1
0
mirror of https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git synced 2024-10-19 02:52:53 +02:00
Commit Graph

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Joel E. Denny
b4b16598f6 [FileCheck] Given multiple -dump-input, prefer most verbose
Problem: `FILECHECK_OPTS` was implemented so that a test runner, such
as a bot, can specify FileCheck debugging options, such as
`-dump-input=fail`.  However, some existing test suites have FileCheck
calls that already specify `-dump-input=fail` or `-dump-input=always`.
Without this patch, such tests fail under such a test runner because
FileCheck doesn't accept multiple occurrences of `-dump-input`.

Solution: This patch permits multiple occurrences of `-dump-input` by
assigning precedence to its values in the following descending order:
`help`, `always`, `fail`, and `never`.  That is, any occurrence of
`help` always obtains help, and otherwise the behavior is similar to
`-v` vs. `-vv` in that the option specifying the greatest verbosity
has precedence.

Rationale: My justification for the new behavior is as follows.  I
have not experienced use cases where, either as a test runner or as a
test author, I want to **limit** the permitted debugging verbosity
(except as a test author in FileCheck's or lit's test suites where the
FileCheck debugging output itself is under test, but the solution
there is `env FILECHECK_OPTS=`, and I imagine we should use the same
solution anywhere else this need might occur).  Of course, as either a
test runner or test author, it is useful to **increase** debugging
verbosity.

Reviewed By: probinson

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70784
2019-12-03 14:21:13 -05:00
Joel E. Denny
dd1fd5b646 [FileCheck] Make FILECHECK_OPTS useful for its test suite
Without this patch, `FILECHECK_OPTS` isn't propagated to FileCheck's
test suite so that `FILECHECK_OPTS` doesn't inadvertently affect test
results by affecting the output of FileCheck calls under test.  As a
result, `FILECHECK_OPTS` is useless for debugging FileCheck's test
suite.

In `llvm/test/FileCheck/lit.local.cfg`, this patch provides a new
subsitution, `%ProtectFileCheckOutput`, to address this problem for
both `FILECHECK_OPTS` and the deprecated
`FILECHECK_DUMP_INPUT_ON_FAILURE`.  The rest of the patch uses
`%ProtectFileCheckOutput` throughout the test suite

Fixes PR40284.

Reviewed By: probinson, thopre

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65121
2019-11-21 18:01:12 -05:00
Don Hinton
181d6dd617 [CommandLine] Change help output to prefix long options with -- instead of -. NFC . Part 3 of 5
Summary:
By default, `parseCommandLineOptions()` will accept either a
`-` or `--` prefix for long options -- options with names longer than
a single character.

While this change does not affect behavior, it will be helpful with a
subsequent change that requires long options use the `--` prefix.

Reviewers: rnk, thopre

Reviewed By: thopre

Subscribers: thopre, cfe-commits, hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm, #clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61269

llvm-svn: 359909
2019-05-03 17:47:29 +00:00
Douglas Yung
826d1a3623 Fixup test after r352704 since it changes how paths may be emitted.
On Unix/Mac OS X, normpath() returns the path unchanged (FileCheck), but
on case-insensitive filesystems (like NTFS on Windows), it converts the
path to lowercase (filecheck) which was causing the test to fail.

llvm-svn: 352735
2019-01-31 07:58:34 +00:00
Joel E. Denny
ef0283f95a [FileCheck] Suppress old -v/-vv diags if dumping input
The old diagnostic form of the trace produced by -v and -vv looks
like:

```
check1:1:8: remark: CHECK: expected string found in input
CHECK: abc
       ^
<stdin>:1:3: note: found here
; abc def
  ^~~
```

When dumping annotated input is requested (via -dump-input), I find
that this old trace is not useful and is sometimes harmful:

1. The old trace is mostly redundant because the same basic
   information also appears in the input dump's annotations.

2. The old trace buries any error diagnostic between it and the input
   dump, but I find it useful to see any error diagnostic up front.

3. FILECHECK_OPTS=-dump-input=fail requests annotated input dumps only
   for failed FileCheck calls.  However, I have to also add -v or -vv
   to get a full set of annotations, and that can produce massive
   output from all FileCheck calls in all tests.  That's a real
   problem when I run this in the IDE I use, which grinds to a halt as
   it tries to capture all that output.

When -dump-input=fail|always, this patch suppresses the old trace from
-v or -vv.  Error diagnostics still print as usual.  If you want the
old trace, perhaps to see variable expansions, you can set
-dump-input=none (the default).

Reviewed By: probinson

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55825

llvm-svn: 351881
2019-01-22 21:41:42 +00:00
Joel E. Denny
9bea51b257 [FileCheck] Try to fix test on windows due to r349418
llvm-svn: 349432
2018-12-18 01:17:28 +00:00
Joel E. Denny
edc00dc9b3 [FileCheck] Annotate input dump (5/7)
This patch implements input annotations for diagnostics enabled by -v,
which report good matches for directives.  These annotations mark
match ranges using `^~~`.

For example:

```
$ FileCheck -dump-input=help
The following description was requested by -dump-input=help to
explain the input annotations printed by -dump-input=always and
-dump-input=fail:

  - L:     labels line number L of the input file
  - T:L    labels the only match result for a pattern of type T from line L of
           the check file
  - T:L'N  labels the Nth match result for a pattern of type T from line L of
           the check file
  - ^~~    marks good match (reported if -v)
  - !~~    marks bad match, such as:
           - CHECK-NEXT on same line as previous match (error)
           - CHECK-NOT found (error)
  - X~~    marks search range when no match is found, such as:
           - CHECK-NEXT not found (error)
  - ?      marks fuzzy match when no match is found
  - colors success, error, fuzzy match, unmatched input

If you are not seeing color above or in input dumps, try: -color

$ FileCheck -v -dump-input=always check3 < input3 |& sed -n '/^<<<</,$p'
<<<<<<
         1: abc foobar def
check:1     ^~~
not:2           !~~~~~     error: no match expected
check:3                ^~~
>>>>>>

$ cat check3
CHECK:     abc
CHECK-NOT: foobar
CHECK:     def

$ cat input3
abc foobar def
```

-vv enables these annotations for FileCheck's implicit EOF patterns as
well.  For an example where EOF patterns become relevant, see patch 7
in this series.

If colors are enabled, `^~~` is green to suggest success.

-v plus color enables highlighting of input text that has no final
match for any expected pattern.  The highlight uses a cyan background
to suggest a cold section.  This highlighting can make it easier to
spot text that was intended to be matched but that failed to be
matched in a long series of good matches.

CHECK-COUNT-<num> good matches are another case where there can be
multiple match results for the same directive.

Reviewed By: george.karpenkov, probinson

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53897

llvm-svn: 349422
2018-12-18 00:03:03 +00:00
Joel E. Denny
12285ee434 [FileCheck] Annotate input dump (1/7)
Extend FileCheck to dump its input annotated with FileCheck's
diagnostics: errors, good matches if -v, and additional information if
-vv.  The goal is to make it easier to visualize FileCheck's matching
behavior when debugging.

Each patch in this series implements input annotations for a
particular category of FileCheck diagnostics.  While the first few
patches alone are somewhat useful, the annotations become much more
useful as later patches implement annotations for -v and -vv
diagnostics, which show the matching behavior leading up to the error.

This first patch implements boilerplate plus input annotations for
error diagnostics reporting that no matches were found for a
directive.  These annotations mark the search ranges of the failed
directives.  Instead of using the usual `^~~`, which is used by later
patches for good matches, these annotations use `X~~` so that this
category of errors is visually distinct.

For example:

```
$ FileCheck -dump-input=help
The following description was requested by -dump-input=help to
explain the input annotations printed by -dump-input=always and
-dump-input=fail:

  - L:     labels line number L of the input file
  - T:L    labels the match result for a pattern of type T from line L of
           the check file
  - X~~    marks search range when no match is found
  - colors error

If you are not seeing color above or in input dumps, try: -color

$ FileCheck -v -dump-input=always check1 < input1 |& sed -n '/^Input file/,$p'
Input file: <stdin>
Check file: check1

-dump-input=help describes the format of the following dump.

Full input was:
<<<<<<
        1: ; abc def
        2: ; ghI jkl
next:3     X~~~~~~~~ error: no match found
>>>>>>

$ cat check1
CHECK: abc
CHECK-SAME: def
CHECK-NEXT: ghi
CHECK-SAME: jkl

$ cat input1
; abc def
; ghI jkl
```

Some additional details related to the boilerplate:

* Enabling: The annotated input dump is enabled by `-dump-input`,
  which can also be set via the `FILECHECK_OPTS` environment variable.
  Accepted values are `help`, `always`, `fail`, or `never`.  As shown
  above, `help` describes the format of the dump.  `always` is helpful
  when you want to investigate a successful FileCheck run, perhaps for
  an unexpected pass. `-dump-input-on-failure` and
  `FILECHECK_DUMP_INPUT_ON_FAILURE` remain as a deprecated alias for
  `-dump-input=fail`.

* Diagnostics: The usual diagnostics are not suppressed in this mode
  and are printed first.  For brevity in the example above, I've
  omitted them using a sed command.  Sometimes they're perfectly
  sufficient, and then they make debugging quicker than if you were
  forced to hunt through a dump of long input looking for the error.
  If you think they'll get in the way sometimes, keep in mind that
  it's pretty easy to grep for the start of the input dump, which is
  `<<<`.

* Colored Annotations: The annotated input is colored if colors are
  enabled (enabling colors can be forced using -color).  For example,
  errors are red.  However, as in the above example, colors are not
  vital to reading the annotations.

I don't know how to test color in the output, so any hints here would
be appreciated.

Reviewed By: george.karpenkov, zturner, probinson

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52999

llvm-svn: 349418
2018-12-18 00:01:39 +00:00