1
0
mirror of https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git synced 2024-10-24 21:42:54 +02:00
Commit Graph

3 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
John Brawn
c944a4af03 [LoopUnroll] Keep the loop test only on the first iteration of max-or-zero loops
When we have a loop with a known upper bound on the number of iterations, and
furthermore know that either the number of iterations will be either exactly
that upper bound or zero, then we can fully unroll up to that upper bound
keeping only the first loop test to check for the zero iteration case.

Most of the work here is in plumbing this 'max-or-zero' information from the
part of scalar evolution where it's detected through to loop unrolling. I've
also gone for the safe default of 'false' everywhere but howManyLessThans which
could probably be improved.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25682

llvm-svn: 284818
2016-10-21 11:08:48 +00:00
John Brawn
fc3f42231b [SCEV] More accurate calculation of max backedge count of some less-than loops
In loops that look something like
 i = n;
 do {
  ...
 } while(i++ < n+k);
where k is a constant, the maximum backedge count is k (in fact the backedge
count will be either 0 or k, depending on whether n+k wraps). More generally
for LHS < RHS if RHS-(LHS of first comparison) is a constant then the loop will
iterate either 0 or that constant number of times.

This allows for more loop unrolling with the recent upper bound loop unrolling
changes, and I'm working on a patch that will let loop unrolling additionally
make use of the loop being executed either 0 or k times (we need to retain the
loop comparison only on the first unrolled iteration).

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25607

llvm-svn: 284465
2016-10-18 10:10:53 +00:00
Sanjoy Das
8576aee95c [SCEV] Fix incorrect trip count computation
The way we elide max expressions when computing trip counts is incorrect
-- it breaks cases like this:

```
static int wrapping_add(int a, int b) {
  return (int)((unsigned)a + (unsigned)b);
}

void test() {
  volatile int end_buf = 2147483548; // INT_MIN - 100
  int end = end_buf;

  unsigned counter = 0;
  for (int start = wrapping_add(end,  200); start < end; start++)
    counter++;

  print(counter);
}
```

Note: the `NoWrap` variable that was being tested has little to do with
the values flowing into the max expression; it is a property of the
induction variable.

test/Transforms/LoopUnroll/nsw-tripcount.ll was added to solely test
functionality I'm reverting in this change, so I've deleted the test
fully.

llvm-svn: 273079
2016-06-18 04:38:31 +00:00