The issue was that the has function was generating different results depending
on the signedness of char on the host platform. This commit fixes the issue by
explicitly using an unsigned char type to prevent sign extension and
adds some extra tests.
The original commit message was:
This patch implements a variant of the DJB hash function which folds the
input according to the algorithm in the Dwarf 5 specification (Section
6.1.1.4.5), which in turn references the Unicode Standard (Section 5.18,
"Case Mappings").
To achieve this, I have added a llvm::sys::unicode::foldCharSimple
function, which performs this mapping. The implementation of this
function was generated from the CaseMatching.txt file from the Unicode
spec using a python script (which is also included in this patch). The
script tries to optimize the function by coalescing adjecant mappings
with the same shift and stride (terms I made up). Theoretically, it
could be made a bit smarter and merge adjecant blocks that were
interrupted by only one or two characters with exceptional mapping, but
this would save only a couple of branches, while it would greatly
complicate the implementation, so I deemed it was not worth it.
Since we assume that the vast majority of the input characters will be
US-ASCII, the folding hash function has a fast-path for handling these,
and only whips out the full decode+fold+encode logic if we encounter a
character outside of this range. It might be possible to implement the
folding directly on utf8 sequences, but this would also bring a lot of
complexity for the few cases where we will actually need to process
non-ascii characters.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, aprantl, probinson, dblaikie
Subscribers: mgorny, hintonda, echristo, clayborg, vleschuk, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42740
llvm-svn: 325732
than a shared ObjectFile/MemoryBuffer pair.
There's no need to pre-parse the buffer into an ObjectFile before passing it
down to the linking layer, and moving the parsing into the linking layer allows
us remove the parsing code at each call site.
llvm-svn: 325725
The bug was introduced here:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL296409
...but the patch doesn't use maxnum and nothing else in
trunk has tried since then, so the bug went unnoticed.
llvm-svn: 325607
This is the second part of recommit of r325224. The previous part was
committed in r325426, which deals with C++ memory allocation. Solution
for C memory allocation involved functions `llvm::malloc` and similar.
This was a fragile solution because it caused ambiguity errors in some
cases. In this commit the new functions have names like `llvm::safe_malloc`.
The relevant part of original comment is below, updated for new function
names.
Analysis of fails in the case of out of memory errors can be tricky on
Windows. Such error emerges at the point where memory allocation function
fails, but manifests itself when null pointer is used. These two points
may be distant from each other. Besides, next runs may not exhibit
allocation error.
In some cases memory is allocated by a call to some of C allocation
functions, malloc, calloc and realloc. They are used for interoperability
with C code, when allocated object has variable size and when it is
necessary to avoid call of constructors. In many calls the result is not
checked for null pointer. To simplify checks, new functions are defined
in the namespace 'llvm': `safe_malloc`, `safe_calloc` and `safe_realloc`.
They behave as corresponding standard functions but produce fatal error if
allocation fails. This change replaces the standard functions like 'malloc'
in the cases when the result of the allocation function is not checked
for null pointer.
Finally, there are plain C code, that uses malloc and similar functions. If
the result is not checked, assert statement is added.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43010
llvm-svn: 325551
This was originally reported as a bug with the symptom being "cvdump
crashes when printing an LLD-linked PDB that has an S_FILESTATIC record
in it". After some additional investigation, I determined that this was
a symptom of a larger problem, and in fact the real problem was in the
way we emitted the global PDB string table. As evidence of this, you can
take any lld-generated PDB, run cvdump -stringtable on it, and it would
return no results.
My hypothesis was that cvdump could not *find* the string table to begin
with. Normally it would do this by looking in the "named stream map",
finding the string /names, and using its value as the stream index. If
this lookup fails, then cvdump would fail to load the string table.
To test this hypothesis, I looked at the name stream map generated by a
link.exe PDB, and I emitted exactly those bytes into an LLD-generated
PDB. Suddenly, cvdump could read our string table!
This code has always been hacky and we knew there was something we
didn't understand. After all, there were some comments to the effect of
"we have to emit strings in a specific order, otherwise things don't
work". The key to fixing this was finally understanding this.
The way it works is that it makes use of a generic serializable hash map
that maps integers to other integers. In this case, the "key" is the
offset into a buffer, and the value is the stream number. If you index
into the buffer at the offset specified by a given key, you find the
name. The underlying cause of all these problems is that we were using
the identity function for the hash. i.e. if a string's offset in the
buffer was 12, the hash value was 12. Instead, we need to hash the
string *at that offset*. There is an additional catch, in that we have
to compute the hash as a uint32 and then truncate it to uint16.
Making this work is a little bit annoying, because we use the same hash
table in other places as well, and normally just using the identity
function for the hash function is actually what's desired. I'm not
totally happy with the template goo I came up with, but it works in any
case.
The reason we never found this bug through our own testing is because we
were building a /parallel/ hash table (in the form of an
llvm::StringMap<>) and doing all of our lookups and "real" hash table
work against that. I deleted all of that code and now everything goes
through the real hash table. Then, to test it, I added a unit test which
adds 7 strings and queries the associated values. I test every possible
insertion order permutation of these 7 strings, to verify that it really
does work as expected.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43326
llvm-svn: 325386
Summary: extractBits assumes that `!this->isSingleWord() implies !Result.isSingleWord()`, which may not necessarily be true. Handle both cases.
Reviewers: RKSimon
Subscribers: sanjoy, llvm-commits, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43363
llvm-svn: 325311
Analysis of fails in the case of out of memory errors can be tricky on
Windows. Such error emerges at the point where memory allocation function
fails, but manifests itself when null pointer is used. These two points
may be distant from each other. Besides, next runs may not exhibit
allocation error.
Usual programming practice does not require checking result of 'operator
new' because it throws 'std::bad_alloc' in the case of allocation error.
However, LLVM is usually built with exceptions turned off, so 'new' can
return null pointer. This change installs custom new handler, which causes
fatal error in the case of out of memory. The handler is installed
automatically prior to call to 'main' during construction of a static
object defined in 'lib/Support/ErrorHandling.cpp'. If the application does
not use this file, the handler may be installed manually by a call to
'llvm::install_out_of_memory_new_handler', declared in
'include/llvm/Support/ErrorHandling.h".
There are calls to C allocation functions, malloc, calloc and realloc.
They are used for interoperability with C code, when allocated object has
variable size and when it is necessary to avoid call of constructors. In
many calls the result is not checked against null pointer. To simplify
checks, new functions are defined in the namespace 'llvm' with the
same names as these C function. These functions produce fatal error if
allocation fails. User should use 'llvm::malloc' instead of 'std::malloc'
in order to use the safe variant. This change replaces 'std::malloc'
in the cases when the result of allocation function is not checked against
null pointer.
Finally, there are plain C code, that uses malloc and similar functions. If
the result is not checked, assert statements are added.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43010
llvm-svn: 325224
Summary:
This patch adds templated functions to MachineIRBuilder for some opcodes
and adds pattern matcher support for G_AND and G_OR.
Reviewers: aditya_nandakumar
Reviewed By: aditya_nandakumar
Subscribers: rovka, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43309
llvm-svn: 325162
Commit https://reviews.llvm.org/rL324489 added
EXPECT_EQ(false, N->isUnsigned());
which older GCC versions dislike for some reason. Anyway, it looks like the
proper GTest way is to use EXPECT_FALSE, etc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43233
llvm-svn: 325121
Summary:
This patch implements a variant of the DJB hash function which folds the
input according to the algorithm in the Dwarf 5 specification (Section
6.1.1.4.5), which in turn references the Unicode Standard (Section 5.18,
"Case Mappings").
To achieve this, I have added a llvm::sys::unicode::foldCharSimple
function, which performs this mapping. The implementation of this
function was generated from the CaseMatching.txt file from the Unicode
spec using a python script (which is also included in this patch). The
script tries to optimize the function by coalescing adjecant mappings
with the same shift and stride (terms I made up). Theoretically, it
could be made a bit smarter and merge adjecant blocks that were
interrupted by only one or two characters with exceptional mapping, but
this would save only a couple of branches, while it would greatly
complicate the implementation, so I deemed it was not worth it.
Since we assume that the vast majority of the input characters will be
US-ASCII, the folding hash function has a fast-path for handling these,
and only whips out the full decode+fold+encode logic if we encounter a
character outside of this range. It might be possible to implement the
folding directly on utf8 sequences, but this would also bring a lot of
complexity for the few cases where we will actually need to process
non-ascii characters.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, aprantl, probinson, dblaikie
Subscribers: mgorny, hintonda, echristo, clayborg, vleschuk, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42740
llvm-svn: 325107
Rather than encode the absence of a checksum with a Kind variant, instead put
both the kind and value in a struct and wrap it in an Optional.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D43043
llvm-svn: 324928
Handles were returned by addModule and used as keys for removeModule,
findSymbolIn, and emitAndFinalize. Their job is now subsumed by VModuleKeys,
which simplify resource management by providing a consistent handle across all
layers.
llvm-svn: 324700
'size' of a vector is unsigned, and I accidentially compared
it to an int through GTEST. I switched it to unsigned, which
is the template parameter type anyway.
llvm-svn: 324625
This is a support change for a CFE change (https://reviews.llvm.org/D42978)
that allows march and -target-cpu to list the valid targets in a note. The changes
are limited to the ARM/AArch64, since this is the only target that gets the CPU
list from LLVM.
llvm-svn: 324623
This patch is the LLVM part of fixing the issues, described in
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36168
* The representation of enumerator values in the debug info metadata now
contains a boolean flag isUnsigned, which determines how the bits of
the value are interpreted.
* The DW_TAG_enumeration type DIE now always (for DWARF version >= 3)
includes a DW_AT_type attribute, which refers to the underlying
integer type, as suggested in DWARFv4 (5.7 Enumeration Type Entries).
* The debug info metadata for enumeration type contains (in flags)
indication whether this is a C++11 "fixed enum".
* For C++11 enumeration with a fixed underlying type, the DIE also
includes the DW_AT_enum_class attribute (for DWARF version >= 4).
* Encoding of enumerator constants uses DW_FORM_sdata for signed values
and DW_FORM_udata for unsigned values, as suggested by DWARFv4 (7.5.4
Attribute Encodings).
The changes should be backwards compatible:
* the isUnsigned attribute is optional and defaults to false.
* if the underlying type for the enumeration is not available, the
enumerator values are considered signed.
* the FixedEnum flag defaults to clear.
* the bitcode format for DIEnumerator stores the unsigned flag bit #1 of
the first record element, so the format does not change and the zero
previously stored there is consistent with the false default for
IsUnsigned.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42734
llvm-svn: 324489
n Rust, an enum that carries data in the variants is, essentially, a
discriminated union. Furthermore, the Rust compiler will perform
space optimizations on such enums in some situations. Previously,
DWARF for these constructs was emitted using a hack (a magic field
name); but this approach stopped working when more space optimizations
were added in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/45225.
This patch changes LLVM to allow discriminated unions to be
represented in DWARF. It adds createDiscriminatedUnionType and
createDiscriminatedMemberType to DIBuilder and then arranges for this
to be emitted using DWARF's DW_TAG_variant_part and DW_TAG_variant.
Note that DWARF requires that a discriminated union be represented as
a structure with a variant part. However, as Rust only needs to emit
pure discriminated unions, this is what I chose to expose on
DIBuilder.
Patch by Tom Tromey!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42082
llvm-svn: 324426
In particular this patch switches RTDyldObjectLinkingLayer to use
orc::SymbolResolver and threads the requried changse (ExecutionSession
references and VModuleKeys) through the existing layer APIs.
The purpose of the new resolver interface is to improve query performance and
better support parallelism, both in JIT'd code and within the compiler itself.
The most visibile change is switch of the <Layer>::addModule signatures from:
Expected<Handle> addModule(std::shared_ptr<ModuleType> Mod,
std::shared_ptr<JITSymbolResolver> Resolver)
to:
Expected<Handle> addModule(VModuleKey K, std::shared_ptr<ModuleType> Mod);
Typical usage of addModule will now look like:
auto K = ES.allocateVModuleKey();
Resolvers[K] = createSymbolResolver(...);
Layer.addModule(K, std::move(Mod));
See the BuildingAJIT tutorial code for example usage.
llvm-svn: 324405
This resolver conforms to the LegacyJITSymbolResolver interface, and will be
replaced with a null-returning resolver conforming to the newer
orc::SymbolResolver interface in the near future. This patch renames the class
to avoid a clash.
llvm-svn: 324175
Discussed here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-January/120320.html
In preparation for adding support for named vregs we are changing the sigil for
physical registers in MIR to '$' from '%'. This will prevent name clashes of
named physical register with named vregs.
llvm-svn: 323922
Summary:
As discussed in D42244, we have difficulty describing the legality of some
operations. We're not able to specify relationships between types.
For example, declaring the following
setAction({..., 0, s32}, Legal)
setAction({..., 0, s64}, Legal)
setAction({..., 1, s32}, Legal)
setAction({..., 1, s64}, Legal)
currently declares these type combinations as legal:
{s32, s32}
{s64, s32}
{s32, s64}
{s64, s64}
but we currently have no means to say that, for example, {s64, s32} is
not legal. Some operations such as G_INSERT/G_EXTRACT/G_MERGE_VALUES/
G_UNMERGE_VALUES have relationships between the types that are currently
described incorrectly.
Additionally, G_LOAD/G_STORE currently have no means to legalize non-atomics
differently to atomics. The necessary information is in the MMO but we have no
way to use this in the legalizer. Similarly, there is currently no way for the
register type and the memory type to differ so there is no way to cleanly
represent extending-load/truncating-store in a way that can't be broken by
optimizers (resulting in illegal MIR).
It's also difficult to control the legalization strategy. We've added support
for legalizing non-power of 2 types but there's still some hardcoded assumptions
about the strategy. The main one I've noticed is that type0 is always legalized
before type1 which is not a good strategy for `type0 = G_EXTRACT type1, ...` if
you need to widen the container. It will converge on the same result eventually
but it will take a much longer route when legalizing type0 than if you legalize
type1 first.
Lastly, the definition of legality and the legalization strategy is kept
separate which is not ideal. It's helpful to be able to look at a one piece of
code and see both what is legal and the method the legalizer will use to make
illegal MIR more legal.
This patch adds a layer onto the LegalizerInfo (to be removed when all targets
have been migrated) which resolves all these issues.
Here are the rules for shift and division:
for (unsigned BinOp : {G_LSHR, G_ASHR, G_SDIV, G_UDIV})
getActionDefinitions(BinOp)
.legalFor({s32, s64}) // If type0 is s32/s64 then it's Legal
.clampScalar(0, s32, s64) // If type0 is <s32 then WidenScalar to s32
// If type0 is >s64 then NarrowScalar to s64
.widenScalarToPow2(0) // Round type0 scalars up to powers of 2
.unsupported(); // Otherwise, it's unsupported
This describes everything needed to both define legality and describe how to
make illegal things legal.
Here's an example of a complex rule:
getActionDefinitions(G_INSERT)
.unsupportedIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) {
// If type0 is smaller than type1 then it's unsupported
return Query.Types[0].getSizeInBits() <= Query.Types[1].getSizeInBits();
})
.legalIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) {
// If type0 is s32/s64/p0 and type1 is a power of 2 other than 2 or 4 then it's legal
// We don't need to worry about large type1's because unsupportedIf caught that.
const LLT &Ty0 = Query.Types[0];
const LLT &Ty1 = Query.Types[1];
if (Ty0 != s32 && Ty0 != s64 && Ty0 != p0)
return false;
return isPowerOf2_32(Ty1.getSizeInBits()) &&
(Ty1.getSizeInBits() == 1 || Ty1.getSizeInBits() >= 8);
})
.clampScalar(0, s32, s64)
.widenScalarToPow2(0)
.maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s32}), 1, s16) // If type0 is s32 and type1 is bigger than s16 then NarrowScalar type1 to s16
.maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s64}), 1, s32) // If type0 is s64 and type1 is bigger than s32 then NarrowScalar type1 to s32
.widenScalarToPow2(1) // Round type1 scalars up to powers of 2
.unsupported();
This uses a lambda to say that G_INSERT is unsupported when type0 is bigger than
type1 (in practice, this would be a default rule for G_INSERT). It also uses one
to describe the legal cases. This particular predicate is equivalent to:
.legalFor({{s32, s1}, {s32, s8}, {s32, s16}, {s64, s1}, {s64, s8}, {s64, s16}, {s64, s32}})
In terms of performance, I saw a slight (~6%) performance improvement when
AArch64 was around 30% ported but it's pretty much break even right now.
I'm going to take a look at constexpr as a means to reduce the initialization
cost.
Future work:
* Make it possible for opcodes to share rulesets. There's no need for
G_LSHR/G_ASHR/G_SDIV/G_UDIV to have separate rule and ruleset objects. There's
no technical barrier to this, it just hasn't been done yet.
* Replace the type-index numbers with an enum to get .clampScalar(Type0, s32, s64)
* Better names for things like .maxScalarIf() (clampMaxScalar?) and the vector rules.
* Improve initialization cost using constexpr
Possible future work:
* It's possible to make these rulesets change the MIR directly instead of
returning a description of how to change the MIR. This should remove a little
overhead caused by parsing the description and routing to the right code, but
the real motivation is that it removes the need for LegalizeAction::Custom.
With Custom removed, there's no longer a requirement that Custom legalization
change the opcode to something that's considered legal.
Reviewers: ab, t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, volkan, reames, bogner
Reviewed By: bogner
Subscribers: hintonda, bogner, aemerson, mgorny, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42251
llvm-svn: 323681
Summary:
The improvements to the LegalizerInfo discussed in D42244 require that
LegalizerInfo::LegalizeAction be available for use in other classes. As such,
it needs to be moved out of LegalizerInfo. This has been done separately to the
next patch to minimize the noise in that patch.
llvm-svn: 323669
This brings it in line with std::optional. My recent changes to
make Optional of trivial types trivially copyable introduced
diverging behavior depending on the type, which is bad. Now all
types have the same moving behavior.
llvm-svn: 323445
first argument.
This makes lookupFlags more consistent with lookup (which takes the query as the
first argument) and composes better in practice, since lookups are usually
linearly chained: Each lookupFlags can populate the result map based on the
symbols not found in the previous lookup. (If the maps were returned rather than
passed by reference there would have to be a merge step at the end).
llvm-svn: 323398
functions/methods that return JITSymbols.
lookupFlagsWithLegacyFn takes a SymbolNameSet and a legacy lookup function and
returns a LookupFlagsResult. It uses the legacy lookup function to search for
each symbol. If found, getFlags is called on the symbol and the flags added to
the SymbolFlags map. If not found, the symbol is added to the SymbolsNotFound
set.
lookupWithLegacyFn takes an AsynchronousSymbolQuery, a SymbolNameSet and a
legacy lookup function. Each symbol in the SymbolNameSet is searched for via the
legacy lookup function. If it is found, its getAddress function is called
(triggering materialization if it has not happened already) and the resulting
mapping stored in the query. If it is not found the symbol is added to the
unresolved symbols set which is returned at the end of the function. If an
error occurs during legacy lookup or materialization it is passed to the
query via setFailed and the function returns immediately.
llvm-svn: 323388
This patch adds a LambdaSymbolResolver convenience utility that can create an
orc::SymbolResolver from a pair of function objects that supply the behavior for
the lookupFlags and lookup methods.
This class plays the same role for orc::SymbolResolver as the legacy
LambdaResolver class plays for LegacyJITSymbolResolver, and will replace the
latter class once all ORC APIs are migrated to orc::SymbolResolver.
This patch also adds some documentation for the orc::SymbolResolver class as
this was left out of the original commit.
llvm-svn: 323375
Summary:
`getAction(const InstrAspect &) const` breaks encapsulation by exposing
the smaller components that are used to decide how to legalize an
instruction.
This is a problem because we need to change the implementation of
LegalizerInfo so that it's able to describe particular type combinations
rather than just cartesian products of types.
For example, declaring the following
setAction({..., 0, s32}, Legal)
setAction({..., 0, s64}, Legal)
setAction({..., 1, s32}, Legal)
setAction({..., 1, s64}, Legal)
currently declares these type combinations as legal:
{s32, s32}
{s64, s32}
{s32, s64}
{s64, s64}
but we currently have no means to say that, for example, {s64, s32} is
not legal. Some operations such as G_INSERT/G_EXTRACT/G_MERGE_VALUES/
G_UNMERGE_VALUES has relationships between the types that are currently
described incorrectly.
Additionally, G_LOAD/G_STORE currently have no means to legalize non-atomics
differently to atomics. The necessary information is in the MMO but we have no
way to use this in the legalizer. Similarly, there is currently no way for the
register type and the memory type to differ so there is no way to cleanly
represent extending-load/truncating-store in a way that can't be broken by
optimizers (resulting in illegal MIR).
This patch introduces LegalityQuery which provides all the information
needed by the legalizer to make a decision on whether something is legal
and how to legalize it.
Reviewers: ab, t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, volkan, reames, bogner
Reviewed By: bogner
Subscribers: bogner, llvm-commits, kristof.beyls
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42244
llvm-svn: 323342
