For FCMEQ, FCMGE, FCMGT, FCMLE and FCMLT, floating point zero will be
printed as #0.0 instead of #0. To support the history codes using #0,
we consider to let asm parser accept both #0.0 and #0.
llvm-svn: 199621
Ensure that the tag types are reflected on a replacement. This is particularly
important for the compatibility tag which has multiple representations where the
last definition wins.
llvm-svn: 199577
Fix MLA defs to use register class GPRnopc.
Add encoding tests for multiply instructions.
(Alias for MUL/SMLAL/UMLAL added by r199026.)
Patch by Zhaoshi.
llvm-svn: 199491
ARM assembly syntax uses @ for a comment, execpt for the second
parameter of the .symver directive which requires @ as part of the
symbol name. This commit fixes the parsing of this directive by
adding a special case for ARM for this one argumnet.
To make the change we had to move the AllowAtInIdentifier variable
to the MCAsmLexer interface (from AsmLexer) and expose a setter for
the value. The ELFAsmParser then toggles this value when parsing
the second argument to the .symver directive for a target that
uses @ as a comment symbol
llvm-svn: 199339
MSVC on x64 requires that we create image relative symbol
references to refer to RTTI data. Seeing as how there is no way to
explicitly make reference to a given relocation type in LLVM IR, pattern
match expressions of the form &foo - &__ImageBase.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2523
llvm-svn: 199312
The GNU as behavior is a bit different and very strange. It will mark any
label that contains an instruction. We can implement that, but using the
type looks more natural since gas will not mark a function if a .word is
used to output the instructions!
llvm-svn: 199287
This finishes the job started in r198756, and creates separate opcodes for
64-bit vs. 32-bit versions of the rest of the RET instructions too.
LRETL/LRETQ are interesting... I can't see any justification for their
existence in the SDM. There should be no 'LRETL' in 64-bit mode, and no
need for a REX.W prefix for LRETQ. But this is what GAS does, and my
Sandybridge CPU and an Opteron 6376 concur when tested as follows:
asm __volatile__("pushq $0x1234\nmovq $0x33,%rax\nsalq $32,%rax\norq $1f,%rax\npushq %rax\nlretl $8\n1:");
asm __volatile__("pushq $1234\npushq $0x33\npushq $1f\nlretq $8\n1:");
asm __volatile__("pushq $0x33\npushq $1f\nlretq\n1:");
asm __volatile__("pushq $0x1234\npushq $0x33\npushq $1f\nlretq $8\n1:");
cf. PR8592 and commit r118903, which added LRETQ. I only added LRETIQ to
match it.
I don't quite understand how the Intel syntax parsing for ret
instructions is working, despite r154468 allegedly fixing it. Aren't the
explicitly sized 'retw', 'retd' and 'retq' supposed to work? I have at
least made the 'lretq' work with (and indeed *require*) the 'q'.
llvm-svn: 199106
The target specific parser should return `false' if the target AsmParser handles
the directive, and `true' if the generic parser should handle the directive.
Many of the target specific directive handlers would `return Error' which does
not follow these semantics. This change simply changes the target specific
routines to conform to the semantis of the ParseDirective correctly.
Conformance to the semantics improves diagnostics emitted for the invalid
directives. X86 is taken as a sample to ensure that multiple diagnostics are
not presented for a single error.
llvm-svn: 199068
An improper qualifier would result in a superfluous error due to the parser not
consuming the remainder of the statement. Simply consume the remainder of the
statement to avoid the error.
llvm-svn: 199035
The implicit immediate 0 forms are assembly aliases, not distinct instruction
encodings. Fix the initial implementation introduced in r198914 to an alias to
avoid two separate instruction definitions for the same encoding.
An InstAlias is insufficient in this case as the necessary due to the need to
add a new additional operand for the implicit zero. By using the AsmPsuedoInst,
fall back to the C++ code to transform the instruction to the equivalent
_POST_IMM form, inserting the additional implicit immediate 0.
llvm-svn: 199032
A 32-bit immediate value can be formed from a constant expression and loaded
into a register. Add support to emit this into an object file. Because this
value is a constant, a relocation must *not* be produced for it.
llvm-svn: 199023
The disassembler would no longer be able to disambiguage between the two
variants (explicit immediate #0 vs implicit, omitted #0) for the ldrt, strt,
ldrbt, strbt mnemonics as both versions indicated the disassembler routine.
llvm-svn: 198944
The GNU assembler supports prefixing the expression with a '#' to indiciate that
the value that is being moved is infact a constant. This improves the
compatibility of the integrated assembler's parser for this.
llvm-svn: 198916
The GNU assembler has an extension that allows for the elision of the paired
register (dt2) for the LDRD and STRD mnemonics. Add support for this in the
assembly parser. Canonicalise the usage during the instruction parsing from
the specified version.
llvm-svn: 198915
The ARM ARM indicates the mnemonics as follows:
ldrbt{<c>}{<q>} <Rt>, [<Rn>], {, #+/-<imm>}
ldrt{<c>}{<q>} <Rt>, [<Rn>] {, #+/-<imm>}
strbt{<c>}{<q>} <Rt>, [<Rn>] {, #<imm>}
strt{<c>}{<q>} <Rt>, [<Rn>] {, #+/-<imm>}
This improves the parser to deal with the implicit immediate 0 for the mnemonics
as per the specification.
Thanks to Joerg Sonnenberger for the tests!
llvm-svn: 198914
We can't do a perfect job here. We *have* to allow (%dx) even in 64-bit
mode, for example, because it might be used for an unofficial form of
the in/out instructions. We actually want to do a better job of validation
*later*. Perhaps *instead* of doing it where we are at the moment.
But for now, doing what validation we *can* do in the place that the code
already has its validation, is an improvement.
llvm-svn: 198760
It seems there is no separate instruction class for having AdSize *and*
OpSize bits set, which is required in order to disambiguate between all
these instructions. So add that to the disassembler.
Hm, perhaps we do need an AdSize16 bit after all?
llvm-svn: 198759
Where "where possible" means that it's an immediate value and it's below
0x10000. In fact GAS will either truncate or error with larger values,
and will insist on using the addr32 prefix to get 32-bit addressing. So
perhaps we should do that, in a later patch.
llvm-svn: 198758
JCXZ should have the 0x67 prefix only if we're in 32-bit mode, so make that
appropriately conditional. And JECXZ needs the prefix instead.
llvm-svn: 198757
I couldn't see how to do this sanely without splitting RETQ from RETL.
Eric says: "sad about the inability to roundtrip them now, but...".
I have no idea what that means, but perhaps it wants preserving in the
commit comment.
llvm-svn: 198756
This fixes the bulk of 16-bit output, and the corresponding test case
x86-16.s now looks mostly like the x86-32.s test case that it was
originally based on. A few irrelevant instructions have been dropped,
and there are still some corner cases to be fixed in subsequent patches.
llvm-svn: 198752
