This should simplify the call sites, which typically want to tweak one
attribute at a time. It should also avoid creating ephemeral
AttributeLists that live forever.
llvm-svn: 300718
Summary:
This seems like an uncontroversial first step toward providing access to the metadata hierarchy that now exists in LLVM. This should allow for good debug info support from C.
Future plans are to deprecate API that take mixed bags of values and metadata (mainly the LLVMMDNode family of functions) and migrate the rest toward the use of LLVMMetadataRef.
Once this is in place, mapping of DIBuilder will be able to start.
Reviewers: mehdi_amini, echristo, whitequark, jketema, Wallbraker
Reviewed By: Wallbraker
Subscribers: Eugene.Zelenko, axw, mehdi_amini, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D19448
llvm-svn: 300447
Summary:
For now, it just wraps AttributeSetNode*. Eventually, it will hold
AvailableAttrs as an inline bitset, and adding and removing enum
attributes will be super cheap.
This sinks AttributeSetNode back down to lib/IR/AttributeImpl.h.
Reviewers: pete, chandlerc
Subscribers: llvm-commits, jfb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31940
llvm-svn: 300014
The getter was equivalent to AttributeList::getAttributes(unsigned),
which seems like a better way to express getting the AttributeSet for a
given index. This static helper was only used in one place anyway.
The constructor doesn't benefit from inlining and doesn't need to be in
a header.
llvm-svn: 299900
This re-lands r299875.
I introduced a bug in Clang code responsible for replacing K&R, no
prototype declarations with a real function definition with a prototype.
The bug was here:
// Collect any return attributes from the call.
- if (oldAttrs.hasAttributes(llvm::AttributeList::ReturnIndex))
- newAttrs.push_back(llvm::AttributeList::get(newFn->getContext(),
- oldAttrs.getRetAttributes()));
+ newAttrs.push_back(oldAttrs.getRetAttributes());
Previously getRetAttributes() carried AttributeList::ReturnIndex in its
AttributeList. Now that we return the AttributeSetNode* directly, it no
longer carries that index, and we call this overload with a single node:
AttributeList::get(LLVMContext&, ArrayRef<AttributeSetNode*>)
That aborted with an assertion on x86_32 targets. I added an explicit
triple to the test and added CHECKs to help find issues like this in the
future sooner.
llvm-svn: 299899
Summary:
AttributeList::get(Fn|Ret|Param)Attributes no longer creates a temporary
AttributeList just to hide the AttributeSetNode type.
I've also added a factory method to create AttributeLists from a
parallel array of AttributeSetNodes. I think this simplifies
construction of AttributeLists when rewriting function prototypes.
Previously we would test if a particular index had attributes, and
conditionally add a temporary attribute list to a vector. Now the
attribute set vector is parallel to the argument vector already that
these passes already construct.
My long term vision is to wrap AttributeSetNode* inside an AttributeSet
type that holds the enum attributes, but that will come in a follow up
change.
I haven't done any performance measurements for this change because
profiling hasn't shown that any of the affected code is hot.
Reviewers: pete, chandlerc, sanjoy, hfinkel
Reviewed By: pete
Subscribers: jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31198
llvm-svn: 299875
Summary:
This class is a list of AttributeSetNodes corresponding the function
prototype of a call or function declaration. This class used to be
called ParamAttrListPtr, then AttrListPtr, then AttributeSet. It is
typically accessed by parameter and return value index, so
"AttributeList" seems like a more intuitive name.
Rename AttributeSetImpl to AttributeListImpl to follow suit.
It's useful to rename this class so that we can rename AttributeSetNode
to AttributeSet later. AttributeSet is the set of attributes that apply
to a single function, argument, or return value.
Reviewers: sanjoy, javed.absar, chandlerc, pete
Reviewed By: pete
Subscribers: pete, jholewinski, arsenm, dschuff, mehdi_amini, jfb, nhaehnle, sbc100, void, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31102
llvm-svn: 298393
This saves two pointers from Argument and eliminates some extra
allocations.
Arguments cannot be inserted or removed from a Function because that
would require changing its Type, which LLVM does not allow. Instead,
passes that change prototypes, like DeadArgElim, create a new Function
and copy over argument names and attributes. The primary benefit of
iplist is O(1) random insertion and removal. We just don't need that for
arguments, so don't use it.
Reviewed By: chandlerc
Subscribers: dlj, inglorion, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31058
llvm-svn: 298105
While this probably should be considered a dump debugger utility, the C
API currently has no other ways to print a module to stderr for error
reporting purposes, so keep it even in release builds.
llvm-svn: 293436
We had various variants of defining dump() functions in LLVM. Normalize
them (this should just consistently implement the things discussed in
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2014-January/034323.html
For reference:
- Public headers should just declare the dump() method but not use
LLVM_DUMP_METHOD or #if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP)
- The definition of a dump method should look like this:
#if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP)
LLVM_DUMP_METHOD void MyClass::dump() {
// print stuff to dbgs()...
}
#endif
llvm-svn: 293359
At least the plugin used by the LibreOffice build
(<https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Clang_plugins>) indirectly
uses those members (through inline functions in LLVM/Clang include files in turn
using them), but they are not exported by utils/extract_symbols.py on Windows,
and accessing data across DLL/EXE boundaries on Windows is generally
problematic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26671
llvm-svn: 289647
As proposed on llvm-dev:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-October/106640.html
This is for a couple of reasons:
- Values of type PointerType are unlike the other SequentialTypes (arrays
and vectors) in that they do not hold values of the element type. By moving
PointerType we can unify certain aspects of how the other SequentialTypes
are handled.
- PointerType will have no place in the SequentialType hierarchy once
pointee types are removed, so this is a necessary step towards removing
pointee types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26595
llvm-svn: 288462
Summary:
Split ReaderWriter.h which contains the APIs into both the BitReader and
BitWriter libraries into BitcodeReader.h and BitcodeWriter.h.
This is to address Chandler's concern about sharing the same API header
between multiple libraries (BitReader and BitWriter). That concern is
why we create a single bitcode library in our downstream build of clang,
which led to r286297 being reverted as it added a dependency that
created a cycle only when there is a single bitcode library (not two as
in upstream).
Reviewers: mehdi_amini
Subscribers: dlj, mehdi_amini, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26502
llvm-svn: 286566
Summary:
This kill various depreacated API related to attribute :
- The deprecated C API attribute based on LLVMAttribute enum.
- The Raw attribute set format (planned to be removed in 4.0).
Reviewers: bkramer, echristo, mehdi_amini, void
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23039
llvm-svn: 286062
Summary:
These are analog to the existing LLVMConstExactSDiv and LLVMBuildExactSDiv
functions.
Reviewers: deadalnix, majnemer
Subscribers: majnemer, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25259
llvm-svn: 283269
End iterators are usually sentinels, not actually Instruction* at all.
Stop casting to it just to get an iterator back.
There is likely no observable functionality change here right now
(although this is relying on UB, I doubt it was triggering anything),
but I'll be removing the cast soon.
llvm-svn: 278346
Summary: As per title. This completes the C API Attribute support.
Reviewers: Wallbraker, whitequark, echristo, rafael, jyknight
Subscribers: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21365
llvm-svn: 272811
If a local_unnamed_addr attribute is attached to a global, the address
is known to be insignificant within the module. It is distinct from the
existing unnamed_addr attribute in that it only describes a local property
of the module rather than a global property of the symbol.
This attribute is intended to be used by the code generator and LTO to allow
the linker to decide whether the global needs to be in the symbol table. It is
possible to exclude a global from the symbol table if three things are true:
- This attribute is present on every instance of the global (which means that
the normal rule that the global must have a unique address can be broken without
being observable by the program by performing comparisons against the global's
address)
- The global has linkonce_odr linkage (which means that each linkage unit must have
its own copy of the global if it requires one, and the copy in each linkage unit
must be the same)
- It is a constant or a function (which means that the program cannot observe that
the unique-address rule has been broken by writing to the global)
Although this attribute could in principle be computed from the module
contents, LTO clients (i.e. linkers) will normally need to be able to compute
this property as part of symbol resolution, and it would be inefficient to
materialize every module just to compute it.
See:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20160509/356401.htmlhttp://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20160516/356738.html
for earlier discussion.
Part of the fix for PR27553.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20348
llvm-svn: 272709
Summary: This also deprecated the get attribute function familly.
Reviewers: Wallbraker, whitequark, joker.eph, echristo, rafael, jyknight
Subscribers: axw, joker.eph, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19181
llvm-svn: 272504
Summary: This needs to get in before anything is released concerning attribute. If the old name gets in the wild, then we are stuck with it forever. Putting it in its own diff should getting that part at least in fast.
Reviewers: Wallbraker, whitequark, joker.eph, echristo, rafael, jyknight
Subscribers: llvm-commits, joker.eph
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20417
llvm-svn: 270452
Summary:
LLVMAttribute has outlived its utility and is becoming a problem for C API users that what to use all the LLVM attributes. In order to help moving away from LLVMAttribute in a smooth manner, this diff introduce LLVMGetAttrKindIDInContext, which can be used instead of the enum values.
See D18749 for reference.
Reviewers: Wallbraker, whitequark, joker.eph, echristo, rafael
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19081
llvm-svn: 266842
The only use for getGlobalContext() is in the C API.
Let's just move the static global here and nuke the C++ API.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19094
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 266380
Summary: LLVMAttribute has outlived its utility and is becoming a problem for C API users that what to use all the LLVM attributes. In order to help moving away from LLVMAttribute in a smooth manner, this diff introduce LLVMGetAttrKindIDInContext, which can be used instead of the enum values.
Reviewers: Wallbraker, whitequark, joker.eph, echristo
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18749
llvm-svn: 266257
Summary:
In the context of http://wg21.link/lwg2445 C++ uses the concept of
'stronger' ordering but doesn't define it properly. This should be fixed
in C++17 barring a small question that's still open.
The code currently plays fast and loose with the AtomicOrdering
enum. Using an enum class is one step towards tightening things. I later
also want to tighten related enums, such as clang's
AtomicOrderingKind (which should be shared with LLVM as a 'C++ ABI'
enum).
This change touches a few lines of code which can be improved later, I'd
like to keep it as NFC for now as it's already quite complex. I have
related changes for clang.
As a follow-up I'll add:
bool operator<(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
bool operator>(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
bool operator<=(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
bool operator>=(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
This is separate so that clang and LLVM changes don't need to be in sync.
Reviewers: jyknight, reames
Subscribers: jyknight, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18775
llvm-svn: 265602
Summary: Also expose getters and setters in the C API, so that the change can be tested.
Reviewers: nhaehnle, axw, joker.eph
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18260
From: Bas Nieuwenhuizen <bas@basnieuwenhuizen.nl>
llvm-svn: 263886
Summary: As per title. There was a lot of part missing in the C API, so I had to extend the invoke and landingpad API.
Reviewers: echristo, joker.eph, Wallbraker
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17359
llvm-svn: 261254
Summary: The name is confusing as it matche another method on the module.
Reviewers: joker.eph, Wallbraker, echristo
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17283
llvm-svn: 260920
