When canonicalizing dags according to the rule
(shl (zext (shr X, c1) ), c1) ==> (zext (shl (shr X, c1), c1))
remember to add the new shl dag to the DAGCombiner worklist of nodes.
If we don't explicitly add it to the worklist of nodes to visit, we
may not trigger later on the rule that folds the shift left + logical
shift right into a AND instruction with bitmask.
llvm-svn: 192883
Consider the following:
typedef unsigned short ushort4U __attribute__((ext_vector_type(4),
aligned(2)));
typedef unsigned short ushort4 __attribute__((ext_vector_type(4)));
typedef unsigned short ushort8 __attribute__((ext_vector_type(8)));
typedef int int4 __attribute__((ext_vector_type(4)));
int4 __bbase_cvt_int(ushort4 v) {
ushort8 a;
a.lo = v;
return _mm_cvtepu16_epi32(a);
}
This generates the, not unreasonable, IR:
define <4 x i32> @foo0(double %v.coerce) nounwind ssp {
%tmp = bitcast double %v.coerce to <4 x i16>
%tmp1 = shufflevector <4 x i16> %tmp, <4 x i16> undef, <8 x i32> <i32
%0, i32 1, i32 2, i32 3, i32 undef, i32 undef, i32 undef, i32 undef>
%tmp2 = tail call <4 x i32> @llvm.x86.sse41.pmovzxwd(<8 x i16> %tmp1)
ret <4 x i32> %tmp2
}
The problem is when type legalization gets hold of the v4i16. It
legalizes that by spilling to the stack, then doing a zero-extending
load. Things go even more silly from there, ending up with something
like:
_foo0:
movsd %xmm0, -8(%rsp) <== Spill to the stack.
movq -8(%rsp), %xmm0 <== Reload it right back out.
pmovzxwd %xmm0, %xmm1 <== Here's what we actually asked for.
pblendw $1, %xmm1, %xmm0 <== We don't need this at all
pmovzxwd %xmm0, %xmm0 <== We already did this
ret
The v8i8 to v8i16 zext intrinsic gives even worse results, with two
table lookups via pshufb instructions(!!).
To avoid all that, we can move the bitcasting until after we've formed
the wider (legal) vector type. Then our normal codegen flows along
nicely and we get the expected:
_foo0:
pmovzxwd %xmm0, %xmm0
ret
rdar://15245794
llvm-svn: 192866
The reason this got reverted was that the @feat.00 symbol which was emitted
for every TU became quoted, and on cygwin/mingw we use the gas assembler which
couldn't handle the quotes.
This commit fixes the problem by only emitting @feat.00 for win32, where we use
clang -cc1as to assemble. gas would just drop this symbol anyway, so there is no
loss there.
With @feat.00 gone, there shouldn't be quoted symbols showing up on cygwin since
it uses the Itanium ABI, which doesn't put these funny characters in symbols.
> Because of win32 mangling, we produce symbol and section names with
> funny characters in them, most notably @ characters.
>
> MC would choke on trying to parse its own assembly output. This patch addresses
> that by:
>
> - Making @ trigger quoting of symbol names
> - Also quote section names in the same way
> - Just parse section names like other identifiers (to allow for quotes)
> - Don't assume @ signifies a symbol variant if it is in a string.
llvm-svn: 192859
bulldozer and piledriver. Support for the instruction itself seems to have
already been added in r178040.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1933
llvm-svn: 192828
This happens e.g. with <2 x i64> -1 on x86_32. It cannot be generated directly
because i64 is illegal. It would be nice if getNOT would handle this
transparently, but I don't see a way to generate a legal constant there right
now. Fixes PR17487.
llvm-svn: 192795
GNU AS didn't like quotes in symbol names.
Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized character is `"'
.def "@feat.00";
"@feat.00" = 1
Reproduced on Cygwin's 2.23.52.20130309 and mingw32's 2.20.1.20100303.
llvm-svn: 192775
Because of win32 mangling, we produce symbol and section names with
funny characters in them, most notably @ characters.
MC would choke on trying to parse its own assembly output. This patch addresses
that by:
- Making @ trigger quoting of symbol names
- Also quote section names in the same way
- Just parse section names like other identifiers (to allow for quotes)
- Don't assume @ signifies a symbol variant if it is in a string.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1945
llvm-svn: 192758
This changes the SelectionDAG scheduling preference to source
order. Soon, the SelectionDAG scheduler can be bypassed saving
a nice chunk of compile time.
Performance differences that result from this change are often a
consequence of register coalescing. The register coalescer is far from
perfect. Bugs can be filed for deficiencies.
On x86 SandyBridge/Haswell, the source order schedule is often
preserved, particularly for small blocks.
Register pressure is generally improved over the SD scheduler's ILP
mode. However, we are still able to handle large blocks that require
latency hiding, unlike the SD scheduler's BURR mode. MI scheduler also
attempts to discover the critical path in single-block loops and
adjust heuristics accordingly.
The MI scheduler relies on the new machine model. This is currently
unimplemented for AVX, so we may not be generating the best code yet.
Unit tests are updated so they don't depend on SD scheduling heuristics.
llvm-svn: 192750
- Type of index used in extract_vector_elt or insert_vector_elt supposes
to be TLI.getVectorIdxTy() which is pointer type on most targets. It'd
better to truncate (or zero-extend in case it's changed later) it to
mask element type to guarantee they are matching instead of asserting
that.
llvm-svn: 192722
- Lower signed division by constant powers-of-2 to target-independent
DAG operators instead of target-dependent ones to support them better
on targets where vector types are legal but shift operators on that
types are illegal. E.g., on AVX, PSRAW is only available on <8 x i16>
though <16 x i16> is a legal type.
llvm-svn: 192721
rdar:15221834 False AVX register dependencies cause 5x slowdown on
flops-5/6 and significant slowdown on several others.
This was blocking the switch to MI-Sched.
llvm-svn: 192669
through bitcast, ptrtoint, and inttoptr instructions. This is valid
only if the related instructions are in that same basic block, otherwise
we may reference variables that were not live accross basic blocks
resulting in undefined virtual registers.
The bug was exposed when both SDISel and FastISel were used within the same
function, i.e., one basic block is issued with FastISel and another with SDISel,
as demonstrated with the testcase.
<rdar://problem/15192473>
llvm-svn: 192636
a) x86-64 TLS has been documented
b) the code path should use movq for the correct relocation
to be generated.
I've also added a fixme for the test case that we should improve
the code generated, it should look something like is documented
in the tls abi document.
llvm-svn: 192631
Per original comment, the intention of this loop
is to go ahead and break the critical edge
(in order to sink this instruction) if there's
reason to believe doing so might "unblock" the
sinking of additional instructions that define
registers used by this one. The idea is that if
we have a few instructions to sink "together"
breaking the edge might be worthwhile.
This commit makes a few small changes
to help better realize this goal:
First, modify the loop to ignore registers
defined by this instruction. We don't
sink definitions of physical registers,
and sinking an SSA definition isn't
going to unblock an upstream instruction.
Second, ignore uses of physical registers.
Instructions that define physical registers are
rejected for sinking, and so moving this one
won't enable moving any defining instructions.
As an added bonus, while virtual register
use-def chains are generally small due
to SSA goodness, iteration over the uses
and definitions (used by hasOneNonDBGUse)
for physical registers like EFLAGS
can be rather expensive in practice.
(This is the original reason for looking at this)
Finally, to keep things simple continue
to only consider this trick for registers that
have a single use (via hasOneNonDBGUse),
but to avoid spuriously breaking critical edges
only do so if the definition resides
in the same MBB and therefore this one directly
blocks it from being sunk as well.
If sinking them together is meant to be,
let the iterative nature of this pass
sink the definition into this block first.
Update tests to accomodate this change,
add new testcase where sinking avoids pipeline stalls.
llvm-svn: 192608
This should fix the buildbots.
Original commit message:
[DAGCombiner] Slice a big load in two loads when the element are next to each
other in memory and the target has paired load and performs post-isel loads
combining.
E.g., this optimization will transform something like this:
a = load i64* addr
b = trunc i64 a to i32
c = lshr i64 a, 32
d = trunc i64 c to i32
into:
b = load i32* addr1
d = load i32* addr2
Where addr1 = addr2 +/- sizeof(i32), if the target supports paired load and
performs post-isel loads combining.
One should overload TargetLowering::hasPairedLoad to provide this information.
The default is false.
<rdar://problem/14477220>
llvm-svn: 192476
other in memory and the target has paired load and performs post-isel loads
combining.
E.g., this optimization will transform something like this:
a = load i64* addr
b = trunc i64 a to i32
c = lshr i64 a, 32
d = trunc i64 c to i32
into:
b = load i32* addr1
d = load i32* addr2
Where addr1 = addr2 +/- sizeof(i32), if the target supports paired load and
performs post-isel loads combining.
One should overload TargetLowering::hasPairedLoad to provide this information.
The default is false.
<rdar://problem/14477220>
llvm-svn: 192471
The most likely case where this error happens is when the user specifies
too many register operands. Don't make it look like an internal LLVM bug
when we can see that the error is coming from an inline asm instruction.
For other instructions we keep the "ran out of registers" error.
llvm-svn: 192041
