Summary:
This patch will provide support for auto return type for the C++ member
functions. Before this return type of the member function is deduced and
stored in the DIE.
This patch includes llvm side implementation of this feature.
Patch by: Awanish Pandey <Awanish.Pandey@amd.com>
Reviewers: dblaikie, aprantl, shafik, alok, SouraVX, jini.susan.george
Reviewed by: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70524
Don't overwrite existing target-cpu attributes.
I've often found the replacement behavior annoying, and this is
inconsistent with how the fast math command line flags interact with
the function attributes.
Does not yet change target-features, since I think that should behave
as a concatenation.
Seeing some curious CFI failures internally - which makes little sense
to me, as I don't think anyone is using this flag (even us,
internally)... so sounds like a bug in my code somewhere (possibly a
latent one that propagating this flag exposed, not sure). Reverting
while I investigate.
This reverts commit c51b45e32ef7f35c11891f60871aa9c2c04cd991.
SelectionDAG::transferDbgValues() can 'reattach' SDDbgValue from one to
another node, but doesn't change its source order. If the destination node has
the order greater than the SDDbgValue, there are two possible issues
revealed later:
* If debug info is attached to an instruction that is the first definition
of a register, this ends up with a def-after-use and the debug info
gets 'undef' later.
* If MIR has another definition of a register above the debug info,
the debug info may represent a source variable incorrectly because
it appears (significantly) before an instruction corresponded
to this debug info.
So, the patch changes the order of an SDDbgValue when it is moved
to a node with greater order.
Reviewers: dblaikie, jmorse, aprantl
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: aprantl, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71175
Tests "dwarfdump-rnglists-dwarf64.s" and "dwarfdump-rnglists.s" were
malformed because they had missing required DWO ID fields in split
compilation unit headers. The patch fixes the tests and checks
the reading of a unit header more thoroughly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71704
It isn't necessary to create DIEs for all of the declaration subprograms
in a CU's retainedTypes list. We can defer creating these subprograms
until we need to prepare a call site tag that refers to one.
This cleanup was mentioned in passing in D70350.
This allows a call site tag in CU A to reference a callee DIE in CU B
without resorting to creating an incomplete duplicate DIE for the callee
inside of CU A.
We already allow cross-CU references of subprogram declarations, so it
doesn't seem like definitions ought to be special.
This improves entry value evaluation and tail call frame synthesis in
the LTO setting. During LTO, it's common for cross-module inlining to
produce a call in some CU A where the callee resides in a different CU,
and there is no declaration subprogram for the callee anywhere. In this
case llvm would (unnecessarily, I think) emit an empty DW_TAG_subprogram
in order to fill in the call site tag. That empty 'definition' defeats
entry value evaluation etc., because the debugger can't figure out what
it means.
As a follow-up, maybe we could add a DWARF verifier check that a
DW_TAG_subprogram at least has a DW_AT_name attribute.
Update:
Reland with a fix to create a declaration DIE when the declaration is
missing from the CU's retainedTypes list. The declaration is left out
of the retainedTypes list in two cases:
1) Re-compiling pre-r266445 bitcode (in which declarations weren't added
to the retainedTypes list), and
2) Doing LTO function importing (which doesn't update the retainedTypes
list).
It's possible to handle (1) and (2) by modifying the retainedTypes list
(in AutoUpgrade, or in the LTO importing logic resp.), but I don't see
an advantage to doing it this way, as it would cause more DWARF to be
emitted compared to creating the declaration DIEs lazily.
Tested with a stage2 ThinLTO+RelWithDebInfo build of clang, and with a
ReleaseLTO-g build of the test suite.
rdar://46577651, rdar://57855316, rdar://57840415
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70350
Extends DWARF expression language to express locals/globals locations. (via
target-index operands atm) (possible variants are: non-virtual registers
or address spaces)
The WebAssemblyExplicitLocals can replace virtual registers to targertindex
operand type at the time when WebAssembly backend introduces
{get,set,tee}_local instead of corresponding virtual registers.
Reviewed By: aprantl, dschuff
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52634
This is a purely cosmetic change that is NFC in terms of the binary
output. I bugs me that I called the attribute DW_AT_LLVM_isysroot
since the "i" is an artifact of GCC command line option syntax
(-isysroot is in the category of -i options) and doesn't carry any
useful information otherwise.
This attribute only appears in Clang module debug info.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71722
Summary:
With -gdwarf-5 local variable locations are emitted as DW_FORM_loclistx
form instead of the regular DW_FORM_sec_offset. Teach
DWARFDie::getLocations to understand the new format and use it in
llvm-symbolizer "FRAME" command.
Reviewers: pcc, jdoerfert
Subscribers: srhines, aprantl, hiraditya, rupprecht, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70756
The calculator was considering instructions such as KILLs as clobbers
of a physical address. This is wrong as meta instructions such as KILLs
produce no output in the final program and thus don't clobber or change
any physical location's value. As a result they're safe to ignore whilst
calculating location list ranges.
reviewers: aprantl, vsk
diff revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70497
fixes: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38753
Since the address pool doesn't get populated in this case (due to the
lack of inlining, no child DIEs are added to the CU - so no addresses
are needed for the DIEs themselves) until the range list is emitted - at
the time the attributes are added to the CU, the address pool is empty.
So check whether the address pool will be used for the range lists & add
an addr_base if that's the case.
This reverts commit 1f3dd83cc1f2b8f72b9d59e2b4221b12fb7f9a95, reapplying
commit bb1b0bc4e57428ce364d3d6c075ff03cb8973462.
The original commit failed on some builds seemingly due to the use of a
bracketed constructor with an std::array, i.e. `std::array<> arr({...})`.
Previously, LLVM had no functional way of performing casts inside of a
DIExpression(), which made salvaging cast instructions other than Noop
casts impossible. This patch enables the salvaging of casts by using the
DW_OP_LLVM_convert operator for SExt and Trunc instructions.
There is another issue which is exposed by this fix, in which fragment
DIExpressions (which are preserved more readily by this patch) for
values that must be split across registers in ISel trigger an assertion,
as the 'split' fragments extend beyond the bounds of the fragment
DIExpression causing an error. This patch also fixes this issue by
checking the fragment status of DIExpressions which are to be split, and
dropping fragments that are invalid.
added a test case for macinfo.dwo emission."
This was reverted in caa412090666c10f854322cdc701c1cbf8ed726e,
since it was causing an assertion failure on Windows bots.
This revision is revised to fix that.
Original commit message -
[DebugInfo] Refactored macro related generation, added a test case for macinfo.dwo emission.
Reviewers: dblaikie, aprantl, jini.susan.george
Tags: #debug-info #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71008
Summary:
With DWARF5 it is no longer possible to distinguish normal methods and methods with `__attribute__((objc_direct))` by just looking at the debug information
as they are both now children of the of the DW_TAG_structure_type that defines them (before only the `__attribute__((objc_direct))` methods were children).
This means that in LLDB we are no longer able to create a correct Clang AST of a module by just looking at the debug information. Instead we would
need to call the Objective-C runtime to see which of the methods have a `__attribute__((objc_direct))` and then add the attribute to our own Clang AST
depending on what the runtime returns. This would mean that we either let the module AST be dependent on the Objective-C runtime (which doesn't
seem right) or we retroactively add the missing attribute to the imported AST in our expressions.
A third option is to annotate methods with `__attribute__((objc_direct))` as `DW_AT_APPLE_objc_direct` which is what this patch implements. This way
LLDB doesn't have to call the runtime for any `__attribute__((objc_direct))` method and the AST in our module will already be correct when we create it.
Reviewers: aprantl, SouraVX
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm, #debug-info
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71201
Summary:
In commit d60f34c20a2f31335c8d5626e (llvm-svn 317128,
PR35113) MergeBlockIntoPredecessor was changed into
discarding some dbg.value intrinsics referring to
PHI values, post-splice due to loop rotation.
That elimination of dbg.value intrinsics did not
consider which dbg.value to keep depending on the
context (e.g. if the variable is changing its value
several times inside the basic block).
In the past that hasn't been such a big problem since
CodeGenPrepare::placeDbgValues has moved the dbg.value
to be next to the PHI node anyway. But after commit
00e238896cd8ad3a7d7 CodeGenPrepare isn't doing that
any longer, so we need to be more careful when avoiding
duplicate dbg.value intrinsics in MergeBlockIntoPredecessor.
This patch replaces the code that tried to avoid duplicate
dbg.values by using the RemoveRedundantDbgInstrs helper.
Reviewers: aprantl, jmorse, vsk
Reviewed By: aprantl, vsk
Subscribers: jholewinski, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71480
The change allows clang -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer to disable frame
pointer elimination. This behavior matches X86 and Mips, and also GCC
AArch64.
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71168
Summary:
This is a quickfix for PR44275. An assertion that checks that the
DIExpression is valid failed due to attempting to create an entry value
for an indirect parameter. This started appearing after D69028, as the
indirect parameter started being represented using an DW_OP_deref,
rather than with the DBG_VALUE's second operand, meaning that the
isIndirectDebugValue() check in LiveDebugValues did not exclude such
parameters. A DIExpression that has an entry value operation can
currently not have any other operation, leading to the failed isValid()
check.
This patch simply makes us stop considering emitting entry values
for such parameters. To support such cases I think we at least need
to do the following changes:
* In DIExpression::isValid(): Remove the limitation that a
DW_OP_LLVM_entry_value operation can be the only operation in a
DIExpression.
* In LiveDebugValues::emitEntryValues(): Create an entry value of size
1, so that it only wraps the register operand, and not the whole
pre-existing expression (the DW_OP_deref).
* In LiveDebugValues::removeEntryValue(): Check that the new debug
value has the same debug expression as the original, rather than
checking that the debug expression is empty.
* In DwarfExpression::addMachineRegExpression(): Modify the logic so
that a DW_OP_reg* expression is emitted for the entry value.
That is how GCC emits entry values for indirect parameters. That will
currently not happen to due the DW_OP_deref causing the
!HasComplexExpression to fail. The LocationKind needs to be changed
also, rather than always emitting a DW_OP_stack_value for entry values.
There are probably more things I have missed, but that could hopefully
be a good starting point for emitting such entry values.
Reviewers: djtodoro, aprantl, jmorse, vsk
Reviewed By: aprantl, vsk
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71416
That patch adds checking into DWARFVerifier that the Skeleton
compilation unit does not have children.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71244
This reverts commit 30038da15b18ac4e34b9ea7a648382ae481e4770. It causes
the stage2 thinLTO bot to fail with:
Assertion failed: (CU.getDIE(CalleeSP) && "Expected declaration subprogram DIE for callee")
rdar://57840415
This allows a call site tag in CU A to reference a callee DIE in CU B
without resorting to creating an incomplete duplicate DIE for the callee
inside of CU A.
We already allow cross-CU references of subprogram declarations, so it
doesn't seem like definitions ought to be special.
This improves entry value evaluation and tail call frame synthesis in
the LTO setting. During LTO, it's common for cross-module inlining to
produce a call in some CU A where the callee resides in a different CU,
and there is no declaration subprogram for the callee anywhere. In this
case llvm would (unnecessarily, I think) emit an empty DW_TAG_subprogram
in order to fill in the call site tag. That empty 'definition' defeats
entry value evaluation etc., because the debugger can't figure out what
it means.
As a follow-up, maybe we could add a DWARF verifier check that a
DW_TAG_subprogram at least has a DW_AT_name attribute.
rdar://46577651
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70350
This caused non-determinism in the compiler, see command on the Phabricator
code review.
> This patch addresses a performance problem reported in PR43855, and
> present in the reapplication in in 001574938e5. It turns out that
> MachineSink will (often) move instructions to the first block that
> post-dominates the current block, and then try to sink further. This
> means if we have a lot of conditionals, we can needlessly create large
> numbers of DBG_VALUEs, one in each block the sunk instruction passes
> through.
>
> To fix this, rather than immediately sinking DBG_VALUEs, record them in
> a pass structure. When sinking is complete and instructions won't be
> sunk any further, new DBG_VALUEs are added, avoiding lots of
> intermediate DBG_VALUE $noregs being created.
>
> Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70676
CodeGenPrepare::placeDebugValues moves variable location intrinsics to be
immediately after the Value they refer to. This makes tracking of locations
very easy; but it changes the order in which assignments appear to the
debugger, from the source programs order to the order in which the
optimised program computes values. This then leads to PR43986 and PR38754,
where variable locations that were in a conditional block are made
unconditional, which is highly misleading.
This patch adjusts placeDbgValues to only re-order variable location
intrinsics if they use a Value before it is defined, significantly reducing
the damage that it does. This is still not 100% safe, but the rest of
CodeGenPrepare needs polishing to correctly update debug info when
optimisations are performed to fully fix this.
This will probably break downstream debuginfo tests -- if the
instruction-stream position of variable location changes isn't the focus of
the test, an easy fix should be to manually apply placeDbgValues' behaviour
to the failing tests, moving dbg.value intrinsics next to SSA variable
definitions thus:
%foo = inst1
%bar = ...
%baz = ...
void call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %foo, ...
to
%foo = inst1
void call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %foo, ...
%bar = ...
%baz = ...
This should return your test to exercising whatever it was testing before.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58453
Mostly this adds testing for certain aliases in more explicit ways.
There are also a few tidy-ups, and additions of missing testing, where
the feature was either not tested at all, or not tested explicitly and
sufficiently.
Reviewed by: MaskRay, rupprecht, grimar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71116
Summary:
Currently the describeLoadedValue() hook is assumed to describe the
value of the instruction's first explicit define. The hook will not be
called for instructions with more than one explicit define.
This commit adds a register parameter to the describeLoadedValue() hook,
and invokes the hook for all registers in the worklist.
This will allow us to for example describe instructions which produce
more than two parameters' values; e.g. Hexagon's various combine
instructions.
This also fixes situations in our downstream target where we may pass
smaller parameters in the high part of a register. If such a parameter's
value is produced by a larger copy instruction, we can't describe the
call site value using the super-register, and we instead need to know
which sub-register that should be used.
This also allows us to handle cases like this:
$ebx = [...]
$rdi = MOVSX64rr32 $ebx
$esi = MOV32rr $edi
CALL64pcrel32 @call
The hook will first be invoked for the MOV32rr instruction, which will
say that @call's second parameter (passed in $esi) is described by $edi.
As $edi is not preserved it will be added to the worklist. When we get
to the MOVSX64rr32 instruction, we need to describe two values; the
sign-extended value of $ebx -> $rdi for the first parameter, and $ebx ->
$edi for the second parameter, which is now possible.
This commit modifies the dbgcall-site-lea-interpretation.mir test case.
In the test case, the values of some 32-bit parameters were produced
with LEA64r. Perhaps we can in general cases handle such by emitting
expressions that AND out the lower 32-bits, but I have not been able to
land in a case where a LEA64r is used for a 32-bit parameter instead of
LEA64_32 from C code.
I have not found a case where it would be useful to describe parameters
using implicit defines, so in this patch the hook is still only invoked
for explicit defines of forwarding registers.
Reviewers: djtodoro, NikolaPrica, aprantl, vsk
Reviewed By: djtodoro, vsk
Subscribers: ormris, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70431
Currently the describeLoadedValue() hook is assumed to describe the
value of the instruction's first explicit define. The hook will not be
called for instructions with more than one explicit define.
This commit adds a register parameter to the describeLoadedValue() hook,
and invokes the hook for all registers in the worklist.
This will allow us to for example describe instructions which produce
more than two parameters' values; e.g. Hexagon's various combine
instructions.
This also fixes a case in our downstream target where we may pass
smaller parameters in the high part of a register. If such a parameter's
value is produced by a larger copy instruction, we can't describe the
call site value using the super-register, and we instead need to know
which sub-register that should be used.
This also allows us to handle cases like this:
$ebx = [...]
$rdi = MOVSX64rr32 $ebx
$esi = MOV32rr $edi
CALL64pcrel32 @call
The hook will first be invoked for the MOV32rr instruction, which will
say that @call's second parameter (passed in $esi) is described by $edi.
As $edi is not preserved it will be added to the worklist. When we get
to the MOVSX64rr32 instruction, we need to describe two values; the
sign-extended value of $ebx -> $rdi for the first parameter, and $ebx ->
$edi for the second parameter, which is now possible.
This commit modifies the dbgcall-site-lea-interpretation.mir test case.
In the test case, the values of some 32-bit parameters were produced
with LEA64r. Perhaps we can in general cases handle such by emitting
expressions that AND out the lower 32-bits, but I have not been able to
land in a case where a LEA64r is used for a 32-bit parameter instead of
LEA64_32 from C code.
I have not found a case where it would be useful to describe parameters
using implicit defines, so in this patch the hook is still only invoked
for explicit defines of forwarding registers.
One of CodeGenPrepare's optimizations is to duplicate address calculations
into basic blocks, so that as much information as possible can be folded
into memory addressing operands. This is great -- but the dbg.value
variable location intrinsics are not updated in the same way. This can lead
to dbg.values referring to address computations in other blocks that will
never be encoded into the DAG, while duplicate address computations are
performed locally that could be used by the dbg.value. Some of these (such
as non-constant-offset GEPs) can't be salvaged past.
Fix this by, whenever we duplicate an address computation into a block,
looking for dbg.value users of the original memory address in the same
block, and redirecting those to the local computation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58403
This patch addresses a performance problem reported in PR43855, and
present in the reapplication in in 001574938e5. It turns out that
MachineSink will (often) move instructions to the first block that
post-dominates the current block, and then try to sink further. This
means if we have a lot of conditionals, we can needlessly create large
numbers of DBG_VALUEs, one in each block the sunk instruction passes
through.
To fix this, rather than immediately sinking DBG_VALUEs, record them in
a pass structure. When sinking is complete and instructions won't be
sunk any further, new DBG_VALUEs are added, avoiding lots of
intermediate DBG_VALUE $noregs being created.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70676
Fix part of PR43855, resolving a problem that comes from the reapplication
in 001574938e5. If we have two DBG_VALUE insts in a block that specify
the location of the same variable, for example:
%0 = someinst
DBG_VALUE %0, !123, !DIExpression()
%1 = anotherinst
DBG_VALUE %1, !123, !DIExpression()
if %0 were to sink, the corresponding DBG_VALUE would sink too, past the
next DBG_VALUE, effectively re-ordering assignments. To fix this, I've
added a SeenDbgVars set recording what variable locations have been seen in
a block already (working bottom up), and now flag DBG_VALUEs that would
pass a later DBG_VALUE for the same variable.
NB, this only works for repeated DBG_VALUEs in the same basic block, the
general case involving control flow is much harder, which I've written
up in PR44117.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70672
These were:
* D58386 / f5e1b718a67 / reverted in d382a8a768b
* D58238 / ee50590e168 / reverted in a8db456b53a
Of which the latter has a performance regression tracked in PR43855,
fixed by D70672 / D70676, which will be committed atomically with this
reapplication.
Contains a minor difference to account for a change in the IsCopyInstr
signature.
Summary:
Currently these function return the raw content of the appropriate table
header, which means they are relative to the DW_AT_{loc,rng}list_base,
and one has to relocate them in order to do anything.
This changes the functions to perform the relocation themselves, which
seems more clearer, particularly as they are sitting right next to the
find{Rng,Loc}listFromOffset functions, but one *cannot* simply take the
result of these functions and take pass them there.
The only effect of this patch is to change what value is dumped for the
DW_AT_ranges attribute, which I think is for the better, as previously
the values appeared to point into thin air.
(The main reason I am looking at this is because I was trying to
implement equivalent functionality in lldb's DWARFUnit, and was stumped
by this behavior.
Reviewers: dblaikie, JDevlieghere, aprantl
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits, SouraVX
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71006
Summary:
If a call is bundled then the code that looks for instructions that
produce parameter values would break when reaching the call's bundle
header, due to the `ifCall(/*AnyInBundle*/)` invocation returning true.
It is not enough to simply ignore bundle headers in the `isCall()`
invocation, as the bundle header may have defines of parameter registers
due to the call, meaning that such registers would incorrectly be
removed from the worklist. Therefore, do not look at bundle headers at
all.
Reviewers: djtodoro, NikolaPrica, aprantl, vsk
Reviewed By: aprantl, vsk
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71024
Build ID is a protocol for looking up debug files that's already
supported by various tools including debuggers. For example, when
locating debug files, gdb would check the following directories:
- /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/ab/cdef1234.debug
- /usr/bin/ls.debug
- /usr/bin/.debug/ls.debug
- /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/ls.debug
llvm-symbolizer currently consults all of these except for build ID
based one. This patch implements support for build ID lookup. The
set of debug directories to search is specified by the new option:
--debug-file-directory, whose name matches the debug-file-directory
variable used by gdb for the same purpose.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70759
