This is a follow-up for r273544.
The end goal is to get rid of the isSwift / isCortexXY / isWhatever methods.
This commit also removes a command line flag that isn't used in any of the tests:
check-vmlx-hazards. It can be replaced easily with the mattr mechanism, since
this is now a subtarget feature.
There is still some work left regarding FeatureExpandMLx. In the past MLx
expansion was enabled for subtargets with hasVFP2(), until r129775 [1] switched
from that to isCortexA9, without too much justification.
In spite of that, the code performing MLx expansion still contains calls to
isSwift/isLikeA9, although the results of those are pretty clear given that
we're only enabling it for the A9.
We should try to enable it for all targets that have FeatureHasVMLxHazards, as
it seems to be closely related to that behaviour, and if that is possible try to
clean up the MLx expansion pass from all calls to isWhatever. This will require
some performance testing, so it will be done in another patch.
[1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20110418/119725.html
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21798
llvm-svn: 274742
friend definitions.
Based on the experiments Sean Silva and Reid did, this seems the safest
course of action and also will work around a questionable warning
provided by GCC6 on the old form of the code. Thanks for Davide pointing
out the issue and other suggesting ways to fix.
llvm-svn: 274740
Summary:
Adds option -esan-aux-field-info to control generating binary with
auxiliary struct field information.
Extracts code for creating auxiliary information from
createCacheFragInfoGV into createCacheFragAuxGV.
Adds test struct_field_small.ll for -esan-aux-field-info test.
Reviewers: aizatsky
Subscribers: llvm-commits, bruening, eugenis, kcc, zhaoqin, vitalybuka
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22019
llvm-svn: 274726
This check is not only unnecessary, it can produce the wrong result. If we
are linking a single module and it has an exported linkonce symbol, we need
to promote to weak in order to avoid PR19901-style problems.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21917
llvm-svn: 274722
This tests the effect of both promotion and internalization on a module,
and helps show that D21883 is NFC wrt promotion+internalization.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21915
llvm-svn: 274699
By replacing dyn_cast of ConstantInt with m_Zero/m_One/m_AllOnes, we
allow these transforms for splat vectors.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21899
llvm-svn: 274696
xorl + setcc is generally the preferred sequence due to the partial register
stall setcc + movzbl suffers from. As a bonus, it also encodes one byte smaller.
This fixes PR28146.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21774
llvm-svn: 274692
On CPUs with the zero cycle zeroing feature enabled "movi v.2d" should
be used to zero a vector register. This was previously done at
instruction selection time, however the register coalescer sometimes
widened multiple vregs to the Q width because of that leading to extra
spills. This patch leaves the decision on how to zero a register to the
AsmPrinter phase where it doesn't affect register allocation anymore.
This patch also sets isAsCheapAsAMove=1 on FMOVS0, FMOVD0.
This fixes http://llvm.org/PR27454, rdar://25866262
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21826
llvm-svn: 274686
findScratchNonCalleeSaveRegister() just needs a simple liveness
analysis, use LivePhysRegs for that as it is simpler and does not depend
on the kill flags.
This commit adds a convenience function available() to LivePhysRegs:
This function returns true if the given register is not reserved and
neither the register nor any of its aliases are alive.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21865
llvm-svn: 274685
Follow-up from r274465: we don't need to capture the value in these cases,
so just match the constant that we're looking for. m_One/m_Zero work with
vector splats as well as scalars.
llvm-svn: 274670
Added metadata to be able to make statistics on how many functions
that have been imported have been removed. Also module name might
be helpfull when debugging.
Reviewers: tejohnson, eraman
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21943
llvm-svn: 274668
Summary:
Fixes an incorrect assert that fails on 128-bit-sized loads or stores.
Augments the wset tests to include this case.
Reviewers: aizatsky
Subscribers: vitalybuka, zhaoqin, kcc, eugenis, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22062
llvm-svn: 274666
Now with a corrected test to account for a recently supported properties bit in the debug info of a struct.
Original review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21939
This reverts commit 970c3fd497a28d25dd69526eb52594a696c37968.
llvm-svn: 274661
The dse_with_dbg_value.ll test committed with r273141 is removed because this
we no longer performs any type of back tracking, which is what was causing the
codegen differences with and without debug information.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21613
llvm-svn: 274660
Text suggested by Daniel Berlin. While it is likely to be exactly what
the advisory committee would do anyway, codifying it does no harm and
helps reassure people that rare does not mean arbitrary.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21981
llvm-svn: 274659
This is "cvtdq2ps" which does not appear to be particularly slow on any CPU
according to Agner's tables. Choosing "5" as a cost here as suggested in:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=21356
...but it seems very conservative given that the instruction is fully pipelined,
and I think these costs are supposed to model throughput.
Note that related costs are also most likely too high, but this fixes PR21356
and partly fixes PR28434.
llvm-svn: 274658
We were still crashing in the "no change" case because LVI was not
getting invalidated.
See the thread "Should analyses be able to hold AssertingVH to IR?
(related to PR28400)" for more discussion.
llvm-svn: 274656
This logic was introduced in r157663 and does not make any sense to me.
The motivating example in rdar://11538365 looks like this:
This is the tail:
BB#16: derived from LLVM BB %if.end68
Live Ins: %R0 %R4 %R5
Predecessors according to CFG: BB#15 BB#5
tBLXi pred:14, pred:%noreg, <ga:@CFRelease>, %R0<kill>, <regmask>, %LR<imp-def,dead>, %SP<imp-use>, %SP<imp-def>
t2B <BB#20>, pred:14, pred:%noreg
Successors according to CFG: BB#20
This is the predBB:
BB#5:
Live Ins: %R5
Predecessors according to CFG: BB#4
%R4<def> = t2MOVi 0, pred:14, pred:%noreg, opt:%noreg
t2B <BB#16>, pred:14, pred:%noreg
Successors according to CFG: BB#16
However this is invalid machine code to begin with, if %R0 is live-in to
BB#16 then it must be live-in to BB#5 as well if BB#5 does not define
it. We should not need logic to retroactively fix broken machine code
and in fact the example from r157663 passes cleanly with the code
removed and I do not see any (newly) failing tests with the machine
verifier enabled.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22031
llvm-svn: 274655
