Summary:
Use the new resolver interface more explicitly, and avoid traversing
all the initializers multiple times.
Change-Id: I679e86988b309d19f25e6cca8b0b14ea150198a6
Reviewers: arsenm, craig.topper, tra, MartinO
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43654
llvm-svn: 326708
Summary:
Use the new resolver interface more explicitly, and avoid traversing
all the initializers multiple times.
Change-Id: Ia4dcc6d42dd8b65e6079d318c6a202f36f320fee
Reviewers: arsenm, craig.topper, tra, MartinO
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43653
llvm-svn: 326707
Summary:
Use the new resolver interface more explicitly, and avoid traversing
all the initializers multiple times.
Add a test case for a pattern that was broken by an earlier version
of this change.
An additional change is that we now remove *all* template arguments
after resolving them.
Change-Id: I86c828c8cc84c18b052dfe0f64c0d5cbf3c4e13c
Reviewers: arsenm, craig.topper, tra, MartinO
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43652
llvm-svn: 326706
Summary:
This changes the syntax of !foreach so that the first "parameter" is
a new syntactic variable: !foreach(x, lst, expr) will define the
variable x within the scope of expr, and evaluation of the !foreach
will substitute elements of the given list (or dag) for x in expr.
Aside from leading to a nicer syntax, this allows more complex
expressions where x is deeply nested, or even constant expressions
in which x does not occur at all.
!foreach is currently not actually used anywhere in trunk, but I
plan to use it in the AMDGPU backend. If out-of-tree targets are
using it, they can adjust to the new syntax very easily.
Change-Id: Ib966694d8ab6542279d6bc358b6f4d767945a805
Reviewers: arsenm, craig.topper, tra, MartinO
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits, tpr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43651
llvm-svn: 326705
Summary:
The intention is to allow us to more easily restructure how resolving is
done, e.g. resolving multiple variables simultaneously, or using the
resolving mechanism to implement !foreach.
Change-Id: I4b976b54a32e240ad4f562f7eb86a4d663a20ea8
Reviewers: arsenm, craig.topper, tra, MartinO
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43564
llvm-svn: 326704
Summary:
NAME has already worked for def in a multiclass, since the (protoype)
record including its NAME variable is created before parsing the
superclasses. Since defm's do not have an associated single record,
support for NAME has to be implemented differently here.
Original test cases provided by Artem Belevich (tra)
Change-Id: I933b74f328c0ff202e7dc23a35b78f3505760cc9
Reviewers: arsenm, craig.topper, tra, MartinO
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43656
llvm-svn: 326700
It is redundant with the implementation in TypedInit.
Change-Id: I8ab1fb5c77e4923f7eb3ffae5889f0f8af6093b4
Reviewers: arsenm, craig.topper, tra, MartinO
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43678
llvm-svn: 326061
Summary:
FieldInit will just rely on the standardized resolving mechanism to give
us DefInits for folding, thus simplifying the code.
Unlike the removal of resolveListElementReference, this shouldn't have
performance implications, because DefInits do not recurse inside their
record.
Change-Id: Id4544c774c9d9ee92f293615af6ecff706453f21
Reviewers: arsenm, craig.topper, tra, MartinO
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43563
llvm-svn: 326060
Summary:
Resolving a VarListElementInit should just resolve the list and then
take its element. This eliminates a lot of duplicated logic and
simplifies the next steps of refactoring resolveReferences.
This does potentially cause sub-elements of the entire list to be
resolved resulting in more work, but I didn't notice a measurable
change in performance, and a later patch adds a caching mechanism that
covers at least the common case of `var[i]` in a more generic way.
Change-Id: I7b59185b855c7368585c329c31e5be38c5749dac
Reviewers: arsenm, craig.topper, tra, MartinO
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43562
llvm-svn: 326059
This reverts r325884.
Clang's TableGen has dependencies on the exact ordering of superclasses.
Revert this change fully for now to fix the build.
Change-Id: Ib297f5571cc7809f00838702ad7ab53d47335b26
llvm-svn: 325891
A subsequent change intends to remove resolveListElementReference
entirely. This part of the removal can be split out for better
bisectability.
Change-Id: Ibd762d88fd2d1e2cc116a259e2a27a5e9f9a8b10
Reviewers: arsenm, craig.topper, tra, MartinO
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43561
Change-Id: Ifb695041cef1964ad8a3102f448249501a9243f0
llvm-svn: 325886
Summary:
Only check whether the left-hand side type is a subclass (or equal to)
the right-hand side type.
This requires a further fix in handling !if expressions and in type
resolution.
Furthermore, reverse the order of superclasses so that resolveTypes will
find a least common ancestor at least in simple cases.
Add a test that used to be accepted without flagging the obvious type
error.
Change-Id: Ib366db1a4e6a079f1a0851e469b402cddae76714
Reviewers: arsenm, craig.topper, tra, MartinO
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43559
llvm-svn: 325884
Summary:
Returns the size of a list. I have found this to be rather useful in some
development for the AMDGPU backend where we could simplify our .td files
by concatenating list<LLVMType> for complex intrinsics. Doing so requires
us to compute the position argument for LLVMMatchType.
Basically, the usage is in a pattern that looks somewhat like this:
list<LLVMType> argtypes =
!listconcat(base,
[llvm_any_ty, LLVMMatchType<!size(base)>]);
Change-Id: I360a0b000fd488d18bea412228230fd93722bd2c
Reviewers: arsenm, craig.topper, tra, MartinO
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits, tpr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43553
llvm-svn: 325883
Summary:
Both of these errors should have been caught by type-checking during
parsing.
Change-Id: I891087936fd1a91d21bcda57c256e3edbe12b94d
Reviewers: arsenm, craig.topper, tra, MartinO
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43558
llvm-svn: 325800
Summary:
Perhaps the distinction between the two should be removed entirely
in the long term, and the [{ ... }] syntax should just be a convenient
way of writing multi-line strings.
In the meantime, a lot of existing .td files are quite relaxed about
string vs. code, and this change allows switching on more consistent
type checks without breaking those.
Change-Id: If85e3e04469e41b58e2703b62ac0032d2711713c
Reviewers: arsenm, craig.topper, tra, MartinO
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43557
llvm-svn: 325799
Summary:
There are no new test cases, but a subsequent patch will introduce
assertions that would be triggered by existing test cases without this
fix.
Change-Id: I6a82d4b311b012aff3932978ae86f6a2dcfbf725
Reviewers: arsenm, craig.topper, tra, MartinO
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43556
llvm-svn: 325798
Summary:
In the case of !foreach(id, input-list, transform) where the type of
input-list is list<A> and the type of transform is B, we now correctly
deduce list<B> as the type of the !foreach.
Change-Id: Ia19dd65eecc5991dd648280ba6a15f6a20fd61de
Reviewers: arsenm, craig.topper, tra, MartinO
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43555
llvm-svn: 325797
Summary:
This way, it should work even with complex operands.
Change-Id: Iaccf5bbb50bd5882a0ba5d59689e4381315fb361
Reviewers: arsenm, craig.topper, tra, MartinO
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43554
llvm-svn: 325796
* !foreach on lists didn't evaluate operands of the RHS operator.
This made nested operators silently fail.
* A typo in the code could result in a wrong value substituted
for an operation which produced a false '!foreach requires an operator' error.
* Keep recursion over the DAG within ForeachHelper. This simplifies
things a bit as we no longer need to pass the Type around in order
to prevent recursion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43083
llvm-svn: 324758
A number of architectures re-use the same register names (e.g. for both 32-bit
FPRs and 64-bit FPRs). They are currently unable to use the tablegen'erated
MatchRegisterName and MatchRegisterAltName, as tablegen (when built with
asserts enabled) will fail.
When the AllowDuplicateRegisterNames in AsmParser is set, duplicated register
names will be tolerated. A backend can then coerce registers to the desired
register class by (for instance) implementing validateTargetOperandClass.
At least the in-tree Sparc backend could benefit from this, as does RISC-V
(single and double precision floating point registers).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39845
llvm-svn: 320018
Summary:
Add LLVM_FORCE_ENABLE_DUMP cmake option, and use it along with
LLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS to set LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP.
Remove NDEBUG and only use LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP to enable dump methods.
Move definition of LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP from config.h to llvm-config.h so
it'll be picked up by public headers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38406
llvm-svn: 315590
I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now
clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every
line with a #include and let it re-sort things according to the precise
LLVM rules for include ordering baked into clang-format these days.
I've reverted a number of files where the results of sorting includes
isn't healthy. Either places where we have legacy code relying on
particular include ordering (where possible, I'll fix these separately)
or where we have particular formatting around #include lines that
I didn't want to disturb in this patch.
This patch is *entirely* mechanical. If you get merge conflicts or
anything, just ignore the changes in this patch and run clang-format
over your #include lines in the files.
Sorry for any noise here, but it is important to keep these things
stable. I was seeing an increasing number of patches with irrelevant
re-ordering of #include lines because clang-format was used. This patch
at least isolates that churn, makes it easy to skip when resolving
conflicts, and gets us to a clean baseline (again).
llvm-svn: 304787
They weren't used often enough to justify having two different interfaces. Push the responsiblity of creating a StringInit up to the caller.
llvm-svn: 304388
Internally both these methods just return the result of getValue on either a StringInit or a CodeInit object. In both cases this returns a StringRef pointing to a string allocated in the BumpPtrAllocator so its not going anywhere. So we can just pass that StringRef along.
This is a fairly naive patch that targets just the build failures caused by this change. There's additional work that can be done to avoid creating std::string at call sites that still think getValueAsString returns a std::string. I'll try to clean those up in future patches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33710
llvm-svn: 304325
DagInits are allocated in a BumpPtrAllocator so they are never destructed. This means the destructor for the SmallVector never runs.
To fix this we now allocate the vectors in the BumpPtrAllocator too using TrailingObjects.
llvm-svn: 304077
These used to hold std::unique_ptrs that managed the allocation for the various *Init object so that they would be deleted on exit. Everything is allocated in a BumpPtrAllocator name so there is no reason for these to still exist.
llvm-svn: 304066
We had various variants of defining dump() functions in LLVM. Normalize
them (this should just consistently implement the things discussed in
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2014-January/034323.html
For reference:
- Public headers should just declare the dump() method but not use
LLVM_DUMP_METHOD or #if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP)
- The definition of a dump method should look like this:
#if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP)
LLVM_DUMP_METHOD void MyClass::dump() {
// print stuff to dbgs()...
}
#endif
llvm-svn: 293359
This forces the code to call StringInit::get on the string early and
avoids storing duplicates in std::string and sometimes allows pointer
comparisons instead of string comparisons.
llvm-svn: 288642
