There is no real reason the index has to have the concept of an
exporting Module. We should be able to have one single unique
instance of the Index, and it should be read-only after creation
for the whole ThinLTO processing.
The linker plugin should be able to process multiple modules (in
parallel or in sequence) with the same index.
The only reason the ExportingModule was present seems to be to
implement hasExportedFunctions() that is used by the Module linker
to decide what to do with the current Module.
For now I replaced it with a query to the map of Modules path to
see if this module was declared in the Index and consider that if
it is the case then it is probably exporting function.
On the long term the Linker interface needs to evolve and this
call should not be needed anymore.
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 254581
Summary:
This allows to query for a function in the map without creating an
entry, allowing to use a const FunctionInfoIndex.
Reviewers: tejohnson
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14912
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 253953
Summary:
Several fixes to the handling of bitcode files without function summary
sections so that they are skipped during ThinLTO processing in llvm-lto
and the gold plugin when appropriate instead of aborting.
1 Don't assert when trying to add a FunctionInfo that doesn't have
a summary attached.
2 Skip FunctionInfo structures that don't have attached function summary
sections when trying to create the combined function summary.
3 In both llvm-lto and gold-plugin, check whether a bitcode file has
a function summary section before trying to parse the index, and skip
the bitcode file if it does not.
4 Fix hasFunctionSummaryInMemBuffer in BitcodeReader, which had a bug
where we returned to early while looking for the summary section.
Also added llvm-lto and gold-plugin based tests for cases where we
don't have function summaries in the bitcode file. I verified that
either the first couple fixes described above are enough to avoid the
crashes, or fixes 1,3,4. But have combined them all here for added
robustness.
Reviewers: joker.eph
Subscribers: llvm-commits, joker.eph
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14903
llvm-svn: 253796
This reverts commit r251837, due to a number of bot failures of the form:
/home/grosser/buildslave/perf-x86_64-penryn-O3-polly-fast/llvm.obj/tools/llvm-link/Release+Asserts/llvm-link.o:llvm-link.cpp:function
loadIndex(llvm::LLVMContext&, llvm::Module const*): error: undefined
reference to
'llvm::object::FunctionIndexObjectFile::create(llvm::MemoryBufferRef,
llvm::LLVMContext&, llvm::Module const*, bool)'
/home/grosser/buildslave/perf-x86_64-penryn-O3-polly-fast/llvm.obj/tools/llvm-link/Release+Asserts/llvm-link.o:llvm-link.cpp:function
loadIndex(llvm::LLVMContext&, llvm::Module const*): error: undefined
reference to 'llvm::object::FunctionIndexObjectFile::takeIndex()'
I'm not sure why these are happening - I added Object to the requred
libraries in tools/llvm-link/LLVMBuild.txt and the LLVM_LINK_COMPONENTS
in tools/llvm-link/CMakeLists.txt. Confirmed for my build that these
symbols come out of libLLVMObject.a. What am I missing?
llvm-svn: 251841
Summary:
Support for necessary linkage changes and symbol renaming during
ThinLTO function importing.
Also includes llvm-link support for manually importing functions
and associated llvm-link based tests.
Note that this does not include support for intelligently importing
metadata, which is currently imported duplicate times. That support will
be in the follow-on patch, and currently is ignored by the tests.
Reviewers: dexonsmith, joker.eph, davidxl
Subscribers: tobiasvk, tejohnson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13515
llvm-svn: 251837
Summary:
The bitcode format is described in this document:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B036uwnWM6RWdnBLakxmeDdOeXc/view
For more info on ThinLTO see:
https://sites.google.com/site/llvmthinlto
The first customer is ThinLTO, however the data structures are designed
and named more generally based on prior feedback. There are a few
comments regarding how certain interfaces are used by ThinLTO, and the
options added here to gold currently have ThinLTO-specific names as the
behavior they provoke is currently ThinLTO-specific.
This patch includes support for generating per-module function indexes,
the combined index file via the gold plugin, and several tests
(more are included with the associated clang patch D11908).
Reviewers: dexonsmith, davidxl, joker.eph
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13107
llvm-svn: 249270
