We can't use Jcc to leave a Win64 function in general, because that
confuses the unwinder. However, for "leaf" functions, that is, functions
where the return address is always on top of the stack and which don't
have unwind info, it's OK.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24836
llvm-svn: 282920
Summary:
In the case below, %Result.i19 is defined between coro.save and coro.suspend and used after coro.suspend. We need to correctly place such a value into the coroutine frame.
```
%save = call token @llvm.coro.save(i8* null)
%Result.i19 = getelementptr inbounds %"struct.lean_future<int>::Awaiter", %"struct.lean_future<int>::Awaiter"* %ref.tmp7, i64 0, i32 0
%suspend = call i8 @llvm.coro.suspend(token %save, i1 false)
switch i8 %suspend, label %exit [
i8 0, label %await.ready
i8 1, label %exit
]
await.ready:
%val = load i32, i32* %Result.i19
```
Reviewers: majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24418
llvm-svn: 282902
Summary:
Without the fix, if there was a function inlined into the coroutine with debug information, CloneFunctionInto(NewF, &F, VMap, /*ModuleLevelChanges=*/true, Returns); would duplicate all of the debug information including the DICompileUnit.
We know use VMap to indicate that debug metadata for a File, Unit and FunctionType should not be duplicated when we creating clones that will become f.resume, f.destroy and f.cleanup.
Reviewers: majnemer
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24417
llvm-svn: 282899
Summary: Not all coro.subfn.addr intrinsics can be eliminated in CoroElide through devirtualization. Those that remain need to be lowered in CoroCleanup.
Reviewers: majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24412
llvm-svn: 282897
Add a OCAML_INSTALL_PATH variable that can be used to control
the install path for OCaml libraries. The new variable defaults to
${OCAML_STDLIB_PATH}, i.e. the OCaml library path obtained from
the OCaml compiler. Install libraries into "llvm" subdirectory.
This fixes two issues:
1. OCaml library directories differ between systems, and 'lib/ocaml' is
incorrect e.g. on amd64 Gentoo where OCaml is installed
in 'lib64/ocaml'. Therefore, obtain the library path from the OCaml
compiler using 'ocamlc -where' (which is already used to set
OCAML_STDLIB_PATH), which is the method used commonly in OCaml packages.
2. The top-level directory is reserved for the standard library, and has
precedence over local directory in search path. As a result, OCaml
preferred the files installed along with previous LLVM version over the
source tree when building a new version, resulting in two versions being
mixed during the build. The new layout is used commonly by other OCaml
packages, and findlib is able to find the LLVM libraries successfully.
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/559134
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/559624
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24354
llvm-svn: 282895
Summary: Debug info should *not* affect optimization decisions. This patch updates loop unroller cost model to make it not affected by debug info.
Reviewers: davidxl, mzolotukhin
Subscribers: haicheng, llvm-commits, mzolotukhin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25098
llvm-svn: 282894
Register stackification currently checks VNInfo for changes. Make that
more accurate by testing each intervening instruction for any other defs
to the same virtual register.
Patch by Jacob Gravelle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24942
llvm-svn: 282886
Summary:
This patch is adding the support for a shadow memory with
dynamically allocated address range.
The compiler-rt needs to export a symbol containing the shadow
memory range.
This is required to support ASAN on windows 64-bits.
Reviewers: kcc, rnk, vitalybuka
Subscribers: zaks.anna, kubabrecka, dberris, llvm-commits, chrisha
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23354
llvm-svn: 282881
The CL was originally failing due to the use of some C++14
specific features, so I've removed those. Hopefully this will
satisfy the bots.
llvm-svn: 282867
When building the steps for scalar induction variables, we previously attempted
to determine if all the scalar users of the induction variable were uniform. If
they were, we would only emit the step corresponding to vector lane zero. This
optimization was too aggressive. We generally don't know the entire set of
induction variable users that will be scalar. We have
isScalarAfterVectorization, but this is only a conservative estimate of the
instructions that will be scalarized. Thus, an induction variable may have
scalar users that aren't already known to be scalar. To avoid emitting unused
steps, we can only check that the induction variable is uniform. This should
fix PR30542.
Reference: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=30542
llvm-svn: 282863
Summary:
This change adds the AVR assembly instruction printer.
No tests are included in this patch. I have left them downstream so we can
add them once `llc` successfully runs (there's very few components left
to upstream until this).
Reviewers: arsenm, kparzysz
Subscribers: wdng, beanz, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25028
llvm-svn: 282854
Summary:
Previously, when allocating unspillable live ranges, we would never
attempt to split. We would always bail out and try last ditch graph
recoloring.
This patch changes this by attempting to split all live intervals before
performing recoloring.
This fixes LLVM bug PR14879.
I can't add test cases for any backends other than AVR because none of
them have small enough register classes to trigger the bug.
Reviewers: qcolombet
Subscribers: MatzeB
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25070
llvm-svn: 282852
When LLVM_INSTALL_TOOLCHAIN_ONLY is used and LLVM_TOOLCHAIN_TOOLS
contains a tool which is a symlink, it would be ignored. This already
worked before but got broken in r282510.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25067
llvm-svn: 282844
I'm not completely sure what this method does or why all the 256-bit VTs returned VR128RegClass when the comments on the method definiton say it should return the largest super register class. I just figured AVX-512 should be similar.
llvm-svn: 282836
If AVX512 is disabled, the registers should already be marked reserved. Pattern predicates and register classes on instructions should take care of most of the rest. Loads/stores and physical register copies for XMM16-31 and YMM16-31 without VLX have already been taken care of.
I'm a little unclear why this changed the register allocation of the SSE2 run of the sad.ll test, but the registers selected appear to be valid after this change.
llvm-svn: 282835
Summary:
We don't want to decay hot callsites to import chains of hot
callsites. The same mechanism is used in LIPO.
Reviewers: tejohnson, eraman, mehdi_amini
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24976
llvm-svn: 282833
For some reason there are both of these available, except
for scalar 64-bit compares which only has u64. I'm not sure
why there are both (I'm guessing it's for the one bit inputs we
don't use), but for consistency always using the
unsigned one.
llvm-svn: 282832
Summary:
This lets people link against LLVM and their own version of the UTF
library.
I determined this only affects llvm, clang, lld, and lldb by running
$ git grep -wl 'UTF[0-9]\+\|\bConvertUTF\bisLegalUTF\|getNumBytesFor' | cut -f 1 -d '/' | sort | uniq
clang
lld
lldb
llvm
Tested with
ninja lldb
ninja check-clang check-llvm check-lld
(ninja check-lldb doesn't complete for me with or without this patch.)
Reviewers: rnk
Subscribers: klimek, beanz, mgorny, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24996
llvm-svn: 282822
