1
0
mirror of https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git synced 2024-10-21 03:53:04 +02:00
Commit Graph

79 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Daniel Berlin
e485ce96aa MemorySSA: Move to Analysis, from Transforms/Utils. It's used as
Analysis, it has Analysis passes, and once NewGVN is made an Analysis,
this removes the cross dependency from Analysis to Transform/Utils.
NFC.

llvm-svn: 299980
2017-04-11 20:06:36 +00:00
Anna Thomas
39cb171e59 [LVI] Add an LVI printer pass to capture test LVI cache after transformations
Summary:
Adding a printer pass for printing the LVI cache values after transformations
that use LVI.
This will help us in identifying cases where LVI
invariants are violated, or transforms that leave LVI in an incorrect state.
Right now, I have added two test cases to show that the printer pass is working.
I will be adding more test cases in a later change, once this change is
checked in upstream.

Reviewers: reames, dberlin, sanjoy, apilipenko

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30790

llvm-svn: 298542
2017-03-22 19:27:12 +00:00
Igor Laevsky
1777237add [LCSSA] Perform LCSSA verification only for the current loop nest.
Now LPPassManager will run LCSSA verification only for the top-level loop
which was processed on the current iteration.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25873

llvm-svn: 285394
2016-10-28 12:57:20 +00:00
Sriraman Tallam
0bea49c555 [PM] Port CFGViewer and CFGPrinter to the new Pass Manager
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24592

llvm-svn: 281640
2016-09-15 18:35:27 +00:00
Adam Nemet
9449a00cc1 [BPI] Add new LazyBPI analysis
Summary:
The motivation is the same as in D22141: In order to add the hotness
attribute to optimization remarks we need BFI to be available in all
passes that emit optimization remarks.  BFI depends on BPI so unless we
make this lazy as well we would still compute BPI unconditionally.

The solution is to use the new LazyBPI pass in LazyBFI and only compute
BPI when computation of BFI is requested by the client.

I extended the laziness test using a LoopDistribute test to also cover
BPI.

Reviewers: hfinkel, davidxl

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22835

llvm-svn: 277083
2016-07-28 23:31:12 +00:00
Adam Nemet
3e5f3565d1 [OptRemarkEmitter] Port to new PM
Summary:
The main goal is to able to start using the new OptRemarkEmitter
analysis from the LoopVectorizer.  Since the vectorizer was recently
converted to the new PM, it makes sense to convert this analysis as
well.

This pass is currently tested through the LoopDistribution pass, so I am
also porting LoopDistribution to get coverage for this analysis with the
new PM.

Reviewers: davidxl, silvas

Subscribers: llvm-commits, mzolotukhin

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22436

llvm-svn: 275810
2016-07-18 16:29:21 +00:00
Dehao Chen
84b1505453 [PM] Convert IVUsers analysis to new pass manager.
Summary: Convert IVUsers analysis to new pass manager.

Reviewers: davidxl, silvas

Subscribers: junbuml, sanjoy, llvm-commits, mzolotukhin

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22434

llvm-svn: 275698
2016-07-16 22:51:33 +00:00
Adam Nemet
cb89dd6834 [OptRemark,LDist] RFC: Add hotness attribute
Summary:
This is the first set of changes implementing the RFC from
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.compilers.llvm.devel/98334

This is a cross-sectional patch; rather than implementing the hotness
attribute for all optimization remarks and all passes in a patch set, it
implements it for the 'missed-optimization' remark for Loop
Distribution.  My goal is to shake out the design issues before scaling
it up to other types and passes.

Hotness is computed as an integer as the multiplication of the block
frequency with the function entry count.  It's only printed in opt
currently since clang prints the diagnostic fields directly.  E.g.:

  remark: /tmp/t.c:3:3: loop not distributed: use -Rpass-analysis=loop-distribute for more info (hotness: 300)

A new API added is similar to emitOptimizationRemarkMissed.  The
difference is that it additionally takes a code region that the
diagnostic corresponds to.  From this, hotness is computed using BFI.
The new API is exposed via an analysis pass so that it can be made
dependent on LazyBFI.  (Thanks to Hal for the analysis pass idea.)

This feature can all be enabled by setDiagnosticHotnessRequested in the
LLVM context.  If this is off, LazyBFI is not calculated (D22141) so
there should be no overhead.

A new command-line option is added to turn this on in opt.

My plan is to switch all user of emitOptimizationRemark* to use this
module instead.

Reviewers: hfinkel

Subscribers: rcox2, mzolotukhin, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21771

llvm-svn: 275583
2016-07-15 17:23:20 +00:00
Adam Nemet
071e00e973 [BFI] Add new LazyBFI analysis pass
Summary:
This is necessary for D21771.  In order to add the hotness attribute to
optimization remarks we need BFI to be available in all passes that emit
optimization remarks.

However we don't want to pay for computing BFI unless the hotness
attribute is requested.

This is achieved by making BFI lazy at the very high-level through a new
analysis pass -- BFI is not calculated unless requested.

I am adding a test to check the laziness under D21771 where the first
user of the analysis is added.

Reviewers: hfinkel, dexonsmith, davidxl

Subscribers: davidxl, dexonsmith, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22141

llvm-svn: 275250
2016-07-13 05:01:48 +00:00
George Burgess IV
9f9488ba33 [CFLAA] Split into Anders+Steens analysis.
StratifiedSets (as implemented) is very fast, but its accuracy is also
limited. If we take a more aggressive andersens-like approach, we can be
way more accurate, but we'll also end up being slower.

So, we've decided to split CFLAA into CFLSteensAA and CFLAndersAA.

Long-term, we want to end up in a place where CFLSteens is queried
first; if it can provide an answer, great (since queries are basically
map lookups). Otherwise, we'll fall back to CFLAnders, BasicAA, etc.

This patch splits everything out so we can try to do something like
that when we get a reasonable CFLAnders implementation.

Patch by Jia Chen.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21910

llvm-svn: 274589
2016-07-06 00:26:41 +00:00
Sean Silva
c29833a552 [PM] Port LVI to the new PM.
This is a bit gnarly since LVI is maintaining its own cache.
I think this port could be somewhat cleaner, but I'd rather not spend
too much time on it while we still have the old pass hanging around and
limiting how much we can clean things up.
Once the old pass is gone it will be easier (less time spent) to clean
it up anyway.

This is the last dependency needed for porting JumpThreading which I'll
do in a follow-up commit (there's no printer pass for LVI or anything to
test it, so porting a pass that depends on it seems best).

I've been mostly following:
r269370 / D18834 which ported Dependence Analysis
r268601 / D19839 which ported BPI

llvm-svn: 272593
2016-06-13 22:01:25 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
fcf369677a [PM] Port of the DepndenceAnalysis to the new PM.
Ported DA to the new PM by splitting the former DependenceAnalysis Pass
into a DependenceInfo result type and DependenceAnalysisWrapperPass type
and adding a new PM-style DependenceAnalysis analysis pass returning the
DependenceInfo.

Patch by Philip Pfaffe, most of the review by Justin.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18834

llvm-svn: 269370
2016-05-12 22:19:39 +00:00
Michael Kuperstein
3e5d8ebde9 Port DemandedBits to the new pass manager.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18679

llvm-svn: 266699
2016-04-18 23:55:01 +00:00
Teresa Johnson
d7c9485243 [ThinLTO] Move summary computation from BitcodeWriter to new pass
Summary:
This is the first step in also serializing the index out to LLVM
assembly.

The per-module summary written to bitcode is moved out of the bitcode
writer and to a new analysis pass (ModuleSummaryIndexWrapperPass).
The pass itself uses a new builder class to compute index, and the
builder class is used directly in places where we don't have a pass
manager (e.g. llvm-as).

Because we are computing summaries outside of the bitcode writer, we no
longer can use value ids created by the bitcode writer's
ValueEnumerator. This required changing the reference graph edge type
to use a new ValueInfo class holding a union between a GUID (combined
index) and Value* (permodule index). The Value* are converted to the
appropriate value ID during bitcode writing.

Also, this enables removal of the BitWriter library's dependence on the
Analysis library that was previously required for the summary computation.

Reviewers: joker.eph

Subscribers: joker.eph, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18763

llvm-svn: 265941
2016-04-11 13:58:45 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
3c5ca0deac [CG] Actually hoist up the generic CallGraphPrinter pass from a weird
location in the opt tool to live along side the analysis in LLVM's
libraries.

No functionality changed here, but this will allow me to port the
printer to the new pass manager as well.

llvm-svn: 263101
2016-03-10 11:08:44 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
937deba1b9 [CG] Rename the DOT printing pass to actually reference "DOT".
There is another pass by the generic name 'CallGraphPrinter' which is
actually just a call graph printer tucked away inside the opt tool. I'd
like to bring it out and make it follow the same patterns as the rest of
the CallGraph code, but doing so would end up conflicting with the name
of the DOT printing pass. So this makes the DOT printing pass name be
more precise.

No functionality changed here.

llvm-svn: 263100
2016-03-10 11:04:40 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
4904b56b75 [PM] Port memdep to the new pass manager.
This is a fairly straightforward port to the new pass manager with one
exception. It removes a very questionable use of releaseMemory() in
the old pass to invalidate its caches between runs on a function.
I don't think this is really guaranteed to be safe. I've just used the
more direct port to the new PM to address this by nuking the results
object each time the pass runs. While this could cause some minor malloc
traffic increase, I don't expect the compile time performance hit to be
noticable, and it makes the correctness and other aspects of the pass
much easier to reason about. In some cases, it may make things faster by
making the sets and maps smaller with better locality. Indeed, the
measurements collected by Bruno (thanks!!!) show mostly compile time
improvements.

There is sadly very limited testing at this point as there are only two
tests of memdep, and both rely on GVN. I'll be porting GVN next and that
will exercise this heavily though.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17962

llvm-svn: 263082
2016-03-10 00:55:30 +00:00
Hongbin Zheng
e391b241c7 Introduce DominanceFrontierAnalysis to the new PassManager to compute DominanceFrontier. NFC
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17570

llvm-svn: 261903
2016-02-25 17:54:15 +00:00
Hongbin Zheng
3e75d3d4e5 Introduce analysis pass to compute PostDominators in the new pass manager. NFC
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17537

llvm-svn: 261902
2016-02-25 17:54:07 +00:00
Hongbin Zheng
3d17e7bc47 Revert "Introduce analysis pass to compute PostDominators in the new pass manager. NFC"
This reverts commit a3e5cc6a51ab5ad88d1760c63284294a4e34c018.

llvm-svn: 261891
2016-02-25 16:45:53 +00:00
Hongbin Zheng
b446bc1e4f Revert "Introduce DominanceFrontierAnalysis to the new PassManager to compute DominanceFrontier. NFC"
This reverts commit 109c38b2226a87b0be73fa7a0a8c1a81df20aeb2.

llvm-svn: 261890
2016-02-25 16:45:46 +00:00
Hongbin Zheng
10a5a19fa0 Introduce DominanceFrontierAnalysis to the new PassManager to compute DominanceFrontier. NFC
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17570

llvm-svn: 261883
2016-02-25 16:33:15 +00:00
Hongbin Zheng
26e597b0c3 Introduce analysis pass to compute PostDominators in the new pass manager. NFC
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17537

llvm-svn: 261882
2016-02-25 16:33:06 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
6d0392224e [PM/AA] Port alias analysis evaluator to the new pass manager, and use
it to actually test the new pass manager AA wiring.

This patch was extracted from the (somewhat too large) D12357 and
rebosed on top of the slightly different design of the new pass manager
AA wiring that I just landed. With this we can start testing the AA in
a thorough way with the new pass manager.

Some minor cleanups to the code in the pass was necessitated here, but
otherwise it is a very minimal change.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17372

llvm-svn: 261403
2016-02-20 03:46:03 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
d7003090ac [PM/AA] Rebuild LLVM's alias analysis infrastructure in a way compatible
with the new pass manager, and no longer relying on analysis groups.

This builds essentially a ground-up new AA infrastructure stack for
LLVM. The core ideas are the same that are used throughout the new pass
manager: type erased polymorphism and direct composition. The design is
as follows:

- FunctionAAResults is a type-erasing alias analysis results aggregation
  interface to walk a single query across a range of results from
  different alias analyses. Currently this is function-specific as we
  always assume that aliasing queries are *within* a function.

- AAResultBase is a CRTP utility providing stub implementations of
  various parts of the alias analysis result concept, notably in several
  cases in terms of other more general parts of the interface. This can
  be used to implement only a narrow part of the interface rather than
  the entire interface. This isn't really ideal, this logic should be
  hoisted into FunctionAAResults as currently it will cause
  a significant amount of redundant work, but it faithfully models the
  behavior of the prior infrastructure.

- All the alias analysis passes are ported to be wrapper passes for the
  legacy PM and new-style analysis passes for the new PM with a shared
  result object. In some cases (most notably CFL), this is an extremely
  naive approach that we should revisit when we can specialize for the
  new pass manager.

- BasicAA has been restructured to reflect that it is much more
  fundamentally a function analysis because it uses dominator trees and
  loop info that need to be constructed for each function.

All of the references to getting alias analysis results have been
updated to use the new aggregation interface. All the preservation and
other pass management code has been updated accordingly.

The way the FunctionAAResultsWrapperPass works is to detect the
available alias analyses when run, and add them to the results object.
This means that we should be able to continue to respect when various
passes are added to the pipeline, for example adding CFL or adding TBAA
passes should just cause their results to be available and to get folded
into this. The exception to this rule is BasicAA which really needs to
be a function pass due to using dominator trees and loop info. As
a consequence, the FunctionAAResultsWrapperPass directly depends on
BasicAA and always includes it in the aggregation.

This has significant implications for preserving analyses. Generally,
most passes shouldn't bother preserving FunctionAAResultsWrapperPass
because rebuilding the results just updates the set of known AA passes.
The exception to this rule are LoopPass instances which need to preserve
all the function analyses that the loop pass manager will end up
needing. This means preserving both BasicAAWrapperPass and the
aggregating FunctionAAResultsWrapperPass.

Now, when preserving an alias analysis, you do so by directly preserving
that analysis. This is only necessary for non-immutable-pass-provided
alias analyses though, and there are only three of interest: BasicAA,
GlobalsAA (formerly GlobalsModRef), and SCEVAA. Usually BasicAA is
preserved when needed because it (like DominatorTree and LoopInfo) is
marked as a CFG-only pass. I've expanded GlobalsAA into the preserved
set everywhere we previously were preserving all of AliasAnalysis, and
I've added SCEVAA in the intersection of that with where we preserve
SCEV itself.

One significant challenge to all of this is that the CGSCC passes were
actually using the alias analysis implementations by taking advantage of
a pretty amazing set of loop holes in the old pass manager's analysis
management code which allowed analysis groups to slide through in many
cases. Moving away from analysis groups makes this problem much more
obvious. To fix it, I've leveraged the flexibility the design of the new
PM components provides to just directly construct the relevant alias
analyses for the relevant functions in the IPO passes that need them.
This is a bit hacky, but should go away with the new pass manager, and
is already in many ways cleaner than the prior state.

Another significant challenge is that various facilities of the old
alias analysis infrastructure just don't fit any more. The most
significant of these is the alias analysis 'counter' pass. That pass
relied on the ability to snoop on AA queries at different points in the
analysis group chain. Instead, I'm planning to build printing
functionality directly into the aggregation layer. I've not included
that in this patch merely to keep it smaller.

Note that all of this needs a nearly complete rewrite of the AA
documentation. I'm planning to do that, but I'd like to make sure the
new design settles, and to flesh out a bit more of what it looks like in
the new pass manager first.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12080

llvm-svn: 247167
2015-09-09 17:55:00 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
e93d4cc138 [ARC] Pull the ObjC ARC components that really serve the role of
analyses into LLVM's Analysis library rather than having them in
a Transforms library.

This is motivated by the need to have the core AliasAnalysis
infrastructure be aware of the ObjCARCAliasAnalysis. However, it also
seems like a nice and clean separation. Everything was very easy to move
and this doesn't create much clutter in the analysis library IMO.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12133

llvm-svn: 245541
2015-08-20 08:06:03 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
bf271cc4e6 [PM/AA] Remove the last relics of the separate IPA library from LLVM,
folding the code into the main Analysis library.

There already wasn't much of a distinction between Analysis and IPA.
A number of the passes in Analysis are actually IPA passes, and there
doesn't seem to be any advantage to separating them.

Moreover, it makes it hard to have interactions between analyses that
are both local and interprocedural. In trying to make the Alias Analysis
infrastructure work with the new pass manager, it becomes particularly
awkward to navigate this split.

I've tried to find all the places where we referenced this, but I may
have missed some. I have also adjusted the C API to continue to be
equivalently functional after this change.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12075

llvm-svn: 245318
2015-08-18 17:51:53 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
4d1e1851a4 [PM] Port ScalarEvolution to the new pass manager.
This change makes ScalarEvolution a stand-alone object and just produces
one from a pass as needed. Making this work well requires making the
object movable, using references instead of overwritten pointers in
a number of places, and other refactorings.

I've also wired it up to the new pass manager and added a RUN line to
a test to exercise it under the new pass manager. This includes basic
printing support much like with other analyses.

But there is a big and somewhat scary change here. Prior to this patch
ScalarEvolution was never *actually* invalidated!!! Re-running the pass
just re-wired up the various other analyses and didn't remove any of the
existing entries in the SCEV caches or clear out anything at all. This
might seem OK as everything in SCEV that can uses ValueHandles to track
updates to the values that serve as SCEV keys. However, this still means
that as we ran SCEV over each function in the module, we kept
accumulating more and more SCEVs into the cache. At the end, we would
have a SCEV cache with every value that we ever needed a SCEV for in the
entire module!!! Yowzers. The releaseMemory routine would dump all of
this, but that isn't realy called during normal runs of the pipeline as
far as I can see.

To make matters worse, there *is* actually a key that we don't update
with value handles -- there is a map keyed off of Loop*s. Because
LoopInfo *does* release its memory from run to run, it is entirely
possible to run SCEV over one function, then over another function, and
then lookup a Loop* from the second function but find an entry inserted
for the first function! Ouch.

To make matters still worse, there are plenty of updates that *don't*
trip a value handle. It seems incredibly unlikely that today GVN or
another pass that invalidates SCEV can update values in *just* such
a way that a subsequent run of SCEV will incorrectly find lookups in
a cache, but it is theoretically possible and would be a nightmare to
debug.

With this refactoring, I've fixed all this by actually destroying and
recreating the ScalarEvolution object from run to run. Technically, this
could increase the amount of malloc traffic we see, but then again it is
also technically correct. ;] I don't actually think we're suffering from
tons of malloc traffic from SCEV because if we were, the fact that we
never clear the memory would seem more likely to have come up as an
actual problem before now. So, I've made the simple fix here. If in fact
there are serious issues with too much allocation and deallocation,
I can work on a clever fix that preserves the allocations (while
clearing the data) between each run, but I'd prefer to do that kind of
optimization with a test case / benchmark that shows why we need such
cleverness (and that can test that we actually make it faster). It's
possible that this will make some things faster by making the SCEV
caches have higher locality (due to being significantly smaller) so
until there is a clear benchmark, I think the simple change is best.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12063

llvm-svn: 245193
2015-08-17 02:08:17 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
2f75ae919d [PM/AA] Delete the LibCallAliasAnalysis and all the associated
infrastructure.

This AA was never used in tree. It's infrastructure also completely
overlaps that of TargetLibraryInfo which is used heavily by BasicAA to
achieve similar goals to those stated for this analysis.

As has come up in several discussions, the use case here is still really
important, but this code isn't helping move toward that use case. Any
progress on better supporting rich AA information for runtime library
environments would likely be better off starting from scratch or
starting from TargetLibraryInfo than from this base.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12028

llvm-svn: 245155
2015-08-15 09:22:21 +00:00
James Molloy
025f427f26 Separate out BDCE's analysis into a separate DemandedBits analysis.
This allows other areas of the compiler to use BDCE's bit-tracking.
NFCI.

llvm-svn: 245039
2015-08-14 11:09:09 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
97b830a9d8 [PM/AA] Remove the AliasDebugger pass.
This debugger was designed to catch places where the old update API was
failing to be used correctly. As I've removed the update API, it no
longer serves any purpose. We can introduce new debugging aid passes
around any future work w.r.t. updating AAs.

Note that I've updated the documentation here, but really I need to
rewrite the documentation to carefully spell out the ideas around
stateful AA and how things are changing in the AA world. However, I'm
hoping to do that as a follow-up to the refactoring of the AA
infrastructure to work in both old and new pass managers so that I can
write the documentation specific to that world.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11984

llvm-svn: 244825
2015-08-12 22:54:47 +00:00
Cong Hou
be08cf7ca6 Create a wrapper pass for BranchProbabilityInfo.
This new wrapper pass is useful when we want to do branch probability analysis conditionally (e.g. only in PGO mode) but don't want to add one more pass dependence.

http://reviews.llvm.org/D11241

llvm-svn: 242349
2015-07-15 22:48:29 +00:00
Wei Mi
3e99add8f8 Create a wrapper pass for BlockFrequencyInfo.
This is useful when we want to do block frequency analysis
conditionally (e.g. only in PGO mode) but don't want to add
one more pass dependence.

Patch by congh.
Approved by dexonsmith.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11196

llvm-svn: 242248
2015-07-14 23:40:50 +00:00
Jingyue Wu
a3bb69f6c6 Divergence analysis for GPU programs
Summary:
Some optimizations such as jump threading and loop unswitching can negatively
affect performance when applied to divergent branches. The divergence analysis
added in this patch conservatively estimates which branches in a GPU program
can diverge. This information can then help LLVM to run certain optimizations
selectively.

Test Plan: test/Analysis/DivergenceAnalysis/NVPTX/diverge.ll

Reviewers: resistor, hfinkel, eliben, meheff, jholewinski

Subscribers: broune, bjarke.roune, madhur13490, tstellarAMD, dberlin, echristo, jholewinski, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8576

llvm-svn: 234567
2015-04-10 05:03:50 +00:00
Eric Christopher
7c8f775d46 Remove the Forward Control Flow Integrity pass and its dependencies.
This work is currently being rethought along different lines and
if this work is needed it can be resurrected out of svn. Remove it
for now as no current work in ongoing on it and it's unused. Verified
with the authors before removal.

llvm-svn: 230780
2015-02-27 19:03:38 +00:00
Ramkumar Ramachandra
39bc517234 Introduce print-memderefs to test isDereferenceablePointer
Since testing the function indirectly is tricky, introduce a direct
print-memderefs pass, in the same spirit as print-memdeps, which prints
dereferenceability information matched by FileCheck.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7075

llvm-svn: 228369
2015-02-06 01:46:42 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
b2d6052871 [PM] Change the core design of the TTI analysis to use a polymorphic
type erased interface and a single analysis pass rather than an
extremely complex analysis group.

The end result is that the TTI analysis can contain a type erased
implementation that supports the polymorphic TTI interface. We can build
one from a target-specific implementation or from a dummy one in the IR.

I've also factored all of the code into "mix-in"-able base classes,
including CRTP base classes to facilitate calling back up to the most
specialized form when delegating horizontally across the surface. These
aren't as clean as I would like and I'm planning to work on cleaning
some of this up, but I wanted to start by putting into the right form.

There are a number of reasons for this change, and this particular
design. The first and foremost reason is that an analysis group is
complete overkill, and the chaining delegation strategy was so opaque,
confusing, and high overhead that TTI was suffering greatly for it.
Several of the TTI functions had failed to be implemented in all places
because of the chaining-based delegation making there be no checking of
this. A few other functions were implemented with incorrect delegation.
The message to me was very clear working on this -- the delegation and
analysis group structure was too confusing to be useful here.

The other reason of course is that this is *much* more natural fit for
the new pass manager. This will lay the ground work for a type-erased
per-function info object that can look up the correct subtarget and even
cache it.

Yet another benefit is that this will significantly simplify the
interaction of the pass managers and the TargetMachine. See the future
work below.

The downside of this change is that it is very, very verbose. I'm going
to work to improve that, but it is somewhat an implementation necessity
in C++ to do type erasure. =/ I discussed this design really extensively
with Eric and Hal prior to going down this path, and afterward showed
them the result. No one was really thrilled with it, but there doesn't
seem to be a substantially better alternative. Using a base class and
virtual method dispatch would make the code much shorter, but as
discussed in the update to the programmer's manual and elsewhere,
a polymorphic interface feels like the more principled approach even if
this is perhaps the least compelling example of it. ;]

Ultimately, there is still a lot more to be done here, but this was the
huge chunk that I couldn't really split things out of because this was
the interface change to TTI. I've tried to minimize all the other parts
of this. The follow up work should include at least:

1) Improving the TargetMachine interface by having it directly return
   a TTI object. Because we have a non-pass object with value semantics
   and an internal type erasure mechanism, we can narrow the interface
   of the TargetMachine to *just* do what we need: build and return
   a TTI object that we can then insert into the pass pipeline.
2) Make the TTI object be fully specialized for a particular function.
   This will include splitting off a minimal form of it which is
   sufficient for the inliner and the old pass manager.
3) Add a new pass manager analysis which produces TTI objects from the
   target machine for each function. This may actually be done as part
   of #2 in order to use the new analysis to implement #2.
4) Work on narrowing the API between TTI and the targets so that it is
   easier to understand and less verbose to type erase.
5) Work on narrowing the API between TTI and its clients so that it is
   easier to understand and less verbose to forward.
6) Try to improve the CRTP-based delegation. I feel like this code is
   just a bit messy and exacerbating the complexity of implementing
   the TTI in each target.

Many thanks to Eric and Hal for their help here. I ended up blocked on
this somewhat more abruptly than I expected, and so I appreciate getting
it sorted out very quickly.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7293

llvm-svn: 227669
2015-01-31 03:43:40 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
c47432114d [PM] Split the LoopInfo object apart from the legacy pass, creating
a LoopInfoWrapperPass to wire the object up to the legacy pass manager.

This switches all the clients of LoopInfo over and paves the way to port
LoopInfo to the new pass manager. No functionality change is intended
with this iteration.

llvm-svn: 226373
2015-01-17 14:16:18 +00:00
Reid Kleckner
30a587b9ae Revert "Don't make assumptions about the name of private global variables."
This reverts commit r222061.

It's causing linker errors.

llvm-svn: 222077
2014-11-15 02:03:53 +00:00
Rafael Espindola
c01b31682e Don't make assumptions about the name of private global variables.
Private variables are can be renamed, so it is not reliable to make
decisions on the name.

The name is also dropped by the assembler before getting to the
linker, so using the name causes a disconnect between how llvm makes a
decision (var name) and how the linker makes a decision (section it is
in).

This patch changes one case where we were looking at the variable name to use
the section instead.

Test tuning by Michael Gottesman.

llvm-svn: 222061
2014-11-14 23:17:47 +00:00
Hal Finkel
0ad5c26d4b Add a CFL Alias Analysis implementation
This provides an implementation of CFL alias analysis (including some
supporting data structures). Currently, we don't have any extremely fancy
features, sans some interprocedural analysis (i.e. no field sensitivity, etc.),
and we do best sitting behind BasicAA + TBAA. In such a configuration, we take
~0.6-0.8% of total compile time, and give ~7-8% NoAlias responses to queries
TBAA and BasicAA couldn't answer when bootstrapping LLVM. In testing this on
other projects, we've seen up to 10.5% of queries dropped by BasicAA+TBAA
answered with NoAlias by this algorithm.

Patch by George Burgess IV (with minor modifications by me -- mostly adapting
some BasicAA tests), thanks!

llvm-svn: 216970
2014-09-02 21:43:13 +00:00
Hal Finkel
7463a12ef9 Add scoped-noalias metadata
This commit adds scoped noalias metadata. The primary motivations for this
feature are:
  1. To preserve noalias function attribute information when inlining
  2. To provide the ability to model block-scope C99 restrict pointers

Neither of these two abilities are added here, only the necessary
infrastructure. In fact, there should be no change to existing functionality,
only the addition of new features. The logic that converts noalias function
parameters into this metadata during inlining will come in a follow-up commit.

What is added here is the ability to generally specify noalias memory-access
sets. Regarding the metadata, alias-analysis scopes are defined similar to TBAA
nodes:

!scope0 = metadata !{ metadata !"scope of foo()" }
!scope1 = metadata !{ metadata !"scope 1", metadata !scope0 }
!scope2 = metadata !{ metadata !"scope 2", metadata !scope0 }
!scope3 = metadata !{ metadata !"scope 2.1", metadata !scope2 }
!scope4 = metadata !{ metadata !"scope 2.2", metadata !scope2 }

Loads and stores can be tagged with an alias-analysis scope, and also, with a
noalias tag for a specific scope:

... = load %ptr1, !alias.scope !{ !scope1 }
... = load %ptr2, !alias.scope !{ !scope1, !scope2 }, !noalias !{ !scope1 }

When evaluating an aliasing query, if one of the instructions is associated
with an alias.scope id that is identical to the noalias scope associated with
the other instruction, or is a descendant (in the scope hierarchy) of the
noalias scope associated with the other instruction, then the two memory
accesses are assumed not to alias.

Note that is the first element of the scope metadata is a string, then it can
be combined accross functions and translation units. The string can be replaced
by a self-reference to create globally unqiue scope identifiers.

[Note: This overview is slightly stylized, since the metadata nodes really need
to just be numbers (!0 instead of !scope0), and the scope lists are also global
unnamed metadata.]

Existing noalias metadata in a callee is "cloned" for use by the inlined code.
This is necessary because the aliasing scopes are unique to each call site
(because of possible control dependencies on the aliasing properties). For
example, consider a function: foo(noalias a, noalias b) { *a = *b; } that gets
inlined into bar() { ... if (...) foo(a1, b1); ... if (...) foo(a2, b2); } --
now just because we know that a1 does not alias with b1 at the first call site,
and a2 does not alias with b2 at the second call site, we cannot let inlining
these functons have the metadata imply that a1 does not alias with b2.

llvm-svn: 213864
2014-07-24 14:25:39 +00:00
Matt Arsenault
56af912b43 Templatify RegionInfo so it works on MachineBasicBlocks
llvm-svn: 213456
2014-07-19 18:29:29 +00:00
Alp Toker
97022b0c1f Revert "Introduce a string_ostream string builder facilty"
Temporarily back out commits r211749, r211752 and r211754.

llvm-svn: 211814
2014-06-26 22:52:05 +00:00
Alp Toker
5ad6808be1 MSVC build fix following r211749
Avoid strndup()

llvm-svn: 211752
2014-06-26 00:25:41 +00:00
Alp Toker
fd9ead3b6f Introduce a string_ostream string builder facilty
string_ostream is a safe and efficient string builder that combines opaque
stack storage with a built-in ostream interface.

small_string_ostream<bytes> additionally permits an explicit stack storage size
other than the default 128 bytes to be provided. Beyond that, storage is
transferred to the heap.

This convenient class can be used in most places an
std::string+raw_string_ostream pair or SmallString<>+raw_svector_ostream pair
would previously have been used, in order to guarantee consistent access
without byte truncation.

The patch also converts much of LLVM to use the new facility. These changes
include several probable bug fixes for truncated output, a programming error
that's no longer possible with the new interface.

llvm-svn: 211749
2014-06-26 00:00:48 +00:00
Tom Roeder
740d86dc79 Add a new attribute called 'jumptable' that creates jump-instruction tables for functions marked with this attribute.
It includes a pass that rewrites all indirect calls to jumptable functions to pass through these tables.

This also adds backend support for generating the jump-instruction tables on ARM and X86.
Note that since the jumptable attribute creates a second function pointer for a
function, any function marked with jumptable must also be marked with unnamed_addr.

llvm-svn: 210280
2014-06-05 19:29:43 +00:00
Craig Topper
8cd194d4c1 [C++11] More 'nullptr' conversion. In some cases just using a boolean check instead of comparing to nullptr.
llvm-svn: 206243
2014-04-15 04:59:12 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
cd48c56575 [cleanup] Re-sort all the includes with utils/sort_includes.py.
llvm-svn: 202811
2014-03-04 10:07:28 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
608f08d699 [PM] Make the verifier work independently of any pass manager.
This makes the 'verifyFunction' and 'verifyModule' functions totally
independent operations on the LLVM IR. It also cleans up their API a bit
by lifting the abort behavior into their clients and just using an
optional raw_ostream parameter to control printing.

The implementation of the verifier is now just an InstVisitor with no
multiple inheritance. It also is significantly more const-correct, and
hides the const violations internally. The two layers that force us to
break const correctness are building a DomTree and dispatching through
the InstVisitor.

A new VerifierPass is used to implement the legacy pass manager
interface in terms of the other pieces.

The error messages produced may be slightly different now, and we may
have slightly different short circuiting behavior with different usage
models of the verifier, but generally everything works equivalently and
this unblocks wiring the verifier up to the new pass manager.

llvm-svn: 199569
2014-01-19 02:22:18 +00:00