The ARM backend has been using most of the MachO related subtarget
checks almost interchangeably, and since the only target it's had to
run on has been IOS (which is all three of MachO, Darwin and IOS) it's
worked out OK so far.
But we'd like to support embedded targets under the "*-*-none-macho"
triple, which means everything starts falling apart and inconsistent
behaviours emerge.
This patch should pick a reasonably sensible set of behaviours for the
new triple (and any others that come along, with luck). Some choices
were debatable (notably FP == r7 or r11), but we can revisit those
later when deficiencies become apparent.
llvm-svn: 198617
We used to generate the compact unwind encoding from the machine
instructions. However, this had the problem that if the user used `-save-temps'
or compiled their hand-written `.s' file (with CFI directives), we wouldn't
generate the compact unwind encoding.
Move the algorithm that generates the compact unwind encoding into the
MCAsmBackend. This way we can generate the encoding whether the code is from a
`.ll' or `.s' file.
<rdar://problem/13623355>
llvm-svn: 190290
instructions. With this patch:
1. ldr.n is recognized as mnemonic for the short encoding
2. ldr.w is recognized as menmonic for the long encoding
3. ldr will map to either short or long encodings depending on the size of the offset
llvm-svn: 186831
- Don't use assert(0), or tests may pass or fail according to assertions.
- For now, The tests are marked as XFAIL for win32 hosts.
FIXME: Could we avoid XFAIL to specify triple in the RUN lines?
llvm-svn: 183728
The encoding of NOP in ARMAsmBackend.cpp is missing a trailing zero, which
causes the emission of a coprocessor instruction rather than "mov r0, r0"
as indicated in the comment. The test also checks for the wrong encoding.
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20121203/157919.html
llvm-svn: 169420
Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes.
I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module
include to be the nearest plausible thing I could find. If you own or
care about any of these source files, I encourage you to take some time
and check that these edits were sensible. I can't have broken anything
(I strictly added headers, and reordered them, never removed), but they
may not be the headers you'd really like to identify as containing the
API being implemented.
Many forward declarations and missing includes were added to a header
files to allow them to parse cleanly when included first. The main
module rule does in fact have its merits. =]
llvm-svn: 169131
The target backend can support data-in-code load commands even when
the assembler doesn't, or vice-versa. Allow targets to opt-in for
direct-to-object.
PR13973.
llvm-svn: 164974
for the assembler and disassembler. Which were not being set/read correctly
for offsets greater than 22 bits in some cases.
Changes to lib/Target/ARM/ARMAsmBackend.cpp from Gideon Myles!
llvm-svn: 156118
Replace some assert() calls w/ actual diagnostics. In a perfect world,
there'd be range checks on these values long before things ever reached
this code. For now, though, issuing a better-late-than-never diagnostic
is still a big improvement over assert().
rdar://11347287
llvm-svn: 155851
The base address for the PC-relative load is Align(PC,4), so it's the
address of the word containing the 16-bit instruction, not the address
of the instruction itself. Ugh.
rdar://11314619
llvm-svn: 155659
We on the linker to resolve calls to the appropriate BL/BLX instruction
to make interworking function correctly. It uses the symbol in the
relocation to do that, so we need to be careful about being too clever.
To enable this for ARM mode, split the BL/BLX fixup kind off from the
unconditional-branch fixups.
rdar://10927209
llvm-svn: 151571
Load/store instructions w/ a fixup to be relative a function marked as thumb
don't use the low bit to specify thumb vs. non-thumb like interworking
branches do, so don't set it when dealing with those fixups.
rdar://10348687.
llvm-svn: 148366
Whether a fixup needs relaxation for the associated instruction is a
target-specific function, as the FIXME indicated. Create a hook for that
and use it.
llvm-svn: 145881
Not right yet, as the rules for when to relax in the MCAssembler aren't
(yet) correct for ARM. This is a step in the proper direction, though.
llvm-svn: 145871
We don't (yet) have the granularity in the fixups to be specific about which
bitranges are affected. That's a future cleanup, but we're not there yet.
llvm-svn: 144852
