Summary:
When building with a Default Target set we can experience issues
in the DWARF DebugInfo unit tests because:
They assume we can generate object files for the host platform.
Some tests assume the endianess of the target we are generating
DWARF for and the host match.
This patch correct these issues by ensuring the tests which
generate objects in memory are run with respect to
LVM_DEFAULT_TARGET_TRIPLE and it's endianess.
We also make sure we don't use the hosts address size for line test
and split the triple util function in DwarfUtils into a version
that takes an address size and one that doesn't.
See also for discussion:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-March/131212.html
Patch by: daltenty
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62084
llvm-svn: 362454
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Whilst working on improvements to the error handling of the debug line
parsing code, I noticed that if an invalid offset were to be specified
in a call to getOrParseLineTable(), an entry in the LineTableMap would
still be created, even if the offset was not within the section range.
The immediate parsing attempt afterwards would fail (it would end up
getting a version of 0), and thereafter, any subsequent calls to
getOrParseLineTable or getLineTable would return the default-
constructed, invalid line table. In reality, we shouldn't even attempt
to parse this table, and we should always return a nullptr from these
two functions for this situation.
I have tested this via a unit test, which required some new framework
for unit testing debug line. My plan is to add quite a few more unit
tests for the new error reporting mechanism that will follow shortly,
hence the reason why the supporting code for the tests are written the
way they are - I intend to extend the DwarfGenerator class to support
generating debug line. At that point, I'll make sure that there are a
few positive test cases for this and the parsing code too.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44200
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, aprantl
llvm-svn: 326995
