The following transforms are valid if -C is a power of 2:
(icmp ugt (xor X, C), ~C) -> (icmp ult X, C)
(icmp ult (xor X, C), -C) -> (icmp uge X, C)
These are nice, they get rid of the xor.
llvm-svn: 185915
Back in r179493 we determined that two transforms collided with each
other. The fix back then was to reorder the transforms so that the
preferred transform would give it a try and then we would try the
secondary transform. However, it was noted that the best approach would
canonicalize one transform into the other, removing the collision and
allowing us to optimize IR given to us in that form.
llvm-svn: 185808
This transform was originally added in r185257 but later removed in
r185415. The original transform would create instructions speculatively
and then discard them if the speculation was proved incorrect. This has
been replaced with a scheme that splits the transform into two parts:
preflight and fold. While we preflight, we build up fold actions that
inform the folding stage on how to act.
llvm-svn: 185667
I'm reverting this commit because:
1. As discussed during review, it needs to be rewritten (to avoid creating and
then deleting instructions).
2. This is causing optimizer crashes. Specifically, I'm seeing things like
this:
While deleting: i1 %
Use still stuck around after Def is destroyed: <badref> = select i1 <badref>, i32 0, i32 1
opt: /src/llvm-trunk/lib/IR/Value.cpp:79: virtual llvm::Value::~Value(): Assertion `use_empty() && "Uses remain when a value is destroyed!"' failed.
I'd guess that these will go away once we're no longer creating/deleting
instructions here, but just in case, I'm adding a regression test.
Because the code is bring rewritten, I've just XFAIL'd the original regression test. Original commit message:
InstCombine: Be more agressive optimizing 'udiv' instrs with 'select' denoms
Real world code sometimes has the denominator of a 'udiv' be a
'select'. LLVM can handle such cases but only when the 'select'
operands are symmetric in structure (both select operands are a constant
power of two or a left shift, etc.). This falls apart if we are dealt a
'udiv' where the code is not symetric or if the select operands lead us
to more select instructions.
Instead, we should treat the LHS and each select operand as a distinct
divide operation and try to optimize them independently. If we can
to simplify each operation, then we can replace the 'udiv' with, say, a
'lshr' that has a new select with a bunch of new operands for the
select.
llvm-svn: 185415
Changing the sign when comparing the base pointer would introduce all
sorts of unexpected things like:
%gep.i = getelementptr inbounds [1 x i8]* %a, i32 0, i32 0
%gep2.i = getelementptr inbounds [1 x i8]* %b, i32 0, i32 0
%cmp.i = icmp ult i8* %gep.i, %gep2.i
%cmp.i1 = icmp ult [1 x i8]* %a, %b
%cmp = icmp ne i1 %cmp.i, %cmp.i1
ret i1 %cmp
into:
%cmp.i = icmp slt [1 x i8]* %a, %b
%cmp.i1 = icmp ult [1 x i8]* %a, %b
%cmp = xor i1 %cmp.i, %cmp.i1
ret i1 %cmp
By preserving the original sign, we now get:
ret i1 false
This fixes PR16483.
llvm-svn: 185259
Real world code sometimes has the denominator of a 'udiv' be a
'select'. LLVM can handle such cases but only when the 'select'
operands are symmetric in structure (both select operands are a constant
power of two or a left shift, etc.). This falls apart if we are dealt a
'udiv' where the code is not symetric or if the select operands lead us
to more select instructions.
Instead, we should treat the LHS and each select operand as a distinct
divide operation and try to optimize them independently. If we can
to simplify each operation, then we can replace the 'udiv' with, say, a
'lshr' that has a new select with a bunch of new operands for the
select.
llvm-svn: 185257
We may, after other optimizations, find ourselves with IR that looks
like:
%shl = shl i32 1, %y
%cmp = icmp ult i32 %shl, 32
Instead, we should just compare the shift count:
%cmp = icmp ult i32 %y, 5
llvm-svn: 185242
This reverts commit r185099.
Looks like both the ppc-64 and mips bots are still failing after I reverted this
change.
Since:
1. The mips bot always performs a clean build,
2. The ppc64-bot failed again after a clean build (I asked the ppc-64
maintainers to clean the bot which they did... Thanks Will!),
I think it is safe to assume that this change was not the cause of the failures
that said builders were seeing. Thus I am recomitting.
llvm-svn: 185111
This reverts commit r185095. This is causing a FileCheck failure on
the 3dnow intrinsics on at least the mips/ppc bots but not on the x86
bots.
Reverting while I figure out what is going on.
llvm-svn: 185099
The category which an APFloat belongs to should be dependent on the
actual value that the APFloat has, not be arbitrarily passed in by the
user. This will prevent inconsistency bugs where the category and the
actual value in APFloat differ.
I also fixed up all of the references to this constructor (which were
only in LLVM).
llvm-svn: 185095
index greater than the size of the vector is invalid. The shuffle may be
shrinking the size of the vector. Fixes a crash!
Also drop the maximum recursion depth of the safety check for this
optimization to five.
llvm-svn: 183080
as the BinaryOperator, *not* in the block where the IRBuilder is currently
inserting into. Fixes a bug where scalarizePHI would create instructions
that would not dominate all uses.
llvm-svn: 182639
The earlier change list introduced the following inst combines:
B * (uitofp i1 C) —> select C, B, 0
A * (1 - uitofp i1 C) —> select C, 0, A
select C, 0, B + select C, A, 0 —> select C, A, B
Together these 3 changes would simplify :
A * (1 - uitofp i1 C) + B * uitofp i1 C
down to :
select C, B, A
In practice we found that the first two substitutions can have a
negative effect on performance, because they reduce opportunities to
use FMA contractions; between the two options FMAs are often the
better choice. This change list amends the previous one to enable
just these inst combines:
select C, B, 0 + select C, 0, A —> select C, B, A
A * (1 - uitofp i1 C) + B * uitofp i1 C —> select C, B, A
llvm-svn: 182499
There are two transforms in visitUrem that conflict with each other.
*) One, if a divisor is a power of two, subtracts one from the divisor
and turns it into a bitwise-and.
*) The other unwraps both operands if they are surrounded by zext
instructions.
Flipping the order allows the subtraction to go beneath the sign
extension.
llvm-svn: 181668
The shift amount may be larger than the type leading to undefined behavior.
Limit the transform to constant shift amounts. While there update the bits to
clear in the result which may enable additional optimizations.
PR15959.
llvm-svn: 181604
That's obviously wrong. Conservatively restrict it to the sign bit, which
matches the original intention of this analysis. Fixes PR15940.
llvm-svn: 181518
A * (1 - (uitofp i1 C)) -> select C, 0, A
B * (uitofp i1 C) -> select C, B, 0
select C, 0, A + select C, B, 0 -> select C, B, A
These come up in code that has been hand-optimized from a select to a linear blend,
on platforms where that may have mattered. We want to undo such changes
with the following transform:
A*(1 - uitofp i1 C) + B*(uitofp i1 C) -> select C, A, B
llvm-svn: 181216
