The costs are somewhat hand-wavy, but should be much closer to the truth
than what we get from BasicTTI.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21156
llvm-svn: 272406
By making pointer extraction from a vector more expensive in the cost model,
we avoid the vectorization of a loop that is very likely to be memory-bound:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27826
There are still bugs related to this, so we may need a more general solution
to avoid vectorizing obviously memory-bound loops when we don't have HW gather
support.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20601
llvm-svn: 270729
As discussed on PR24888, until SSE42 we don't have access to PCMPGTQ for v2i64 comparisons, but the cost models don't reflect this, resulting in over-optimistic vectorizaton.
This patch adds SSE2 'base level' costs that match what a typical target is capable of and only reduces the v2i64 costs at SSE42.
Technically SSE41 provides a PCMPEQQ v2i64 equality test, but as getCmpSelInstrCost doesn't give us a way to discriminate between comparison test types we can't easily make use of this, otherwise we could split the cost of integer equality and greater-than tests to give better costings of each.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20057
llvm-svn: 268972
Summary:
rL256194 transforms truncations between vectors of integers into PACKUS/PACKSS
operations during DAG combine. This generates better code for truncate, so cost
of truncate needs to be changed but looks like it got changed only in SSE2 table
Whereas this change is also applicable for SSE4.1, so the cost of truncate needs
to be changed for that as well. Cost of “TRUNCATE v16i32 to v16i8” & “TRUNCATE
v16i16 to v16i8” should be same in SSE4.1 & SSE2 table. Removing their cost from
SSE4.1, so it will fall back to SSE2.
Reviewers: Simon Pilgrim
llvm-svn: 267123
This code was creating a new type in the global context, regardless
of which context the user is sitting in, what can possibly go wrong?
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 266275
The irony of this patch is that one CPU that is affected is AMD Jaguar, and Jaguar
has a completely double-pumped AVX implementation. But getting the cost model to
reflect that is a much bigger problem. The small goal here is simply to improve on
the lie that !AVX2 == SandyBridge.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18000
llvm-svn: 263069
Use AVX1 FP instructions (vmaskmovps/pd) in place of the AVX2 int instructions (vpmaskmovd/q).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16528
llvm-svn: 258675
The cost is calculated for all X86 targets. When gather/scatter instruction
is not supported we calculate the cost of scalar sequence.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15677
llvm-svn: 256519
This patch transforms truncation between vectors of integers into
X86ISD::PACKUS/PACKSS operations during DAG combine. We don't do it in
lowering phase because after type legalization, the original truncation
will be turned into a BUILD_VECTOR with each element that is extracted
from a vector and then truncated, and from them it is difficult to do
this optimization. This greatly improves the performance of truncations
on some specific types.
Cost table is updated accordingly.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14588
llvm-svn: 256194
This allows "icmp ugt %a, 4294967295" and "icmp uge %a, 4294967296" to be optimized into right shifts by 32 which can fold the immediate into the shift instruction. These patterns show up with some regularity in real code.
Unfortunately, since getImmCost can't see the icmp predicate we can't be tell if we're only catching these specific cases.
llvm-svn: 256126
Previously in the conversion cost table there are no entries for integer-integer
conversions on SSE2. This will result in imprecise costs for certain vectorized
operations. This patch adds those entries for SSE2 and SSE4.1. The cost numbers
are counted from the result of running llc on the new test case in this patch.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15132
llvm-svn: 255315
I checked and updated the cost of AVX-512 conversion operations. Added cost of conversion operations in DQ mode.
Conversion of illegal types that requires vector split is not calculated right now (like for other X86 targets).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15074
llvm-svn: 254494
The masked intrinsics support all integer and floating point data types. I added the pointer type to this list.
Added tests for CodeGen and for Loop Vectorizer.
Updated the Language Reference.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14150
llvm-svn: 253544
This also lets us remove the versions of the functions that took a statically sized array as we can rely on ArrayRef implicit conversion now.
llvm-svn: 251490
This avoid mentioning the table name an extra time and allows the lookup to be done directly in the ifs by relying on the bool conversion of the pointer.
While there make use of ArrayRef and std::find_if.
llvm-svn: 251382
When the target does not support these intrinsics they should be converted to a chain of scalar load or store operations.
If the mask is not constant, the scalarizer will build a chain of conditional basic blocks.
I added isLegalMaskedGather() isLegalMaskedScatter() APIs.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13722
llvm-svn: 251237
Clang runtime failure was reported.
Assertion failed: (isExtended() && "Type is not extended!"), function getTypeForEVT
I'll need to add a proper handling for PointerType in masked load/store intrinsics.
llvm-svn: 250995
Originally I planned to use the same interface for masked gather/scatter and set isConsecutive to "false" in this case.
Now I'm implementing masked gather/scatter and see that the interface is inconvenient. I want to add interfaces isLegalMaskedGather() / isLegalMaskedScatter() instead of using the "Consecutive" parameter in the existing interfaces.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13850
llvm-svn: 250686
Most importantly, this keeps constant hoisting from preventing instruction selections ability to turn an AND with 0xffffffff into a move into a 32-bit subregister.
llvm-svn: 249370
The XOP shifts just have logical/arithmetic versions and the left/right shifts are controlled by whether the value is positive/negative. Because of this I've added new X86ISD nodes instead of trying to force them to use the existing shift nodes.
Additionally Excavator cores (bdver4) support XOP and AVX2 - meaning that it should use the AVX2 shifts when it can and fall back to XOP in other cases.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8690
llvm-svn: 248878
rather than 'unsigned' for their costs.
For something like costs in particular there is a natural "negative"
value, that of savings or saved cost. As a consequence, there is a lot
of code that subtracts or creates negative values based on cost, all of
which is prone to awkwardness or bugs when dealing with an unsigned
type. Similarly, we *never* want these values to wrap, as that would
cause Very Bad code generation (likely percieved as an infinite loop as
we try to emit over 2^32 instructions or some such insanity).
All around 'int' seems a much better fit for these basic metrics. I've
added asserts to ensure that at least the TTI interface never returns
negative numbers here. If we ever have a use case for negative numbers,
we can remove this, but this way a bug where someone used '-1' to
produce a 'very large' cost will be caught by the assert.
This passes all tests, and is also UBSan clean.
No functional change intended.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11741
llvm-svn: 244080
This patch vectorizes the v2i64/v4i64 ASHR shift operations - the last remaining integer vector shifts that are still being transferred to/from the scalar unit to be completed.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11439
llvm-svn: 243569
Reordered the data tables at the top and placed the lookups after. The first stage in the yak shaving necessary to get more accurate costs for a variety of targets given the recent improvements to SINT_TO_FP/UINT_TO_FP/SIGN_EXTEND vector lowering.
llvm-svn: 242643
While the v4i32 shl operation is already vectorized using a cvttps2dq/pmulld pattern, the lshr/ashr opeations are still scalarized.
This patch adds vectorization support for non-uniform v4i32 shift operations - it splats constant shift amounts to allow them to use the immediate sse shift instructions, or extracts/zero-extends non-constant shift amounts. The individual results are then blended together.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11063
llvm-svn: 241989
Summary:
This change is part of a series of commits dedicated to have a single
DataLayout during compilation by using always the one owned by the
module.
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: jholewinski, ted, yaron.keren, rafael, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11028
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 241775
This patch adds vectorization support for uniform constant i64 arithmetic shift right operators.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9645
llvm-svn: 241514
This checks subtarget feature compatibility for inlining by verifying
that the callee is a strict subset of the caller's features. This includes
the cpu as part of the subtarget we can get via the incoming functions as
the backend takes CPUs as feature sets.
This allows us to inline things like:
int foo() { return baz(); }
int __attribute__((target("sse4.2"))) bar() {
return foo();
}
so that generic code can be inlined into specialized functions.
llvm-svn: 241221
This patch ensures that SHL/SRL/SRA shifts for i8 and i16 vectors avoid scalarization. It builds on the existing i8 SHL vectorized implementation of moving the shift bits up to the sign bit position and separating the 4, 2 & 1 bit shifts with several improvements:
1 - SSE41 targets can use (v)pblendvb directly with the sign bit instead of performing a comparison to feed into a VSELECT node.
2 - pre-SSE41 targets were masking + comparing with an 0x80 constant - we avoid this by using the fact that a set sign bit means a negative integer which can be compared against zero to then feed into VSELECT, avoiding the need for a constant mask (zero generation is much cheaper).
3 - SRA i8 needs to be unpacked to the upper byte of a i16 so that the i16 psraw instruction can be correctly used for sign extension - we have to do more work than for SHL/SRL but perf tests indicate that this is still beneficial.
The i16 implementation is similar but simpler than for i8 - we have to do 8, 4, 2 & 1 bit shifts but less shift masking is involved. SSE41 use of (v)pblendvb requires that the i16 shift amount is splatted to both bytes however.
Tested on SSE2, SSE41 and AVX machines.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9474
llvm-svn: 239509
Part of D9474, this patch extends AVX2 v16i16 types to 2 x 8i32 vectors and uses i32 shift variable shifts before packing back to i16.
Adds AVX2 tests for v8i16 and v16i16
llvm-svn: 238149
The patch disabled unrolling in loop vectorization pass when VF==1 on x86 architecture,
by setting MaxInterleaveFactor to 1. Unrolling in loop vectorization pass may introduce
the cost of overflow check, memory boundary check and extra prologue/epilogue code when
regular unroller will unroll the loop another time. Disable it when VF==1 remove the
unnecessary cost on x86. The same can be done for other platforms after verifying
interleaving/memory bound checking to be not perf critical on those platforms.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9515
llvm-svn: 236613
base which it adds a single analysis pass to, to instead return the type
erased TargetTransformInfo object constructed for that TargetMachine.
This removes all of the pass variants for TTI. There is now a single TTI
*pass* in the Analysis layer. All of the Analysis <-> Target
communication is through the TTI's type erased interface itself. While
the diff is large here, it is nothing more that code motion to make
types available in a header file for use in a different source file
within each target.
I've tried to keep all the doxygen comments and file boilerplate in line
with this move, but let me know if I missed anything.
With this in place, the next step to making TTI work with the new pass
manager is to introduce a really simple new-style analysis that produces
a TTI object via a callback into this routine on the target machine.
Once we have that, we'll have the building blocks necessary to accept
a function argument as well.
llvm-svn: 227685
type erased interface and a single analysis pass rather than an
extremely complex analysis group.
The end result is that the TTI analysis can contain a type erased
implementation that supports the polymorphic TTI interface. We can build
one from a target-specific implementation or from a dummy one in the IR.
I've also factored all of the code into "mix-in"-able base classes,
including CRTP base classes to facilitate calling back up to the most
specialized form when delegating horizontally across the surface. These
aren't as clean as I would like and I'm planning to work on cleaning
some of this up, but I wanted to start by putting into the right form.
There are a number of reasons for this change, and this particular
design. The first and foremost reason is that an analysis group is
complete overkill, and the chaining delegation strategy was so opaque,
confusing, and high overhead that TTI was suffering greatly for it.
Several of the TTI functions had failed to be implemented in all places
because of the chaining-based delegation making there be no checking of
this. A few other functions were implemented with incorrect delegation.
The message to me was very clear working on this -- the delegation and
analysis group structure was too confusing to be useful here.
The other reason of course is that this is *much* more natural fit for
the new pass manager. This will lay the ground work for a type-erased
per-function info object that can look up the correct subtarget and even
cache it.
Yet another benefit is that this will significantly simplify the
interaction of the pass managers and the TargetMachine. See the future
work below.
The downside of this change is that it is very, very verbose. I'm going
to work to improve that, but it is somewhat an implementation necessity
in C++ to do type erasure. =/ I discussed this design really extensively
with Eric and Hal prior to going down this path, and afterward showed
them the result. No one was really thrilled with it, but there doesn't
seem to be a substantially better alternative. Using a base class and
virtual method dispatch would make the code much shorter, but as
discussed in the update to the programmer's manual and elsewhere,
a polymorphic interface feels like the more principled approach even if
this is perhaps the least compelling example of it. ;]
Ultimately, there is still a lot more to be done here, but this was the
huge chunk that I couldn't really split things out of because this was
the interface change to TTI. I've tried to minimize all the other parts
of this. The follow up work should include at least:
1) Improving the TargetMachine interface by having it directly return
a TTI object. Because we have a non-pass object with value semantics
and an internal type erasure mechanism, we can narrow the interface
of the TargetMachine to *just* do what we need: build and return
a TTI object that we can then insert into the pass pipeline.
2) Make the TTI object be fully specialized for a particular function.
This will include splitting off a minimal form of it which is
sufficient for the inliner and the old pass manager.
3) Add a new pass manager analysis which produces TTI objects from the
target machine for each function. This may actually be done as part
of #2 in order to use the new analysis to implement #2.
4) Work on narrowing the API between TTI and the targets so that it is
easier to understand and less verbose to type erase.
5) Work on narrowing the API between TTI and its clients so that it is
easier to understand and less verbose to forward.
6) Try to improve the CRTP-based delegation. I feel like this code is
just a bit messy and exacerbating the complexity of implementing
the TTI in each target.
Many thanks to Eric and Hal for their help here. I ended up blocked on
this somewhat more abruptly than I expected, and so I appreciate getting
it sorted out very quickly.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7293
llvm-svn: 227669
I'm recommiting the codegen part of the patch.
The vectorizer part will be send to review again.
Masked Vector Load and Store Intrinsics.
Introduced new target-independent intrinsics in order to support masked vector loads and stores. The loop vectorizer optimizes loops containing conditional memory accesses by generating these intrinsics for existing targets AVX2 and AVX-512. The vectorizer asks the target about availability of masked vector loads and stores.
Added SDNodes for masked operations and lowering patterns for X86 code generator.
Examples:
<16 x i32> @llvm.masked.load.v16i32(i8* %addr, <16 x i32> %passthru, i32 4 /* align */, <16 x i1> %mask)
declare void @llvm.masked.store.v8f64(i8* %addr, <8 x double> %value, i32 4, <8 x i1> %mask)
Scalarizer for other targets (not AVX2/AVX-512) will be done in a separate patch.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D6191
llvm-svn: 223348
This reverts commit r222632 (and follow-up r222636), which caused a host
of LNT failures on an internal bot. I'll respond to the commit on the
list with a reproduction of one of the failures.
Conflicts:
lib/Target/X86/X86TargetTransformInfo.cpp
llvm-svn: 222936
Introduced new target-independent intrinsics in order to support masked vector loads and stores. The loop vectorizer optimizes loops containing conditional memory accesses by generating these intrinsics for existing targets AVX2 and AVX-512. The vectorizer asks the target about availability of masked vector loads and stores.
Added SDNodes for masked operations and lowering patterns for X86 code generator.
Examples:
<16 x i32> @llvm.masked.load.v16i32(i8* %addr, <16 x i32> %passthru, i32 4 /* align */, <16 x i1> %mask)
declare void @llvm.masked.store.v8f64(i8* %addr, <8 x double> %value, i32 4, <8 x i1> %mask)
Scalarizer for other targets (not AVX2/AVX-512) will be done in a separate patch.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D6191
llvm-svn: 222632
