1
0
mirror of https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git synced 2024-10-20 03:23:01 +02:00
Commit Graph

15 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Chandler Carruth
4d1e1851a4 [PM] Port ScalarEvolution to the new pass manager.
This change makes ScalarEvolution a stand-alone object and just produces
one from a pass as needed. Making this work well requires making the
object movable, using references instead of overwritten pointers in
a number of places, and other refactorings.

I've also wired it up to the new pass manager and added a RUN line to
a test to exercise it under the new pass manager. This includes basic
printing support much like with other analyses.

But there is a big and somewhat scary change here. Prior to this patch
ScalarEvolution was never *actually* invalidated!!! Re-running the pass
just re-wired up the various other analyses and didn't remove any of the
existing entries in the SCEV caches or clear out anything at all. This
might seem OK as everything in SCEV that can uses ValueHandles to track
updates to the values that serve as SCEV keys. However, this still means
that as we ran SCEV over each function in the module, we kept
accumulating more and more SCEVs into the cache. At the end, we would
have a SCEV cache with every value that we ever needed a SCEV for in the
entire module!!! Yowzers. The releaseMemory routine would dump all of
this, but that isn't realy called during normal runs of the pipeline as
far as I can see.

To make matters worse, there *is* actually a key that we don't update
with value handles -- there is a map keyed off of Loop*s. Because
LoopInfo *does* release its memory from run to run, it is entirely
possible to run SCEV over one function, then over another function, and
then lookup a Loop* from the second function but find an entry inserted
for the first function! Ouch.

To make matters still worse, there are plenty of updates that *don't*
trip a value handle. It seems incredibly unlikely that today GVN or
another pass that invalidates SCEV can update values in *just* such
a way that a subsequent run of SCEV will incorrectly find lookups in
a cache, but it is theoretically possible and would be a nightmare to
debug.

With this refactoring, I've fixed all this by actually destroying and
recreating the ScalarEvolution object from run to run. Technically, this
could increase the amount of malloc traffic we see, but then again it is
also technically correct. ;] I don't actually think we're suffering from
tons of malloc traffic from SCEV because if we were, the fact that we
never clear the memory would seem more likely to have come up as an
actual problem before now. So, I've made the simple fix here. If in fact
there are serious issues with too much allocation and deallocation,
I can work on a clever fix that preserves the allocations (while
clearing the data) between each run, but I'd prefer to do that kind of
optimization with a test case / benchmark that shows why we need such
cleverness (and that can test that we actually make it faster). It's
possible that this will make some things faster by making the SCEV
caches have higher locality (due to being significantly smaller) so
until there is a clear benchmark, I think the simple change is best.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12063

llvm-svn: 245193
2015-08-17 02:08:17 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
33dabe4f44 Re-sort #include lines using my handy dandy ./utils/sort_includes.py
script. This is in preparation for changes to lots of include lines.

llvm-svn: 229088
2015-02-13 09:09:03 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
2835bf79f7 [LPM] Stop using the string based preservation API. It is an
abomination.

For starters, this API is incredibly slow. In order to lookup the name
of a pass it must take a memory fence to acquire a pointer to the
managed static pass registry, and then potentially acquire locks while
it consults this registry for information about what passes exist by
that name. This stops the world of LLVMs in your process no matter
how little they cared about the result.

To make this more joyful, you'll note that we are preserving many passes
which *do not exist* any more, or are not even analyses which one might
wish to have be preserved. This means we do all the work only to say
"nope" with no error to the user.

String-based APIs are a *bad idea*. String-based APIs that cannot
produce any meaningful error are an even worse idea. =/

I have a patch that simply removes this API completely, but I'm hesitant
to commit it as I don't really want to perniciously break out-of-tree
users of the old pass manager. I'd rather they just have to migrate to
the new one at some point. If others disagree and would like me to kill
it with fire, just say the word. =]

llvm-svn: 227294
2015-01-28 04:57:56 +00:00
Josh Magee
86d29cffa7 [stackprotector] Use analysis from the StackProtector pass for stack layout in PEI a nd LocalStackSlot passes.
This changes the MachineFrameInfo API to use the new SSPLayoutKind information
produced by the StackProtector pass (instead of a boolean flag) and updates a
few pass dependencies (to preserve the SSP analysis).

The stack layout follows the same approach used prior to this change - i.e.,
only LargeArray stack objects will be placed near the canary and everything
else will be laid out normally.  After this change, structures containing large
arrays will also be placed near the canary - a case previously missed by the
old implementation.

Out of tree targets will need to update their usage of
MachineFrameInfo::CreateStackObject to remove the MayNeedSP argument. 

The next patch will implement the rules for sspstrong and sspreq.  The end goal
is to support ssp-strong stack layout rules.

WIP.

Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2158

llvm-svn: 197653
2013-12-19 03:17:11 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
4c1f3c24db Move all of the header files which are involved in modelling the LLVM IR
into their new header subdirectory: include/llvm/IR. This matches the
directory structure of lib, and begins to correct a long standing point
of file layout clutter in LLVM.

There are still more header files to move here, but I wanted to handle
them in separate commits to make tracking what files make sense at each
layer easier.

The only really questionable files here are the target intrinsic
tablegen files. But that's a battle I'd rather not fight today.

I've updated both CMake and Makefile build systems (I think, and my
tests think, but I may have missed something).

I've also re-sorted the includes throughout the project. I'll be
committing updates to Clang, DragonEgg, and Polly momentarily.

llvm-svn: 171366
2013-01-02 11:36:10 +00:00
David Greene
7c81589636 Ok, third time's the charm. No changes from last time except the CMake
source addition.  Apparently the buildbots were wrong about failures.

---

Add some switches helpful for debugging:

-print-before=<Pass Name>

Dump IR before running pass <Pass Name>.

-print-before-all

Dump IR before running each pass.

-print-after-all

Dump IR after running each pass.

These are helpful when tracking down a miscompilation.  It is easy to
get IR dumps and do diffs on them, etc.

To make this work well, add a new getPrinterPass API to Pass so that
each kind of pass (ModulePass, FunctionPass, etc.) can create a Pass
suitable for dumping out the kind of object the Pass works on.

llvm-svn: 100249
2010-04-02 23:17:14 +00:00
Evan Cheng
499918dabf Revert 100204. It broke a bunch of tests and apparently changed what passes are run during codegen.
llvm-svn: 100207
2010-04-02 19:29:15 +00:00
David Greene
554373897c Let's try this again. Re-apply 100143 including an apparent missing
<string> include.  For some reason the buildbot choked on this while my
builds did not.  It's probably due to a difference in system headers.

---

Add some switches helpful for debugging:

-print-before=<Pass Name>

Dump IR before running pass <Pass Name>.

-print-before-all

Dump IR before running each pass.

-print-after-all

Dump IR after running each pass.

These are helpful when tracking down a miscompilation.  It is easy to
get IR dumps and do diffs on them, etc.

To make this work well, add a new getPrinterPass API to Pass so that
each kind of pass (ModulePass, FunctionPass, etc.) can create a Pass
suitable for dumping out the kind of object the Pass works on.

llvm-svn: 100204
2010-04-02 18:46:26 +00:00
Eric Christopher
77e4cc4bbd Revert r100143.
llvm-svn: 100146
2010-04-01 22:54:42 +00:00
David Greene
a358be0ef7 Add some switches helpful for debugging:
-print-before=<Pass Name>

Dump IR before running pass <Pass Name>.

-print-before-all

Dump IR before running each pass.

-print-after-all

Dump IR after running each pass.

These are helpful when tracking down a miscompilation.  It is easy to
get IR dumps and do diffs on them, etc.

To make this work well, add a new getPrinterPass API to Pass so that
each kind of pass (ModulePass, FunctionPass, etc.) can create a Pass
suitable for dumping out the kind of object the Pass works on.

llvm-svn: 100143
2010-04-01 22:43:57 +00:00
Dan Gohman
68e044e81a Add a form of addPreserved which takes a string argument, to allow passes
to declare that they preserve other passes without needing to pull in
additional header file or library dependencies. Convert MachineFunctionPass
and CodeGenLICM to make use of this.

llvm-svn: 83555
2009-10-08 17:00:02 +00:00
Chris Lattner
2c0a4fb325 stop MachineFunctionPass from claiming that it preserves LoopDependence info,
which causes dependence info to be linked into lli.

llvm-svn: 83289
2009-10-05 02:35:05 +00:00
Dan Gohman
f28b3bb262 Reapply r77654 with a fix: MachineFunctionPass's getAnalysisUsage
shouldn't do AU.setPreservesCFG(), because even though CodeGen passes
don't modify the LLVM IR CFG, they may modify the MachineFunction CFG,
and passes like MachineLoop are registered with isCFGOnly set to true.

llvm-svn: 77691
2009-07-31 18:16:33 +00:00
Daniel Dunbar
60d71a790c Revert r77654, it appears to be causing llvm-gcc bootstrap failures, and many
failures when building assorted projects with clang.

--- Reverse-merging r77654 into '.':
U    include/llvm/CodeGen/Passes.h
U    include/llvm/CodeGen/MachineFunctionPass.h
U    include/llvm/CodeGen/MachineFunction.h
U    include/llvm/CodeGen/LazyLiveness.h
U    include/llvm/CodeGen/SelectionDAGISel.h
D    include/llvm/CodeGen/MachineFunctionAnalysis.h
U    include/llvm/Function.h
U    lib/Target/CellSPU/SPUISelDAGToDAG.cpp
U    lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCISelDAGToDAG.cpp
U    lib/CodeGen/LLVMTargetMachine.cpp
U    lib/CodeGen/MachineVerifier.cpp
U    lib/CodeGen/MachineFunction.cpp
U    lib/CodeGen/PrologEpilogInserter.cpp
U    lib/CodeGen/MachineLoopInfo.cpp
U    lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp
D    lib/CodeGen/MachineFunctionAnalysis.cpp
D    lib/CodeGen/MachineFunctionPass.cpp
U    lib/CodeGen/LiveVariables.cpp

llvm-svn: 77661
2009-07-31 03:02:41 +00:00
Dan Gohman
645f1122c0 Manage MachineFunctions with an analysis Pass instead of the Annotable
mechanism. To support this, make MachineFunctionPass a little more
complete.

llvm-svn: 77654
2009-07-31 01:52:50 +00:00