Function static variables, typedefs and records (class, struct or union) declared inside
a lexical scope were associated with the function as their parent scope, rather than the
lexical scope they are defined or declared in.
This fixes PR19238
Patch by: amjad.aboud@intel.com
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9758
llvm-svn: 241153
The patch is generated using this command:
tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
llvm/lib/
Thanks to Eugene Kosov for the original patch!
llvm-svn: 240137
This default constructor is a bit weird. It left the range in an invalid
state. That might be reasonable so that you can construct a local
iterator range and assign to it based on some logic to compute the range
you want. If folks would like to support that use case, I can add it
back, but in 238-odd usages none have actually wanted to do this. ;]
llvm-svn: 225592
One of many steps to generalize subprogram emission to both the DWO and
non-DWO sections (to emit -gmlt-like data under fission). Once the
functions are pushed down into DwarfCompileUnit some of the data
structures will be pushed at least into DwarfFile so that they can be
unique per-file, allowing emission to both files independently.
llvm-svn: 219345
Move the iterators into the range the same way the range's ctor moves
them into the members.
Also remove some redundant top level parens in the return statement.
llvm-svn: 205993
Convenience wrapper to make dealing with sub-ranges easier. Like the
iterator_range<> itself, if/when this sort of thing gets standards
blessing, it will be replaced by the official version.
llvm-svn: 205987
proposed std::iterator_pair which was in committee suggested to move
toward std::iterator_range. There isn't a formal paper yet, but there
seems little disagreement within the committee at this point so it seems
fine to provide our own version in the llvm namespace so we can easily
build range adaptors for the numerous iterators in LLVM's interfaces.
Note that I'm not really comfortable advocating a crazed range-based
migration just yet. The range stuff is still in a great deal of flux in
C++ and the committee hasn't entirely made up its mind (afaict) about
how it will work. So I'm mostly trying to provide the minimal
functionality needed to make writing easy and convenient range adaptors
for range based for loops easy and convenient. ;]
Subsequent patches will use this across the fundamental IR types, where
there are iterator views.
llvm-svn: 202686
