It's currently ambiguous in IR whether the source language explicitly
did not want a stack a stack protector (in C, via function attribute
no_stack_protector) or doesn't care for any given function.
It's common for code that manipulates the stack via inline assembly or
that has to set up its own stack canary (such as the Linux kernel) would
like to avoid stack protectors in certain functions. In this case, we've
been bitten by numerous bugs where a callee with a stack protector is
inlined into an __attribute__((__no_stack_protector__)) caller, which
generally breaks the caller's assumptions about not having a stack
protector. LTO exacerbates the issue.
While developers can avoid this by putting all no_stack_protector
functions in one translation unit together and compiling those with
-fno-stack-protector, it's generally not very ergonomic or as
ergonomic as a function attribute, and still doesn't work for LTO. See also:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20200915172658.1432732-1-rkir@google.com/https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200918201436.2932360-30-samitolvanen@google.com/T/#u
Typically, when inlining a callee into a caller, the caller will be
upgraded in its level of stack protection (see adjustCallerSSPLevel()).
By adding an explicit attribute in the IR when the function attribute is
used in the source language, we can now identify such cases and prevent
inlining. Block inlining when the callee and caller differ in the case that one
contains `nossp` when the other has `ssp`, `sspstrong`, or `sspreq`.
Fixes pr/47479.
Reviewed By: void
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87956
As discussed in
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-July/143801.html.
Currently no users outside of unit tests.
Replace all instances in tests of -constprop with -instsimplify.
Notable changes in tests:
* vscale.ll - @llvm.sadd.sat.nxv16i8 is evaluated by instsimplify, use a fake intrinsic instead
* InsertElement.ll - insertelement undef is removed by instsimplify in @insertelement_undef
llvm/test/Transforms/ConstProp moved to llvm/test/Transforms/InstSimplify/ConstProp
Reviewed By: lattner, nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85159
This reverts commit 59d6e814ce0e7b40b7cc3ab136b9af2ffab9c6f8.
The cause for the revert (3 clang tests running opt -ipconstprop) was
fixed by removing those lines.
As far as I know, ipconstprop has not been used in years and ipsccp has
been used instead. This has the potential for confusion and sometimes
leads people to spend time finding & reporting bugs as well as
updating it to work with the latest API changes.
This patch moves the tests over to SCCP. There's one functional difference
I am aware of: ipconstprop propagates for each call-site individually, so
for functions that are called with different constant arguments it can sometimes
produce better results than ipsccp (at much higher compile-time cost).But
IPSCCP can be thought to do so as well for internal functions and as mentioned
earlier, the pass seems unused in practice (and there are no plans on working
towards enabling it anytime).
Also discussed on llvm-dev:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-July/143773.html
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84447
This is part of PR44213 https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44213
When importing (system) Clang modules, LLDB needs to know which SDK
(e.g., MacOSX, iPhoneSimulator, ...) they came from. While the sysroot
attribute contains the absolute path to the SDK, this doesn't work
well when the debugger is run on a different machine than the
compiler, and the SDKs are installed in different directories. It thus
makes sense to just store the name of the SDK instead of the absolute
path, so it can be found relative to LLDB.
rdar://problem/51645582
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75646
This patch adds bindings to C and Go for
addCoroutinePassesToExtensionPoints, which is used to add coroutine
passes to the correct locations in PassManagerBuilder.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51642
And add llvm-go back to the test dependencies.
No longer necessary now that llvm-go has been brought back.
This reverts commit e8f8873da5eaad187f82dad78ebdb3ab3df22b36.
Basically change the layout to please `go build` and remove references to
`llvm-go`.
Update llvm/test/Bindings/Go/ to use the system go compiler
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74540
[this re-applies c0176916a4824812d25a5a22c4ff7c95857b0cd6
with the correct commit message and phabricator link]
This addresses point 1 of PR44213.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44213
The DW_AT_LLVM_sysroot attribute is used for Clang module debug info,
to allow LLDB to import a Clang module from source. Currently it is
part of each DW_TAG_module, however, it is the same for all modules in
a compile unit. It is more efficient and less ambiguous to store it
once in the DW_TAG_compile_unit.
This should have no effect on DWARF consumers other than LLDB.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71732
This is a purely cosmetic change that is NFC in terms of the binary
output. I bugs me that I called the attribute DW_AT_LLVM_isysroot
since the "i" is an artifact of GCC command line option syntax
(-isysroot is in the category of -i options) and doesn't carry any
useful information otherwise.
This attribute only appears in Clang module debug info.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71722
This revision is revised to update Go-bindings and Release Notes.
The original commit message follows.
This patch, adds support for DW_AT_alignment[DWARF5] attribute, to be emitted with typdef DIE.
When explicit alignment is specified.
Patch by Awanish Pandey <Awanish.Pandey@amd.com>
Reviewers: aprantl, dblaikie, jini.susan.george, SouraVX, alok,
deadalinx
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70111
DIFlagBlockByRefStruct is an unused DIFlag that originally was used by
clang to express (Objective-)C block captures in debug info. For the
last year Clang has been emitting complex DIExpressions to describe
block captures instead, which makes all the code supporting this flag
redundant.
This patch removes the flag and all supporting "dead" code, so we can
reuse the bit for something else in the future.
Since this only affects debug info generated by Clang with the block
extension this mostly affects Apple platforms and I don't have any
bitcode compatibility concerns for removing this. The Verifier will
reject debug info that uses the bit and thus degrade gracefully when
LTO'ing older bitcode with a newer compiler.
rdar://problem/44304813
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67453
llvm-svn: 372272
Introduce the debug info flag that indicates that a parameter has unchanged
value throughout a function. This info will be used to emit the expressions
with DW_OP_entry_value.
([4/13] Introduce the debug entry values.)
Co-authored-by: Ananth Sowda <asowda@cisco.com>
Co-authored-by: Nikola Prica <nikola.prica@rt-rk.com>
Co-authored-by: Ivan Baev <ibaev@cisco.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58034
llvm-svn: 364406
Add debug information accessors, as provided in the following patches:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D46627 (DILocation)
https://reviews.llvm.org/D52693 metadata kind
https://reviews.llvm.org/D60481 get/set debug location on a Value
https://reviews.llvm.org/D60489 (DIScope)
The API as proposed in this patch is similar to the current Value API,
with a single root type and methods that are only valid for certain
subclasses. I have considered just implementing generic Line() calls
(that are valid on all DINodes that have a line) but the implementation
of that got a bit awkward without support from the C API. I've also
considered creating generic getters like a Metadata.DebugLoc() that
returns a DebugLoc, but there is a mismatch between the Go DI nodes in
the LLVM API and the actual DINode class hierarchy, so that's also hard
to get right (without being confusing or breaking the API).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63056
llvm-svn: 364198
Run go fmt (version 1.12) over the Go bindings. This cleans up lots of
inconsistencies in the code, it does not change the code in a functional
way.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63057
llvm-svn: 363148
Add bindings so that predicates on comparisons (icmp/fcmp) can be
inspected from IR.
Note: I considered adding Value.ICmpPredicate() etc. instead but
Value.IntPredicate() seemed easier to read and matches the name of the
returned type.
(This change was also pushed two commits ago but accidentally had the
wrong title and description.)
Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53884
llvm-svn: 362893
This is very useful for inspecting generated IR, there appears to be no
other way to get the called function from a CallInst.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52972
llvm-svn: 362891
This is very useful for inspecting generated IR, there appears to be no
other way to get the called function from a CallInst.
Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52972
llvm-svn: 362890
Summary:
The patch in https://reviews.llvm.org/D53883 (by me) fails to build on 32-bit systems like ARM. Fix the array size to be less ridiculously large. 2<<20 should still be enough for all practical purposes.
Bug: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40426
Reviewers: whitequark, pcc
Reviewed By: whitequark
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58030
llvm-svn: 354207
This is the second attempt to port ASan to new PM after D52739. This takes the
initialization requried by ASan from the Module by moving it into a separate
class with it's own analysis that the new PM ASan can use.
Changes:
- Split AddressSanitizer into 2 passes: 1 for the instrumentation on the
function, and 1 for the pass itself which creates an instance of the first
during it's run. The same is done for AddressSanitizerModule.
- Add new PM AddressSanitizer and AddressSanitizerModule.
- Add legacy and new PM analyses for reading data needed to initialize ASan with.
- Removed DominatorTree dependency from ASan since it was unused.
- Move GlobalsMetadata and ShadowMapping out of anonymous namespace since the
new PM analysis holds these 2 classes and will need to expose them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56470
llvm-svn: 353985
The test started failing for me recently. I don't see any changes around
this code, so maybe it's my local go version that changed or something.
The error seems real to me: we're trying to print an Attribute with %d.
The test talks about "attribute masks" I'm not sure what that refers to,
but I suppose we could print the raw pointer value, since that's
what the test seems to be comparing.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57672
llvm-svn: 353155
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
Second iteration of D56433 which got reverted in rL350719. The problem
in the previous version was that we dropped the thunk calling the tsan init
function. The new version keeps the thunk which should appease dyld, but is not
actually OK wrt. the current semantics of function passes. Hence, add a
helper to insert the functions only on the first time. The helper
allows hooking into the insertion to be able to append them to the
global ctors list.
Reviewers: chandlerc, vitalybuka, fedor.sergeev, leonardchan
Subscribers: hiraditya, bollu, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56538
llvm-svn: 351314
Summary:
Keeping msan a function pass requires replacing the module level initialization:
That means, don't define a ctor function which calls __msan_init, instead just
declare the init function at the first access, and add that to the global ctors
list.
Changes:
- Pull the actual sanitizer and the wrapper pass apart.
- Add a newpm msan pass. The function pass inserts calls to runtime
library functions, for which it inserts declarations as necessary.
- Update tests.
Caveats:
- There is one test that I dropped, because it specifically tested the
definition of the ctor.
Reviewers: chandlerc, fedor.sergeev, leonardchan, vitalybuka
Subscribers: sdardis, nemanjai, javed.absar, hiraditya, kbarton, bollu, atanasyan, jsji
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55647
llvm-svn: 350305
Summary: This instruction is useful for inspecting extractvalue/insertvalue in IR. Unlike most other operations, indices cannot be inspected using the generic Value.Opcode() function so a specialized function needs to be added.
Reviewers: whitequark, pcc
Reviewed By: whitequark
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53883
llvm-svn: 346388
