The only valid lowering of atomic stores in the X86 backend was mov from
register to memory. As a result, storing an immediate required a useless copy
of the immediate in a register. Now these can be compiled as a simple mov.
Similarily, adding/and-ing/or-ing/xor-ing an
immediate to an atomic location (but through an atomic_store/atomic_load,
not a fetch_whatever intrinsic) can now make use of an 'add $imm, x(%rip)'
instead of using a register. And the same applies to inc/dec.
This second point matches the first issue identified in
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=17281
llvm-svn: 216980
In theory, alignPtr() could push a pointer beyond the end of the current slab, making
comparisons with that pointer undefined behaviour. Use an integer type to avoid this.
llvm-svn: 216973
This provides an implementation of CFL alias analysis (including some
supporting data structures). Currently, we don't have any extremely fancy
features, sans some interprocedural analysis (i.e. no field sensitivity, etc.),
and we do best sitting behind BasicAA + TBAA. In such a configuration, we take
~0.6-0.8% of total compile time, and give ~7-8% NoAlias responses to queries
TBAA and BasicAA couldn't answer when bootstrapping LLVM. In testing this on
other projects, we've seen up to 10.5% of queries dropped by BasicAA+TBAA
answered with NoAlias by this algorithm.
Patch by George Burgess IV (with minor modifications by me -- mostly adapting
some BasicAA tests), thanks!
llvm-svn: 216970
This change moves FastISel for AArch64 to target-dependent instruction selection
only. This change replicates the existing target-independent behavior, therefore
there are no changes to the unit tests or new tests.
Future changes will take advantage of this change and update functionality
and unit tests.
llvm-svn: 216955
This allows the target to disable target-independent instruction selection and
jump directly into the target-dependent instruction selection code.
This can be beneficial for targets, such as AArch64, which could emit much
better code, but never got a chance to do so, because the target-independent
instruction selector was able to find an instruction sequence.
llvm-svn: 216947
We duplicate ~30 lines of code to lower FABS and FNEG for x86, so this patch combines them into one function.
No functional change intended, so no additional test cases. Test-suite behavior is unchanged.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5064
llvm-svn: 216942
Summary:
MemoryDependenceAnalysis is currently cautious when the QueryInstr is an atomic
load or store, but I forgot to check for atomic cmpxchg/atomicrmw. This patch
is a way of fixing that, and making it less brittle (i.e. no risk that I forget
another possible kind of atomic, even if the IR ends up changing in the future),
by adding a fallback checking mayReadOrWriteFromMemory.
Thanks to Philip Reames for finding this bug and suggesting this solution in
http://reviews.llvm.org/D4845
Sadly, I don't see how to add a test for this, since the passes depending on
MemoryDependenceAnalysis won't trigger for an atomic rmw anyway. Does anyone
see a way for testing it?
Test Plan: none possible at first sight
Reviewers: jfb, reames
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5019
llvm-svn: 216940
"Setting" does not equal "copying". This bug has sat dormant for 2 reasons:
1. The unit test was not adequate.
2. Every current user of the "copyFastMathFlags" API is operating on a new instruction.
(ie, all existing fast-math flags are off). If you copy flags to an existing
instruction that has some flags on already, you will not necessarily turn them off
as expected.
I uncovered this bug while trying to implement a fix for PR20802.
llvm-svn: 216939
I've been assuming chain operands were always the first operand,
since the documentation says this. I was confused about why they
were missing after instruction selection. Apparently the convention
changes to using the last operand for MachineSDNodes and I've never
noticed before.
llvm-svn: 216934
If an fmul was introduced by lowering, it wouldn't be folded
into a multiply by a constant since the earlier combine would
have replaced the fmul with the fadd.
llvm-svn: 216932
This removes static initializers from the backends which generate this data, and also makes this struct match the other Tablegen generated structs in behaviour
Reviewed by Andy Trick and Chandler C
llvm-svn: 216919
Rather than passing by lvalue reference, pass by value to ensure that
the caller provides an rvalue (and use move assignment, rather than
release+reset, to assign to the member variable)
llvm-svn: 216916
When folding a fused multiply-add builtin call, make sure that we propagate the
correct result in the case where the addend is zero, and the two other operands
are finite non-zero.
Example:
define double @test() {
%1 = call double @llvm.fma.f64(double 7.0, double 8.0, double 0.0)
ret double %1
}
Before this patch, the instruction simplifier wrongly folded the builtin call
in function @test to constant 'double 7.0'.
With this patch, method 'fusedMultiplyAdd' correctly evaluates the multiply and
propagates the expected result (i.e. 56.0).
Added test fold-builtin-fma.ll with the reproducible from PR20832 plus extra
test cases to verify the behavior of method 'fusedMultiplyAdd' in the presence
of NaN/Inf operands.
This fixes PR20832.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5152
llvm-svn: 216913
Summary:
BBs might contain non-LCSSA'd values after the LCSSA pass is run if they
are unreachable from the entry block.
Normally, the users of the instruction would be PHIs but the unreachable
BBs have normal users; rewrite their uses to be undef values.
An alternative fix could involve fixing this at LCSSA but that would
require this invariant to hold after subsequent transforms. If a BB
created an unreachable block, they would be in violation of this.
This fixes PR19798.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5146
llvm-svn: 216911
Summary:
Left shift of negative integer is an undefined behavior, and
is reported by UBSan. It's ok for imm values to be negative, so we can
just replace left shifts with multiplications.
Test Plan: check-llvm test suite
Reviewers: t.p.northover
Reviewed By: t.p.northover
Subscribers: aemerson, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5132
llvm-svn: 216910
When I recommitted r208640 (in r216898) I added an exclusion for TargetConstant
offsets, as there is no guarantee that a backend can handle them on generic
ADDs (even if it generates them during address-mode matching) -- and,
specifically, applying this transformation directly with TargetConstants caused
a self-hosting failure on PPC64. Ignoring all TargetConstants, however, is less
than ideal. Instead, for non-opaque constants, we can convert them into regular
constants for use with the generated ADD (or SUB).
llvm-svn: 216908
We have been using .init-array for most systems for quiet some time,
but tools like llc are still defaulting to .ctors because the old
option was never changed.
This patch makes llc default to .init-array and changes the option to
be -use-ctors.
Clang is not affected by this. It has its own fancier logic.
llvm-svn: 216905
I reverted r208640 in r209747 because r208640 broke self-hosting on PPC64. The
underlying cause of the failure is that pre-inc loads with increments
represented by ISD::TargetConstants were being transformed into ISD:::ADDs with
ISD::TargetConstant operands. PPC doesn't have a pattern for those, and so they
were selected as invalid r+r adds.
This recommits r208640, rebased and with an exclusion for ISD::TargetConstant
increments. This behavior seems correct, although in the future we might want
to ask the target to split out the indexing that uses ISD::TargetConstants.
Unfortunately, I don't yet have small test case where the relevant invalid
'add' instruction is not itself dead (and thus eliminated by
DeadMachineInstructionElim -- sometimes bugpoint is too good at removing things)
Original commit message (by Adam Nemet):
Right now the load may not get DCE'd because of the side-effect of updating
the base pointer.
This can happen if we lower a read-modify-write of an illegal larger type
(e.g. i48) such that the modification only affects one of the subparts (the
lower i32 part but not the higher i16 part). See the testcase.
In order to spot the dead load we need to revisit it when SimplifyDemandedBits
decided that the value of the load is masked off. This is the
CommitTargetLoweringOpt piece.
I checked compile time with ARM64 by sending SPEC bitcode files through llc.
No measurable change.
Fixes <rdar://problem/16031651>
llvm-svn: 216898
r208640 was reverted because it caused a self-hosting failure on ppc64. The
underlying cause was the formation of ISD::ADD nodes with ISD::TargetConstant
operands. Because we have no patterns for 'add' taking 'timm' nodes, these are
selected as r+r add instructions (which is a miscompile). Guard against this
kind of behavior in the future by making the backend crash should this occur
(instead of silently generating invalid output).
llvm-svn: 216897
The structures for Windows unwinding are shared across multiple platforms.
Indicate the encoding to be used for the particular target. Use this to switch
the unwind emitter instantiated by the AsmPrinter.
llvm-svn: 216895
This is an enum class, and will be appropriately prefixed, making the encoding
type prefix redundant. No change to any uses as the use of this was not yet
introduced.
llvm-svn: 216893
SROA may decide that it needs to insert a bitcast and would set it's
insertion point before a PHI. This will create an invalid module
right quick.
Instead, choose the first insertion point in the basic block that holds
our PHI.
This fixes PR20822.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5141
llvm-svn: 216891
