The behavior of {MIN,MAX}NAN differs from that of {MIN,MAX}NUM when only
one of the inputs is NaN: -NUM will return the non-NaN argument while
-NAN would return NaN.
It is desirable to lower to @llvm.{min,max}num to -NAN if they don't
have a native instruction for -NUM. Notably, ARMv7 NEON's vmin has the
-NAN semantics.
N.B. Of course, it is only safe to do this if the intrinsic call is
marked nnan.
llvm-svn: 266279
Vectorization cost of uniform load wasn't correctly calculated.
As a result, a simple loop that loads a uniform value wasn't vectorized.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18940
llvm-svn: 265901
InstCombine cannot effectively remove redundant assumptions without them
registered in the assumption cache. The vectorizer can create identical
assumptions but doesn't register them with the cache, resulting in
slower compile times because InstCombine tries to reason about a lot
more assumptions.
Fix this by registering the cloned assumptions.
llvm-svn: 265800
This re-commits r265535 which was reverted in r265541 because it
broke the windows bots. The problem was that we had a PointerIntPair
which took a pointer to a struct allocated with new. The problem
was that new doesn't provide sufficient alignment guarantees.
This pattern was already present before r265535 and it just happened
to work. To fix this, we now separate the PointerToIntPair from the
ExitNotTakenInfo struct into a pointer and a bool.
Original commit message:
Summary:
When the backedge taken codition is computed from an icmp, SCEV can
deduce the backedge taken count only if one of the sides of the icmp
is an AddRecExpr. However, due to sign/zero extensions, we sometimes
end up with something that is not an AddRecExpr.
However, we can use SCEV predicates to produce a 'guarded' expression.
This change adds a method to SCEV to get this expression, and the
SCEV predicate associated with it.
In HowManyGreaterThans and HowManyLessThans we will now add a SCEV
predicate associated with the guarded backedge taken count when the
analyzed SCEV expression is not an AddRecExpr. Note that we only do
this as an alternative to returning a 'CouldNotCompute'.
We use new feature in Loop Access Analysis and LoopVectorize to analyze
and transform more loops.
Reviewers: anemet, mzolotukhin, hfinkel, sanjoy
Subscribers: flyingforyou, mcrosier, atrick, mssimpso, sanjoy, mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17201
llvm-svn: 265786
Summary:
When the backedge taken codition is computed from an icmp, SCEV can
deduce the backedge taken count only if one of the sides of the icmp
is an AddRecExpr. However, due to sign/zero extensions, we sometimes
end up with something that is not an AddRecExpr.
However, we can use SCEV predicates to produce a 'guarded' expression.
This change adds a method to SCEV to get this expression, and the
SCEV predicate associated with it.
In HowManyGreaterThans and HowManyLessThans we will now add a SCEV
predicate associated with the guarded backedge taken count when the
analyzed SCEV expression is not an AddRecExpr. Note that we only do
this as an alternative to returning a 'CouldNotCompute'.
We use new feature in Loop Access Analysis and LoopVectorize to analyze
and transform more loops.
Reviewers: anemet, mzolotukhin, hfinkel, sanjoy
Subscribers: flyingforyou, mcrosier, atrick, mssimpso, sanjoy, mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17201
llvm-svn: 265535
A catchswitch cannot be preceded by another instruction in the same
basic block (other than a PHI node).
Instead, insert the extract element right after the materialization of
the vectorized value. This isn't optimal but is a reasonable compromise
given the constraints of WinEH.
This fixes PR27163.
llvm-svn: 265157
This change prevents the loop vectorizer from vectorizing when all of the vector
types it generates will be scalarized. I've run into this problem on the PPC's QPX
vector ISA, which only holds floating-point vector types. The loop vectorizer
will, however, happily vectorize loops with purely integer computation. Here's
an example:
LV: The Smallest and Widest types: 32 / 32 bits.
LV: The Widest register is: 256 bits.
LV: Found an estimated cost of 0 for VF 1 For instruction: %indvars.iv25 = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %indvars.iv.next26, %for.body ]
LV: Found an estimated cost of 0 for VF 1 For instruction: %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds [1600 x i32], [1600 x i32]* %a, i64 0, i64 %indvars.iv25
LV: Found an estimated cost of 0 for VF 1 For instruction: %2 = trunc i64 %indvars.iv25 to i32
LV: Found an estimated cost of 1 for VF 1 For instruction: store i32 %2, i32* %arrayidx, align 4
LV: Found an estimated cost of 1 for VF 1 For instruction: %indvars.iv.next26 = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv25, 1
LV: Found an estimated cost of 1 for VF 1 For instruction: %exitcond27 = icmp eq i64 %indvars.iv.next26, 1600
LV: Found an estimated cost of 0 for VF 1 For instruction: br i1 %exitcond27, label %for.cond.cleanup, label %for.body
LV: Scalar loop costs: 3.
LV: Found an estimated cost of 0 for VF 2 For instruction: %indvars.iv25 = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %indvars.iv.next26, %for.body ]
LV: Found an estimated cost of 0 for VF 2 For instruction: %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds [1600 x i32], [1600 x i32]* %a, i64 0, i64 %indvars.iv25
LV: Found an estimated cost of 0 for VF 2 For instruction: %2 = trunc i64 %indvars.iv25 to i32
LV: Found an estimated cost of 2 for VF 2 For instruction: store i32 %2, i32* %arrayidx, align 4
LV: Found an estimated cost of 1 for VF 2 For instruction: %indvars.iv.next26 = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv25, 1
LV: Found an estimated cost of 1 for VF 2 For instruction: %exitcond27 = icmp eq i64 %indvars.iv.next26, 1600
LV: Found an estimated cost of 0 for VF 2 For instruction: br i1 %exitcond27, label %for.cond.cleanup, label %for.body
LV: Vector loop of width 2 costs: 2.
LV: Found an estimated cost of 0 for VF 4 For instruction: %indvars.iv25 = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %indvars.iv.next26, %for.body ]
LV: Found an estimated cost of 0 for VF 4 For instruction: %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds [1600 x i32], [1600 x i32]* %a, i64 0, i64 %indvars.iv25
LV: Found an estimated cost of 0 for VF 4 For instruction: %2 = trunc i64 %indvars.iv25 to i32
LV: Found an estimated cost of 4 for VF 4 For instruction: store i32 %2, i32* %arrayidx, align 4
LV: Found an estimated cost of 1 for VF 4 For instruction: %indvars.iv.next26 = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv25, 1
LV: Found an estimated cost of 1 for VF 4 For instruction: %exitcond27 = icmp eq i64 %indvars.iv.next26, 1600
LV: Found an estimated cost of 0 for VF 4 For instruction: br i1 %exitcond27, label %for.cond.cleanup, label %for.body
LV: Vector loop of width 4 costs: 1.
...
LV: Selecting VF: 8.
LV: The target has 32 registers
LV(REG): Calculating max register usage:
LV(REG): At #0 Interval # 0
LV(REG): At #1 Interval # 1
LV(REG): At #2 Interval # 2
LV(REG): At #4 Interval # 1
LV(REG): At #5 Interval # 1
LV(REG): VF = 8
The problem is that the cost model here is not wrong, exactly. Since all of
these operations are scalarized, their cost (aside from the uniform ones) are
indeed VF*(scalar cost), just as the model suggests. In fact, the larger the VF
picked, the lower the relative overhead from the loop itself (and the
induction-variable update and check), and so in a sense, picking the largest VF
here is the right thing to do.
The problem is that vectorizing like this, where all of the vectors will be
scalarized in the backend, isn't really vectorizing, but rather interleaving.
By itself, this would be okay, but then the vectorizer itself also interleaves,
and that's where the problem manifests itself. There's aren't actually enough
scalar registers to support the normal interleave factor multiplied by a factor
of VF (8 in this example). In other words, the problem with this is that our
register-pressure heuristic does not account for scalarization.
While we might want to improve our register-pressure heuristic, I don't think
this is the right motivating case for that work. Here we have a more-basic
problem: The job of the vectorizer is to vectorize things (interleaving aside),
and if the IR it generates won't generate any actual vector code, then
something is wrong. Thus, if every type looks like it will be scalarized (i.e.
will be split into VF or more parts), then don't consider that VF.
This is not a problem specific to PPC/QPX, however. The problem comes up under
SSE on x86 too, and as such, this change fixes PR26837 too. I've added Sanjay's
reduced test case from PR26837 to this commit.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18537
llvm-svn: 264904
These checks are redundant and can be removed
Reviewers: hans
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mzolotukhin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18564
llvm-svn: 264872
Summary:
Use the new LoopVersioning facility (D16712) to add noalias metadata in
the vector loop if we versioned with memchecks. This can enable some
optimization opportunities further down the pipeline (see the included
test or the benchmark improvement quoted in D16712).
The test also covers the bug I had in the initial version in D16712.
The vectorizer did not previously use LoopVersioning. The reason is
that the vectorizer performs its transformations in single shot. It
creates an empty single-block vector loop that it then populates with
the widened, if-converted instructions. Thus creating an intermediate
versioned scalar loop seems wasteful.
So this patch (rather than bringing in LoopVersioning fully) adds a
special interface to LoopVersioning to allow the vectorizer to add
no-alias annotation while still performing its own versioning.
As the vectorizer propagates metadata from the instructions in the
original loop to the vector instructions we also check the pointer in
the original instruction and see if LoopVersioning can add no-alias
metadata based on the issued memchecks.
Reviewers: hfinkel, nadav, mzolotukhin
Subscribers: mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17191
llvm-svn: 263744
This was a latent bug that got exposed by the change to add LoopSimplify
as a dependence to LoopLoadElimination. Since LoopInfo was corrupted
after LV, LoopSimplify mis-compiled nbench in the test-suite (more
details in the PR).
The problem was that when we create the blocks for predicated stores we
didn't add those to any loops.
The original testcase for store predication provides coverage for this
assuming we verify LI on the way out of LV.
Fixes PR26952.
llvm-svn: 263565
commit ae14bf6488e8441f0f6d74f00455555f6f3943ac
Author: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
Date: Fri Mar 11 17:15:50 2016 +0000
Remove PreserveNames template parameter from IRBuilder
Summary:
Following r263086, we are now relying on a flag on the Context to
discard Value names in release builds.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18023
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@263258
91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
until we can figure out what to do about clang and Release build testing.
This reverts commit 263258.
llvm-svn: 263321
Summary:
Following r263086, we are now relying on a flag on the Context to
discard Value names in release builds.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18023
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 263258
MinVecRegSize is currently hardcoded to 128; this patch adds a cl::opt
to allow changing it. I tried not to change any existing behavior for the default
case.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13278
llvm-svn: 263089
I missed == and != when I removed implicit conversions between iterators
and pointers in r252380 since they were defined outside ilist_iterator.
Since they depend on getNodePtrUnchecked(), they indirectly rely on UB.
This commit removes all uses of these operators. (I'll delete the
operators themselves in a separate commit so that it can be easily
reverted if necessary.)
There should be NFC here.
llvm-svn: 261498
This patch enables the vectorization of first-order recurrences. A first-order
recurrence is a non-reduction recurrence relation in which the value of the
recurrence in the current loop iteration equals a value defined in the previous
iteration. The load PRE of the GVN pass often creates these recurrences by
hoisting loads from within loops.
In this patch, we add a new recurrence kind for first-order phi nodes and
attempt to vectorize them if possible. Vectorization is performed by shuffling
the values for the current and previous iterations. The vectorization cost
estimate is updated to account for the added shuffle instruction.
Contributed-by: Matthew Simpson and Chad Rosier <mcrosier@codeaurora.org>
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16197
llvm-svn: 261346
Summary:
If we don't have the first and last access of an interleaved load group,
the first and last wide load in the loop can do an out of bounds
access. Even though we discard results from speculative loads,
this can cause problems, since it can technically generate page faults
(or worse).
We now discard interleaved load groups that don't have the first and
load in the group.
Reviewers: hfinkel, rengolin
Subscribers: rengolin, llvm-commits, mzolotukhin, anemet
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17332
llvm-svn: 261331
Commit r259357 was reverted because it caused PR26629. We were assuming all
roots of a vectorizable tree could be truncated to the same width, which is not
the case in general. This commit reapplies the patch along with a fix and a new
test case to ensure we don't regress because of this issue again. This should
fix PR26629.
llvm-svn: 261212
Loop vectorizer now knows to vectorize GEP and create masked gather and scatter intrinsics for random memory access.
The feature is enabled on AVX-512 target.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15690
llvm-svn: 261140
Summary:
While shrinking types according to the required bits, we can
encounter insert/extract element instructions. This will cause us to
reach an llvm_unreachable statement.
This change adds support for truncating insert/extract element
operations, and adds a regression test.
Reviewers: jmolloy
Subscribers: mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17078
llvm-svn: 260893
sanitizer issue. The PredicatedScalarEvolution's copy constructor
wasn't copying the Generation value, and was leaving it un-initialized.
Original commit message:
[SCEV][LAA] Add no wrap SCEV predicates and use use them to improve strided pointer detection
Summary:
This change adds no wrap SCEV predicates with:
- support for runtime checking
- support for expression rewriting:
(sext ({x,+,y}) -> {sext(x),+,sext(y)}
(zext ({x,+,y}) -> {zext(x),+,sext(y)}
Note that we are sign extending the increment of the SCEV, even for
the zext case. This is needed to cover the fairly common case where y would
be a (small) negative integer. In order to do this, this change adds two new
flags: nusw and nssw that are applicable to AddRecExprs and permit the
transformations above.
We also change isStridedPtr in LAA to be able to make use of
these predicates. With this feature we should now always be able to
work around overflow issues in the dependence analysis.
Reviewers: mzolotukhin, sanjoy, anemet
Subscribers: mzolotukhin, sanjoy, llvm-commits, rengolin, jmolloy, hfinkel
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15412
llvm-svn: 260112
Summary:
This change adds no wrap SCEV predicates with:
- support for runtime checking
- support for expression rewriting:
(sext ({x,+,y}) -> {sext(x),+,sext(y)}
(zext ({x,+,y}) -> {zext(x),+,sext(y)}
Note that we are sign extending the increment of the SCEV, even for
the zext case. This is needed to cover the fairly common case where y would
be a (small) negative integer. In order to do this, this change adds two new
flags: nusw and nssw that are applicable to AddRecExprs and permit the
transformations above.
We also change isStridedPtr in LAA to be able to make use of
these predicates. With this feature we should now always be able to
work around overflow issues in the dependence analysis.
Reviewers: mzolotukhin, sanjoy, anemet
Subscribers: mzolotukhin, sanjoy, llvm-commits, rengolin, jmolloy, hfinkel
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15412
llvm-svn: 260085
Current SCEV expansion will expand SCEV as a sequence of operations
and doesn't utilize the value already existed. This will introduce
redundent computation which may not be cleaned up throughly by
following optimizations.
This patch introduces an ExprValueMap which is a map from SCEV to the
set of equal values with the same SCEV. When a SCEV is expanded, the
set of values is checked and reused whenever possible before generating
a sequence of operations.
The original commit triggered regressions in Polly tests. The regressions
exposed two problems which have been fixed in current version.
1. Polly will generate a new function based on the old one. To generate an
instruction for the new function, it builds SCEV for the old instruction,
applies some tranformation on the SCEV generated, then expands the transformed
SCEV and insert the expanded value into new function. Because SCEV expansion
may reuse value cached in ExprValueMap, the value in old function may be
inserted into new function, which is wrong.
In SCEVExpander::expand, there is a logic to check the cached value to
be used should dominate the insertion point. However, for the above
case, the check always passes. That is because the insertion point is
in a new function, which is unreachable from the old function. However
for unreachable node, DominatorTreeBase::dominates thinks it will be
dominated by any other node.
The fix is to simply add a check that the cached value to be used in
expansion should be in the same function as the insertion point instruction.
2. When the SCEV is of scConstant type, expanding it directly is cheaper than
reusing a normal value cached. Although in the cached value set in ExprValueMap,
there is a Constant type value, but it is not easy to find it out -- the cached
Value set is not sorted according to the potential cost. Existing reuse logic
in SCEVExpander::expand simply chooses the first legal element from the cached
value set.
The fix is that when the SCEV is of scConstant type, don't try the reuse
logic. simply expand it.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12090
llvm-svn: 259736
Current SCEV expansion will expand SCEV as a sequence of operations
and doesn't utilize the value already existed. This will introduce
redundent computation which may not be cleaned up throughly by
following optimizations.
This patch introduces an ExprValueMap which is a map from SCEV to the
set of equal values with the same SCEV. When a SCEV is expanded, the
set of values is checked and reused whenever possible before generating
a sequence of operations.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12090
llvm-svn: 259662
In the future, we will vectorize recurrences other than reductions. This patch
renames a few variables and updates their associated comments to enable them to
be reused for non-reduction PHI nodes.
This change was requested in the review for D16197.
llvm-svn: 259364
This patch is the second attempt to reapply commit r258404. There was bug in
the initial patch and subsequent fix (mentioned below).
The initial patch caused an assertion because we were computing smaller type
sizes for instructions that cannot be demoted. The fix first determines the
instructions that will be demoted, and then applies the smaller type size to
only those instructions.
This should fix PR26239 and PR26307.
llvm-svn: 258929
Summary:
This patch is provided in preparation for removing autoconf on 1/26. The proposal to remove autoconf on 1/26 was discussed on the llvm-dev thread here: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-January/093875.html
"I felt a great disturbance in the [build system], as if millions of [makefiles] suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced. I fear something [amazing] has happened."
- Obi Wan Kenobi
Reviewers: chandlerc, grosbach, bob.wilson, tstellarAMD, echristo, whitequark
Subscribers: chfast, simoncook, emaste, jholewinski, tberghammer, jfb, danalbert, srhines, arsenm, dschuff, jyknight, dsanders, joker.eph, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16471
llvm-svn: 258861
This commit exposes a crash in computeKnownBits on the Chromium buildbots.
Reverting to investigate.
Reference: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26307
llvm-svn: 258812
This is a recommit of r258620 which causes PR26293.
The original message:
Now LIR can turn following codes into memset:
typedef struct foo {
int a;
int b;
} foo_t;
void bar(foo_t *f, unsigned n) {
for (unsigned i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
f[i].a = 0;
f[i].b = 0;
}
}
void test(foo_t *f, unsigned n) {
for (unsigned i = 0; i < n; i += 2) {
f[i] = 0;
f[i+1] = 0;
}
}
llvm-svn: 258777
We were hitting an assertion because we were computing smaller type sizes for
instructions that cannot be demoted. The fix first determines the instructions
that will be demoted, and then applies the smaller type size to only those
instructions.
This should fix PR26239.
llvm-svn: 258705
This change attempts to produce vectorized integer expressions in bit widths
that are narrower than their scalar counterparts. The need for demotion arises
especially on architectures in which the small integer types (e.g., i8 and i16)
are not legal for scalar operations but can still be used in vectors. Like
similar work done within the loop vectorizer, we rely on InstCombine to perform
the actual type-shrinking. We use the DemandedBits analysis and
ComputeNumSignBits from ValueTracking to determine the minimum required bit
width of an expression.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15815
llvm-svn: 258404
