-svn: 368418
I've now needed to add an extra parameter to this call twice recently. Not only
is the signature getting extremely unwieldy, but just updating all of the
callsites and implementations is a pain. Putting the parameters in a struct
sidesteps both issues.
llvm-svn: 368408
As loads are combined and widened, we replaced their sext users
operands whereas we should have been replacing the uses of the sext.
I've added a load of tests, with only a few of them originally
causing assertion failures, the rest improve pattern coverage.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65740
llvm-svn: 368404
The only way to generate these was through promoting legalization
of narrow vectors, but we widen those types now. So we shouldn't
produce these nodes.
llvm-svn: 368396
