There are plenty more instcombines we could probably do with bitreverse, but this seems like a very obvious and trivial starting point and was brought up by Hal in his review.
llvm-svn: 252879
A function can be marked as norecurse if:
* The SCC to which it belongs has cardinality 1; and either
a) It does not call any non-norecurse function. This includes self-recursion; or
b) It only has one callsite and the function that callsite is within is marked norecurse.
a) is best propagated bottom-up and b) is best propagated top-down.
We build up the norecurse attributes bottom-up using the existing SCC pass, and mark functions with no obvious recursion (but not provably norecurse) to sweep later, top-down.
llvm-svn: 252862
The discriminators pass relied on the presence of llvm.dbg.cu to decide
whether to add discriminators, but this fails in the case where debug
info is only enabled partially when -fprofile-sample-use is active.
The reason llvm.dbg.cu is not present in these cases is to prevent
codegen from emitting debug info (as it is only used for the sample
profile pass).
This changes the discriminators pass to also emit discriminators even
when debug info is not being emitted.
llvm-svn: 252763
MIPS32 has instructions for efficient count-leading/trailing-zeros, so this should be
considered a cheap operation (and therefore fair game for speculation) for any MIPS32
implementation.
The net result of allowing this speculation for the regression tests in this patch is
that we get this code:
ctlz:
jr $ra
clz $2, $4
cttz:
addiu $1, $4, -1
not $2, $4
and $1, $2, $1
clz $1, $1
addiu $2, $zero, 32
jr $ra
subu $2, $2, $1
Instead of:
ctlz:
beqz $4, $BB0_2
addiu $2, $zero, 32
clz $2, $4
$BB0_2:
jr $ra
nop
cttz:
beqz $4, $BB1_2
addiu $2, $zero, 32
addiu $1, $4, -1
not $2, $4
and $1, $2, $1
clz $1, $1
addiu $2, $zero, 32
subu $2, $2, $1
$BB1_2:
jr $ra
nop
See D14469 for the larger motivation.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14500
llvm-svn: 252755
Summary:
This change teaches isImpliedCondition to prove things like
(A | 15) < L ==> (A | 14) < L
if the low 4 bits of A are known to be zero.
Depends on D14391
Reviewers: majnemer, reames, hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14392
llvm-svn: 252673
This patch adds a pass for doing PowerPC peephole optimizations at the
MI level while the code is still in SSA form. This allows for easy
modifications to the instructions while depending on a subsequent pass
of DCE. Both passes are very fast due to the characteristics of SSA.
At this time, the only peepholes added are for cleaning up various
redundancies involving the XXPERMDI instruction. However, I would
expect this will be a useful place to add more peepholes for
inefficiencies generated during instruction selection. The pass is
placed after VSX swap optimization, as it is best to let that pass
remove unnecessary swaps before performing any remaining clean-ups.
The utility of these clean-ups are demonstrated by changes to four
existing test cases, all of which now have tighter expected code
generation. I've also added Eric Schweiz's bugpoint-reduced test from
PR25157, for which we now generate tight code. One other test started
failing for me, and I've fixed it
(test/Transforms/PlaceSafepoints/finite-loops.ll) as well; this is not
related to my changes, and I'm not sure why it works before and not
after. The problem is that the CHECK-NOT: of "statepoint" from test1
fails because of the "statepoint" in test2, and so forth. Adding a
CHECK-LABEL in between keeps the different occurrences of that string
properly scoped.
llvm-svn: 252651
ARM V6T2 has instructions for efficient count-leading/trailing-zeros, so this should be
considered a cheap operation (and therefore fair game for speculation) for any ARM V6T2
implementation.
The net result of allowing this speculation for the regression tests in this patch is
that we get this code:
ctlz:
clz r0, r0
bx lr
cttz:
rbit r0, r0
clz r0, r0
bx lr
Instead of:
ctlz:
cmp r0, #0
moveq r0, #32
clzne r0, r0
bx lr
cttz:
cmp r0, #0
moveq r0, #32
rbitne r0, r0
clzne r0, r0
bx lr
This will help solve a general speculation/despeculation problem noted in PR24818:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24818
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14469
llvm-svn: 252639
This is a cleaned up version of a patch by John Regehr with permission. Originally found via the souper tool.
If we add an odd number to x, then bitwise-and the result with x, we know that the low bit of the result must be zero. Either it was zero in x originally, or the add cleared it in the temporary value. As a result, one of the two values anded together must have the bit cleared.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14315
llvm-svn: 252629
AArch64 has instructions for efficient count-leading/trailing-zeros, so this should be
considered a cheap operation (and therefore fair game for speculation) for any AArch64
implementation.
The net result of allowing this speculation for the regression tests in this
patch is that we get this code:
ctlz:
clz w0, w0
ret
cttz:
rbit w8, w0
clz w0, w8
ret
Instead of:
ctlz:
cbz w0, .LBB0_2
clz w0, w0
ret
.LBB0_2:
orr w0, wzr, #0x20
ret
cttz:
cbz w0, .LBB1_2
rbit w8, w0
clz w0, w8
ret
.LBB1_2:
orr w0, wzr, #0x20
ret
See D14469 for the larger motivation.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14505
llvm-svn: 252625
This is fix for PR24059.
When we are hoisting instruction above some condition it may turn out
that metadata on this instruction was control dependant on the condition.
This metadata becomes invalid and we need to drop it.
This patch should cover most obvious places of speculative execution (which
I have found by greping isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute). I think there are more
cases but at least this change covers the severe ones.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14398
llvm-svn: 252604
Summary: Call instructions that are from the same line and same basic block needs to have separate discriminators to distinguish between different callsites.
Reviewers: davidxl, dnovillo, dblaikie
Subscribers: dblaikie, probinson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14464
llvm-svn: 252492
When GlobalOpt splits an internal, global variable with an aggregate type, it
should propagate the externally_initialized flag to the newly created globals.
This makes the pass safe for our downstream use of this flag, while still
allowing some useful optimisations (such as removing dead parts of the split
aggregate) to be performed.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13382
llvm-svn: 252490
Implemented as many of Michael's suggestions as were possible:
* clang-format the added code while it is still fresh.
* tried to change Value* to Instruction* in many places in computeMinimumValueSizes - unfortunately there are several places where Constants need to be handled so this wasn't possible.
* Reduce the pass list on loop-vectorization-factors.ll.
* Fix a bug where we were querying MinBWs for I->getOperand(0) but using MinBWs[I].
llvm-svn: 252469
Summary:
LAA currently generates a set of SCEV predicates that must be checked by users.
In the case of Loop Distribute/Loop Load Elimination, no such predicates could have
been emitted, since we don't allow stride versioning. However, in the future there
could be SCEV predicates that will need to be checked.
This change adds support for SCEV predicate versioning in the Loop Distribute, Loop
Load Eliminate and the loop versioning infrastructure.
Reviewers: anemet
Subscribers: mssimpso, sanjoy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14240
llvm-svn: 252467
Summary:
This change fixes an iterator wraparound bug in
`determinePointerReadAttrs`.
Ideally, ++'ing off the `end()` of an iplist should result in a failed
assert, but currently iplist seems to silently wrap to the head of the
list on `end()++`. This is why the bad behavior is difficult to
demonstrate.
Reviewers: chandlerc, reames
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14350
llvm-svn: 252386
FoldPHIArgZextsIntoPHI cannot insert an instruction after the PHI if
there is an EHPad in the BB. Doing so would result in an instruction
inserted after a terminator.
llvm-svn: 252377
We tried to insert a cast of a phi in a block whose terminator is an
EHPad. This is invalid. Do not attempt the transform in these
circumstances.
llvm-svn: 252370
This marker prevents optimization passes from adding 'tail' or
'musttail' markers to a call. Is is used to prevent tail call
optimization from being performed on the call.
rdar://problem/22667622
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12923
llvm-svn: 252368
The SLPVectorizer had a very crude way of trying to benefit
from associativity: it tried to optimize for splat/broadcast
or in order to have the same operator on the same side.
This is benefitial to the cost model and allows more vectorization
to occur.
This patch improve the logic and make the detection optimal (locally,
we don't look at the full tree but only at the immediate children).
Should fix https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25247
Reviewers: mzolotukhin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13996
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 252337
Summary:
Currently `isImpliedCondition` will optimize "I +_nuw C < L ==> I < L"
only if C is positive. This is an unnecessary restriction -- the
implication holds even if `C` is negative.
Reviewers: reames, majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14369
llvm-svn: 252332
Summary:
This change adds a framework for adding more smarts to
`isImpliedCondition` around inequalities. Informally,
`isImpliedCondition` will now try to prove "A < B ==> C < D" by proving
"C <= A && B <= D", since then it follows "C <= A < B <= D".
While this change is in principle NFC, I could not think of a way to not
handle cases like "i +_nsw 1 < L ==> i < L +_nsw 1" (that ValueTracking
did not handle before) while keeping the change understandable. I've
added tests for these cases.
Reviewers: reames, majnemer, hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14368
llvm-svn: 252331
The bug: I missed adding break statements in the switch / case.
Original commit message:
[SCEV] Teach SCEV some axioms about non-wrapping arithmetic
Summary:
- A s< (A + C)<nsw> if C > 0
- A s<= (A + C)<nsw> if C >= 0
- (A + C)<nsw> s< A if C < 0
- (A + C)<nsw> s<= A if C <= 0
Right now `C` needs to be a constant, but we can later generalize it to
be a non-constant if needed.
Reviewers: atrick, hfinkel, reames, nlewycky
Subscribers: sanjoy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13686
llvm-svn: 252236
Previously, subprograms contained a metadata reference to the function they
described. Because most clients need to get or set a subprogram for a given
function rather than the other way around, this created unneeded inefficiency.
For example, many passes needed to call the function llvm::makeSubprogramMap()
to build a mapping from functions to subprograms, and the IR linker needed to
fix up function references in a way that caused quadratic complexity in the IR
linking phase of LTO.
This change reverses the direction of the edge by storing the subprogram as
function-level metadata and removing DISubprogram's function field.
Since this is an IR change, a bitcode upgrade has been provided.
Fixes PR23367. An upgrade script for textual IR for out-of-tree clients is
attached to the PR.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14265
llvm-svn: 252219
We can often end up with conditional stores that cannot be speculated. They can come from fairly simple, idiomatic code:
if (c & flag1)
*a = x;
if (c & flag2)
*a = y;
...
There is no dominating or post-dominating store to a, so it is not legal to move the store unconditionally to the end of the sequence and cache the intermediate result in a register, as we would like to.
It is, however, legal to merge the stores together and do the store once:
tmp = undef;
if (c & flag1)
tmp = x;
if (c & flag2)
tmp = y;
if (c & flag1 || c & flag2)
*a = tmp;
The real power in this optimization is that it allows arbitrary length ladders such as these to be completely and trivially if-converted. The typical code I'd expect this to trigger on often uses binary-AND with constants as the condition (as in the above example), which means the ending condition can simply be truncated into a single binary-AND too: 'if (c & (flag1|flag2))'. As in the general case there are bitwise operators here, the ladder can often be optimized further too.
This optimization involves potentially increasing register pressure. Even in the simplest case, the lifetime of the first predicate is extended. This can be elided in some cases such as using binary-AND on constants, but not in the general case. Threading 'tmp' through all branches can also increase register pressure.
The optimization as in this patch is enabled by default but kept in a very conservative mode. It will only optimize if it thinks the resultant code should be if-convertable, and additionally if it can thread 'tmp' through at least one existing PHI, so it will only ever in the worst case create one more PHI and extend the lifetime of a predicate.
This doesn't trigger much in LNT, unfortunately, but it does trigger in a big way in a third party test suite.
llvm-svn: 252051
In my previous change to CVP (251606), I made CVP much more aggressive about trying to constant fold comparisons. This patch is a reversal in direction. Rather than being agressive about every compare, we restore the non-block local restriction for most, and then try hard for compares feeding returns.
The motivation for this is two fold:
* The more I thought about it, the less comfortable I got with the possible compile time impact of the other approach. There have been no reported issues, but after talking to a couple of folks, I've come to the conclusion the time probably isn't justified.
* It turns out we need to know the context to leverage the full power of LVI. In particular, asking about something at the end of it's block (the use of a compare in a return) will frequently get more precise results than something in the middle of a block. This is an implementation detail, but it's also hard to get around since mid-block queries have to reason about possible throwing instructions and don't get to use most of LVI's block focused infrastructure. This will become particular important when combined with http://reviews.llvm.org/D14263.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14271
llvm-svn: 252032
Summary:
The goal of this pass is to perform store-to-load forwarding across the
backedge of a loop. E.g.:
for (i)
A[i + 1] = A[i] + B[i]
=>
T = A[0]
for (i)
T = T + B[i]
A[i + 1] = T
The pass relies on loop dependence analysis via LoopAccessAnalisys to
find opportunities of loop-carried dependences with a distance of one
between a store and a load. Since it's using LoopAccessAnalysis, it was
easy to also add support for versioning away may-aliasing intervening
stores that would otherwise prevent this transformation.
This optimization is also performed by Load-PRE in GVN without the
option of multi-versioning. As was discussed with Daniel Berlin in
http://reviews.llvm.org/D9548, this is inferior to a more loop-aware
solution applied here. Hopefully, we will be able to remove some
complexity from GVN/MemorySSA as a consequence.
In the long run, we may want to extend this pass (or create a new one if
there is little overlap) to also eliminate loop-indepedent redundant
loads and store that *require* versioning due to may-aliasing
intervening stores/loads. I have some motivating cases for store
elimination. My plan right now is to wait for MemorySSA to come online
first rather than using memdep for this.
The main motiviation for this pass is the 456.hmmer loop in SPECint2006
where after distributing the original loop and vectorizing the top part,
we are left with the critical path exposed in the bottom loop. Being
able to promote the memory dependence into a register depedence (even
though the HW does perform store-to-load fowarding as well) results in a
major gain (~20%). This gain also transfers over to x86: it's
around 8-10%.
Right now the pass is off by default and can be enabled
with -enable-loop-load-elim. On the LNT testsuite, there are two
performance changes (negative number -> improvement):
1. -28% in Polybench/linear-algebra/solvers/dynprog: the length of the
critical paths is reduced
2. +2% in Polybench/stencils/adi: Unfortunately, I couldn't reproduce this
outside of LNT
The pass is scheduled after the loop vectorizer (which is after loop
distribution). The rational is to try to reuse LAA state, rather than
recomputing it. The order between LV and LLE is not critical because
normally LV does not touch scalar st->ld forwarding cases where
vectorizing would inhibit the CPU's st->ld forwarding to kick in.
LoopLoadElimination requires LAA to provide the full set of dependences
(including forward dependences). LAA is known to omit loop-independent
dependences in certain situations. The big comment before
removeDependencesFromMultipleStores explains why this should not occur
for the cases that we're interested in.
Reviewers: dberlin, hfinkel
Subscribers: junbuml, dberlin, mssimpso, rengolin, sanjoy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13259
llvm-svn: 252017
Summary:
Since now Scalar Evolution can create non-add rec expressions for PHI
nodes, it can also create SCEVConstant expressions. This will confuse
replaceCongruentPHIs, which previously relied on the fact that SCEV
could not produce constants in this case.
We will now replace the node with a constant in these cases - or avoid
processing the Phi in case of a type mismatch.
Reviewers: sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits, majnemer
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14230
llvm-svn: 251938
Commit 251839 triggers miscompiles on some bots:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/perf-x86_64-penryn-O3-polly-fast/builds/13723
(The commit is listed in 13722, but due to an existing failure introduced in
13721 and reverted in 13723 the failure is only visible in 13723)
To verify r251839 is indeed the only change that triggered the buildbot failures
and to ensure the buildbots remain green while investigating I temporarily
revert this commit. At the current state it is unclear if this commit introduced
some miscompile or if it only exposed code to Polly that is subsequently
miscompiled by Polly.
llvm-svn: 251901
This is a redo of r251849 except the tests have been split into arch-specific folders
to hopefully make the bots happy.
This is a follow-up from the discussion in D12965. The block-at-a-time limitation of
SelectionDAG also came up in D13297.
Without the InstCombine change from D12965, I don't expect this patch to make any
difference in the real world because InstCombine does not shrink cases like this in
visitSwitchInst(). But we need to have this CGP safety harness in place before
proceeding with any shrinkage in D12965, so we won't generate extra extends for compares.
I've opted for IR regression tests in the patch because that seems like a clearer way to
test the transform, but PowerPC CodeGen for an i16 widening test is shown below. x86
will need more work to solve: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=22473
Before:
BB#0:
mr 4, 3
extsh. 3, 4
ble 0, .LBB0_5
BB#1:
cmpwi 3, 99
bgt 0, .LBB0_9
BB#2:
rlwinm 4, 4, 0, 16, 31 <--- 32-bit mask/extend
li 3, 0
cmplwi 4, 1
beqlr 0
BB#3:
cmplwi 4, 10
bne 0, .LBB0_12
BB#4:
li 3, 1
blr
.LBB0_5:
rlwinm 3, 4, 0, 16, 31 <--- 32-bit mask/extend
cmplwi 3, 65436
beq 0, .LBB0_13
BB#6:
cmplwi 3, 65526
beq 0, .LBB0_15
BB#7:
cmplwi 3, 65535
bne 0, .LBB0_12
BB#8:
li 3, 4
blr
.LBB0_9:
rlwinm 3, 4, 0, 16, 31 <--- 32-bit mask/extend
cmplwi 3, 100
beq 0, .LBB0_14
...
After:
BB#0:
rlwinm 4, 3, 0, 16, 31 <--- mask/extend to 32-bit and then use that for comparisons
cmpwi 4, 999
ble 0, .LBB0_5
BB#1:
lis 3, 0
ori 3, 3, 65525
cmpw 4, 3
bgt 0, .LBB0_9
BB#2:
cmplwi 4, 1000
beq 0, .LBB0_14
BB#3:
cmplwi 4, 65436
bne 0, .LBB0_13
BB#4:
li 3, 6
blr
.LBB0_5:
li 3, 0
cmplwi 4, 1
beqlr 0
BB#6:
cmplwi 4, 10
beq 0, .LBB0_12
BB#7:
cmplwi 4, 100
bne 0, .LBB0_13
BB#8:
li 3, 2
blr
.LBB0_9:
cmplwi 4, 65526
beq 0, .LBB0_15
BB#10:
cmplwi 4, 65535
bne 0, .LBB0_13
...
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13532
llvm-svn: 251857
To be able to maximize the bandwidth during vectorization, this patch provides a new flag vectorizer-maximize-bandwidth. When it is turned on, the vectorizer will determine the vectorization factor (VF) using the smallest instead of widest type in the loop. To avoid increasing register pressure too much, estimates of the register usage for different VFs are calculated so that we only choose a VF when its register usage doesn't exceed the number of available registers.
This is the second attempt to submit this patch. The first attempt got a test failure on ARM. This patch is updated to try to fix the failure (more specifically, by handling the case when VF=1).
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8943
llvm-svn: 251850
This is a follow-up from the discussion in D12965. The block-at-a-time limitation of
SelectionDAG also came up in D13297.
Without the InstCombine change from D12965, I don't expect this patch to make any
difference in the real world because InstCombine does not shrink cases like this in
visitSwitchInst(). But we need to have this CGP safety harness in place before
proceeding with any shrinkage in D12965, so we won't generate extra extends for compares.
I've opted for IR regression tests in the patch because that seems like a clearer way to
test the transform, but PowerPC CodeGen for an i16 widening test is shown below. x86
will need more work to solve: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=22473
Before:
BB#0:
mr 4, 3
extsh. 3, 4
ble 0, .LBB0_5
BB#1:
cmpwi 3, 99
bgt 0, .LBB0_9
BB#2:
rlwinm 4, 4, 0, 16, 31 <--- 32-bit mask/extend
li 3, 0
cmplwi 4, 1
beqlr 0
BB#3:
cmplwi 4, 10
bne 0, .LBB0_12
BB#4:
li 3, 1
blr
.LBB0_5:
rlwinm 3, 4, 0, 16, 31 <--- 32-bit mask/extend
cmplwi 3, 65436
beq 0, .LBB0_13
BB#6:
cmplwi 3, 65526
beq 0, .LBB0_15
BB#7:
cmplwi 3, 65535
bne 0, .LBB0_12
BB#8:
li 3, 4
blr
.LBB0_9:
rlwinm 3, 4, 0, 16, 31 <--- 32-bit mask/extend
cmplwi 3, 100
beq 0, .LBB0_14
...
After:
BB#0:
rlwinm 4, 3, 0, 16, 31 <--- mask/extend to 32-bit and then use that for comparisons
cmpwi 4, 999
ble 0, .LBB0_5
BB#1:
lis 3, 0
ori 3, 3, 65525
cmpw 4, 3
bgt 0, .LBB0_9
BB#2:
cmplwi 4, 1000
beq 0, .LBB0_14
BB#3:
cmplwi 4, 65436
bne 0, .LBB0_13
BB#4:
li 3, 6
blr
.LBB0_5:
li 3, 0
cmplwi 4, 1
beqlr 0
BB#6:
cmplwi 4, 10
beq 0, .LBB0_12
BB#7:
cmplwi 4, 100
bne 0, .LBB0_13
BB#8:
li 3, 2
blr
.LBB0_9:
cmplwi 4, 65526
beq 0, .LBB0_15
BB#10:
cmplwi 4, 65535
bne 0, .LBB0_13
...
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13532
llvm-svn: 251849
Summary:
This patch adds support to check if a loop has loop invariant conditions which lead to loop exits. If so, we know that if the exit path is taken, it is at the first loop iteration. If there is an induction variable used in that exit path whose value has not been updated, it will keep its initial value passing from loop preheader. We can therefore rewrite the exit value with
its initial value. This will help remove phis created by LCSSA and enable other optimizations like loop unswitch.
Reviewers: sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13974
llvm-svn: 251839
Prevent `createNodeFromSelectLikePHI` from creating SCEV expressions
that break LCSSA.
A better fix for the same issue is to teach SCEVExpander to not break
LCSSA by inserting PHI nodes at appropriate places. That's planned for
the future.
Fixes PR25360.
llvm-svn: 251756
The initial coverage checking code for sample records failed to count
records inside inlined profiles. This change fixes the oversight.
llvm-svn: 251752
attribute is not present.
During my refactor in r251595 I changed the behavior of optimizeSqrt(),
skipping the transformation if the function wasn't marked with unsafe-fp-math
attribute. This fixed a bug, as confirmed by Sanjay (before the optimization
was silently executed anyway), although it wasn't my primary aim.
This commit adds a test to ensure the code doesn't break again.
Reported by: Marcello Maggioni
Discussed with: Sanjay Patel
llvm-svn: 251747
