Increment the MBB iterator at the top of the loop to properly handle the
current (and previous) instructions getting erased.
This fixes PR13625.
llvm-svn: 162099
I really need to find a way to automate this, but I can't come up with a regex
that has no false positives while handling tricky cases like custom check
prefixes.
llvm-svn: 162097
It is not my plan to duplicate the entire ARM instruction set with
predicated versions. We need a way of representing predicated
instructions in SSA form without requiring a separate opcode.
Then the pseudo-instructions can go away.
llvm-svn: 162061
Select instructions pick one of two virtual registers based on a
condition, like x86 cmov. On targets like ARM that support predication,
selects can sometimes be eliminated by predicating the instruction
defining one of the operands.
Teach PeepholeOptimizer to recognize select instructions, and ask the
target to optimize them.
llvm-svn: 162059
where some fact lake a=b dominates a use in a phi, but doesn't dominate the
basic block itself.
This feature could also be implemented by splitting critical edges, but at least
with the current algorithm reasoning about the dominance directly is faster.
The time for running "opt -O2" in the testcase in pr10584 is 1.003 times slower
and on gcc as a single file it is 1.0007 times faster.
llvm-svn: 162023
Without fastcc support, the caller just falls through to CallingConv::C
for fastcc, but callee still uses fastcc, this inconsistency of calling
convention is a problem, and fastcc support can fix it.
llvm-svn: 162013
The ARM select instructions are just predicated moves. If the select is
the only use of an operand, the instruction defining the operand can be
predicated instead, saving one instruction and decreasing register
pressure.
This implementation can turn AND/ORR/EOR instructions into their
corresponding ANDCC/ORRCC/EORCC variants. Ideally, we should be able to
predicate any instruction, but we don't yet support predicated
instructions in SSA form.
llvm-svn: 161994
around. That's not how we do things. Besides, the commit message tells us that
it is covered by the GCC test suite.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r127497 | zwarich | 2011-03-11 13:51:56 -0800 (Fri, 11 Mar 2011) | 3 lines
Fix the GCC test suite issue exposed by r127477, which was caused by stack
protector insertion not working correctly with unreachable code. Since that
revision was rolled out, this test doesn't actual fail before this fix.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
llvm-svn: 161985
allocations of executable memory would not be padded
to account for the size of the allocation header.
This resulted in undersized allocations, meaning that
when the allocation was written to later the next
allocation's header would be corrupted.
llvm-svn: 161984
TableGen sometimes synthesizes missing sub-register indexes. Emit these
indexes as enumerators in the target namespace along with the
user-defined ones.
Also take this opportunity to stop creating new Record objects for
synthetic indexes.
llvm-svn: 161964
When predicating this instruction:
Rd = ADD Rn, Rm
We need an extra operand to represent the value given to Rd when the
predicate is false:
Rd = ADDCC Rfalse, Rn, Rm, pred
The Rd and Rfalse operands are different registers while in SSA form.
Rfalse is tied to Rd to make sure they get the same register during
register allocation.
Previously, Rd and Rn were tied, but that is not required.
Compare to MOVCC:
Rd = MOVCC Rfalse, Rtrue, pred
llvm-svn: 161955
instruction to something absurdly high, while setting the probability of
branching to the 'unwind' destination to the bare minimum. This should set cause
the normal destination's invoke blocks to be moved closer to the invoke.
PR13612
llvm-svn: 161944
