This adds support for scalarizing these intrinsics as well the X86TargetTransformInfo support to avoid scalarizing them in the cases X86 can handle.
I've omitted handling special cases for constant masks for this first pass. Though CodeGenPrepare can constant fold the branch conditions and remove some of the control flow anyway.
Fixes PR40994 and is covers most of PR3666. Might want to implement constant masks to close that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59180
llvm-svn: 356687
This is D59450, but for signed sub. This case is not NFC, because
the overflow logic in ConstantRange is more powerful than the existing
check. This resolves the TODO in the function.
I've added two tests to show that this indeed catches more cases than
the previous logic, but the main correctness test coverage here is in
the existing ConstantRange unit tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59617
llvm-svn: 356685
Summary:
This is a refactoring patch.
- Reduce the number of map searches by reusing the iterator.
- Add asserts to check that the entry is in the cache, as this is something BasicAA relies on to avoid infinite recursion.
Reviewers: chandlerc, aschwaighofer
Subscribers: sanjoy, jlebar, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59151
llvm-svn: 356644
Code archaeology in D59315 revealed that MSSA should never be moved.
Rather than trying to check dynamically that this hasn't happened in the
verify() functions of Walkers, it's likely best to just delete its move
constructor.
Since all these verify() functions did is check that MSSA hasn't moved,
this allows us to remove these verify functions.
I can readd the verification checks if someone's super concerned about
us trying to `memcpy` MemorySSA or something somewhere, but I imagine we
have other problems if we're trying anything like that...
llvm-svn: 356641
This is a small followup to D59511. The code that was moved into
computeConstantRange() there is a bit overly conversative: If the
abs is not nsw, it does not compute any range. However, abs without
nsw still has a well-defined contiguous unsigned range from 0 to
SIGNED_MIN. This is a lot less useful than the usual 0 to SIGNED_MAX
range, but if we're already here we might as well specify it...
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59563
llvm-svn: 356586
Improve computeOverflowForUnsignedAdd/Sub in ValueTracking by
intersecting the computeConstantRange() result into the ConstantRange
created from computeKnownBits(). This allows us to detect some
additional never/always overflows conditions that can't be determined
from known bits.
This revision also adds basic handling for constants to
computeConstantRange(). Non-splat vectors will be handled in a followup.
The signed case will also be handled in a followup, as it needs some
more groundwork.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59386
llvm-svn: 356489
These changes are related to PR37743 and include:
SelectionDAGBuilder::visitSelect handles the unary SelectPatternFlavor::SPF_ABS case to build ABS node.
Delete the redundant recognizer of the integer ABS pattern from the DAGCombiner.
Add promoting the integer ABS node in the LegalizeIntegerType.
Expand-based legalization of integer result for the ABS nodes.
Expand-based legalization of ABS vector operations.
Add some integer abs testcases for different typesizes for Thumb arch
Add the custom ABS expanding and change the SAD pattern recognizer for X86 arch: The i64 result of the ABS is expanded to:
tmp = (SRA, Hi, 31)
Lo = (UADDO tmp, Lo)
Hi = (XOR tmp, (ADDCARRY tmp, hi, Lo:1))
Lo = (XOR tmp, Lo)
The "detectZextAbsDiff" function is changed for the recognition of pattern with the ABS node. Given a ABS node, detect the following pattern:
(ABS (SUB (ZERO_EXTEND a), (ZERO_EXTEND b))).
Change integer abs testcases for codegen with the ABS node support for AArch64.
Indicate that the ABS is legal for the i64 type when the NEON is supported.
Change the integer abs testcases to show changing of codegen.
Add combine and legalization of ABS nodes for Thumb arch.
Extend 'matchSelectPattern' to recognize the ABS patterns with ICMP_SGE condition.
For discussion, see https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37743
Patch by: @ikulagin (Ivan Kulagin)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49837
llvm-svn: 356468
As discussed on PR41125 and D59363, we have a mismatch between icmp eq/ne cases with an undef operand:
When the other operand is constant we fold to undef (handled in ConstantFoldCompareInstruction)
When the other operand is non-constant we fold to a bool constant based on isTrueWhenEqual (handled in SimplifyICmpInst).
Neither is really wrong, but this patch changes the logic in SimplifyICmpInst to consistently fold to undef.
The NewGVN test change is annoying (as with most heavily reduced tests) but AFAICT I have kept the purpose of the test based on rL291968.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59541
llvm-svn: 356456
Add support for min/max flavor selects in computeConstantRange(),
which allows us to fold comparisons of a min/max against a constant
in InstSimplify. This was suggested by spatel as an alternative
approach to D59378. I've also added the infinite looping test from
that revision here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59506
llvm-svn: 356415
This is preparation for D59506. The InstructionSimplify abs handling
is moved into computeConstantRange(), which is the general place for
such calculations. This is NFC and doesn't affect the existing tests
in test/Transforms/InstSimplify/icmp-abs-nabs.ll.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59511
llvm-svn: 356409
This reinstates r347934, along with a tweak to address a problem with
PHI node ordering that that commit created (or exposed). (That commit
was reverted at r348426, due to the PHI node issue.)
Original commit message:
r320789 suppressed moving the insertion point of SCEV expressions with
dev/rem operations to the loop header in non-loop-invariant situations.
This, and similar, hoisting is also unsafe in the loop-invariant case,
since there may be a guard against a zero denominator. This is an
adjustment to the fix of r320789 to suppress the movement even in the
loop-invariant case.
This fixes PR30806.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57428
llvm-svn: 356392
This is the same change as rL356290, but for signed add. It replaces
the existing ripple logic with the overflow logic in ConstantRange.
This is NFC in that it should return NeverOverflow in exactly the
same cases as the previous implementation. However, it does make
computeOverflowForSignedAdd() more powerful by now also determining
AlwaysOverflows conditions. As none of its consumers handle this yet,
this has no impact on optimization. Making use of AlwaysOverflows
in with.overflow folding will be handled as a followup.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59450
llvm-svn: 356345
Following the suggestion in D59450, I'm moving the code for constructing
a ConstantRange from KnownBits out of ValueTracking, which also allows us
to test this code independently.
I'm adding this method to ConstantRange rather than KnownBits (which
would have been a bit nicer API wise) to avoid creating a dependency
from Support to IR, where ConstantRange lives.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59475
llvm-svn: 356339
Use the methods introduced in rL356276 to implement the
computeOverflowForUnsigned(Add|Sub) functions in ValueTracking, by
converting the KnownBits into a ConstantRange.
This is NFC: The existing KnownBits based implementation uses the same
logic as the the ConstantRange based one. This is not the case for the
signed equivalents, so I'm only changing unsigned here.
This is in preparation for D59386, which will also intersect the
computeConstantRange() result into the range determined from KnownBits.
llvm-svn: 356290
Summary:
The AliasSummary previously contained the AliaseeGUID, which was only
populated when reading the summary from bitcode. This patch changes it
to instead hold the ValueInfo of the aliasee, and always populates it.
This enables more efficient access to the ValueInfo (specifically in the
recent patch r352438 which needed to perform an index hash table lookup
using the aliasee GUID).
As noted in the comments in AliasSummary, we no longer technically need
to keep a pointer to the corresponding aliasee summary, since it could
be obtained by walking the list of summaries on the ValueInfo looking
for the summary in the same module. However, I am concerned that this
would be inefficient when walking through the index during the thin
link for various analyses. That can be reevaluated in the future.
By always populating this new field, we can remove the guard and special
handling for a 0 aliasee GUID when dumping the dot graph of the summary.
An additional improvement in this patch is when reading the summaries
from LLVM assembly we now set the AliaseeSummary field to the aliasee
summary in that same module, which makes it consistent with the behavior
when reading the summary from bitcode.
Reviewers: pcc, mehdi_amini
Subscribers: inglorion, eraman, steven_wu, dexonsmith, arphaman, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57470
llvm-svn: 356268
The shift argument is defined to be modulo the bitwidth, so if that argument
is a constant, we can always reduce the constant to its minimal form to allow
better CSE and other follow-on transforms.
We need to be careful to ignore constant expressions here, or we will likely
infinite loop. I'm adding a general vector constant query for that case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59374
llvm-svn: 356192
Summary:
This fixes an extremely long compile time caused by recursive analysis
of truncs, which were not previously subject to any depth limits unlike
some of the other ops. I decided to use the same control used for
sext/zext, since the routines analyzing these are sometimes mutually
recursive with the trunc analysis.
Reviewers: mkazantsev, sanjoy
Subscribers: sanjoy, jdoerfert, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58994
llvm-svn: 355949
This is addressing the issue that we're not modeling the cost of clib functions
in TTI::getIntrinsicCosts and thus we're basically addressing this fixme:
// FIXME: This is wrong for libc intrinsics.
To enable analysis of clib functions, we not only need an intrinsic ID and
formal arguments, but also the actual user of that function so that we can e.g.
look at alignment and values of arguments. So, this is the initial plumbing to
pass the user of an intrinsinsic on to getCallCosts, which queries
getIntrinsicCosts.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59014
llvm-svn: 355901
Change from original commit: move test (that uses an X86 triple) into the X86
subdirectory.
Original description:
Gating vectorizing reductions on *all* fastmath flags seems unnecessary;
`reassoc` should be sufficient.
Reviewers: tvvikram, mkuper, kristof.beyls, sdesmalen, Ayal
Reviewed By: sdesmalen
Subscribers: dcaballe, huntergr, jmolloy, mcrosier, jlebar, bixia, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57728
llvm-svn: 355889
InstructionSimplify currently has some code to determine the constant
range of integer instructions for some simple cases. It is used to
simplify icmps.
This change moves the relevant code into ValueTracking as
llvm::computeConstantRange(), so it can also be reused for other
purposes.
In particular this is with the optimization of overflow checks in
mind (ref D59071), where constant ranges cover some cases that
known bits don't.
llvm-svn: 355781
Commit r355068 "Fix IR/Analysis layering issue with OptBisect" uses the
template
return Gate.isEnabled() && !Gate.shouldRunPass(this, getDescription(...));
for all pass kinds. For the RegionPass, it left out the not operator,
causing region passes to be skipped as soon as a pass gate is used.
llvm-svn: 355733
Summary:
Right now, when we encounter a string equality check,
e.g. `if (memcmp(a, b, s) == 0)`, we try to expand to a comparison if `s` is a
small compile-time constant, and fall back on calling `memcmp()` else.
This is sub-optimal because memcmp has to compute much more than
equality.
This patch replaces `memcmp(a, b, s) == 0` by `bcmp(a, b, s) == 0` on platforms
that support `bcmp`.
`bcmp` can be made much more efficient than `memcmp` because equality
compare is trivially parallel while lexicographic ordering has a chain
dependency.
Subscribers: fedor.sergeev, jyknight, ckennelly, gchatelet, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56593
llvm-svn: 355672
In the DJ-graph based computation of iterated dominance frontiers,
SuccNode->getIDom() == Node is one of the tests to check if (Node,Succ)
is a J-edge. If it is true, since Node is dominated by Root,
SuccLevel = level(Node)+1 > RootLevel
which means the next test SuccLevel > RootLevel will also be true. test
the check is redundant and can be deleted as it also involves one
indirection and provides no speed-up.
llvm-svn: 355589
A SCEV is not low-cost just because you can divide it by a power of 2. We need to also
check what we are dividing to make sure it too is not a high-code expansion. This helps
to not expand the exit value of certain loops, helping not to bloat the code.
The change in no-iv-rewrite.ll is reverting back to what it was testing before rL194116,
and looks a lot like the other tests in replace-loop-exit-folds.ll.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58435
llvm-svn: 355393
There are no tests for this case, and I'm not sure how it could ever work,
so I'm just removing this option from the matcher. This should fix PR40940:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40940
llvm-svn: 355292
InputIsKnownDead check is shared by all operands. Compute it once.
For non-integer instructions, use Visited.insert(I).second to replace a
find() and an insert().
llvm-svn: 355290
In some cases, MaxBECount can be less precise than ExactBECount for AND
and OR (the AND case was PR26207). In the OR test case, both ExactBECounts are
undef, but MaxBECount are different, so we hit the assertion below. This
patch uses the same solution the AND case already uses.
Assertion failed:
((isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(ExactNotTaken) || !isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(MaxNotTaken))
&& "Exact is not allowed to be less precise than Max"), function ExitLimit
This patch also consolidates test cases for both AND and OR in a single
test case.
Fixes https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=13245
Reviewers: sanjoy, efriedma, mkazantsev
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58853
llvm-svn: 355259
The value stored in SCEVConstant is of type ConstantInt*, which can
never be UndefValue. So we should never hit that code.
Reviewers: mkazantsev, sanjoy
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58851
llvm-svn: 355257
We have two sources of known bits:
1. For adds leading ones of either operand are preserved. For sub
leading zeros of LHS and leading ones of RHS become leading zeros in
the result.
2. The saturating math is a select between add/sub and an all-ones/
zero value. As such we can carry out the add/sub known bits
calculation, and only preseve the known one/zero bits respectively.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58329
llvm-svn: 355223
GCC correctly moans that PlainCFGBuilder::isExternalDef(llvm::Value*) and
StackSafetyDataFlowAnalysis::verifyFixedPoint() are defined but not used
in Release builds. Hide them behind 'ifndef NDEBUG'.
llvm-svn: 355205
Part 2 of CSPGO changes (mostly related to ProfileSummary).
Note that I use a default parameter in setProfileSummary() and getSummary().
This is to break the dependency in clang. I will make the parameter explicit
after changing clang in a separated patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54175
llvm-svn: 355131
Second part of D58593.
Compute precise overflow conditions based on all known bits, rather
than just the sign bits. Unsigned a - b overflows iff a < b, and we
can determine whether this always/never happens based on the minimal
and maximal values achievable for a and b subject to the known bits
constraint.
llvm-svn: 355109
Summary:
The description of KnownBits::zext() and
KnownBits::zextOrTrunc() has confusingly been telling
that the operation is equivalent to zero extending the
value we're tracking. That has not been true, instead
the user has been forced to explicitly set the extended
bits as known zero afterwards.
This patch adds a second argument to KnownBits::zext()
and KnownBits::zextOrTrunc() to control if the extended
bits should be considered as known zero or as unknown.
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: javed.absar, hiraditya, jdoerfert, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58650
llvm-svn: 355099
Part of D58593.
Compute precise overflow conditions based on all known bits, rather
than just the sign bits. Unsigned a + b overflows iff a > ~b, and we
can determine whether this always/never happens based on the minimal
and maximal values achievable for a and ~b subject to the known bits
constraint.
llvm-svn: 355072
OptBisect is in IR due to LLVMContext using it. However, it uses IR units from
Analysis as well. This change moves getDescription functions from OptBisect
to their respective IR units. Generating names for IR units will now be up
to the callers, keeping the Analysis IR units in Analysis. To prevent
unnecessary string generation, isEnabled function is added so that callers know
when the description needs to be generated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58406
llvm-svn: 355068
Summary:
The original assumption for the insertDef method was that it would not
materialize Defs out of no-where, hence it will not insert phis needed
after inserting a Def.
However, when cloning an instruction (use case used in LICM), we do
materialize Defs "out of no-where". If the block receiving a Def has at
least one other Def, then no processing is needed. If the block just
received its first Def, we must check where Phi placement is needed.
The only new usage of insertDef is in LICM, hence the trigger for the bug.
But the original goal of the method also fails to apply for the move()
method. If we move a Def from the entry point of a diamond to either the
left or right blocks, then the merge block must add a phi.
While this usecase does not currently occur, or may be viewed as an
incorrect transformation, MSSA must behave corectly given the scenario.
Resolves PR40749 and PR40754.
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: sanjoy, jlebar, Prazek, jdoerfert, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58652
llvm-svn: 355040
As discussed on llvm-dev:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130491.html
We can't remove the compare+select in the general case because
we are treating funnel shift like a standard instruction (as
opposed to a special instruction like select/phi).
That means that if one of the operands of the funnel shift is
poison, the result is poison regardless of whether we know that
the operand is actually unused based on the instruction's
particular semantics.
The motivating case for this transform is the more specific
rotate op (rather than funnel shift), and we are preserving the
fold for that case because there is no chance of introducing
extra poison when there is no anonymous extra operand to the
funnel shift.
llvm-svn: 354905
This requires a couple of tweaks to existing vectorization functions as they were assuming that only the second call argument (ctlz/cttz/powi) could ever be the 'always scalar' argument, but for smul.fix + umul.fix its the third argument.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58616
llvm-svn: 354790
Summary:
This patch separates two semantics of `applyUpdates`:
1. User provides an accurate CFG diff and the dominator tree is updated according to the difference of `the number of edge insertions` and `the number of edge deletions` to infer the status of an edge before and after the update.
2. User provides a sequence of hints. Updates mentioned in this sequence might never happened and even duplicated.
Logic changes:
Previously, removing invalid updates is considered a side-effect of deduplication and is not guaranteed to be reliable. To handle the second semantic, `applyUpdates` does validity checking before deduplication, which can cause updates that have already been applied to be submitted again. Then, different calls to `applyUpdates` might cause unintended consequences, for example,
```
DTU(Lazy) and Edge A->B exists.
1. DTU.applyUpdates({{Delete, A, B}, {Insert, A, B}}) // User expects these 2 updates result in a no-op, but {Insert, A, B} is queued
2. Remove A->B
3. DTU.applyUpdates({{Delete, A, B}}) // DTU cancels this update with {Insert, A, B} mentioned above together (Unintended)
```
But by restricting the precondition that updates of an edge need to be strictly ordered as how CFG changes were made, we can infer the initial status of this edge to resolve this issue.
Interface changes:
The second semantic of `applyUpdates` is separated to `applyUpdatesPermissive`.
These changes enable DTU(Lazy) to use the first semantic if needed, which is quite useful in `transforms/utils`.
Reviewers: kuhar, brzycki, dmgreen, grosser
Reviewed By: brzycki
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58170
llvm-svn: 354669
The m_APFloat matcher does not work with anything but strict
splat vector constants, so we could miss these folds and then
trigger an assertion in instcombine:
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=13201
The previous attempt at this in rL354406 had a logic bug that
actually triggered a regression test failure, but I failed to
notice it the first time.
llvm-svn: 354467
