Specifically, objc-arc-expand will make sure that the
objc_retainAutoreleasedReturnValue, objc_autoreleaseReturnValue, and ret
will all have %call as an argument.
llvm-svn: 178382
std::lower_bound is the canonical "binary search" in the STL
(std::binary_search generally is not what you want). The name actually
makes a lot of sense (and also has a beautiful symmetry with the
std::upper_bound algorithm). The name is nonetheless non-obvious.
Also, remove mention of "radix search". It's not even clear how that
would work in the context of a sorted vector. AFAIK "radix search" only
makes sense when you have a trie-like data structure.
llvm-svn: 178376
clang.arc.used is an interesting call for ARC since ObjCARCContract
needs to run to remove said intrinsic to avoid a linker error (since the
call does not exist).
llvm-svn: 178369
Like nearbyint, rint can be implemented on PPC using the frin instruction. The
complication comes from the fact that rint needs to set the FE_INEXACT flag
when the result does not equal the input value (and frin does not do that). As
a result, we use a custom inserter which, after the rounding, compares the
rounded value with the original, and if they differ, explicitly sets the XX bit
in the FPSCR register (which corresponds to FE_INEXACT).
Once LLVM has better modeling of the floating-point environment we should be
able to (often) eliminate this extra complexity.
llvm-svn: 178362
A9 uses itinerary classes, Swift uses RW lists. This tripped some
verification when we're expanding variants. I had to refine the
verification a bit.
llvm-svn: 178357
These instructions are available on the P5x (and later) and on the A2. They
implement the standard floating-point rounding operations (floor, trunc, etc.).
One caveat: frin (round to nearest) does not implement "ties to even", and so
is only enabled in fast-math mode.
llvm-svn: 178337
This reverts commit 617330909f0c26a3f2ab8601a029b9bdca48aa61.
It broke the bots:
/home/clangbuild2/clang-ppc64-2/llvm.src/unittests/ADT/SmallVectorTest.cpp:150: PushPopTest
/home/clangbuild2/clang-ppc64-2/llvm.src/unittests/ADT/SmallVectorTest.cpp:118: Failure
Value of: v[i].getValue()
Actual: 0
Expected: value
Which is: 2
llvm-svn: 178334
Mips assembler supports macros that allows the OR instruction
to have an immediate parameter. This patch adds an instruction
alias that converts this macro into a Mips ORI instruction.
Contributer: Vladimir Medic
llvm-svn: 178316
- RDRAND always clears the destination value when a random value is not
available (i.e. CF == 0). This value is truncated or zero-extended as
the false boolean value to be returned. Boolean simplification needs
to skip this 'zext' or 'trunc' node.
llvm-svn: 178312
To enable a load of a call address to be folded with that call, this
load is moved from outside of callseq into callseq. Such a moving
adds a non-glued node (that load) into a glued sequence. This non-glue
load is only removed when DAG selection folds them into a memory form
call instruction. When such instruction selection is disabled, it breaks
DAG schedule.
To prevent that, such moving is disabled when target favors register
indirect call.
Previous workaround disabling CALL32m/CALL64m insn selection is removed.
llvm-svn: 178308
immediate in a register. I don't believe this should ever fail, but I see no
harm in trying to make this code bullet proof.
I've added an assert to ensure my assumtion is correct. If the assertion fires
something is wrong and we should fix it, rather then just silently fall back to
SelectionDAG isel.
llvm-svn: 178305
Mips assembler allows following to be used as aliased instructions:
jal $rs for jalr $rs
jal $rd,$rd for jalr $rd,$rs
This patch provides alias definitions in td files and test cases to show the usage.
Contributer: Vladimir Medic
llvm-svn: 178304
Compiling in 32-bit mode on a P7 would assert after 64-bit DAG combines were
added for bswap with load/store. This is because these combines are really only
valid in 64-bit mode, regardless of the CPU (and this was not being checked).
llvm-svn: 178286
Since we handle optimizable objc_retainBlocks through strength reduction
in OptimizableIndividualCalls, we know that all code after that point
will only see non-optimizable objc_retainBlock calls. IsForwarding is
only called by functions after that point, so it is ok to just classify
objc_retainBlock as non-forwarding.
<rdar://problem/13249661>.
llvm-svn: 178285
