already been added and the inconsistency made choosing names and
changing code more annoying. Plus, wow are they better for this code!
llvm-svn: 231347
result reasonable.
This code predated clang-format and so there was a reasonable amount of
crufty formatting that had accumulated. This should ensure that neither
myself nor others end up with formatting-only changes sneaking into
other fixes.
llvm-svn: 231341
just arbitrarily interleaving unrelated control flows once they get
moved "out-of-line" (both outside of natural CFG ordering and with
diamonds that cannot be fully laid out by chaining fallthrough edges).
This easy solution doesn't work in practice, and it isn't just a small
bug. It looks like a very different strategy will be required. I'm
working on that now, and it'll again go behind some flag so that
everyone can experiment and make sure it is working well for them.
llvm-svn: 231332
Improve test robustness in preparation of coming commits:
- Avoid undefs which may get propagated too much.
- Remove several pointless add 0, instructions
llvm-svn: 231307
Summary:
rL225282 introduced an ad-hoc way to promote some additions to nuw or
nsw. Since then SCEV has become smarter in directly proving no-wrap;
and using the canonical "ext(A op B) == ext(A) op ext(B)" method of
proving no-wrap is just as powerful now. Rip out the existing
complexity in favor of getting SCEV to do all the heaving lifting
internally.
This change does not add any unit tests because it is supposed to be a
non-functional change. Tests added in rL225282 and rL226075 are valid
tests for this change.
Reviewers: atrick, majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7981
llvm-svn: 231306
Summary:
Teach SCEV to prove no overflow for an add recurrence by proving
something about the range of another add recurrence a loop-invariant
distance away from it.
Reviewers: atrick, hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7980
llvm-svn: 231305
This commit adds code to emit DIE trees that have been pruned from the
parts that haven't been marked as kept in the previous pass.
It works by 'cloning' the input DIE tree (as read by libDebugInfoDwarf)
into a tree of DIE objects. Cloning the DIEs means essentially cloning
their attributes. The code in this commit does only handle scalar and
block attributes (scalar because they are trivial, blocks because they
can't be easily replaced by a scalr placeholder), all the other ones
are replaced by placeholder zero values and will be handled in
further commits.
The added tests mostly check that the DIE tree has the correct layout and
also verify that a few chosen scalar and block attributes correctly make
their way into the output.
llvm-svn: 231300
To be used/tested by llvm-dsymutil. (llvm-dsymutil does a 'static' link,
no need for relocations for most things, so it'll just emit raw integers
for most attributes)
llvm-svn: 231298
Here's a rough/first draft - it at least hits the actual textual IR
examples and some of the phrasing. It's probably worth a full pass over,
but I'm not sure how much these docs should reflect the strange
intermediate state we're in anyway.
Totally open to lots of review/feedback/suggestions.
llvm-svn: 231294
When calling lock() after all passes are registered, the PassRegistry doesn't need a mutex anymore to look up passes.
This speeds up multithreaded llvm execution by ~5% (tested with 4 threads).
In an asserts build of llvm this has an even bigger impact.
Note that it's not required to use the lock function.
llvm-svn: 231276
Reverted in r231254 due to a self-hosting crash of Clang (see Clang
PR22793). Workaround the crash by using {} instead of = default to
define a dtor.
llvm-svn: 231274
The issue was that we were always printing the remarks. Fix that and add a test
showing that it prints nothing if -pass-remarks is not given.
Original message:
Correctly handle -pass-remarks in the gold plugin.
llvm-svn: 231273
Summary:
DataLayout keeps the string used for its creation.
As a side effect it is no longer needed in the Module.
This is "almost" NFC, the string is no longer
canonicalized, you can't rely on two "equals" DataLayout
having the same string returned by getStringRepresentation().
Get rid of DataLayoutPass: the DataLayout is in the Module
The DataLayout is "per-module", let's enforce this by not
duplicating it more than necessary.
One more step toward non-optionality of the DataLayout in the
module.
Make DataLayout Non-Optional in the Module
Module->getDataLayout() will never returns nullptr anymore.
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: resistor, llvm-commits, jholewinski
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7992
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 231270
This reverts r231200 and r231204. The second one added an explicit move
ctor for MSVC.
This change broke the clang-cl self-host due to weirdness in MSVC's
implementation of std::map::insert. Somehow we lost our rvalue ref-ness
when going through variadic placement new:
template <class _Objty, class... _Types>
void construct(_Objty *_Ptr,
_Types &&... _Args) { // construct _Objty(_Types...) at _Ptr
::new ((void *)_Ptr) _Objty(_STD forward<_Types>(_Args)...);
}
For some reason, Clang decided to call the deleted std::pair copy
constructor at this point. Needs further investigation, once I can
build.
llvm-svn: 231269
Summary:
In PNaCl, most atomic instructions have their own @llvm.nacl.atomic.* function, each one, with a few exceptions, represents a consistent behaviour across all NaCl-supported targets. Unfortunately, the atomic RMW operations nand, [u]min, and [u]max aren't directly represented by any such @llvm.nacl.atomic.* function. This patch refines shouldExpandAtomicRMWInIR in TargetLowering so that a future `Le32TargetLowering` class can selectively inform the caller how the target desires the atomic RMW instruction to be expanded (ie via load-linked/store-conditional for ARM/AArch64, via cmpxchg for X86/others?, or not at all for Mips) if at all.
This does not represent a behavioural change and as such no tests were added.
Patch by: Richard Diamond.
Reviewers: jfb
Reviewed By: jfb
Subscribers: jfb, aemerson, t.p.northover, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7713
llvm-svn: 231250
This "itinerary class map" in PPCSchedule.td is incomplete and
redundant with the actual code. As it provides no value, we've
decided to remove it.
No functional change.
llvm-svn: 231246
