TestWorkspace allows easily writing tests involving multiple
files that can have inclusion relationships between them.
BackgroundIndexTest.RelationsMultiFile is refactored to use
TestWorkspace, and moved to FileIndexTest as it no longer
depends on BackgroundIndex.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89297
It's currently ambiguous in IR whether the source language explicitly
did not want a stack a stack protector (in C, via function attribute
no_stack_protector) or doesn't care for any given function.
It's common for code that manipulates the stack via inline assembly or
that has to set up its own stack canary (such as the Linux kernel) would
like to avoid stack protectors in certain functions. In this case, we've
been bitten by numerous bugs where a callee with a stack protector is
inlined into an __attribute__((__no_stack_protector__)) caller, which
generally breaks the caller's assumptions about not having a stack
protector. LTO exacerbates the issue.
While developers can avoid this by putting all no_stack_protector
functions in one translation unit together and compiling those with
-fno-stack-protector, it's generally not very ergonomic or as
ergonomic as a function attribute, and still doesn't work for LTO. See also:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20200915172658.1432732-1-rkir@google.com/https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200918201436.2932360-30-samitolvanen@google.com/T/#u
Typically, when inlining a callee into a caller, the caller will be
upgraded in its level of stack protection (see adjustCallerSSPLevel()).
By adding an explicit attribute in the IR when the function attribute is
used in the source language, we can now identify such cases and prevent
inlining. Block inlining when the callee and caller differ in the case that one
contains `nossp` when the other has `ssp`, `sspstrong`, or `sspreq`.
Fixes pr/47479.
Reviewed By: void
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87956
There are two optimizations here:
1. Consider the following code:
FCMPSrr %0, %1, implicit-def $nzcv
%sel1:gpr32 = CSELWr %_, %_, 12, implicit $nzcv
%sub:gpr32 = SUBSWrr %_, %_, implicit-def $nzcv
FCMPSrr %0, %1, implicit-def $nzcv
%sel2:gpr32 = CSELWr %_, %_, 12, implicit $nzcv
This kind of code where we have 2 FCMPs each feeding a CSEL can happen
when we have a single IR fcmp being used by two selects. During selection,
to ensure that there can be no clobbering of nzcv between the fcmp and the
csel, we have to generate an fcmp immediately before each csel is
selected.
However, often we can essentially CSE these together later in MachineCSE.
This doesn't work though if there are unrelated flag-setting instructions
in between the two FCMPs. In this case, the SUBS defines NZCV
but it doesn't have any users, being overwritten by the second FCMP.
Our solution here is to try to convert flag setting operations between
a interval of identical FCMPs, so that CSE will be able to eliminate one.
2. SelectionDAG imported patterns for arithmetic ops currently select the
flag-setting ops for CSE reasons, and add the implicit-def $nzcv operand
to those instructions. However if those impdef operands are not marked as
dead, the peephole optimizations are not able to optimize them into non-flag
setting variants. The optimization here is to find these dead imp-defs and
mark them as such.
This pass is only enabled when optimizations are enabled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89415
Runs an executable on a remote host.
This is meant to be used as an executor when running the LLVM and the Libraries tests on a target.
Reviewed By: vvereschaka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89349
Implementation of instructions table.get, table.set, table.grow,
table.size, table.fill, table.copy.
Missing instructions are table.init and elem.drop as they deal with
element sections which are not yet implemented.
Added more tests to tables.s
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89797
This reverts commit b3ca53e14274642274be8fe7db8b43dc3c146366.
This reverts commit 8b7dac81d378c339d3e55f6f51cd0c42803903ad.
This reverts commit 37c030f81a9fdd7a7e1b6fa5407b277c1ab1afa1.
Fixes
$ ninja obj/build/rel/gen/clang-tools-extra/clangd/CompletionModel.CompletionModel.obj
Some tablegen include files from clang/include/clang/AST and
clang/include/clang/Sema need to be generated before CompletionModel is
compiled.
Reviewed By: thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89657
37c030f81a9fdd made it so that depending on //libcxx/include
automatically added the copied header dir to the include search path.
For some reason, clang can't build against the copied libcxx headers
(it complains about ldiv_t not being a type). I don't have a mac
to debug right now, but for the clang target this change was
unintentional anyways -- only depend on the copies target, instead
of on the target that also adjusts the include path.
Currently, a LIT test named directly (on the command line) will
be run even if the name of the test file does not meet the rules
to be considered a test in the LIT test configuration files for
its test suite. For example, if the test does not have a
recognised file extension.
This makes it relatively easy to write a LIT test that won't
actually be run. I did in: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82567
This patch adds an error to avoid users doing that. There is a
small performance overhead for this check. A command line option
has been added so that users can opt into the old behaviour.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83069
LLVM IR currently assumes some form of forward progress. This form is
not explicitly defined anywhere, and is the cause of miscompilations
in most languages that are not C++11 or later. This implicit forward progress
guarantee can not be opted out of on a function level nor on a loop
level. Languages such as C (C11 and later), C++ (pre-C++11), and Rust
have different forward progress requirements and this needs to be
evident in the IR.
Specifically, C11 and onwards (6.8.5, Paragraph 6) states that "An
iteration statement whose controlling expression is not a constant
expression, that performs no input/output operations, does not access
volatile objects, and performs no synchronization or atomic operations
in its body, controlling expression, or (in the case of for statement)
its expression-3, may be assumed by the implementation to terminate."
C++11 and onwards does not have this assumption, and instead assumes
that every thread must make progress as defined in [intro.progress] when
it comes to scheduling.
This was initially brought up in [0] as a bug, a solution was presented
in [1] which is the current workaround, and the predecessor to this
change was [2].
After defining a notion of forward progress for IR, there are two
options to address this:
1) Set the default to assuming Forward Progress and provide an opt-out for functions and an opt-in for loops.
2) Set the default to not assuming Forward Progress and provide an opt-in for functions, and an opt-in for loops.
Option 2) has been selected because only C++11 and onwards have a
forward progress requirement and it makes sense for them to opt-into it
via the defined `mustprogress` function attribute. The `mustprogress`
function attribute indicates that the function is required to make
forward progress as defined. This is sharply in contrast to the status
quo where this is implicitly assumed. In addition, `willreturn` implies `mustprogress`.
The background for why this definition was chosen is in [3] and for why
the option was chosen is in [4] and the corresponding thread(s). The implementation is in D85393, the
clang patch is in D86841, the LoopDeletion patch is in D86844, the
Inliner patches are in D87180 and D87262, and there will be more
incoming.
[0] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=965#c25
[1] https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-October/118558.html
[2] https://reviews.llvm.org/D65718
[3] https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-September/144919.html
[4] https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-September/145023.html
Reviewed By: jdoerfert, efriedma, nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86233
I did some profiling of lit while trying to optimize the libc++ test
startup for remote hosts and it turns out that there is a realpath() call
for every message printed and this shows up in the profile.
The inspect.getframeinfo() function calls realpath() internally and
moreover we don't need most of the other information returned from it.
This patch uses inspect.getsourcefile() and os.path.abspath() to remove
../ from the path instead. Not resolving symlinks reduces the startup time
for running a single test with lit by about 50ms for me.
Reviewed By: ldionne, yln
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89186
In CodeGenDAGPatterns.cpp we were relying upon TypeSize comparison
operators for ordering types, when we can actually just use the known
minimum size since the scalable property is already being taken into
account. Also, in TypeInfer::EnforceSameSize I fixed some implicit
TypeSize->uint64_t casts by changing the code to test the equality
of TypeSize objects instead.
In other places I have replaced calls to getSizeInBits() with
getFixedSizeInBits() because we are only ever expecting integer values.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88947
This makes diffing with the manual tables easier. And if we ever
directly use the autogenerated tables instead of the manual tables
we'll need them to be in sorted order for the binary search.
Apparenlty I added these in https://reviews.llvm.org/rL350628 but
I'm not sure why. They never existed in the CMake build, and now
they're causing trouble.
This patch adds support for assemble disassemble intrinsics
for MMA.
Reviewed By: bsaleil, #powerpc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88739
