I overzealously landed this before I was sure that another change
wouldn't break the build that this change depends on.
This change adds support for sections involved in dynamic loading such
as SHT_DYNAMIC, SHT_DYNSYM, and allocated string tables.
The two added binaries used for tests can be downloaded here and here
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36560
llvm-svn: 313767
Summary:
The fix for dead stripping analysis in the case of SamplePGO indirect
calls to local functions (r313151) introduced the possibility of an
infinite loop.
Make sure we check for the value being already live after we update it
for SamplePGO indirect call handling.
Reviewers: danielcdh
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, llvm-commits, eraman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38086
llvm-svn: 313766
Bug pointed out by EricWF. This would construct a path where
items would be added in the wrong order, potentially leading
to using the wrong tools for testing.
llvm-svn: 313765
Despite a strong CMake warning that this is an unsupported
libcxx build configuration, some bots still rely on being
able to check out lit and libcxx independently with no
LLVM sources, and then run lit against libcxx.
A previous patch broke that workflow, so this is making it work
again. Unfortunately, it breaks generation of the llvm-lit
script for libcxx, but we will just have to live with that until
a solution is found that allows libcxx to make more use of
llvm build pieces. libcxx can still run tests by using the
ninja check target, or by running lit.py directly against the
build tree or source tree.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38057
llvm-svn: 313763
Remove unneeded attributes from test/DebugInfo/Generic/imported-name-inlined.ll because it was causing failures on pure MIPS builds.
Patch by Miloš Stojanović!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38079
llvm-svn: 313762
This version of the patch fixes an off-by-one error causing PR34596. We
do not need to use std::next(BlockIter) when calling updateDepths, as
BlockIter already points to the next element.
Original commit message:
> For large basic blocks with lots of combinable instructions, the
> MachineTraceMetrics computations in MachineCombiner can dominate the compile
> time, as computing the trace information is quadratic in the number of
> instructions in a BB and it's relevant successors/predecessors.
> In most cases, knowing the instruction depth should be enough to make
> combination decisions. As we already iterate over all instructions in a basic
> block, the instruction depth can be computed incrementally. This reduces the
> cost of machine-combine drastically in cases where lots of instructions
> are combined. The major drawback is that AFAIK, computing the critical path
> length cannot be done incrementally. Therefore we only compute
> instruction depths incrementally, for basic blocks with more
> instructions than inc_threshold. The -machine-combiner-inc-threshold
> option can be used to set the threshold and allows for easier
> experimenting and checking if using incremental updates for all basic
> blocks has any impact on the performance.
>
> Reviewers: sanjoy, Gerolf, MatzeB, efriedma, fhahn
>
> Reviewed By: fhahn
>
> Subscribers: kiranchandramohan, javed.absar, efriedma, llvm-commits
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36619
llvm-svn: 313751
Summary:
This patch tries to vectorize loads of consecutive memory accesses, accessed
in non-consecutive or jumbled way. An earlier attempt was made with patch D26905
which was reverted back due to some basic issue with representing the 'use mask' of
jumbled accesses.
This patch fixes the mask representation by recording the 'use mask' in the usertree entry.
Change-Id: I9fe7f5045f065d84c126fa307ef6ebe0787296df
Reviewers: mkuper, loladiro, Ayal, zvi, danielcdh
Reviewed By: Ayal
Subscribers: mzolotukhin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36130
Commit after rebase for patch D36130
Change-Id: I8add1c265455669ef288d880f870a9522c8c08ab
llvm-svn: 313736
If these checks fail we end up not selecting an instruction at all. So we are already relying on the immediate being checked upstream of isel. So doing the check in isel is just bloat to the isel table. Interestingly, we didn't check on the AVX512 version of the instructions anyway.
llvm-svn: 313724
Also starts selecting global loads for constant address
in some cases. Some end up selecting to mubuf still, which
requires investigation.
We still get sub-optimal regalloc and extra waitcnts inserted
due to not really tracking the liveness of the separate register
halves.
llvm-svn: 313716
Summary:
With this change:
- Methods in LoopBase trip an assert if the receiver has been invalidated
- LoopBase::clear frees up the memory held the LoopBase instance
This change also shuffles things around as necessary to work with this stricter invariant.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38055
llvm-svn: 313708
Many svn-based buildbots seem to be getting stuck continually
in tree conflicts due to the output of pyc files. I'm disabling
these as a temporary measure in an attempt to get everything
stable again.
I'll try to remove this code once I understand the problem
better.
llvm-svn: 313698
This re-applies commit r313685, this time with the proper updates to
the test cases.
Original commit message:
Unreachable blocks in the machine instr representation are these
weird empty blocks with no successors.
The MIR printer used to not print empty lists of successors. However,
the MIR parser now treats non-printed list of successors as "please
guess it for me". As a result, the parser tries to guess the list of
successors and given the block is empty, just assumes it falls through
the next block (if any).
For instance, the following test case used to fail the verifier.
The MIR printer would print
entry
/ \
true (def) false (no list of successors)
|
split.true (use)
The MIR parser would understand this:
entry
/ \
true (def) false
| / <-- invalid edge
split.true (use)
Because of the invalid edge, we get the "def does not
dominate all uses" error.
The fix consists in printing empty successor lists, so that the parser
knows what to do for unreachable blocks.
rdar://problem/34022159
llvm-svn: 313696
Summary:
See comment for why I think this is a good idea.
This change also:
- Removes an SCEV test case. The SCEV test was not testing anything useful (most of it was `#if 0` ed out) and it would need to be updated to deal with a private ~Loop::Loop.
- Updates the loop pass manager test case to deal with a private ~Loop::Loop.
- Renames markAsRemoved to markAsErased to contrast with removeLoop, via the usual remove vs. erase idiom we already have for instructions and basic blocks.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37996
llvm-svn: 313695
Add adds support for naming data segments. This is useful
useful linkers so that they can merge similar sections.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37886
llvm-svn: 313692
In the lambda we are now returning the remark by value so we need to preserve
its type in the insertion operator. This requires making the insertion
operator generic.
I've also converted a few cases to use the new API. It seems to work pretty
well. See the LoopUnroller for a slightly more interesting case.
llvm-svn: 313691
Summary: Introduces the llvm-cfi-verify tool to llvm. Includes the design document (docs/CFIVerify.rst). Current implementation of the tool is simply a disassembler that identifies and prints the indirect control flow instructions.
Reviewers: vlad.tsyrklevich
Reviewed By: vlad.tsyrklevich
Patch by Mitch Phillips
Subscribers: llvm-commits, kcc, pcc, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37937
llvm-svn: 313688
Unreachable blocks in the machine instr representation are these
weird empty blocks with no successors.
The MIR printer used to not print empty lists of successors. However,
the MIR parser now treats non-printed list of successors as "please
guess it for me". As a result, the parser tries to guess the list of
successors and given the block is empty, just assumes it falls through
the next block (if any).
For instance, the following test case used to fail the verifier.
The MIR printer would print
entry
/ \
true (def) false (no list of successors)
|
split.true (use)
The MIR parser would understand this:
entry
/ \
true (def) false
| / <-- invalid edge
split.true (use)
Because of the invalid edge, we get the "def does not
dominate all uses" error.
The fix consists in printing empty successor lists, so that the parser
knows what to do for unreachable blocks.
rdar://problem/34022159
llvm-svn: 313685
I didn't initialize a pointer to be nullptr that I needed to.
This change adds support for nested and even overlapping segments. This means
that PT_PHDR, PT_GNU_RELRO, PT_TLS, and PT_DYNAMIC can be supported properly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36558
llvm-svn: 313682
The ARM docs suggest in examples that the flags can have either case, and there
are applications in the wild that (libopencm3, for example) that expect to be
able to use the uppercase spelling.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D37953
llvm-svn: 313680
This reverts r313640, originally r313400, one more time for essentially
the same issue. My BitVector of spilled location numbers isn't working
because we coalesce identical DBG_VALUE locations as we rewrite them,
invalidating the location numbers used to index the BitVector.
llvm-svn: 313679
Summary: In the ThinLTO compilation, if a function is inlined in the profiling binary, we need to inline it before annotation. If the callee is not available in the primary module, a first step is needed to import that callee function. For the current implementation, if the call is an indirect call, which has been promoted to >1 targets and inlined, SamplePGO will only import one target with the largest sample count. This patch fixed the bug to import all targets instead.
Reviewers: tejohnson, davidxl
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Subscribers: sanjoy, llvm-commits, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36637
llvm-svn: 313678
Summary:
There is no benefit in having the 4-byte alignment, and removing this
restriction can save a lot of space for some applications.
Reviewers: asl, awygle
Reviewed By: awygle
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36165
llvm-svn: 313676
The generated DAG isel file currently makes use of formatted_raw_ostream primarily for generating a hierarchical representation while also skipping over the initial comment that contains the current index.
It was reported in D37957 that this formatting might be slow due to the need to keep track of column numbers by monitoring all the written data for new lines.
This patch attempts to rewrite the emitter to make use of simpler formatting mechanisms to generate a fairly similar output. The main difference is that the number in the index comment is now right justified and padded with spaces inside the comment. Previously we appended the spaces after the comment.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37966
llvm-svn: 313674
