The vectorization of first-order recurrences (r261346) caused PR26734. When
detecting these recurrences, we need to ensure that the previous value is
actually defined inside the loop. This patch includes the fix and test case.
llvm-svn: 262624
Summary: This is the last step toward supporting aggregate memory access in instcombine. This explodes stores of arrays into a serie of stores for each element, allowing them to be optimized.
Reviewers: joker.eph, reames, hfinkel, majnemer, mgrang
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17828
llvm-svn: 262530
Summary: This is another step toward improving fca support. This unpack load of array in a series of load to array's elements.
Reviewers: chandlerc, joker.eph, majnemer, reames, hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15890
llvm-svn: 262521
parts of the AA interface out of the base class of every single AA
result object.
Because this logic reformulates the query in terms of some other aspect
of the API, it would easily cause O(n^2) query patterns in alias
analysis. These could in turn be magnified further based on the number
of call arguments, and then further based on the number of AA queries
made for a particular call. This ended up causing problems for Rust that
were actually noticable enough to get a bug (PR26564) and probably other
places as well.
When originally re-working the AA infrastructure, the desire was to
regularize the pattern of refinement without losing any generality.
While I think it was successful, that is clearly proving to be too
costly. And the cost is needless: we gain no actual improvement for this
generality of making a direct query to tbaa actually be able to
re-use some other alias analysis's refinement logic for one of the other
APIs, or some such. In short, this is entirely wasted work.
To the extent possible, delegation to other API surfaces should be done
at the aggregation layer so that we can avoid re-walking the
aggregation. In fact, this significantly simplifies the logic as we no
longer need to smuggle the aggregation layer into each alias analysis
(or the TargetLibraryInfo into each alias analysis just so we can form
argument memory locations!).
However, we also have some delegation logic inside of BasicAA and some
of it even makes sense. When the delegation logic is baking in specific
knowledge of aliasing properties of the LLVM IR, as opposed to simply
reformulating the query to utilize a different alias analysis interface
entry point, it makes a lot of sense to restrict that logic to
a different layer such as BasicAA. So one aspect of the delegation that
was in every AA base class is that when we don't have operand bundles,
we re-use function AA results as a fallback for callsite alias results.
This relies on the IR properties of calls and functions w.r.t. aliasing,
and so seems a better fit to BasicAA. I've lifted the logic up to that
point where it seems to be a natural fit. This still does a bit of
redundant work (we query function attributes twice, once via the
callsite and once via the function AA query) but it is *exactly* twice
here, no more.
The end result is that all of the delegation logic is hoisted out of the
base class and into either the aggregation layer when it is a pure
retargeting to a different API surface, or into BasicAA when it relies
on the IR's aliasing properties. This should fix the quadratic query
pattern reported in PR26564, although I don't have a stand-alone test
case to reproduce it.
It also seems general goodness. Now the numerous AAs that don't need
target library info don't carry it around and depend on it. I think
I can even rip out the general access to the aggregation layer and only
expose that in BasicAA as it is the only place where we re-query in that
manner.
However, this is a non-trivial change to the AA infrastructure so I want
to get some additional eyes on this before it lands. Sadly, it can't
wait long because we should really cherry pick this into 3.8 if we're
going to go this route.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17329
llvm-svn: 262490
As noted in the code comment, I don't think we can do the same transform that we do for
*scalar* integers comparisons to *vector* integers comparisons because it might pessimize
the general case.
Exhibit A for an incomplete integer comparison ISA remains x86 SSE/AVX: it only has EQ and GT
for integer vectors.
But we should now recognize all the variants of this construct and produce the optimal code
for the cases shown in:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26701
llvm-svn: 262424
Summary: SampleProfile pass needs to be performed after InstructionCombiningPass, which helps eliminate un-inlinable function calls.
Reviewers: davidxl, dnovillo
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17742
llvm-svn: 262419
Summary:
This adds the beginning of an update API to preserve MemorySSA. In particular,
this patch adds a way to remove memory SSA accesses when instructions are
deleted.
It also adds relevant unit testing infrastructure for MemorySSA's API.
(There is an actual user of this API, i will make that diff dependent on this one. In practice, a ton of opt passes remove memory instructions, so it's hopefully an obviously useful API :P)
Reviewers: hfinkel, reames, george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17157
llvm-svn: 262362
This patch fixes calculating correct value for builtin_object_size function
when pointer is used only in builtin_object_size function call and never
after that.
Patch by Strahinja Petrovic.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17337
llvm-svn: 262337
The intended effect of this patch in conjunction with:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL259392http://reviews.llvm.org/rL260145
is that customers using the AVX intrinsics in C will benefit from combines when
the load mask is constant:
__m128 mload_zeros(float *f) {
return _mm_maskload_ps(f, _mm_set1_epi32(0));
}
__m128 mload_fakeones(float *f) {
return _mm_maskload_ps(f, _mm_set1_epi32(1));
}
__m128 mload_ones(float *f) {
return _mm_maskload_ps(f, _mm_set1_epi32(0x80000000));
}
__m128 mload_oneset(float *f) {
return _mm_maskload_ps(f, _mm_set_epi32(0x80000000, 0, 0, 0));
}
...so none of the above will actually generate a masked load for optimized code.
This is the masked load counterpart to:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL262064
llvm-svn: 262269
Summary:
I re-benchmarked this and results are similar to original results in
D13259:
On ARM64:
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/solvers/dynprog -59.27%
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/stencils/adi -19.78%
On x86:
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/solvers/dynprog -27.14%
And of course the original ~20% gain on SPECint_2006/456.hmmer with Loop
Distribution.
In terms of compile time, there is ~5% increase on both
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/oourafft and
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Linkpack/linkpack-pc. These are both very tiny
loop-intensive programs where SCEV computations dominates compile time.
The reason that time spent in SCEV increases has to do with the design
of the old pass manager. If a transform pass does not preserve an
analysis we *invalidate* the analysis even if there was *no*
modification made by the transform pass.
This means that currently we don't take advantage of LLE and LV sharing
the same analysis (LAA) and unfortunately we recompute LAA *and* SCEV
for LLE.
(There should be a way to work around this limitation in the case of
SCEV and LAA since both compute things on demand and internally cache
their result. Thus we could pretend that transform passes preserve
these analyses and manually invalidate them upon actual modification.
On the other hand the new pass manager is supposed to solve so I am not
sure if this is worthwhile.)
Reviewers: hfinkel, dberlin
Subscribers: dberlin, reames, mssimpso, aemerson, joker.eph, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16300
llvm-svn: 262250
Summary:
The PS4 linker seems to handle this fine.
Hi David, it seems that indeed most ELF linkers support
__{start,stop}_SECNAME, as our proprietary linker does as well.
This follows the pattern of r250679 w.r.t. the testing.
Maggie, Phillip, Paul: I've tested this with the PS4 SDK 3.5 toolchain
prerelease and it seems to work fine.
Reviewers: davidxl
Subscribers: probinson, phillip.power, MaggieYi
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17672
llvm-svn: 262112
merged into a loop that was subsequently unrolled (or otherwise nuked).
In this case it can't merge in the ASTs for any remaining nested loops,
it needs to re-add their instructions dircetly.
The fix is very isolated, but I've pulled the code for merging blocks
into the AST into a single place in the process. The only behavior
change is in the case which would have crashed before.
This fixes a crash reported by Mikael Holmen on the list after r261316
restored much of the loop pass pipelining and allowed us to actually do
this kind of nested transformation sequenc. I've taken that test case
and further reduced it into the somewhat twisty maze of loops in the
included test case. This does in fact trigger the bug even in this
reduced form.
llvm-svn: 262108
Summary:
Without tree pruning clang has 2,667,552 points.
Wiht only dominators pruning: 1,515,586.
With both dominators & predominators pruning: 1,340,534.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17671
llvm-svn: 262103
The intended effect of this patch in conjunction with:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL259392http://reviews.llvm.org/rL260145
is that customers using the AVX intrinsics in C will benefit from combines when
the store mask is constant:
void mstore_zero_mask(float *f, __m128 v) {
_mm_maskstore_ps(f, _mm_set1_epi32(0), v);
}
void mstore_fake_ones_mask(float *f, __m128 v) {
_mm_maskstore_ps(f, _mm_set1_epi32(1), v);
}
void mstore_ones_mask(float *f, __m128 v) {
_mm_maskstore_ps(f, _mm_set1_epi32(0x80000000), v);
}
void mstore_one_set_elt_mask(float *f, __m128 v) {
_mm_maskstore_ps(f, _mm_set_epi32(0x80000000, 0, 0, 0), v);
}
...so none of the above will actually generate a masked store for optimized code.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17485
llvm-svn: 262064
Summary: Check that we're using SCEV for the same loop we're simulating. Otherwise, we might try to use the iteration number of the current loop in SCEV expressions for inner/outer loops IVs, which is clearly incorrect.
Reviewers: chandlerc, hfinkel
Subscribers: sanjoy, llvm-commits, mzolotukhin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17632
llvm-svn: 261958
Summary:
This is the first simple attempt to reduce number of coverage-
instrumented blocks.
If a basic block dominates all its successors, then its coverage
information is useless to us. Ingore such blocks if
santizer-coverage-prune-tree option is set.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17626
llvm-svn: 261949
The cleanupret instruction has an invariant that it's 'from' operand be
a cleanuppad. This invariant was violated when we removed a dead block
which removed a cleanuppad leaving behind a cleanupret with an undef
'from' operand.
This was solved in r261731 by staving off the removal of the dead block
to a later pass.
However, it occured to me that we do not need to do this.
Instead, we can simply avoid processing the cleanupret if it has an
undef 'from' operand because we know that it will be removed soon.
llvm-svn: 261754
This is part of the payoff for the refactoring in:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL261649http://reviews.llvm.org/rL261707
In addition to removing a pile of duplicated code, the xor case was
missing the optimization for vector types because it checked
"SrcTy->isIntegerTy()" rather than "SrcTy->isIntOrIntVectorTy()"
like 'and' and 'or' were already doing.
This solves part of:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26702
llvm-svn: 261750
This is a part of the refactoring to unify isSafeToLoadUnconditionally and isDereferenceablePointer functions. In subsequent change I'm going to eliminate isDerferenceableAndAlignedPointer from Loads API, leaving isSafeToLoadSpecualtively the only function to check is load instruction can be speculated.
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16180
llvm-svn: 261736
DeleteDeadBlock was called indiscriminately, leading to cleanuprets with
undef cleanuppad references.
Instead, try to drain the BB of most of it's instructions if it is
unreachable. We can then remove the BB if it solely consists of a
terminator (and maybe some phis).
llvm-svn: 261731
Note: The 'and' case in foldCastedBitwiseLogic() is inheriting one extra
check from the nearly identical 'or' case:
if ((!isa<ICmpInst>(Cast0Src) || !isa<ICmpInst>(Cast1Src))
But I'm not sure how to expose that difference in a regression test.
Without that check, the 'or' path will infinite loop on:
test/Transforms/InstCombine/zext-or-icmp.ll
because the zext-or-icmp fold is attempting a reverse transform.
The refactoring should extend to the 'xor' case next to solve part of
PR26702.
llvm-svn: 261707
It is problematic if the inlinee has a cleanupret which unwinds to
caller and we inline it into a call site which doesn't unwind.
If the funclet unwinds anywhere other than to the caller,
then we will give the funclet two unwind destinations.
This will result in a verifier failure.
Seeing as how the caller wasn't an invoke (which would locally unwind)
and that the funclet cannot unwind to caller, we must conclude that an
'unwind to caller' cleanupret is dynamically unreachable.
This fixes PR26698.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17536
llvm-svn: 261656
This is a straight cut and paste of the existing code and is intended to
be the first step in solving part of PR26702:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26702
We should be able to reuse most of this and delete the nearly identical
existing code in visitOr(). Then, we can enhance visitXor() to use the
same code too.
llvm-svn: 261649
Summary:
When we completely unroll a loop, it's pretty easy to update DT in-place and
thus avoid rebuilding it. DT recalculation is one of the most time-consuming
tasks in loop-unroll, so avoiding it at least in case of full unroll should be
beneficial.
On some extreme (but still real-world) tests this patch improves compile time by
~2x.
Reviewers: escha, jmolloy, hfinkel, sanjoy, chandlerc
Subscribers: joker.eph, sanjoy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17473
llvm-svn: 261595
Summary:
Since this is an IR pass it's nice to be able to write tests without
llc. This is the counterpart of the llc test under
CodeGen/PowerPC/loop-data-prefetch.ll.
Reviewers: hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17464
llvm-svn: 261578
