Summary:
The iterative algorithm for Loop Unswitching may render some of the branches unreachable in the unswitched loops.
Given the exponential nature of the algorithm, this is quite an overhead.
This patch fixes this problem by selectively unswitching only those branches within a loop that are reachable from the loop header.
Reviewers: Michael Zolothukin, Anna Thomas, Weiming Zhao.
Subscribers: llvm-commits.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D26299
llvm-svn: 287925
Summary:
The "getVectorizablePrefix" method would give up if it found an aliasing load for a store chain.
In practice, the aliasing load can be treated as a memory barrier and all stores that precede it
are a valid vectorizable prefix.
Issue found by volkan in D26962. Testcase is a pruned version of the one in the original patch.
Reviewers: jlebar, arsenm, tstellarAMD
Subscribers: mzolotukhin, wdng, nhaehnle, anna, volkan, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27008
llvm-svn: 287781
Without this test, you can just remove the code fixing the
switch to the first constant in ResolvedUndefs in and everything
pass. This test, instead, fails with an assertion if the code
is removed. Found while refactoring SCCP to integrate undef in
the solver.
llvm-svn: 287731
We visit and/or, we try to derive a lattice value for the
instruction even if one of the operands is overdefined.
If the non-overdefined value is still 'unknown' just return and wait
for ResolvedUndefsIn to "plug in" the correct value. This simplifies
the logic a bit. While I'm here add tests for missing cases.
llvm-svn: 287709
In PR27925:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27925
...we proposed adding this fold to eliminate a bitcast. In D20774, there was
some concern about changing the type of a bitwise op as well as creating
bitcasts that might not be free for a target. However, if we're strictly
eliminating an instruction (by limiting this to one-use ops), then we should
be able to do this in InstCombine.
But we're cautiously restricting the transform for now to vector types to
avoid possible backend problems. A transform to make sure the logic op is
legal for the target should be added to reverse this transform and improve
codegen.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26641
llvm-svn: 287707
Summary:
Previously, CGP would unconditionally sink addrspacecast instructions,
even going so far as to sink them into a loop.
Now we check that the cast is "cheap", as defined by TLI.
We introduce a new "is-cheap" function to TLI rather than using
isNopAddrSpaceCast because some GPU platforms want the ability to ask
for non-nop casts to be sunk.
Reviewers: arsenm, tra
Subscribers: jholewinski, wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26923
llvm-svn: 287591
Allow using an instruction other than a mul or phi as the base for
root-finding. For example, the included testcase includes a loop
which requires using a getelementptr as the base for root-finding.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26529
llvm-svn: 287588
This is a first step towards canonicalization and improved folding/codegen
for integer min/max as discussed here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-November/106868.html
Here, we're just matching the simplest min/max patterns and adjusting the
icmp predicate while swapping the select operands.
I've included FIXME tests in test/Transforms/InstCombine/select_meta.ll
so it's easier to see how this might be extended (corresponds to the TODO
comment in the code). That's also why I'm using matchSelectPattern()
rather than a simpler check; once the backend is patched, we can just
remove some of the restrictions to allow the obfuscated min/max patterns
in the FIXME tests to be matched.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26525
llvm-svn: 287585
Summary:
D26704 fixed the non-determinism in codegen by sorting basic blocks before
iteration so as to have a defined iteration order. As a result we need to fix
the names (numbers) of the temporaries in the following unit tests:
test/Transforms/Util/MemorySSA/multi-edges.ll
test/Transforms/Util/MemorySSA/multiple-backedges-hal.ll
Reviewers: dberlin, david2050, mgrang
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26926
llvm-svn: 287575
This patch fixes the non-determinism caused due to iterating SmallPtrSet's
which was uncovered due to the experimental "reverse iteration order " patch:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D26718
The following unit tests failed because of the undefined order of iteration.
LLVM :: Transforms/Util/MemorySSA/cyclicphi.ll
LLVM :: Transforms/Util/MemorySSA/many-dom-backedge.ll
LLVM :: Transforms/Util/MemorySSA/many-doms.ll
LLVM :: Transforms/Util/MemorySSA/phi-translation.ll
Reviewers: dberlin, mgrang
Subscribers: dberlin, llvm-commits, david2050
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26704
llvm-svn: 287563
Summary: Merging an empty case block into the header block of switch could cause
ISel to add COPY instructions in the header of switch, instead of the case
block, if the case block is used as an incoming block of a PHI. This could
potentially increase dynamic instructions, especially when the switch is in a
loop. I added a test case which was reduced from the benchmark I was targetting.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, mcrosier, manmanren, wmi, davidxl
Subscribers: qcolombet, danielcdh, hfinkel, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22696
llvm-svn: 287553
Currently LLVM assumes that a pointer addrspacecasted to a different addr space is equivalent to trunc or zext bitwise, which is not true. For example, in amdgcn target, when a null pointer is addrspacecasted from addr space 4 to 0, its value is changed from i64 0 to i32 -1.
This patch teaches LLVM not to assume known bits of addrspacecast instruction to its operand.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26803
llvm-svn: 287545
This is a prerequisite patch for D26556:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D26556
...because there was no direct coverage for these folds (which in some cases are adding instructions).
llvm-svn: 287400
insertUniqueBackedgeBlock in lib/Transforms/Utils/LoopSimplify.cpp now
propagates existing llvm.loop metadata to newly the added backedge.
llvm::TryToSimplifyUncondBranchFromEmptyBlock in lib/Transforms/Utils/Local.cpp
now propagates existing llvm.loop metadata to the branch instructions in the
predecessor blocks of the empty block that is removed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26495
llvm-svn: 287341
This is a straightforward extension of the existing support for 32/64-bit element types. Just needed to add the additional instrinsics to the switches.
llvm-svn: 287316
Summary:
This extends FCOPYSIGN support to 512-bit vectors.
I've also added tests to show what the 128-bit and 256-bit cases look like with broadcast loads.
Reviewers: delena, zvi, RKSimon, spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26791
llvm-svn: 287298
Summary:
For flat loop, even if it is hot, it is not a good idea to unroll in runtime, thus we set a lower partial unroll threshold.
For hot loop, we set a higher unroll threshold and allows expensive tripcount computation to allow more aggressive unrolling.
Reviewers: davidxl, mzolotukhin
Subscribers: sanjoy, mehdi_amini, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26527
llvm-svn: 287186
This pass splits globals into elements using inrange annotations on
getelementptr indices.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22295
llvm-svn: 287178
Summary: These intrinsics have been unused for clang for a while. This patch removes them. We auto upgrade them to extractelements, a scalar operation and then an insertelement. This matches the sequence used by clangs intrinsic file.
Reviewers: zvi, delena, RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26660
llvm-svn: 287083
Summary:
We don't do BypassSlowDivision when the denominator is a constant, but
we do do it when the numerator is a constant.
This patch makes two related changes to BypassSlowDivision when the
numerator is a constant:
* If the numerator is too large to fit into the bypass width, don't
bypass slow division (because we'll never run the smaller-width
code).
* If we bypass slow division where the numerator is a constant, don't
OR together the numerator and denominator when determining whether
both operands fit within the bypass width. We need to check only the
denominator.
Reviewers: tra
Subscribers: llvm-commits, jholewinski
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26699
llvm-svn: 287062
In RateRegister of existing LSR, if a formula contains a Reg which is a SCEVAddRecExpr,
and this SCEVAddRecExpr's loop is an outerloop, the formula will be marked as Loser
and dropped.
Suppose we have an IR that %for.body is outerloop and %for.body2 is innerloop. LSR only
handle inner loop now so only %for.body2 will be handled.
Using the logic above, formula like
reg(%array) + reg({1,+, %size}<%for.body>) + 1*reg({0,+,1}<%for.body2>) will be dropped
no matter what because reg({1,+, %size}<%for.body>) is a SCEVAddRecExpr type reg related
with outerloop. Only formula like
reg(%array) + 1*reg({{1,+, %size}<%for.body>,+,1}<nuw><nsw><%for.body2>) will be kept
because the SCEVAddRecExpr related with outerloop is folded into the initial value of the
SCEVAddRecExpr related with current loop.
But in some cases, we do need to share the basic induction variable
reg{0 ,+, 1}<%for.body2> among LSR Uses to reduce the final total number of induction
variables used by LSR, so we don't want to drop the formula like
reg(%array) + reg({1,+, %size}<%for.body>) + 1*reg({0,+,1}<%for.body2>) unconditionally.
From the existing comment, it tries to avoid considering multiple level loops at the same time.
However, existing LSR only handles innermost loop, so for any SCEVAddRecExpr with a loop other
than current loop, it is an invariant and will be simple to handle, and the formula doesn't have
to be dropped.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26429
llvm-svn: 286999
When both WidenIV::getWideRecurrence and WidenIV::getExtendedOperandRecurrence
return non-null but different WideAddRec, if getWideRecurrence is called
before getExtendedOperandRecurrence, we won't bother to call
getExtendedOperandRecurrence again. But As we know it is possible that after
SCEV folding, we cannot prove the legality using the SCEVAddRecExpr returned
by getWideRecurrence. Meanwhile if getExtendedOperandRecurrence returns non-null
WideAddRec, we know for sure that it is legal to do widening for current instruction.
So it is better to put getExtendedOperandRecurrence before getWideRecurrence, which
will increase the chance of successful widening.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26059
llvm-svn: 286987
The register usage algorithm incorrectly treats instructions whose value is
not used within the loop (e.g. those that do not produce a value).
The algorithm first calculates the usages within the loop. It iterates over
the instructions in order, and records at which instruction index each use
ends (in fact, they're actually recorded against the next index, as this is
when we want to delete them from the open intervals).
The algorithm then iterates over the instructions again, adding each
instruction in turn to a list of open intervals. Instructions are then
removed from the list of open intervals when they occur in the list of uses
ended at the current index.
The problem is, instructions which are not used in the loop are skipped.
However, although they aren't used, the last use of a value may have been
recorded against that instruction index. In this case, the use is not deleted
from the open intervals, which may then bump up the estimated register usage.
This patch fixes the issue by simply moving the "is used" check after the loop
which erases the uses at the current index.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26554
llvm-svn: 286969
Add explicit v16i16/v32i8 ADD/SUB costs, matching the costs of v4i64/v8i32 - they were missing for some reason.
This has side effects on the LV max bandwidth tests (AVX1 now prefers 128-bit vectors vs AVX2 which still prefers 256-bit)
llvm-svn: 286832
When calculating the cost of a call instruction we were applying a heuristic penalty as well as the cost of the instruction itself.
However, when calculating the benefit from inlining we weren't discounting the equivalent penalty for the call instruction that would be removed! This caused skew in the calculation and meant we wouldn't inline in the following, trivial case:
int g() {
h();
}
int f() {
g();
}
llvm-svn: 286814
This is PR28376.
Unfortunately given the current structure of optimization diagnostics we
lack the capability to tell whether the user has
passed -Rpass-analysis=loop-vectorize since this is local to the
front-end (BackendConsumer::OptimizationRemarkHandler).
So rather than printing this even if the user has already
passed -Rpass-analysis, this patch just punts and stops recommending
this option. I don't think that getting this right is worth the
complexity.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26563
llvm-svn: 286662
When a function pointer is replaced with a jumptable pointer, special
case is needed to preserve the semantics of extern_weak functions.
Since a jumptable entry can not be extern_weak, we emulate that
behaviour by replacing all references to F (the extern_weak function)
with the following expression: F != nullptr ? JumpTablePtr : nullptr.
Extra special care is needed for global initializers, since most (or
probably all) backends can not lower an initializer that includes
this kind of constant expression. Initializers like that are replaced
with a global constructor (i.e. a runtime initializer).
llvm-svn: 286636
