(and hopefully on Windows). The bots have been down most of the day
because of this, and it's not clear to me what all will be required to
fix it.
The commits started with r153205, then r153207, r153208, and r153221.
The first commit seems to be the real culprit, but I couldn't revert
a smaller number of patches.
When resubmitting, r153207 and r153208 should be folded into r153205,
they were simple build fixes.
llvm-svn: 153241
Take #2. Don't piggyback on the existing config.build_mode. Instead,
define a new lit feature for each build feature we need (currently
just "asserts"). Teach both autoconf'd and cmake'd Makefiles to define
this feature within test/lit.site.cfg. This doesn't require any lit
harness changes and should be more robust across build systems.
llvm-svn: 133664
It broke the llvm-gcc-native-mingw32 buildbot, and we need all of them to be green for the 2.9 branch.
Takumi, please reapply after we branch, preferably with a fix ;-)
llvm-svn: 127107
run the tests using DejaGNU, but not for much longer. This is a last call for
DejaGNU supporters, if no one complains soon the DejaGNU support is going to
die.
llvm-svn: 109997
the llvm tests :-(
It was failing with
-- Testing: 5324 tests, 8 threads --
Fatal Python error: PyEval_AcquireThread: NULL new thread state
llvm-svn: 105610
--enable-shared configure flag to have the tools linked shared. (2.7svn is just
$(LLVMVersion) so it'll change to "2.7" in the release.) Always link the
example programs shared to test that the shared library keeps working.
On my mac laptop, Debug libLLVM2.7svn.dylib is 39MB, and opt (for example) is
16M static vs 440K shared.
Two things are less than ideal here:
1) The library doesn't include any version information. Since we expect to break
the ABI with every release, this shouldn't be much of a problem. If we do
release a compatible 2.7.1, we may be able to hack its library to work with
binaries compiled against 2.7.0, or we can just ask them to recompile. I'm
hoping to get a real packaging expert to look at this for the 2.8 release.
2) llvm-config doesn't yet have an option to print link options for the shared
library. I'll add this as a subsequent patch.
llvm-svn: 96559
address space (though it only uses a small fraction of that), and the
buildbots disallow that.
Also add a comment to the Makefile's ulimit line warning future
developers that changing it won't work.
llvm-svn: 88994
The large code model is documented at
http://www.x86-64.org/documentation/abi.pdf and says that calls should
assume their target doesn't live within the 32-bit pc-relative offset
that fits in the call instruction.
To do this, we turn off the global-address->target-global-address
conversion in X86TargetLowering::LowerCall(). The first attempt at
this broke the lazy JIT because it can separate the movabs(imm->reg)
from the actual call instruction. The lazy JIT receives the address of
the movabs as a relocation and needs to record the return address from
the call; and then when that call happens, it needs to patch the
movabs with the newly-compiled target. We could thread the call
instruction into the relocation and record the movabs<->call mapping
explicitly, but that seems to require at least as much new
complication in the code generator as this change.
To fix this, we make lazy functions _always_ go through a call
stub. You'd think we'd only have to force lazy calls through a stub on
difficult platforms, but that turns out to break indirect calls
through a function pointer. The right fix for that is to distinguish
between calls and address-of operations on uncompiled functions, but
that's complex enough to leave for someone else to do.
Another attempt at this defined a new CALL64i pseudo-instruction,
which expanded to a 2-instruction sequence in the assembly output and
was special-cased in the X86CodeEmitter's emitInstruction()
function. That broke indirect calls in the same way as above.
This patch also removes a hack forcing Darwin to the small code model.
Without far-call-stubs, the small code model requires things of the
JITMemoryManager that the DefaultJITMemoryManager can't provide.
Thanks to echristo for lots of testing!
llvm-svn: 88984
Also, fix a few other details of the cmake test target and rename it to
'check'. CMake tests now work for the most part, but there are a handful of
failures left due to missing site.exp bits.
llvm-svn: 86452