Although repairing definitions is not mandatory for correctness (only
phis would be impacted because of the RPO traversal), not repairing
might go against the cost model. Therefore, just repair when it is
possible.
llvm-svn: 266025
Use the MachineFunctionProperty mechanism to indicate whether the
liveness info is accurate instead of a bool flag on MRI.
Keeps the MRI accessor function for convenience. NFC
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18767
llvm-svn: 266020
AtomicExpandPass can now lower atomic load, atomic store, atomicrmw, and
cmpxchg instructions to __atomic_* library calls, when the target
doesn't support atomics of a given size.
This is the first step towards moving all atomic lowering from clang
into llvm. When all is done, the behavior of __sync_* builtins,
__atomic_* builtins, and C11 atomics will be unified.
Previously LLVM would pass everything through to the ISelLowering
code. There, unsupported atomic instructions would turn into __sync_*
library calls. Because of that behavior, Clang currently avoids emitting
llvm IR atomic instructions when this would happen, and emits __atomic_*
library functions itself, in the frontend.
This change makes LLVM able to emit __atomic_* libcalls, and thus will
eventually allow clang to depend on LLVM to do the right thing.
It is advantageous to do the new lowering to atomic libcalls in
AtomicExpandPass, before ISel time, because it's important that all
atomic operations for a given size either lower to __atomic_*
libcalls (which may use locks), or native instructions which won't. No
mixing and matching.
At the moment, this code is enabled only for SPARC, as a
demonstration. The next commit will expand support to all of the other
targets.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18200
llvm-svn: 266002
MachineFrameInfo does not need to be able to distinguish between the
user asking us not to realign the stack and the target telling us it
doesn't support stack realignment. Either way, fixed stack objects have
their alignment clamped.
llvm-svn: 265971
Summary:
After we make the adjustment, we can assume that for local allocas, but
not for stack parameters, the return address, or any other fixed stack
object (which has a negative offset and therefore lies prior to the
adjusted SP).
Fixes PR26662.
Reviewers: hfinkel, qcolombet, rnk
Subscribers: rnk, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18471
llvm-svn: 265886
This is a cleanup patch for SSP support in LLVM. There is no functional change.
llvm.stackprotectorcheck is not needed, because SelectionDAG isn't
actually lowering it in SelectBasicBlock; rather, it adds check code in
FinishBasicBlock, ignoring the position where the intrinsic is inserted
(See FindSplitPointForStackProtector()).
llvm-svn: 265851
This is in preparation for tail duplication during block placement. See D18226.
This needs to be a utility class for 2 reasons. No passes may run after block
placement, and also, tail-duplication affects subsequent layout decisions, so
it must be interleaved with placement, and can't be separated out into its own
pass. The original pass is still useful, and now runs by delegating to the
utility class.
llvm-svn: 265842
It caused PR27275: "ARM: Bad machine code: Using an undefined physical register"
Also reverting the following commits that were landed on top:
r265610 "Fix the compare-clang diff error introduced by r265547."
r265639 "Fix the sanitizer bootstrap error in r265547."
r265657 "InlineSpiller.cpp: Escap \@ in r265547. [-Wdocumentation]"
llvm-svn: 265790
Now, recordRegBankForType records only the first register bank that
covers a type instead of the last. This behavior can, nevertheless, be
override with the additional Force parameter to force the update.
llvm-svn: 265741
specific type.
This will be used to find the default mapping of the instruction.
Also, this information is recorded, instead of computed, because it is
expensive from a type to know which register bank maps it.
Indeed, we need to iterate through all the register classes of all the
register banks to find the one that maps the given type.
llvm-svn: 265736
from a register.
On top of duplicating the logic, it was buggy! It would assert on
physical registers, since MachineRegisterInfo does not have any
information regarding register classes/banks for them.
llvm-svn: 265727
The pass walk through the machine function and assign the register banks
using the default mapping. In other words, there is no attempt to reduce
cross register copies.
llvm-svn: 265707
the mapping of an instruction on register bank.
For most instructions, it is possible to guess the mapping of the
instruciton by using the encoding constraints.
It remains instructions without encoding constraints.
For copy-like instructions, we try to propagate the information we get
from the other operands. Otherwise, the target has to give this
information.
llvm-svn: 265703
helper class.
The default constructor creates invalid (isValid() == false) instances
and may be used to communicate that a mapping was not found.
llvm-svn: 265699
A virtual register may have either a register bank or a register class.
This is represented by a PointerUnion between the related classes.
Typically, a virtual register went through the following states
regarding register class and register bank:
1. Creation: None is set. Virtual registers are fully generic.
2. Register bank assignment: Register bank is set. Virtual registers
live into a register bank, but we do not know the constraints they need
to fulfil.
3. Instruction selection: Register class is set. Virtual registers are
bound by encoding constraints.
To map these states to GlobalISel, the IRTranslator implements #1,
RegBankSelect #2, and Select #3.
llvm-svn: 265696
This will be used by the register bank select pass to assign register banks
for generic virtual registers.
This was originally committed as r265573 but broke at least one windows bot.
The problem with the windows bot was that it was using a copy constructor for
the InstructionMappings class and could not synthesize it. Actually, the fact
that this class is not copy constructable is expected and the compiler should
use the move assignment constructor. Marking the problematic assignment
explicitly as using the move constructor has its own problems.
Indeed, with recent clang we get a warning that we may prevent the elision of
the copy by the compiler. A proper fix for both compilers would be to change the
API of getPossibleInstrMapping to take a InstructionMappings as input/output
parameter. This does not feel natural and since GISel is not used on windows
yet, I chose to workaround the problem by not compiling the problematic code on
windows.
llvm-svn: 265604
Summary:
In the context of http://wg21.link/lwg2445 C++ uses the concept of
'stronger' ordering but doesn't define it properly. This should be fixed
in C++17 barring a small question that's still open.
The code currently plays fast and loose with the AtomicOrdering
enum. Using an enum class is one step towards tightening things. I later
also want to tighten related enums, such as clang's
AtomicOrderingKind (which should be shared with LLVM as a 'C++ ABI'
enum).
This change touches a few lines of code which can be improved later, I'd
like to keep it as NFC for now as it's already quite complex. I have
related changes for clang.
As a follow-up I'll add:
bool operator<(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
bool operator>(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
bool operator<=(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
bool operator>=(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
This is separate so that clang and LLVM changes don't need to be in sync.
Reviewers: jyknight, reames
Subscribers: jyknight, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18775
llvm-svn: 265602
instruction on a register bank. This will be used by the register bank select
pass to assign register banks for generic virtual registers." and the follow-on
commits while I find out a way to fix the win7 bot:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-windows/builds/19882
This reverts commit r265578, r265581, r265584, and r265585.
llvm-svn: 265587
helper class.
The default constructor creates invalid (isValid() == false) instances
and may be used to communicate that a mapping was not found.
llvm-svn: 265581
The method checks that the value is fully defined accross the different partial
mappings and that the partial mappings are compatible between each other.
llvm-svn: 265556
when DenseMap growed and moved memory. I verified it fixed the bootstrap
problem on x86_64-linux-gnu but I cannot verify whether it fixes
the bootstrap error on clang-ppc64be-linux. I will watch the build-bot
result closely.
Replace analyzeSiblingValues with new algorithm to fix its compile
time issue. The patch is to solve PR17409 and its duplicates.
analyzeSiblingValues is a N x N complexity algorithm where N is
the number of siblings generated by reg splitting. Although it
causes siginificant compile time issue when N is large, it is also
important for performance since it removes redundent spills and
enables rematerialization.
To solve the compile time issue, the patch removes analyzeSiblingValues
and replaces it with lower cost alternatives containing two parts. The
first part creates a new spill hoisting method in postOptimization of
register allocation. It does spill hoisting at once after all the spills
are generated instead of inside every instance of selectOrSplit. The
second part queries the define expr of the original register for
rematerializaiton and keep it always available during register allocation
even if it is already dead. It deletes those dead instructions only in
postOptimization. With the two parts in the patch, it can remove
analyzeSiblingValues without sacrificing performance.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15302
llvm-svn: 265547
We must remove all aliased registers which may be more than the all sub
and super registers combined.
Bug found while reading the code. The bug does not affect any existing
target as the only use of register aliases I could found were control
registers on ARM and Hexagon which are all reserved.
llvm-svn: 265510
As part of the TRI argument of addRegBankCoverage we already have access to
the TargetRegisterClass through the ID of that register class.
Therefore, there is no point in needing a TargetRegisterClass instance,
the ID is enough to get to it.
llvm-svn: 265487
