The "invariant.load" metadata indicates the memory unit being accessed is immutable.
A load annotated with this metadata can be moved across any store.
As I am not sure if it is legal to move such loads across barrier/fence, this
change dose not allow such transformation.
rdar://11311484
Thank Arnold for code review.
llvm-svn: 176562
This reverts my commit 171047. Now that I've removed my misguided attempt to
support backend warnings, these diagnostics are only about inline assembly.
It would take quite a bit more work to generalize them properly, so I'm
just reverting this.
llvm-svn: 174860
This reverts r171041. This was a nice idea that didn't work out well.
Clang warnings need to be associated with warning groups so that they can
be selectively disabled, promoted to errors, etc. This simplistic patch didn't
allow for that. Enhancing it to provide some way for the backend to specify
a front-end warning type seems like overkill for the few uses of this, at
least for now.
llvm-svn: 174748
into their new header subdirectory: include/llvm/IR. This matches the
directory structure of lib, and begins to correct a long standing point
of file layout clutter in LLVM.
There are still more header files to move here, but I wanted to handle
them in separate commits to make tracking what files make sense at each
layer easier.
The only really questionable files here are the target intrinsic
tablegen files. But that's a battle I'd rather not fight today.
I've updated both CMake and Makefile build systems (I think, and my
tests think, but I may have missed something).
I've also re-sorted the includes throughout the project. I'll be
committing updates to Clang, DragonEgg, and Polly momentarily.
llvm-svn: 171366
Aside from moving the actual files, this patch only updates the build
system and the source file comments under lib/... that are relevant.
I'll be updating other docs and other files in smaller subsequnet
commits.
While I've tried to test this, but it is entirely possible that there
will still be some build system fallout.
Also, note that I've not changed the library name itself: libLLVMCore.a
is still the library name. I'd be interested in others' opinions about
whether we should rename this as well (I think we should, just not sure
what it might break)
llvm-svn: 171359
